Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2015

Open Access 01.10.2015 | Original Paper

Free spreader grafts in rhinoplasty

verfasst von: Yves Goffart, Sarah Karelle, Jacques Daele

Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2015

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

Background

Spreader grafts (SPG) are widely used for different purposes in rhinoplasty procedures. However, selection of the size of the grafts, trimming and fixation often proved time consuming and difficult. We used an original method of placement of “free” SPG to improve both ease of placement and fine trimming of the grafts. To assess pertinence of this approach, we evaluated retrospectively our rate of correction of the middle third of the nose.

Methods

We used a personal method for securing SPG after suturing upper lateral cartilages (ULC). Grafts were inserted between the ULC and nasal septum, adding fibrin glue for fixation. We reviewed the aesthetic results of a series of 420 consecutive rhinoplasties in whom free SPG were used in 218 patients and conventional fixed SPG were used in 33 patients. Retrospective analysis of the photographic data of all patients was performed. Adequacy of brow tip lines, symmetry and relative width of the middle third was assessed by an independent observer and the surgeon.

Results

No evidence of postoperative displacement was noted. Symmetry of the middle third of the nose and adequacy of aesthetic brow tip lines were obtained in the vast majority of the patients. Comparable rates of middle vault correction and harmony were obtained in patients with free SPG or conventional SPG. On occasion during revision surgeries, we found the grafts resting in adequate position.

Conclusions

Free SPG placement appeared a straightforward and timesaving method in rhinoplasty procedures and proved especially meaningful when limited to moderate amount of support was needed in the middle vault reconstruction. Repositioning, resizing of the graft or placement of additional pieces of cartilage were feasible instantly if needed. This technique might help to obtain better correction of the middle third due to easiness and possibility of fine adjustments in rhinoplasty procedures.
Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.
Hinweise
The preliminary results of this study have been orally presented by the first author YG at the 2011 Meeting of the European Society of Facial Plastic Surgery at Bruges, Belgium, on September 2, 2011.

Introduction

Sheen first described spreader grafts (SPG) to reconstruct the middle vault after dorsal reduction, and this technique proved one of the most valuable graft in rhinoplasty [1, 2]. The initial Sheen technique was performed endonasally by placement of SPG into submucous tunnels. Variations in the technique have been described, such as endonasal placement with loop sutures [3], with spreader flap by folding the upper lateral cartilages (ULC) [4], or by various shapes of the grafts [5, 6], although the advent of open rhinoplasty procedures contributed extensively to the development of SPG [7].
SPG are used for different and frequent purposes: avoiding inferomedial collapse of the ULC after dorsal reduction, maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines after osteotomies, correcting asymmetries of the middle third and repairing avulsion of the ULC. Their role can also be functional when opening the nasal valve is needed or structural when used for straightening a deviated dorsal septum or lengthening a short nose [8].
SPG are made of autologous cartilage and are sutured alongside the nasal septum. These grafts may stand level with the dorsal septum or slightly lower if adequate height of ULC is present. There are no standard sizes but dimensions of 15–25 mm length, 1–2 mm width are often reported. They tend to be larger in revision surgery, longer in extended SPG. A careful trimming of the grafts is necessary to obtain adequate width and symmetry of the middle third and avoiding irregularities on the dorsum [9]. Even with proficiency, this step is often time consuming. When additional layers of cartilages are required, they might be difficult to position and fix accurately [10].
The amount of time needed for accurate placement could be a reason for a relative underuse during initial surgery: In his revision surgery experience, Daniel [11] found out as little as 5 % of patients having prior PSG 11.
In an effort to correct quickly and smoothly even small defects in the nasal vault, we used a personal technique of placement of free SPG secured with fibrin glue between septum and ULC, without thigh tunnel to support them and without suturing.

