nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.03.2021 | Original Article

Four-Year Interim Results of the Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

verfasst von: Pa Hong, Seung Soo Kim, Cheol Jeong, Seung Hwan Hwang, Tae Seob Kim, Jung Heum Park, Yun Gyu Song, Yu Kwan Song

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface (Establishment Labs Holdings Inc., Alajuela, Costa Rica) is the fifth generation of a silicone gel-filled breast implant that is commercially available in Korea.

Objectives

In this study, we describe 4-year interim results of the safety of augmentation mammaplasty using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface in Korean women.

Methods

In the current multicenter, retrospective study, we performed a retrospective review of medical records of a total of 1314 patients who received augmentation mammaplasty using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface at our hospitals between September 1, 2016, and August 31, 2020. For safety assessment, we analyzed incidences of postoperative complications and Kaplan–Meier complication-free survival of the patients.

Results

We included a total of 873 patients (1746 breasts, mean age = 32.18 ± 6.88 years) in the current study. There were a total of 111 cases (12.70%) of postoperative complications; these include 24 cases (2.70%) of early seroma, 18 cases (2.10%) of hematoma, 18 cases (2.10%) of capsular contracture, 17 cases (1.95%) of dissatisfaction with shape, 16 cases (1.83%) of dissatisfaction with size, 9 cases (1.03%) of asymmetry, 6 cases (0.70%) of infection and 3 cases (0.34%) of rippling. Moreover, time-to-events were estimated at 918.34 ± 36.22 days (95% CI 845.44–988.52).

Conclusions

Here, we describe 4-year interim results of the safety of augmentation mammaplasty using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface in Korean women in a non-manufacturer-sponsored study. But further large-scale, prospective, multicenter studies with a long period of follow-up are warranted to establish our results.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Calobrace MB, Schwartz MR, Zeidler KR, Pittman TA, Cohen R, Stevens WG (2017) Long-term safety of textured and smooth breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 38(1):38–48PubMed

Chang EI, Hammond DC (2018) Clinical results on innovation in breast implant design. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:31S-38SPubMed

Munhoz AM, Clemens MW, Nahabedian MY (2019) Breast implant surfaces and their impact on current practices: where we are now and where are we going? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(10):e2466PubMedPubMedCentral

Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS (2007) Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:8S-16SPubMed

Tanner B (2017) Low rate of capsular contracture in a series of 214 consecutive primary and revision breast augmentations using microtextured implants. JPRAS Open 15:66–73PubMedPubMedCentral

Adams WP Jr, Rios JL, Smith SJ (2006) Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7 Suppl):46S-52SPubMed

Jones P, Mempin M, Hu H, Chowdhury D, Foley M, Cooter R, Adams WP Jr, Vickery K, Deva AK (2018) The functional influence of breast implant outer shell morphology on bacterial attachment and growth. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(4):837–849PubMed

Wong CH, Samuel M, Tan BK, Song C (2006) Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(5):1224–1236PubMed

Barnsley GP, Sigurdson LJ, Barnsley SE (2006) Textured surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(7):2182–2190PubMed

10.

Poeppl N, Schreml S, Lichtenegger F, Lenich A, Eisenmann-Klein M, Prantl L (2007) Does the surface structure of implants have an impact on the formation of a capsular contracture? Aesthetic Plast Surg 31(2):133–139PubMed

11.

Asplund O, Gylbert L, Jurell G, Ward C (1999) Textured or smooth implants for submuscular breast augmentation: a controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(6):1200–1206

12.

Tandon VJ, DeLong MR, Ballard TN, Clemens MW, Brandt KE, Kenkel JM, Cederna PS (2018) Evolving trends in textured implant use for cosmetic augmentation in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(6):1456–1461PubMed

13.

Hamdi M (2019) Association between breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) risk and polyurethane breast implants: clinical evidence and european perspective. Aesthet Surg J 39(Suppl_1):S49–S54PubMed

14.

