Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Education 5/2018

11.03.2017

Evaluation of Promotional Materials To Promote Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) Screening to High-Risk Consumers and Health Care Providers

verfasst von: Janella N. Hudson, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Lauren E. Wilson, Vani N. Simmons

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Education | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is a promising screening modality for increasing the detection rate of early stage lung cancers among high-risk individuals. Despite being recommended by the US Preventative Services Task Force, uptake of LDCT remains low. The objective of the current study was to gather feedback from high-risk consumers and health care providers on LDCT promotional materials. Focus group discussions were conducted with high-risk individuals (8 focus groups; N = 38) and primary care providers (9 focus groups; N = 23). Participants reviewed existing LDCT promotional materials to assess their perceptions of media materials created to publicize LDCT. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Several key themes emerged from focus groups that can be used to inform development of future LDCT promotional materials. High-risk (HR) participants expressed greater receptivity for promotional materials that did not further stigmatize lung cancer and/or smoking and expressed preferences for materials that clearly outlined the risks/benefits of screening. Primary care providers (PCPs) offered suggestions to facilitate the referral process such as diagnostic codes and requested a design that clearly outlined eligibility criteria. A clear and thorough explanation of LDCT eligibility, cost, harms, and benefits was of chief importance for both PCP and HR audiences. Given that PCPs and HR audiences are not well informed on the specifics of LDCT screening eligibility and insurance coverage, creating provider and patient education opportunities will aid in shared decision-making opportunities. Promotional materials that meet the needs of the target audience are needed to facilitate discussions of risks/benefits of screening with HR individuals.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruchalski K, Gutierrez A, Genshaft S, Abtin F, Suh R. The evidence for low-dose CT screening of lung cancer. Clinical imaging. 2015. Ruchalski K, Gutierrez A, Genshaft S, Abtin F, Suh R. The evidence for low-dose CT screening of lung cancer. Clinical imaging. 2015.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tota JE, Ramanakumar AV, Franco EL (2014) Lung cancer screening: review and performance comparison under different risk scenarios. Lung 192(1):55–63CrossRef Tota JE, Ramanakumar AV, Franco EL (2014) Lung cancer screening: review and performance comparison under different risk scenarios. Lung 192(1):55–63CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cataldo JK (2016) High-risk older smokers’ perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs about lung cancer screening. Cancer Med 4:753CrossRef Cataldo JK (2016) High-risk older smokers’ perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs about lung cancer screening. Cancer Med 4:753CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Howlander N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse S. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2012. 2015. 2012. Howlander N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse S. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2012. 2015. 2012.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2016. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2016.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulshine JL, D’Amico TA (2014) Issues with implementing a high-quality lung cancer screening program. CA Cancer J Clin 64(5):352–363CrossRef Mulshine JL, D’Amico TA (2014) Issues with implementing a high-quality lung cancer screening program. CA Cancer J Clin 64(5):352–363CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Team NLSTR (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365(5):395CrossRef Team NLSTR (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365(5):395CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wender R, Fontham ET, Barrera E et al (2013) American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 63(2):106–117CrossRef Wender R, Fontham ET, Barrera E et al (2013) American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 63(2):106–117CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Barton MK (2015) Integration of lung cancer screening into practice is lacking. CA Cancer J Clin 65(4):255–256CrossRef Barton MK (2015) Integration of lung cancer screening into practice is lacking. CA Cancer J Clin 65(4):255–256CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardarelli R, Roper KL, Cardarelli K, et al. Identifying community perspectives for a lung cancer screening awareness campaign in Appalachia Kentucky: the terminate lung cancer (TLC) study. Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education. 2015. Cardarelli R, Roper KL, Cardarelli K, et al. Identifying community perspectives for a lung cancer screening awareness campaign in Appalachia Kentucky: the terminate lung cancer (TLC) study. Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education. 2015.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonnalagadda S, Bergamo C, Lin JJ et al (2012) Beliefs and attitudes about lung cancer screening among smokers. Lung Cancer 77(3):526–531CrossRef Jonnalagadda S, Bergamo C, Lin JJ et al (2012) Beliefs and attitudes about lung cancer screening among smokers. Lung Cancer 77(3):526–531CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Quaife SL, Marlow LA, McEwen A, Janes SM, Wardle J. Attitudes towards lung cancer screening in socioeconomically deprived and heavy smoking communities: informing screening communication. Health Expectations. 2016. Quaife SL, Marlow LA, McEwen A, Janes SM, Wardle J. Attitudes towards lung cancer screening in socioeconomically deprived and heavy smoking communities: informing screening communication. Health Expectations. 