nach oben

Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports

Erschienen in:

12.03.2022 | Neurorehabilitation and Recovery (J. Krakauer and T. Kitago, Section Editors)

Gamified Neurorehabilitation Strategies for Post-stroke Motor Recovery: Challenges and Advantages

verfasst von: Jenna Tosto-Mancuso, Laura Tabacof, Joseph E. Herrera, Erica Breyman, Sophie Dewil, Mar Cortes, Loreene Correa-esnard, Christopher P. Kellner, Neha Dangayach, David Putrino

Erschienen in: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Stroke is the leading cause of permanent motor disability in the United States (US), but there has been little progress in developing novel, effective strategies for treating post-stroke motor deficits. The past decade has seen the rapid development of many promising, gamified neurorehabilitation technologies; however, clinical adoption remains limited. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the recent literature surrounding the adoption and use of gamification in neurorehabilitation after stroke.

Recent Findings

Gamification of neurorehabilitation protocols is both feasible and effective. Deployment strategies and scalability need to be addressed with more rigor. Relationship between engaged time on task and rehabilitation outcomes should be explored further as it may create benefits beyond repetitive movement.

Summary

As gamification becomes a more common and feasible way of delivering exercise-based therapies, additional benefits of gamification are emerging. In spite of this, questions still exist about scalability and widespread clinical adoption.

Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 11];135. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485.

Langhorne P, Sandercock P, Prasad K. Evidence-based practice for stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:308–9.PubMedCrossRef

Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, Choo PL, Forster A, Morris J, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Stroke Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Aug 11]; Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD001920.pub3.

Crichton SL, Bray BD, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CDA. Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:1091–8.PubMedCrossRef

Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2008 update. Circulation. 2008;117:e25–146.PubMed

Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 May 26];47. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.

Dobkin BH. Spinal and supraspinal plasticity after incomplete spinal cord injury: correlations between functional magnetic resonance imaging and engaged locomotor networks. Prog Brain Res [Internet]. Elsevier; 2000 [cited 2019 Jun 19]. p. 99–111. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079612300280102.

•• Ward NS, Brander F, Kelly K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:498–506 This study showed significant and long-lasting clinical important differences in impairment and activity outcomes in chronic stroke survivors who underwent an intensive rehabilitation program including advanced technologies such as neuromodulation and rehabilitation robotics.PubMedCrossRef

Rodgers H, Bosomworth H, Krebs HI, van Wijck F, Howel D, Wilson N, et al. Robot assisted training for the upper limb after stroke (RATULS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:51–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

10.

Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of Repetitive Motor Training on Movement Representations in Adult Squirrel Monkeys: Role of Use versus Learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000;74:27–55.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Biernaskie J, Corbett D. Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. J Neurosci. 2001;21:5272–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

12.

Rajsic S, Gothe H, Borba HH, Sroczynski G, Vujicic J, Toell T, et al. Economic burden of stroke: a systematic review on post-stroke care. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20:107–34.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Medford-Davis LN, Fonarow GC, Bhatt DL, Xu H, Smith EE, Suter R, et al. Impact of insurance status on outcomes and use of rehabilitation services in acute ischemic stroke: findings from get with the guidelines-stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 5:e004282.

14.

Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2021 May 28];51.

15.

Oyake K, Suzuki M, Otaka Y, Momose K, Tanaka S. Motivational strategies for stroke rehabilitation: a Delphi study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101:1929–36.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Putrino D, Zanders H, Hamilton T, Rykman A, Lee P, Edwards DJ. Patient Engagement Is Related to Impairment Reduction During Digital Game-Based Therapy in Stroke. Games Health J. 2017;6:295–302.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

17.

•• Cramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, et al. Efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation vs in-clinic therapy for adults after stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019. Randomized blinded noninferiority clinical trial showed that telerehabilitation showed comparable efficacy to usual care for improving motor status following stroke.

18.

Henrique PPB, Colussi EL, Marchi ACBD. Effects of Exergame on Patients’ Balance and Upper Limb Motor Function after Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28:2351–7.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Mat Rosly M, Mat Rosly H, Davis OAMGM, Husain R, Hasnan N. Exergaming for individuals with neurological disability: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:727–35.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Sardi L, Idri A, Fernández-Alemán JL. A systematic review of gamification in e-Health. J Biomed Inform. 2017;71:31–48.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Laver KE, Lange B, George S, Deutsch JE, Saposnik G, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Stroke Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 18]; Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub4.