Barr S, Bayat A (2011) Breast implant surface development: perspectives on development and manufacture. Aesthet Surg J 31(1):56–67PubMed

15.

Spear SL, Elmaraghy M, Hess C (2000) Textured-surface saline-filled silicone breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(4):1542–1552PubMed

16.

Niechajev I, Jurell G, Lohjelm L (2007) Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31(6):697–710PubMed

17.

Thorne CH (2010) An evidence-based approach to augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2184–2188PubMed

18.

Lista F, Ahmad J (2013) Evidence-based medicine: augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(6):1684–1696PubMed

19.

Schwartz MR (2017) Evidence-based medicine: breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(1):109e–119ePubMed

20.

Henriksen TF, Fryzek JP, Hölmich LR, McLaughlin JK, Kjøller K, Høyer AP, Olsen JH, Friis S (2005) Surgical intervention and capsular contracture after breast augmentation: a prospective study of risk factors. Ann Plast Surg 54(4):343–351PubMed

21.

Spear SL, Boehmler JH 4th, Clemens MW (2006) Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single surgeon’s practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7 Suppl):136S-147SPubMed

22.

Wixtrom RN, Stutman RL, Burke RM, Mahoney AK, Codner MA (2012) Risk of breast implant bacterial contamination from endogenous breast flora, prevention with nipple shields, and implications for biofilm formation. Aesthet Surg J 32(8):956–963PubMed

23.

Ajdic D, Zoghbi Y, Gerth D, Panthaki ZJ, Thaller S (2016) The relationship of bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 36(3):297–309PubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Hu H, Johani K, Almatroudi A, Vickery K, Natta BV, Kadin ME, Brody G, Clemens M, Cheah CY, Lade S, Joshi PA, Prince HM, Deva AK (2016) Bacterial biofilm infection detected in breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(6):1659–1669PubMed

25.

Magnusson MR, Connell T, Miroshnik M, Layt C, Ashton M, Deva AK, Farrow H, Januszkiewicz J (2019) Breast implant selection: consensus recommendations using a modified delphi method. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(5):e2237PubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Montemurro P, Hedén P, Behr B, Wallner C (2020) Controllable factors to reduce the rate of complications in primary breast augmentation: a review of the literature. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01726-xCrossRef

27.

Khavanin N, Gutowski KA, Hume KM, Simmons CJ, Mlodinow AS, Weiss M, Mayer KE, Murphy RX Jr, Kim JYS (2015) The use of patient registries in breast surgery: a comparison of the tracking operations and outcomes for plastic surgeons and national surgical quality improvement program data sets. Ann Plast Surg 74(2):157–162PubMed

28.

Kim JH, Paik NS, Nam SY, Cho Y, Park HK (2020) The emerging crisis of stakeholders in implant-based augmentation mammaplasty in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 35(15):e103PubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Mendonça Munhoz A, Santanelli di Pompeo F, De Mezerville R (2017) Nanotechnology, nanosurfaces and silicone gel breast implants: current aspects. Case Rep Plast Surg Hand Surg 4(1):99–113

30.

Sforza M, Hammond DC, Botti G, Hedén P, Quirós MC, Munhoz AM, Kinney BM, Corduff N (2019) Expert consensus on the use of a new bioengineered, cell-friendly, smooth surface breast implant. Aesthet Surg J 39(Suppl_3):S95–S102PubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Sforza M, Zaccheddu R, Alleruzzo A, Seno A, Mileto D, Paganelli A, Sulaiman H, Payne M, Maurovich-Horvat L (2018) Preliminary 3-year evaluation of experience with silksurface and velvetsurface motiva silicone breast implants: a single-center experience with 5813 consecutive breast augmentation cases. Aesthet Surg J 38(Suppl_2):S62–S73PubMed

32.

Huemer GM, Wenny R, Aitzetmüller MM, Duscher D (2018) Motiva ergonomix round silksurface silicone breast implants: outcome analysis of 100 primary breast augmentations over 3 years and technical considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(6):831e–842ePubMed

33.