Surgical technique

In rhinoplasty procedures, after performing modifications of the nasal cartilaginous and bony dorsum and completing osteotomies, we proceed to fixation of the ULC. They are fastened level with the nasal septum by a U-loop suture of 5–0 PDS (polydioxanone monofilament suture, Ethicon°) (Fig. 1a). Redraping of the skin permits careful visualization and palpation of the middle third. When it appears that SPG should be used, we determine the rough size of the cartilage grafts. A few drops of first component of fibrin sealant, fibrinogen (Tissucol Baxter°, Tisseel Baxter°, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, CA, USA) are applied to the cartilaginous septum (Fig. 1b). The free SPG are introduced with a forceps between the nasal septum and the ULC (Fig. 1c, d), and then gradually pushed with a Freer elevator (Fig. 2a–c), until they are slightly lower, 1 or 2 mm, than that of the dorsal septum. The skin is redraped over the nose, and again visualization and palpation evaluate adequacy of graft placement. If the graft is too large, it is removed, trimmed and replaced. In the contrary, if the amount of correction appears insufficient, the graft is gently pushed 1 or 2 mm higher. In an incremental fashion, additional pieces of cartilages are positioned laterally to the first graft if necessary. Once correction is considered adequate (Fig. 2d), the second component of fibrin sealant (thrombin) is applied to the grafts. Tip surgery is accomplished and an ultimate control is done before definitive closing of the internal or external columellar incision.

Material and method

We performed a retrospective analysis for free SPG in 430 consecutive rhinoplasties between January 2007 and February 2011.
Postoperative follow-up extended from 1 year up to 5 years. All patients were operated by the same senior surgeon (YG). Digital photographic files were reviewed both by an experienced rhinoplastic surgeon (JD), who was not aware of the surgical technique used, and by the surgeon (YG). Face views, oblique, lateral and basal views were considered for the purpose of the study. The two senior authors (YG and JD) reached on each case a consensus as to classify the harmony of the middle third of the nose, in relationship with the bony pyramid and the tip. We classified postoperative results into four categories:
a.
Adequate correction of the middle third and harmony of brow tip lines
 
b.
Insufficient correction, with inverted V deformity or rigidity of brow tip lines
 
c.
Excessive width of middle third
 
d.
Asymmetry of the middle third and/or disruption of aesthetic brow tip lines.
 
Examples of our assessments are displayed in Figs. 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Results

Overall, 420 patients were eligible for evaluation as ten patients were lost for follow-up. Surgery was performed for cosmetic or both cosmetic and functional purposes in 367 patients (87 %). Three hundred seventy-eight patients were primary cases and 42 patients (10 %) were revision cases (Table 1). SPG were placed in 251 patients (62 %) (Table 2). Free SPG were used in 218 patients (54 % of rhinoplasty patients) while classic, sutured SPG were used in 33 patients (8 %). Among the patients with free SPG asymmetric sizing of the graft was used 35 patients (16 % of grafts placed) while multilayered grafts were used in 19 patients (9 % of grafts placed). External rhinoplasty was the most common surgical route used in 402 patients while endonasal approach accounted for 18 patients.
Table 1
Patient’s population
Number of eligible patients
420
Type of procedure
Primary procedures
196
Aesthetic
n = 378
131
Aesthetic and functional
 
51
Functional
Revision procedures
31
Aesthetic
n = 42
9
Aesthetic and functional
 
2
Functional
Table 2
Type of spreader grafts used
Number of open rhinoplasty patients
n = 402
%
All spreader grafts included
251
62 %
Free SPG
218
54 %
Subtypes of SPG
Asymmetric grafts n = 35
16 % of free SPG
 