22.

Rand D, Givon N, Weingarden H, Nota A, Zeilig G. Eliciting upper extremity purposeful movements using video games: a comparison with traditional therapy for stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28:733–9.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Yavuzer G, Senel A, Atay MB, Stam HJ. “‘Playstation eyetoy games’” improve upper extremity-related motor functioning in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44:237–44.PubMed

24.

Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, Hall J, McIlroy W, Cheung D, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality using wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke. 2010;41:1477–84.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

25.

McNulty PA, Thompson-Butel AG, Faux SG, Lin G, Katrak PH, Harris LR, et al. The efficacy of Wii-based Movement Therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in the chronic poststroke period: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke Off J Int Stroke Soc. 2015;10:1253–60.CrossRef

26.

Trinh T, Scheuer SE, Thompson-Butel AG, Shiner CT, McNulty PA. Cardiovascular fitness is improved post-stroke with upper-limb Wii-based Movement Therapy but not dose-matched constraint therapy. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23:208–16.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Neil A, Ens S, Pelletier R, Jarus T, Rand D. Sony PlayStation EyeToy elicits higher levels of movement than the Nintendo Wii: implications for stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;49:13–21.PubMed

28.

Flynn S, Palma P, Bender A. Feasibility of using the Sony PlayStation 2 gaming platform for an individual poststroke: a case report. J Neurol Phys Ther JNPT. 2007;31:180–9.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Kim EK, Kang JH, Park JS, Jung BH. Clinical feasibility of interactive commercial nintendo gaming for chronic stroke rehabilitation. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012;24:901–3.CrossRef

30.

Golla A, Müller T, Wohlfarth K, Jahn P, Mattukat K, Mau W. Home-based balance training using Wii Fit^TM: a pilot randomised controlled trial with mobile older stroke survivors. Pilot Feasibil Stud. 2018;4:143.CrossRef

31.

Lee HS, Park YJ, Park SW. The effects of virtual reality training on function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:1–12.

32.

Carabeo CGG, Dalida CMM, Padilla EMZ, Rodrigo MMT. Stroke patient rehabilitation: a pilot study of an android-based game. Simul Gaming. 2014;45:151–66.CrossRef

33.

Krakauer JW, Kitago T, Goldsmith J, et al. Comparing a novel neuroanimation experience to conventional therapy for high-dose intensive upper-limb training in subacute stroke: the SMARTS2 randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021;35(5):393–405.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Webster D, Celik O. Systematic review of Kinect applications in elderly care and stroke rehabilitation. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2014;11:108.CrossRef

35.

Rogers JM, Duckworth J, Middleton S, Steenbergen B, Wilson PH. Elements virtual rehabilitation improves motor, cognitive, and functional outcomes in adult stroke: evidence from a randomized controlled pilot study. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 10];16. Available from: https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-019-0531-y.

36.

Dodakian L, McKenzie AL, Le V, See J, Pearson-Fuhrhop K, Burke Quinlan E, et al. A home-based telerehabilitation program for patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31:923–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

37.

Goršič M, Cikajlo I, Goljar N, Novak D. A multisession evaluation of an adaptive competitive arm rehabilitation game. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 18];14. Available from: https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-017-0336-9.

38.

Tabacof L, Dewil S, Herrera JE, Cortes M, Putrino D. Adaptive esports for people with spinal cord injury: new frontiers for inclusion in mainstream sports performance. Front Psychol [Internet]. Frontiers; 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 21];12. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.612350/full?&utm_source=Email_to_authors_&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=T1_11.5e1_author&utm_campaign=Email_publication&field=&journalName=Frontiers_in_Psychology&id=612350.

39.

Cortés-Pérez I, Nieto-Escamez FA, Obrero-Gaitán E. Immersive virtual reality in stroke patients as a new approach for reducing postural disabilities and falls risk: a case series. Brain Sci [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 May 27];10. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287864/.