Deva AK, Adams WP Jr, Vickery K (2013) The role of bacterial biofilms in device-associated infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1319–1328PubMed

34.

Adams WP Jr (2009) Capsular contracture: what is it? What causes it? how can it be prevented and managed? Clin Plast Surg 36(1):119–126PubMed

35.

Blount AL, Martin MD, Lineberry KD, Kettaneh N, Alfonso DR (2013) Capsular contracture rate in a low-risk population after primary augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthet Surg J 33(4):516–521PubMed

36.

Giordano S, Peltoniemi H, Lilius P, Salmi A (2013) Povidone-iodine combined with antibiotic topical irrigation to reduce capsular contracture in cosmetic breast augmentation: a comparative study. Aesthet Surg J 33(5):675–680PubMed

37.

Hu H, Jacombs A, Vickery K, Merten SL, Pennington DG, Deva AK (2015) Chronic biofilm infection in breast implants is associated with an increased T-cell lymphocytic infiltrate: implications for breast implant-associated lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(2):319–329PubMed

38.

Wiener TC (2008) Relationship of incision choice to capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(2):303–306PubMed

39.

Li S, Chen L, Liu W, Mu D, Luan J (2018) Capsular contracture rate after breast augmentation with periareolar versus other two (inframammary and transaxillary) incisions: a meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42(1):32–37PubMed

40.

Adams WP, Conner WC, Barton FE, Rohrich RJ (2000) Optimizing breast pocket irrigation: an in vitro study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(1):334–338PubMed

41.

Adams WP Jr, Conner WC, Barton FE Jr, Rohrich RJ (2001) Optimizing breast-pocket irrigation: the post-betadine era. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(6):1596–1601PubMed

42.

Degnim AC, Scow JS, Hoskin TL, Miller JP, Loprinzi M, Boughey JC, Jakub JW, Throckmorton A, Patel R, Baddour LM (2013) Randomized controlled trial to reduce bacterial colonization of surgical drains after breast and axillary operations. Ann Surg 258(2):240–247PubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Ooi ASh, Song DH (2016) Reducing infection risk in implant-based breast-reconstruction surgery: challenges and solutions. Breast Cancer 8:161–172PubMed

44.

Sung JY, Jeong JP, Moon DS, Kim MS, Kim HC, Choi WS, Song KY, Kim HJ, Lim HG, Kim JH (2019) Short-term safety of augmentation mammaplasty using the bellagel implants in Korean women. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(12):e2566PubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Clemens MW, Brody GS, Mahabir RC, Miranda RN (2018) How to diagnose and treat breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(4):586e–599ePubMed

46.

Nava MB, Rancati A, Angrigiani C, Catanuto G, Rocco N (2017) How to prevent complications in breast augmentation. Gland Surg 6(2):210–217PubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Tanner B (2018) Low rate of capsular contracture in a series of 214 consecutive primary and revision breast augmentations using microtextured implants. JPRAS Open 15:66–73PubMed

48.

Caplin DA (2014) Indications for the use of memory shape breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: long-term clinical outcomes of shaped versus round silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:27S-37SPubMed

49.

Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, Murphy DK (2015) Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study. Aesthet Surg J 35(2):145–155PubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Spear SL, Murphy DK (2014) Allergan silicone breast implant US core clinical study group Natrelle round silicone breast implants: core study results at 10 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(6):1354–1361PubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Stevens WG, Calobrace MB, Harrington J, Alizadeh K, Zeidler KR, d’Incelli RC (2016) Nine-year core study data for sientra’s fda-approved round and shaped implants with high-strength cohesive silicone gel. Aesthet Surg J 36(4):404–416PubMed

52.

Steiert AE, Boyce M, Sorg H (2013) Capsular contracture by silicone breast implants: possible causes, biocompatibility, and prophylactic strategies. Med Devices 6:211–218

53.

Chong SJ, Deva AK (2015) Understanding the etiology and prevention of capsular contracture: translating science into practice. Clin Plast Surg 42(4):427–436PubMed

54.

