First-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein is not a good predictor for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study of 3325 cases

Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), such as preterm birth, stillbirth, preeclampsia and small for gestational age (SGA), are the major causes of fetal, neonatal and even maternal death and complications [1, 2]. In the recent years, much progress has been made in the first-trimester screening of preeclampsia and low-dose aspirin treatment to prevent the disease [3]. In 2018, low-dose aspirin was recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) as the prophylactic treatment for women at high risk of preeclampsia [4]. However, except for preeclampsia, other APOs lack effective methods for prediction so far.

Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MS-AFP) is a second-trimester biochemical marker for prenatal screening. High or low MS-AFP suggests high risk of fetal open neural tube defects (ONTDs) or chromosomal aneuploidy, respectively [5]. Based on the decades’ experience of prenatal screening, it has been reported in numerous studies that after excluding fetal ONTDs, women with elevated second-trimester MS-AFP have higher risk of APOs [6‐12]. Therefore, it has been well known that second-trimester MS-AFP can be a biomarker for the predictions of APOs.

In the recent years, the use of first-trimester screening has been considered as a window of opportunity to predict and prevent APOs [13]. Maternal serum analytes such as pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and placental growth factor (PlGF), which have already been used in the screening of preeclampsia and been proven to be associated with APOs, were also available in the first trimester [14‐16]. However, MS-AFP is routinely tested only in the second trimester, and it is unknown whether first-trimester MS-AFP can also be as predictive of APOs as second-trimester MS-AFP. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of first-trimester MS-AFP to preterm birth, stillbirth, preeclampsia and SGA in this study.

Among 3325 women enrolled in the study, 240 (7.22%) of them had MS-AFP ≥ 2.5 MoM, and 3085 (92.78%) had MS-AFP < 2.5 MoM. Participants’ basic characteristics such as maternal age, weight, body mass index, parity, smoking history, gestational diabetes mellitus, neonatal gender and delivery mode, and screening markers β-HCG and nuchal translucency (NT) were all not significantly different between women with MS-AFP ≥ 2.5 and < 2.5 MoM. However, women with elevated MS-AFP had lower PAPP-A levels (P = 0.001) and higher proportion of assisted reproductive technology (P = 0.003) (Table 1).

A total of 594 pregnancies resulted in APOs, among which 181 in preterm birth, 32 in stillbirth, 81 in preeclampsia, and 362 in SGA. The incidence rate of overall APOs among women with MS-AFP ≥ 2.5 and < 2.5 MoM were 29.58 vs. 16.95% (P = 0.000). The incidence rate of each APO in the study population and its corresponding rate in the elevated and normal MS-AFP groups were 5.44% (11.67 vs. 4.96%, P = 0.000) for preterm birth, 0.96% (1.25 vs. 0.94%, P = 0.500) for stillbirth, 2.44% (6.25 vs. 2.14%, P = 0.001) for preeclampsia, and 10.89% (17.92 vs. 10.34%, P = 0.001) for SGA. Women with MS-AFP ≥ 2.5 MoM had increased risks (OR, 95% CI) of preterm birth (2.53, 1.65~3.88), preeclampsia (3.05, 1.71~5.43) and SGA (1.90, 1.34~2.69), while the risk of stillbirth was not significantly increased (1.33, 0.40~4.41) (Table 2).

In order to figure out the association of individual MS-AFP level with the incidences of APOs, the ROC curve was used to evaluate the predictive efficiency. The areas under ROC curves (AUROC) were 0.569 for overall APOs (P = 0.000), 0.572 for preterm birth (P = 0.001), 0.597 for stillbirth (P = 0.060), 0.579 for preeclampsia (P = 0.015) and 0.565 for SGA (P = 0.000) (Fig. 2). It could be seen that the AUROC was small for each APO, and the significance was not obtained for stillbirth probably due to its lower incidence than that of the other three APOs.

Considering that MS-AFP might perform better for more severe APOs such as SGA < 3rd percentile, or preterm birth at < 32 weeks, or severe preeclampsia, we further evaluated the performances of MS-AFP for these subdivisions of APOs. It could be seen that MS-AFP did not perform remarkably better as predictors of more severe APOs (Table 3). When preterm birth was divided into spontaneous (n = 145) and iatrogenic (n = 36), a mildly improved AUROC was obtained: 0.631 for iatrogenic (P = 0.007) vs. 0.556 for spontaneous (P = 0.023) (Table 3). Since SGA consists also of group of healthy small fetuses, we tried to use ultrasound definition that was put forward by Gordijn et al. in 2016 to discriminate fetal growth restriction (FGR) cases [21]. One hundred four cases of FGR were defined in 362 SGA, and the performance of MS-AFP for FGR was mildly improved, with an AUROC of 0.602 (P = 0.000) compared to 0.565 for SGA (P = 0.000) (Table 3). To sum up, first-trimester MS-AFP was not a good predictor for these APOs, even if the subdivisions of APOs were applied for analysis.

To concretely show the discriminatory power of MS-AFP for preterm birth, a Kaplan-Meier curve was used to record the gestational weeks at delivery for all participants. Women with MS-AFP ≥ 2.5 MoM had an earlier overall distribution of gestational weeks at delivery (P = 0.004). However, the actual difference was minuscule; the most significant difference in gestational weeks at delivery were concentrated in 36~37 weeks in which the fetuses are close to maturity and are less prone to adverse outcomes (Fig. 3a). A boxplot was used to show the birth weights of all neonates. Women with MS-AFP ≥ 2.5 MoM had a lower overall distribution of neonatal birth weights (P = 0.000). However, the actual difference was also minuscule; the medians of neonatal birth weight were 3200 and 3050 g respectively in the two groups (Fig. 3b).