Multilayered grafts n = 19
9 % of free SPG
Sutured SPG
33
8 %
Asymmetric grafts means that the size of the graft were not equal on each side
Multilayered grafts means that more than one piece of cartilage were used to obtain adequate correction of the middle vault
Among the 169 patients where no SPG were placed, 71 % of good control of middle third was noted, while 4 % of the patients presented a too thin middle third, 5 % too wide and 21 % with asymmetry of the middle third (Table 3).
Table 3
Aesthetic results—no spreader grafts used
No SPG
169 patients without SPG
Middle third-aesthetic brow tip lines
 Symmetric adequate
120
71 %
 Symmetric thin
6
4 %
 Symmetric wide
8
5 %
 Asymmetric disruption
35
21 %
In the group of 33 patients with sutured SPG adequate middle third was noted in 70 %, too thin in 3 %, too wide in 9 % and asymmetry or disruption of aesthetic lines in 18 % of the patients (Table 4).
Table 4
Aesthetic results—conventional sutured spreader grafts
Fixed SPG
33 patients with SPG
Middle third-aesthetic brow tip lines
 Symmetric adequate
23
70 %
 Symmetric thin
1
3 %
 Symmetric wide
3
9 %
 Asymmetric disruption
6
18 %
In the group of 218 patients with free SPG (Table 5), postoperative evaluation by the authors showed that middle third width and aesthetic brow nasal lines were considered as symmetric and adequate in 168 patients (77 % of the grafts), symmetric but too thin in six patients (3 %), symmetric but too wide in six patients (3 %). Asymmetry of the middle third of the nose or disruption of the aesthetic lines of the nose was observed in 38 patients (17 %).
Table 5
Aesthetic results—free spreader grafts
Fixed SPG
218 patients with SPG
Middle third-aesthetic brow tip lines
 Symmetric adequate
168
77 % of the grafts
 Symmetric thin
6
3 % of the grafts
 Symmetric wide
6
3 % of the grafts
 Asymmetric disruption
38
17 % of the grafts
We performed a statistical evaluation within the three groups: no SPG, fixed SPG and free SPG with a Statgraphics Centurion° software. Since P value is largely greater than that of statistical significance at 0.95, there is no statistically significance amongst the three samples tested.
No signs of early displacement of the graft were clinically observed. No graft extrusion towards the dorsum was observed. One patient with revision rhinoplasty (including dorsal augmentation with conchal cartilage and fascia temporalis grafting) presented an infection with drainage through the dorsal skin but it does not appeared to be specifically related to the free SPG technique.

Discussion

Fixation of SPG is an issue in rhinoplasty. While Sheen [1, 2] and Constantian [12] described initially the placement into a submucous tunnel, suturing techniques have been reported by various authors. Johnson [3] described loop sutures placed between SPG and saddled over the septum. Suturing techniques really emerged with the advent of open rhinoplasty procedures [13].
In our technique, free SPG were used as a customizable material between the ULC and septum. Overall, the whole process of tailoring the free SPG and placing it took only a few minutes. It allowed us to correct minor defect or asymmetries in the middle third, and the versatility of the placement increased the frequency of use of SPG placement. As free SPG are placed cephalically to the fixation of ULC to the septum, they reduce the risk of creating excessive bulk and inadequate fullness in the supratip area. Positioning through an endonasal approach was also readily achievable.
In functional rhinoplasty, free SPG provide less opening of the nasal valve than a SPG fixed along the dorsal edge and running to the anterior septal angle. We did not intend to correct marked deviation of the dorsum with those grafts.
