Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer 3/2012

01.07.2012 | Original article

Gastrectomy as a secondary surgery for stage IV gastric cancer patients who underwent S-1-based chemotherapy: a multi-institute retrospective study

verfasst von: Tatsuo Kanda, Kazuhito Yajima, Shin-ichi Kosugi, Takashi Ishikawa, Yoichi Ajioka, Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama

Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Current advances in chemotherapy provide opportunities for stage IV gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis to undergo potentially curable resection. There are, however, few data on gastrectomy as a secondary surgery aimed at rendering such patients cancer-free.

Methods

We investigated stage IV gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery with curative intent after S-1-based chemotherapy between 2000 and 2008. Twenty-eight patients from 12 hospitals were enrolled in this study. Factors indicating that the tumors were incurable included clinical stage T4 in 9 patients, para-aortic node metastasis in 15, peritoneal metastasis in 7, and liver metastasis in 4.

Results

Of the 28 laparotomy patients, 26 underwent complete resection with no residual tumor, obtaining a complete resection rate of 92.9%. There were no in-hospital deaths or reoperations. In four patients, the primary tumor showed pathological complete response. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates after secondary gastrectomy were 82.1, 45.9, and 34.4%, respectively, with a median survival time of 29 months. Univariate analysis revealed histological tumor length, clinical depth of tumor invasion, number of metastatic nodes, pathological depth of tumor invasion, and pathological response to be the factors influencing patient survival after secondary surgery. On multivariate analysis, histological tumor length (5.0 cm or larger) was the only significant prognostic factor (relative risk 3.23, P = 0.028).