40.

Corbetta D, Imeri F, Gatti R. Rehabilitation that incorporates virtual reality is more effective than standard rehabilitation for improving walking speed, balance and mobility after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2015;61:117–24.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Saposnik G, Levin M. for the Stroke Outcome Research Canada (SORCan) Working Group. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke. 2011;42:1380–6.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Lohse KR, Hilderman CGE, Cheung KL, Tatla S, Van der Loos HFM. Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. Quinn TJ, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e93318.

43.

Maier M, Ballester BR, Verschure PFMJ. Principles of neurorehabilitation after stroke based on motor learning and brain plasticity mechanisms. Front Syst Neurosci [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 May 27];13. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928101/.

44.

Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Borm PJ, Schack T, Wade DT. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:842–52.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Decety J, Jeannerod M. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts’s law hold in motor imagery? Behav Brain Res. 1995;72:127–34.PubMedCrossRef

46.

• Palacios-Navarro G, Hogan N. Head-mounted display-based therapies for adults post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sensors [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 3];21. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915338/. Meta-analysis that specifically evaluated immersive virtual reality therapies for stroke rehabilitation found that patients who received IVR rehabilitation found a trend toward significantly greater improvements compared to those receiving traditional or conventional therapies.

47.

Yang Y-R, Tsai M-P, Chuang T-Y, Sung W-H, Wang R-Y. Virtual reality-based training improves community ambulation in individuals with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture. 2008;28:201–6.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Crosbie JH, Lennon S, Basford JR, McDonough SM. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: still more virtual than real. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1139–46 discussion 1147-1152.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:52–61.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Subramanian SK, Levin MF. Viewing medium affects arm motor performance in 3D virtual environments. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2011;8:36.CrossRef

51.

Bertani R, Melegari C, De Cola MC, Bramanti A, Bramanti P, Calabrò RS. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2017;38:1561–9.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, van Wegen EEH, Meskers CGM, Kwakkel G. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31:107–21.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Kugler J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 May 27]; Available from: https://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002%2F14651858.CD006185.pub5.

54.

Tedla JS, Dixit S, Gular K, Abohashrh M. Robotic-assisted gait training effect on function and gait speed in subacute and chronic stroke population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Neurol. 2019;81:103–11.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Bruni MF, Melegari C, De Cola MC, Bramanti A, Bramanti P, Calabrò RS. What does best evidence tell us about robotic gait rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;48:11–7.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Lorenz RC, Gleich T, Gallinat J, Kühn S. Video game training and the reward system. Front Hum Neurosci [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 May 27];9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318496/.

57.

Koepp MJ, Gunn RN, Lawrence AD, Cunningham VJ, Dagher A, Jones T, et al. Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game. Nature. 1998;393:266–8.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Kühn S, Romanowski A, Schilling C, Lorenz R, Mörsen C, Seiferth N, et al. The neural basis of video gaming. Transl Psychiatry. 2011;1:e53–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

59.

Palaus M, Marron EM, Viejo-Sobera R, Redolar-Ripoll D. Neural basis of video gaming: a systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 May 27];11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5438999/.

60.

Zhang Y, Du G, Yang Y, Qin W, Li X, Zhang Q. Higher integrity of the motor and visual pathways in long-term video game players. Front Hum Neurosci [Internet]. Frontiers; 2015 [cited 2021 May 27];9. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00098/full.

61.

Landers RN, Bauer KN, Callan RC, Armstrong MB. Psychological theory and the gamification of learning. Gamification Educ Bus. 2015:165–86.

62.

Caponetto I, Earp J, Ott M. Gamification and Education: a Literature Review. Proc 8th Eur Conf Games-Based Learn - ECGBL 2014. 2014;1:50–7.

63.

Brian S. Bovee. A gamification technique to increase engagement in asynchronous online discussions. Issues Inf Syst [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 May 27]; Available from: https://iacis.org/iis/2020/3_iis_2020_20-30.pdf.

64.