In this study, we found that elevated first-trimester MS-AFP is associated with increased risks of preterm birth, preeclampsia and SGA. However, the predictive efficiencies were low and it is not a good predictor for these APOs.

In our previous studies on second-trimester MS-AFP and APOs, the AUROC was 0.686, 0.717 and 0.611 for preterm birth, preeclampsia and SGA, respectively; women with second-trimester MS-AFP ≥ 2.5 MoM had increased risks (OR, 95% CI) of preterm birth (4.10, 2.44~6.88), preeclampsia (3.95, 2.23~6.99) and SGA (3.45, 1.91~6.21) [22]. The results were in general agreement with other studies on second-trimester MS-AFP and APOs [6, 9‐12]. A case-control study on MS-AFP and preeclampsia also revealed that MS-AFP was elevated in both the first and the second trimesters in pregnancies that developed preeclampsia, but the performance of second-trimester MS-AFP combined with maternal factors for preeclampsia screening was better than that of first-trimester MS-AFP [23]. Taking others’ and our findings together, we can conclude that first-trimester MS-AFP is less predictive of APOs than second-trimester MS-AFP.

The lower efficiencies of first-trimester MS-AFP than second-trimester MS-AFP for the predictions of APOs may be interpreted by the mechanism of MS-AFP elevation. Unlike other maternal serum markers produced by the placenta, AFP is fetal-derived during pregnancy. Elevated MS-AFP is thought to reflect excessive placental permeability that leads to the escape of AFP from the fetus to the mother [24, 25]. This was verified in the animal studies that lipopolysaccharide-induced intrauterine inflammation gave rise to increased placental permeability and lipopolysaccharide-treated pregnant rats had elevated MS-AFP [26, 27]. It has been known that the placenta plays important roles in the pathophysiology of a number of APOs. Preterm birth, preeclampsia and SGA are currently considered as “placenta-mediated” disorders [28‐30]. A series of evidences indicated that increased placental permeability might occur in these disorders [31‐33]. Therefore, we may infer that, starting from the end of the first trimester when the primitive placenta undergoes remodeling to form the definitive organ [34], the increase in placental permeability is a gradually developed process under certain pathological conditions. In the process, placental permeability to AFP is also increasing from the first to the second trimester. As a typical placenta-mediated disease, the pathogenesis of preeclampsia may support our inference by its “two-stage” model: maternal vascular malperfusion caused by poor trophoblast uterine invasion and impaired transformation of the spiral arteries in the first trimester leads to placental inflammation and vascular endothelial injury that cause placental dysfunction and precipitate the onset of the maternal syndrome in the later gestation [35].

In the recent years, much concern has been raised about the first-trimester screenings for APOs which are considered as a window of opportunity to predict and prevent these disorders [13]. In addition to preeclampsia, it has been reported that low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy is also effective in the prevention of other APOs [36‐38]. ACOG Committee opinion recommends that low-dose aspirin prophylaxis commenced optimally before 16 gestational weeks [4]. Given this, the need for early predictions of APOs is important. Although our findings indicated that first-trimester MS-AFP is not efficient enough for the predictions of APOs, it showed significant associations with these disorders and may play a role in the combined multi-marker screenings. In addition to preeclampsia screening which has achieved much progress, the first-trimester combined multi-marker screenings for other APOs have also been explored in the recent years. Beta et al. described a model based on the factors identifiable in the first trimester which detected 18.4 and 38.2% of preterm birth for nulliparous or primiparous women at a 10% false-positive rate [39]. Greco et al. described a screening method combining cervical echography with maternal characteristics and obstetric history which detected 54.8% of preterm birth at a 10% false-positive rate [40]. Poon et al. published a predictive algorithm involving demographic, biophysical and biochemical parameters which had a detection rate of 55.5% for preterm SGA and 44.3% for term SGA with a 10.9% false-positive rate [41]. Akolekar et al. reported a screening model base on maternal factors, PlGF, fetal ductus venosus and uterine artery pulsatility index which predicted 42% of all stillbirths and 61% of those due to impaired placentation at a false-positive rate of 10% [42]. These models for APOs screenings are in the developing stage. Incorporation of further variables may help to improve the screening efficacies, and first-trimester MS-AFP may be a promising biochemical marker.

It was reported that singleton pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology had increased risk of APOs; MS-AFP levels in women who were conceived using assisted reproductive technology was different from that of natural conceptions [43‐45]. These might be the reason why elevated MS-AFP group had higher proportion of assisted reproductive technology in our study. Besides, elevated MS-AFP group had lower maternal serum PAPP-A. The possible reason is that PAPP-A is also a marker for APOs, and decreased PAPP-A is associated with increased risk of APOs [46]. In our data analysis, it was indeed that MS-AFP was negatively correlated to PAPP-A (Pearson correlation P = 0.010). In China, the caesarean section rate increased from 29% in 2008 to 35% in 2014. After the relaxation of the one-child policy in November 2013, considering the safety of delivery, hospitals in China were generally reluctant to try vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). In 2016, the caesarean section rate was 41.1% in China [47]. That was the reason why we had a high caesarean section percentage in this study.

This study provides evidence that elevated first-trimester MS-AFP is associated with increased risk of preterm birth, preeclampsia and SGA, but the predictive efficiencies were low for these APOs, even if the subdivisions of APOs were applied for analysis. However, as the importance of first-trimester combined multi-marker screenings for APOs are increasingly emphasized in the recent years, first-trimester MS-AFP may also be a useful marker in the future studies on this subject.