We could not detect sign of early displacement of the graft. On occasion during revision surgery, we found that SPG were in place and underwent no specific resorption, as depicted in Fig. 7.
No specific complications were related to the use of fibrin glue. This is in contrast to a study of André [14] who described in functional rhinoplasty patients the opening the nasal valve with SPG without dividing the ULC and securing them with 2-cyano-butyl-acrylate glue. It resulted in an unacceptable rate of postoperative infection (three patients out of eight patients reported).
Fibrin sealants have been used widely in Europe for 15 years. Concerns exist regarding the use of blood derivates (fibrin glue contains human fibrinogen, human thrombin and bovine aprotinin), but the European’s Agency Committee for Medical Products for Human Use concluded that the use of these products is safe [15].
Additional costs are associated with fibrin glue use. The cost is limited as an amount of 1 ml of fibrin glue per patient is sufficient. In Europe, the price in 2014 was for 1 ml Tissucol° or Tisseel° (Baxter°, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, CA, USA) 104 € or approximately US$120. Regarding the total costs involved in surgery, anesthesia, medications and hospital stay, the additional charge is regarded as acceptable. Nevertheless, the patient should be informed that fibrin glue, containing human and bovine blood derivates, would be possibly used during surgery.
The evaluation of the results of SPG is difficult and subjective. Few objective quantitative assessments have been described [16]. We estimated that the best way to assess appropriateness of SPG was to appreciate width and symmetry of the middle nasal vault, as well as the brow tip aesthetic lines referred by Tardy [17] and Sheen [18]. The pertinence of the method of assessment could be debated, as several factors influence these issues. For example, brow tip lines are determined by adequate harmony between nasal bones and middle third, and are affected not only by the width of middle third, but also by overly narrow or wide osteotomies or persisting deviation of nasal pyramid. This was the reason for evaluating the results by an independent and experimented observer reviewing patient’s pictures and by the surgeon.
No statistical differences were detected between the different groups, regardless of the technique used. This fact does not imply that SPG were of no use, but that statistical analysis was hindered by a bias: the more severe the deformity, the more the surgeon is prone to use strong and fixed reconstructive material to achieve structural correction. The deviated nose, the short nose, the revision surgery or the posttraumatic nose are much more likely to need fixed SPG. It shows interestingly that although surgical techniques are individually tailored, we are left over time with a comparable proportion of patients with unsatisfactory correction. This may be explained by misjudgment during surgery or unforeseen evolution during the healing process. For this reason, the purpose of the study was not to assess the superiority of a technique over another but to evaluate if our free SPG technique leads to an acceptable rate of correction of the middle third. The high percentage of free SPG compared to conventional SPG in our patients is probably related to the indications for surgery, with a majority of cosmetic indications for surgery.
The major advantage was the user-friendliness and versatility of free SPG, accounting for a relatively high rate of use (62 % of rhinoplasty patients at the time of the study), and a much higher rate in our recent surgeries. Moreover, certain authors advocate bilateral SPG each time that the middle vault has been opened during rhinoplasty [9]. This simplified method could help preventing the underuse of conventional SPG often reported by authors [9, 11].