Karamians R, Proffitt R, Kline D, Gauthier LV. Effectiveness of virtual reality- and gaming-based interventions for upper extremity rehabilitation poststroke: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101:885–96.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Tăut D, Pintea S, Roovers J-PWR, Mañanas M-A, Băban A. Play seriously: effectiveness of serious games and their features in motor rehabilitation. A meta-analysis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41:105–18.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Donoso Brown EV, McCoy SW, Fechko AS, Price R, Gilbertson T, Moritz CT. Preliminary investigation of an electromyography-controlled video game as a home program for persons in the chronic phase of stroke recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1461–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

67.

Burke JW, McNeill MDJ, Charles DK, Morrow PJ, Crosbie JH, McDonough SM. Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. Vis Comput. 2009;25:1085–99.CrossRef

68.

Chen Y, Abel KT, Janecek JT, Chen Y, Zheng K, Cramer SC. Home-based technologies for stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;123:11–22.PubMedCrossRef

69.

Jurkiewicz MT, Marzolini S, Oh P. Adherence to a home-based exercise program for individuals after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18:277–84.PubMedCrossRef

70.

Nudo RJ. Recovery after brain injury: mechanisms and principles. Front Hum Neurosci [Internet]. Frontiers; 2013 [cited 2021 May 27];7. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00887/full.

71.

Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Reisman DS, Boyd L, Jacobson Kimberley T, Schindler-Ivens SM, et al. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1692–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

72.

Lohse K, Shirzad N, Verster A, Hodges N, Van der Loos HFM. Video games and rehabilitation: using design principles to enhance engagement in physical therapy. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2013;37:166–75.PubMedCrossRef

73.

Goršič M, Cikajlo I, Goljar N, Novak D. A multisession evaluation of an adaptive competitive arm rehabilitation game. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2017;14:128.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

74.

Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104:510–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

75.

Glegg SMN, Levac DE. Barriers, facilitators and interventions to support virtual reality implementation in rehabilitation: a scoping review. PM R. 2018;10:1237–1251.e1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

76.

• Bower KJ, Verdonck M, Hamilton A, Williams G, Tan D, Clark RA. What factors influence clinicians’ use of technology in neurorehabilitation? A multisite qualitative study. Phys Ther. 2021;101:pzab031. This study found that although clinicians perceive technology as having a beneficial role in improving health outcomes, self-efficacy and technology competence are two major barriers to scalability and widespread clinical adoption.

77.

Levac D, Glegg S, Colquhoun H, Miller P, Noubary F. Virtual reality and active videogame-based practice, learning needs, and preferences: a cross-Canada survey of physical therapists and occupational therapists. Games Health J. 2017;6:217–28.PubMedCrossRef

78.

Hung Y-X, Huang P-C, Chen K-T, Chu W-C. What do stroke patients look for in game-based rehabilitation: a survey study. Medicine. 2016;95:e3032.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

79.

Mann DM, Chen J, Chunara R, Testa PA, Nov O. COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: evidence from the field. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27:1132–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

80.

Trumbower RD, Wolf SL. A forward move: interfacing biotechnology and physical therapy in and out of the classroom. Phys Ther. 2019;99:519–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

81.

Kigin CM, Rodgers MM, Wolf SL. The physical therapy and society summit (PASS) meeting: observations and opportunities. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1555–67.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Gamified Neurorehabilitation Strategies for Post-stroke Motor Recovery: Challenges and Advantages
verfasst von: Jenna Tosto-Mancuso
Laura Tabacof
Joseph E. Herrera
Erica Breyman
Sophie Dewil
Mar Cortes
Loreene Correa-esnard
Christopher P. Kellner
Neha Dangayach
David Putrino
Publikationsdatum: 12.03.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1528-4042
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6293
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-022-01181-y

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

25.04.2024 AAN-Jahrestagung 2024 Nachrichten

Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

25.04.2024 Parkinson-Krankheit Nachrichten

Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

23.04.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

The Allure of Big Data to Improve Stroke Outcomes: Review of Current Literature

Visual Snow: Updates on Pathology

Neuro-Visual and Vestibular Manifestations of Concussion and Mild TBI

Essential Tremor—Do We Have Better Therapeutics? A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions

Neuromodulation Treatments for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Post-concussive Symptoms

Recent Advances in the Impact of Infection and Inflammation on Stroke Risk and Outcomes