The systematic evaluation of EMG responses to stimulation in more than 7000 dorsal rootlets, recorded from eight relevant leg-muscle groups, provided a comprehensive overview of the initial spinal-neurofunctional state in 146 CP children, prior to any surgical nerve-root intervention. Rootlets which triggered sustained responses to stimulation were not evenly distributed, neither with regard to side, nor segmental level, nor gender. What we saw instead was an anatomical distribution of grades in which prevalence varied along the nerve–root levels, from side to side and between genders. These findings remain fully valid, also when taking the GMFM-D&E into account.
In the main investigation (ANOVA 1), the results did not correspond in all respects with those obtained in our interim evaluation (initial small sample). After adjusting for the number difference (from a smaller number to 146), no convincing side significance could be determined for grades 3+4. This is a very important finding, possible causes of which will be outlined below. In our investigations, the differences in grade distribution across the five evaluated nerve root levels were repeatedly found to be highly significant. However, no researchers, ourselves included, had considered the factor of gender in connection with higher–grade EMG assessments.
Gender and the prevalence of exacerbated stimulation-evoked EMG responses
Grade 3+4 responses at lower nerve–root levels (L5, S1) were likewise most frequent in girls, but somewhat lower than in the boys, who showed a considerably larger number of rootlets with sustained and widely spread responses to 50 Hz stimulation.
Assuming that rootlets with inordinately intense 50 Hz responses contribute the most to spasticity [
39], these results should come as no surprise, as it has been frequently reported that gender plays a role in the way in which the brain responds to injury, as is the case with CP [
5,
7,
14,
18]. The male brain is generally thought to be more vulnerable to white matter injuries during certain periods of development [
7,
14,
18]. The risk of developing CP is higher among males and its manifestations are more severe [
17]. Thus, gender-related differences were noted elsewhere as well.
In one large sample described by Jarvis et al. [
17], the incidence of CP was found to be 30% higher in boys than in girls, with a male-to-female prevalence ratio of 1.4. Chounti et al. [
7] confirmed that CP prevalence differed in both sexes. This male bias meant that there were more boys in our consecutively recorded patient group (male-female ratio: 1.25), despite the fact that our indication criteria excluded particularly severe cases from undergoing SDR during two data acquisition stages in this study (from 2007 until about 2011 and from about 2012 until 2014).
A similar pattern emerged in Romeo’s large cohort (male-female ratio: 1.34) of CP children [
31], likewise consecutively included, in which motor-functional and cognitive assessments were made, in an attempt to determine the influence of gender on development, not only in CP cases in general, but possibly also in subtypes such as hemiplegic and quadriplegic patients [
31]. Boys outnumbered girls in their sample only in one age-specific hemiplegic children’s group. Otherwise, no sexual dimorphism was found in diplegic or quadriplegic patients [
29,
31]. On the other hand, reporting on the results of a 10-year study of post-surgery outcomes following orthopedic single-event multilevel surgery in which the Gillette Gait Index was used, Zwick et al. [
42] believe that the role of gender in the treatment outcomes of CP children should not be underestimated.
In the course of intraoperative EMG grading, we discovered a gender-related effect in tetraspastic SDR patients, although no gender disparity was found in our GMFM data (Mann-Whitney U–test) between the boys and girls. It was probably our differentiated approach, using 3-factorial ANOVA and making assessments according to level and laterality, that enabled us to detect the gender-specific differences, findings which held up after considering the children’s varying motor skills, evaluated with GMFM-D&E as covariate. These results, backed by control analysis, were in keeping with our findings with regard to gender-specific interactions derived from our main investigation.
Significance of left-biased asymmetry in exacerbated stimulation-evoked EMG responses
For a time there was no clear explanation as to why results obtained in the main investigation deviated from those recorded in the interim evaluation conducted during the initial phase of our study [
41]. As mentioned above, obvious asymmetries with regard to exacerbated stimulation-evoked EMG responses had been the reason for undertaking the statistical analysis in the first place, and now, with a large number of patients (
n = 146), the significant side differences could no longer be convincingly demonstrated (
p = 0.055 in ANOVA1; however,
p = 0.006 in 2007/11 subset
X (ANOVA 5) and the initial small sample).
Peculiarities of the left and the right sides have rarely been mentioned in connection with spasticity [
20]. Up to now, little research has been done on possible rules governing reorganization in the corticospinal tract in male and female patients, following diffuse perinatal CNS insults. Nor do we know the degree of asymmetry which is likely to emerge as the reorganization process advances in tetraspastic patients. Far more insight has been gained into the development of the corticospinal system in response to upper motor neuron lesions where only one side is affected [
9,
11,
35].
In congenital hemiparesis, when unilateral damage is suffered and balance is lost between the two hemispheres, or when hemidecortication occurs [
40], a marked reorganization takes place (depending on the lesion itself and the activity performed) which is characterized by the reinforcement of ipsilateral pathways originating in the non-affected hemisphere, in addition to the anticipated contralateral alignment [
23].
