Erschienen in:
27.11.2017 | Original articles
Final kissing balloon inflation for coronary bifurcation lesions treated with single-stent technique
A meta-analysis
verfasst von:
G. Liu, MD, X. Ke, MD, Z.‑B. Huang, MD, L.‑C. Wang, MD, Z.‑N. Huang, MD, Y. Guo, MD, M. Long, MD, X.‑X. Liao, MD
Erschienen in:
Herz
|
Ausgabe 4/2019
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
The efficacy of final kissing balloon (FKB) inflation in one-stent techniques for bifurcation lesions is controversial. The goal of the present study was to investigate the impact of FKB on long-term clinical outcomes in one-stent strategies.
Methods
A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was undertaken through August 2017. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. Overall hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.
Results
Ten studies comprising 7364 patients treated with a one-stent technique were included in the analysis. Overall, FKB did not demonstrate a significant reduction in MACE compared with non-FKB in both randomized trials (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.65–1.98) and observational studies (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.61–1.20). The risk of cardiac death (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.53–1.49), myocardial infarction (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.53–1.09), and target lesion revascularization (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.74–1.23) was also similar in both groups.
Conclusion
FKB may not be mandatory and a selective FKB strategy might be more justified in one-stent techniques for bifurcation lesions.