Conclusion

Free SPG placement during a rhinoplasty procedure when limited amount of support was needed appeared easy and timesaving. The placement in an incremental fashion as suggested by visualization and palpation proved a very flexible maneuver and allows instant adjustability and fine trimming. Over time, it does not appear that unexpected displacement of the grafts occurred in early postoperative period. At long term, we observed occasionally during revision surgeries that the free SPG were integrated in suitable position. The evaluation of cosmetic results by an independent observer and the surgeon find out an acceptable rate of adequate correction to the middle third of the nose. Free SPG behave as a filler material, easy to adjust, to correct minor to moderate irregularities or to prevent middle third collapse. The ease of placement might help preventing underuse of SPG often detected in revision surgeries. Over the last 8 years, the author’s modification of technique has dramatically changed our approach to SPG and increased considerably both frequency of use and straightforwardness of placement.

Conflict of interest

Yves Goffart, Sarah Karelle and Jacques Daele declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Patient concent

Informed consent, including written consent for use of photographs, was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical Standards

For this type of retrospective study a formal consent is not required.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Dent – Das Online-Abo der Zahnmedizin

Online-Abonnement

Mit e.Dent erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen zahnmedizinischen Fortbildungen und unseren zahnmedizinischen und ausgesuchten medizinischen Zeitschriften.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheen JH (1984) Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 73(2):230–9CrossRefPubMed Sheen JH (1984) Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 73(2):230–9CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheen JH, Sheen AP. Adjunctive techniques. In Sheen JH: Aesthetic rhinoplasty, ed 2, St Louis, Mosby, 1987, p 530 Sheen JH, Sheen AP. Adjunctive techniques. In Sheen JH: Aesthetic rhinoplasty, ed 2, St Louis, Mosby, 1987, p 530
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gruber RP, Park E, Newman J, Berkowitz L, Oneal R (2007) The spreader flap in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(6):1903–10CrossRefPubMed Gruber RP, Park E, Newman J, Berkowitz L, Oneal R (2007) The spreader flap in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(6):1903–10CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stacey H, Cook T, Marcus B (2009) Correction of internal nasal valve stenosis. Ann Plast Surg 63(3):280–284 Stacey H, Cook T, Marcus B (2009) Correction of internal nasal valve stenosis. Ann Plast Surg 63(3):280–284
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyuron B, Michelow BJ, Englebardt C (1998) Upper lateral splay graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(6):2169–77CrossRefPubMed Guyuron B, Michelow BJ, Englebardt C (1998) Upper lateral splay graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(6):2169–77CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrich R, Hollier L (1996) Use of spreader graft in the external approach to rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 23:2,255–262 Rohrich R, Hollier L (1996) Use of spreader graft in the external approach to rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 23:2,255–262
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Toriumi DM (1995) Management of the middle nasal vault in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 3:77–91 Toriumi DM (1995) Management of the middle nasal vault in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 3:77–91
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Toriumi DM (2002) Structure approach in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 10(1):1–22CrossRefPubMed Toriumi DM (2002) Structure approach in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 10(1):1–22CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Papel ID. Management of the middle vault. Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. New York, Thieme 2009, Chap 43, 555–60 Papel ID. Management of the middle vault. Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. New York, Thieme 2009, Chap 43, 555–60
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniel RK. Secondary rhinoplasty: Surgical techniques. Mastering rhinoplasty, Heidelberg, Springer, 2010, Chap10, p.368 Daniel RK. Secondary rhinoplasty: Surgical techniques. Mastering rhinoplasty, Heidelberg, Springer, 2010, Chap10, p.368
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Constantian MB, Clardy RB (1996) The relative importance of septal and nasal valvular surgery in correcting airway obstruction in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:38–58CrossRefPubMed Constantian MB, Clardy RB (1996) The relative importance of septal and nasal valvular surgery in correcting airway obstruction in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:38–58CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tebbetts JB. Primary rhinoplasty. A new approach to the logic and the techniques. Mosby 1998, St Louis, Missouri, Chap 7, 133–159 Tebbetts JB. Primary rhinoplasty. A new approach to the logic and the techniques. Mosby 1998, St Louis, Missouri, Chap 7, 133–159
14.
Zurück zum Zitat André RF, Paun SH, Vuyk HD. Endonasal spreader graft placement as treatment for internal nasal valve insufficiency: no need to divide the upper lateral cartilages from the septum. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004 Jan-Feb;6(1):36–40 André RF, Paun SH, Vuyk HD. Endonasal spreader graft placement as treatment for internal nasal valve insufficiency: no need to divide the upper lateral cartilages from the septum. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004 Jan-Feb;6(1):36–40
15.
Zurück zum Zitat European Medicines Agency. Questions and answers on the review of the fibrin sealants. EMA/785380/2012 rev.1 European Medicines Agency. Questions and answers on the review of the fibrin sealants. EMA/785380/2012 rev.1
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mojallal A, Ouyang D, Saint-Cyr M, Bui N, Brown SA, Rohrich RJ (2011) Dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty: a quantitative outcome-based assessment of the component dorsal reduction technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(1):280–8CrossRefPubMed Mojallal A, Ouyang D, Saint-Cyr M, Bui N, Brown SA, Rohrich RJ (2011) Dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty: a quantitative outcome-based assessment of the component dorsal reduction technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(1):280–8CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tardy ME Rhinoplasty: the art and the science. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1997, p 507–528 Tardy ME Rhinoplasty: the art and the science. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1997, p 507–528
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheen JH, Sheen AP. Adjunctive techniques. Sheen JH: Aesthetic rhinoplasty, ed 2, St Louis, Mosby, 1987, p 51 Sheen JH, Sheen AP. Adjunctive techniques. Sheen JH: Aesthetic rhinoplasty, ed 2, St Louis, Mosby, 1987, p 51
Metadaten
Titel
Free spreader grafts in rhinoplasty
verfasst von
Yves Goffart
Sarah Karelle
Jacques Daele
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-015-1085-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.