2016.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Delmerico J, Hyland A, Celestino P, Reid M, Cummings KM (2014) Patient willingness and barriers to receiving a CT scan for lung cancer screening. Lung Cancer 84(3):307–309CrossRef Delmerico J, Hyland A, Celestino P, Reid M, Cummings KM (2014) Patient willingness and barriers to receiving a CT scan for lung cancer screening. Lung Cancer 84(3):307–309CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ersek JL, Eberth JM, McDonnell KK, et al. Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and use of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening among family physicians. Cancer. 2016. Ersek JL, Eberth JM, McDonnell KK, et al. Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and use of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening among family physicians. Cancer. 2016.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis JA, Petty WJ, Tooze JA et al (2015) Low-dose CT lung cancer screening practices and attitudes among primary care providers at an academic medical center. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 24(4):664–670CrossRef Lewis JA, Petty WJ, Tooze JA et al (2015) Low-dose CT lung cancer screening practices and attitudes among primary care providers at an academic medical center. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 24(4):664–670CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman RM, Sussman AL, Getrich CM et al (2015) Attitudes and beliefs of primary care providers in New Mexico about lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography. Prev Chronic Dis 12:E108CrossRef Hoffman RM, Sussman AL, Getrich CM et al (2015) Attitudes and beliefs of primary care providers in New Mexico about lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography. Prev Chronic Dis 12:E108CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Simmons VN, Gray JE, Schabath MB, Wilson LE, Quinn GP (2017) Low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: high-risk community and primary care providers barriers and facilitators. Lung Cancer (in press) Simmons VN, Gray JE, Schabath MB, Wilson LE, Quinn GP (2017) Low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: high-risk community and primary care providers barriers and facilitators. Lung Cancer (in press)
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kreps GL (2003) The impact of communication on cancer risk, incidence, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Health Commun 15(2):161–169CrossRef Kreps GL (2003) The impact of communication on cancer risk, incidence, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Health Commun 15(2):161–169CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Silvestri GA, Nietert PJ, Zoller J, Carter C, Bradford D (2007) Attitudes towards screening for lung cancer among smokers and their non-smoking counterparts. Thorax 62(2):126–130CrossRef Silvestri GA, Nietert PJ, Zoller J, Carter C, Bradford D (2007) Attitudes towards screening for lung cancer among smokers and their non-smoking counterparts. Thorax 62(2):126–130CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser BG (1965) The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl 12(4):436–445CrossRef Glaser BG (1965) The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl 12(4):436–445CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Black WC, Kramer BS (2012) Cancer screening campaigns—getting past uninformative persuasion. N Engl J Med 367(18):1677–1679CrossRef Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Black WC, Kramer BS (2012) Cancer screening campaigns—getting past uninformative persuasion. N Engl J Med 367(18):1677–1679CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones SC, Owen N (2006) Using fear appeals to promote cancer screening—are we scaring the wrong people? Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 11(2):93–103CrossRef Jones SC, Owen N (2006) Using fear appeals to promote cancer screening—are we scaring the wrong people? Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 11(2):93–103CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall M, Sheeran, P, Noar, S, Ribisil, K, Boynton, M, Brewer N. A brief measure of reactance to health warnings | SpringerLink. 2017. Hall M, Sheeran, P, Noar, S, Ribisil, K, Boynton, M, Brewer N. A brief measure of reactance to health warnings | SpringerLink. 2017.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunn G, Garvey, P.C., Ball, D, Fong, K.M., Vinod, S, O’Connell, S.K. Barriers to lung cancer care: health professionals’ perspectives | SpringerLink. 2017. Dunn G, Garvey, P.C., Ball, D, Fong, K.M., Vinod, S, O’Connell, S.K. Barriers to lung cancer care: health professionals’ perspectives | SpringerLink. 2017.
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of Promotional Materials To Promote Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) Screening to High-Risk Consumers and Health Care Providers
verfasst von
Janella N. Hudson
Gwendolyn P. Quinn
Lauren E. Wilson
Vani N. Simmons
Publikationsdatum
11.03.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Cancer Education / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Elektronische ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-017-1204-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Journal of Cancer Education 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Bei seelischem Stress sind Checkpoint-Hemmer weniger wirksam

03.06.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Wie stark Menschen mit fortgeschrittenem NSCLC von einer Therapie mit Immun-Checkpoint-Hemmern profitieren, hängt offenbar auch davon ab, wie sehr die Diagnose ihre psychische Verfassung erschüttert

Antikörper mobilisiert Neutrophile gegen Krebs

03.06.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

Ein bispezifischer Antikörper formiert gezielt eine Armee neutrophiler Granulozyten gegen Krebszellen. An den Antikörper gekoppeltes TNF-alpha soll die Zellen zudem tief in solide Tumoren hineinführen.

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.