Conclusions

Secondary gastrectomy following S-1-based chemotherapy was a safe and effective treatment for stage IV gastric cancer. Primary tumor size is an indicator for the appropriate selection of patients for this treatment.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4991–7.PubMedCrossRef Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4991–7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:36–46.PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:36–46.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shirasaka T, Nakano K, Takechi T, Satake H, Uchida J, Fujioka A, et al. Antitumor activity of 1M tegaful-0.4M 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine-1M potassium oxonate (S-1) against human colon carcinoma orthotopically implanted into nude rats. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2602–6.PubMed Shirasaka T, Nakano K, Takechi T, Satake H, Uchida J, Fujioka A, et al. Antitumor activity of 1M tegaful-0.4M 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine-1M potassium oxonate (S-1) against human colon carcinoma orthotopically implanted into nude rats. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2602–6.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakata Y, Ohtsu A, Horikoshi N, Sugimachi K, Mitachi Y, Taguchi T. Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4M gimestat-1M otastat potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:1715–20.PubMedCrossRef Sakata Y, Ohtsu A, Horikoshi N, Sugimachi K, Mitachi Y, Taguchi T. Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4M gimestat-1M otastat potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:1715–20.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi W, Tanabe S, Saigenji K, Ohtsu A, Boku N, Nagashima F, et al. Phase I/II study of S-1 combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:2207–12.PubMedCrossRef Koizumi W, Tanabe S, Saigenji K, Ohtsu A, Boku N, Nagashima F, et al. Phase I/II study of S-1 combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:2207–12.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, Shirao K, Doi T, Sawaki A, et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomized phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1063–9.PubMedCrossRef Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, Shirao K, Doi T, Sawaki A, et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomized phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1063–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.PubMedCrossRef Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Nakajo A, Matsumoto M, Uenosono Y, Arigami T, et al. Salvage gastrectomy following a combination of biweekly paclitaxel and S-1 for stage IV gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1370–5.PubMedCrossRef Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Nakajo A, Matsumoto M, Uenosono Y, Arigami T, et al. Salvage gastrectomy following a combination of biweekly paclitaxel and S-1 for stage IV gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1370–5.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujitani K, Narahara H, Takiuchi H, Tsujinaka T, Satomi E, Gotoh M, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of S-1 combined with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Oncology. 2005;69:414–20.PubMedCrossRef Fujitani K, Narahara H, Takiuchi H, Tsujinaka T, Satomi E, Gotoh M, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of S-1 combined with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Oncology. 2005;69:414–20.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Takiuchi H, Narahara H, Tsujinaka T, Gotoh M, Kawabe S, Katsu K, et al. Phase I study of S-1 combined with irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (OGSG 0002). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005;35:520–5.PubMedCrossRef Takiuchi H, Narahara H, Tsujinaka T, Gotoh M, Kawabe S, Katsu K, et al. Phase I study of S-1 combined with irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (OGSG 0002). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005;35:520–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma—2nd English Edition—response assessment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for gastric carcinoma: clinical criteria. Gastric Cancer. 2001;4:1–8.CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma—2nd English Edition—response assessment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for gastric carcinoma: clinical criteria. Gastric Cancer. 2001;4:1–8.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002. p. 99–103. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002. p. 99–103.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. 13th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & co., Ltd.; 1998 (in Japanese). Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. 13th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & co., Ltd.; 1998 (in Japanese).
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohashi M, Kanda T, Kobayashi T, Hirota M, Hayami M, Yajima K, et al. Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel following fixed three cycles of S-1-based chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:652–8.PubMed Ohashi M, Kanda T, Kobayashi T, Hirota M, Hayami M, Yajima K, et al. Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel following fixed three cycles of S-1-based chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:652–8.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwahashi M, Nakamori M, Tani M, Yamaue H, Sakaguchi S, Nakamura M, et al. Complete response of highly advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination after new combined chemotherapy of S-1 and low-dose cisplatin: report of a case. Oncology. 2001;61:16–22.PubMedCrossRef Iwahashi M, Nakamori M, Tani M, Yamaue H, Sakaguchi S, Nakamura M, et al. Complete response of highly advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination after new combined chemotherapy of S-1 and low-dose cisplatin: report of a case. Oncology. 2001;61:16–22.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshimizu N, Saikawa Y, Kubota T, Yoshimizu N, Saikawa Y, Kubota T, et al. Complete response of a highly advanced gastric carcinoma to preoperative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and low-dose cisplatin. Gastric Cancer. 2003;6:185–90.PubMedCrossRef Yoshimizu N, Saikawa Y, Kubota T, Yoshimizu N, Saikawa Y, Kubota T, et al. Complete response of a highly advanced gastric carcinoma to preoperative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and low-dose cisplatin. Gastric Cancer. 2003;6:185–90.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida I, Sakurai Y, Komori Y, Tonomura S, Masui T, Shoji M, et al. Successful downstaging by S-1-based chemotherapy followed by surgical resections for gastric carcinoma with extensive distant lymph node metastasis—report of two cases and a review of cases with surgical resection after downstaging by S-1-based chemotherapy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:978–84.PubMed Yoshida I, Sakurai Y, Komori Y, Tonomura S, Masui T, Shoji M, et al. Successful downstaging by S-1-based chemotherapy followed by surgical resections for gastric carcinoma with extensive distant lymph node metastasis—report of two cases and a review of cases with surgical resection after downstaging by S-1-based chemotherapy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:978–84.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, Hiratsuka M, et al. Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9501. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2767–73.PubMedCrossRef Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, Hiratsuka M, et al. Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9501. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2767–73.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group. Morbidity and mortality in the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group randomized clinical trial of D1 versus D2 resection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:643–9.PubMedCrossRef Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group. Morbidity and mortality in the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group randomized clinical trial of D1 versus D2 resection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:643–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, Craven J, Bancewicz J, Joypaul V, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet. 1996;347:995–9.PubMedCrossRef Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, Craven J, Bancewicz J, Joypaul V, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet. 1996;347:995–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nashimoto A, Yabusaki H, Nakagawa S, Takii Y, Tsuchiya Y, Otsuo T. Preoperative chemotherapy S-1 and cisplatin for highly advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:4689–96.PubMed Nashimoto A, Yabusaki H, Nakagawa S, Takii Y, Tsuchiya Y, Otsuo T. Preoperative chemotherapy S-1 and cisplatin for highly advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:4689–96.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Gastrectomy as a secondary surgery for stage IV gastric cancer patients who underwent S-1-based chemotherapy: a multi-institute retrospective study
verfasst von
Tatsuo Kanda
Kazuhito Yajima
Shin-ichi Kosugi
Takashi Ishikawa
Yoichi Ajioka
Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2012
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Gastric Cancer / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0100-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

Gastric Cancer 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Wie sieht der OP der Zukunft aus?

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.