Hester TR Jr, Tebbetts JB, Maxwell GP (2001) The polyurethane-covered mammary prosthesis: facts and fiction (II): a look back and a “peek” ahead. Clin Plast Surg 28(3):579–586PubMed

55.

Luu HM, Hutter JC, Bushar HF (1998) A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for 2,4-toluenediamine leached from polyurethane foam-covered breast implants. Environ Health Perspect 106(7):393–400PubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Brown MH, Shenker R, Silver SA (2005) Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(3):768–779PubMed

57.

Fruhstorfer BH, Hodgson EL, Malata CM (2004) Early experience with an anatomical soft cohesive silicone gel prosthesis in cosmetic and reconstructive breast implant surgery. Ann Plast Surg 53(6):536–542PubMed

58.

Hedén P, Jernbeck J, Hober M (2001) Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: the world’s largest current experience. Clin Plast Surg 28(3):531–552PubMed

59.

Kyle DJ, Oikonomou A, Hill E, Bayat A (2015) Development and functional evaluation of biomimetic silicone surfaces with hierarchical micro/nano-topographical features demonstrates favourable in vitro foreign body response of breast-derived fibroblasts. Biomater 52:88–102

60.

Cappellano G, Ploner C, Lobenwein S, Sopper S, Hoertnagl P, Mayerl C, Wick N, Pierer G, Wick G, Wolfram D (2018) Immunophenotypic characterization of human T cells after in vitro exposure to different silicone breast implant surfaces. PLoS ONE 13(2):e0192108PubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Wixtrom RN, Garadi V, Leopold J, Canady JW (2020) Device-specific findings of imprinted-texture breast implants: characteristics, risks, and benefits. Aesthet Surg J 40(2):167–173PubMed

62.

Brown T (2018) Surface areas of textured breast implants: implications for the biofilm theory of capsule formation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 6(3):e1700PubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Mempin M, Hu H, Chowdhury D, Deva A, Vickery K (2018) The A, B and C’s of silicone breast implants: anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Biofilm Capsul Contract Mater 11(12):2393

64.

Michael A, Brian MK, Tracy AP (2020) Intra- and inter-shell roughness variability of breast implant surfaces. Aesthet Surg J 40(5):NP324–NP326

65.

Taylor SR, Gibbons DF (1983) Effect of surface texture on the soft tissue response to polymer implants. J Biomed Mater Res 17(2):205–227PubMed

66.

Brohim RM, Foresman PA, Hildebrandt PK, Rodeheaver GT (1992) Early tissue reaction to textured breast implant surfaces. Ann Plast Surg 28(4):354–362PubMed

67.

Hall-Findlay EJ (2011) Breast implant complication review: double capsules and late seromas. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(1):56–66PubMed

68.

Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA (2006) A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(3):757–767PubMed

69.

Camirand A, Doucet J, Harris J (1999) Breast augmentation: compression–a very important factor in preventing capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(2):529–538PubMed

70.

Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Bengtson BP (2012) Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years. Aesthet Surg J 32(6):709–717PubMed

71.

Quirós MC, Bolaños MC, Fassero JJ (2019) Six-year prospective outcomes of primary breast augmentation with nano surface implants. Aesthet Surg J 39(5):495–508PubMed

72.

Yoon S, Chang JH (2020) Short-term safety of a silicone gel–filled breast implant: a manufacturer-sponsored, retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8:e2807PubMedPubMedCentral

73.

Sforza M, Husein R, Atkinson C, Zaccheddu R (2017) Unraveling factors influencing early seroma formation in breast augmentation surgery. Aesthet Surg J 37(3):301–307PubMed

Titel: Four-Year Interim Results of the Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study
verfasst von: Pa Hong
Seung Soo Kim
Cheol Jeong
Seung Hwan Hwang
Tae Seob Kim
Jung Heum Park
Yun Gyu Song
Yu Kwan Song
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02152-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Four-Year Interim Results of the Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study