Both hemispheres are subject to gender-specific hormonal influences at certain periods [
10,
18,
21]. The left hemisphere plays a more important role when it comes to motor execution, while the right hemisphere has a head start in the growth process [
38]. Thus, it is unlikely that the suspected differences in connectivity [
16] and vulnerability between the two maturing hemispheres [
9,
26] are limited to hemiplegic patients. Hemispheric imbalance resulting from perinatal brain damage might also cause asymmetry in the immature, bilaterally aligned pathways and spinal circuits [
11,
15] of tetraspastic patients, depending on the degree of hemispheric affectedness.
In cases where brain damage occurred in early childhood, the left hemisphere is more affected with noticeable frequency [
26]. Here one would expect the non-damaged right side to compensate, providing bilateral support to the pathways on both sides leading to the spinal cord, the more heavily damaged left hemisphere being incapable of maintaining its contralateral connections.
This could be one reason for the left-biased spinal asymmetry in grade 3+4 prevalence (Fig.
3c) which our grading data revealed at various lumbosacral levels (mainly at lower nerve roots L5, S1). In some of our patients, particularly in the males, both factors (higher-grade assessments and left-biased asymmetry) seem to go hand-in-hand, suggesting that asymmetrical spinal reorganization might be attributable to a hemispheric imbalance. It is possible that this is dealt with differently in girls.
While analyzing the subset
degree H (ANOVA 4), however, we noticed one peculiarity: it appears that when grade 3+4 prevalence is similarly high in boys and girls, similar distribution patterns are also to be found (compare Fig.
4 and Fig.
3c). The highly significant side difference which we thought was no longer observable (see Table
1) reappeared here (ANOVA 4,
p < 0.001) and was in fact more pronounced. However, this high level of statistical significance should not be overrated. On the basis of these supplementary analyses, we would limit ourselves to the conclusion that side differences were observable where there was high grade 3+4 prevalence.
Matching subsets in the categories Affectedness and Starting date might help explain why the results obtained in the main investigation deviated in some respects from those observed in the beginning. Slight deviation in the composition of the group (depending on indication criteria) in the final third of the whole sample—with higher proportions of GMFCS levels III and II (up to 2011, levels I and IV were more common)—undoubtedly played a role in reducing statistical significance in the side difference observed in the beginning.
Of relevance for the final third of our entire sample is the study period from around 2012 until 2014. Here the greatest increase in the number of more serious spastic cases with GMFCS level III and a corresponding drop in the number of GMFCS level I (Table
3) took place. Beyond that, there was a large percentage of patients who showed minimal grade 3+4 results during IOM (Table
2, subset
2012/14). Spinal asymmetry prevailed where certain grades occurred and seemed to be an especially characteristic distribution pattern in boys, although it also appeared in patient groupings with a higher proportion of GMFCS–level I children. Thus, it was revealed that changes in the GMFCS constellation were reflected in changes in the lateral intraoperative grade distribution.
This observation is corroborated by what is currently known about hemispheric imbalance and hemiparetic CP conditions [
9,
11,
23]. It is of vital importance to further investigate the possible link between intraoperatively assessed EMG responses and the clinical evaluation values. Future research might also focus on spinal lateralization—which might, according to Njiokiktjien [
26], be primarily attributable to a right–hemisphere predominance—and on the implication this could have for the reorganization process as a whole and for the role of grade 0 to grade 3+4 responses in this context.
Findings might also be of use to neuropediatricians and physiotherapists. Applying simple pie charts illustrating the IOM results for the individual patient could prove helpful in designing more customized post-SDR rehabilitation training programs. The grade evaluations obtained in SDR might, in turn, be of use in devising activity-based therapies [
11,
23] aimed at helping restore the corticospinal system.
Limitations
In this retrospective cohort study, conducted between 2007 and 2014, all girls and boys for whom SDR was indicated were registered consecutively. As anticipated for the larger number of patients in the entire sample, there was a shift toward a higher proportion of boys. For this reason, the numbers of patients are given (Fig.
1), including the respective proportion of boys and girls.
In evaluating our intraoperative data, applying appropriate multivariate techniques, we treated the sub-group analyses in this part as subordinate. Here a limited number of cases were available (GMFM was missing in the beginning) in our analyses of sub-group Motor functioning. Because of the restricted sample size (GMFM value), in comparison to that of the entire sample (grade values), additional control analyses were carried out for this particular sub-group. The results obtained were regarded as exploratory, meaning that further validation is needed if they are to be applied in practice.
As already mentioned, objective classification scales are of great importance, enabling us to describe the individual patient’s motor ability (GMFM value) and to pool information on the nature and distribution of 50 Hz responses to stimulation per rootlet (grade values). However, in attempting to find common ground between intraoperatively graded EMG responses and clinical evaluation values, it must be noted that the scales and definitions we used (grades 0 to 4+) were completely different from those used in obtaining clinical values (GMFM, GMFCS level) and were not designed for direct comparison. It is important to bear this in mind when applying such divergent sets of categories.
Changes in the eligibility criteria over time would commonly be listed under limitations. In our study, however, this slight variation proved beneficial, as it enabled us to show that changes in the GMFCS constellation were reflected in changes in the lateral intraoperative grade distribution.