Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Gastroenterology Reports 3/2011

01.06.2011

Growth Assessment in Clinical Practice: Whose Growth Curve?

verfasst von: Howard G. Parsons, Michael A. George, Sheila M. Innis

Erschienen in: Current Gastroenterology Reports | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Differences in growth curves can influence the diagnosis of under- and overnutrition, and the interpretation of adequate growth following nutrition intervention. This effect is notable when comparing the World Health Organization (WHO) 2006 Growth Standard and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2000 Growth Reference for infants and children to 59 months of age. Important differences relate to conceptual approaches for generating growth standards to describe what population growth should be, compared to a reference of what growth is. WHO included only term infants exclusively or predominantly breast-fed beyond 4 months, and data for infants and children indicative of excess adiposity and growth failure were removed. Thus, fewer children are diagnosed with poor weight gain, and more with excess adiposity, using the WHO Growth Standard than when using the CDC Growth Reference. Adequate growth is based on proportional height and weight gains that track along growth curve trajectories. Use of the WHO curves should assist in prevention of inappropriate intervention or overfeeding in young children.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat De Onis M, Habicht JP. Anthropometric reference data for international use: recommendations from a World Health Orgaization Expert Committee. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:650–8.PubMed De Onis M, Habicht JP. Anthropometric reference data for international use: recommendations from a World Health Orgaization Expert Committee. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:650–8.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuzcmarski RJ, Ogden CK, Guo SS, et al. 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat II. 2002;246:1–190. Kuzcmarski RJ, Ogden CK, Guo SS, et al. 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat II. 2002;246:1–190.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat De Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW, et al. WHO child growth standards. Acta Paediatr. 2006;450:S1–101. De Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW, et al. WHO child growth standards. Acta Paediatr. 2006;450:S1–101.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat De Onis M, Onyango A, Borghi E, et al. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:660–7.PubMedCrossRef De Onis M, Onyango A, Borghi E, et al. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:660–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Prost M-A, Jahn A, Floyd S, et al. Implication of new WHO growth standards on identification of risk factors and estimated prevalence of malnutrition in rural Malawian infants. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2684.PubMedCrossRef Prost M-A, Jahn A, Floyd S, et al. Implication of new WHO growth standards on identification of risk factors and estimated prevalence of malnutrition in rural Malawian infants. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2684.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat • Grummer-Strawn LM, Reinhol C, Krebs NF. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of World Health Organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0–59 months in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-9):1–15. This CDC report provides the background evidence for the recommendation for using the WHO 2006 Growth Standard for assessment of children up to 24 months old, but evidence for continued use of the CDC Growth Reference for children 2 to 19 years old is also given. Key messages include use of the 2.3rd and 97.7th percentiles, when screening for unhealthy growth, that the slower growth of breast-fed infants is normal, and that fewer US children will be identified as underweight when using the WHO 2006 rather than CDC 2000 growth curves.PubMed • Grummer-Strawn LM, Reinhol C, Krebs NF. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of World Health Organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0–59 months in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-9):1–15. This CDC report provides the background evidence for the recommendation for using the WHO 2006 Growth Standard for assessment of children up to 24 months old, but evidence for continued use of the CDC Growth Reference for children 2 to 19 years old is also given. Key messages include use of the 2.3rd and 97.7th percentiles, when screening for unhealthy growth, that the slower growth of breast-fed infants is normal, and that fewer US children will be identified as underweight when using the WHO 2006 rather than CDC 2000 growth curves.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat • Dietitians of Canada, Canadian Paediatric Society, The College of Family Physicians of Canada, Community Health Nurses of Canada. Collaborative Statement. Promoting optimal growth monitoring of child growth in Canada: using the new WHO growth charts. Available at www.dieitians.ca. This paper provides definitions of growth measures and growth monitoring, the WHO Growth Study, and the percentile and z-score measures on all of the WHO Child Growth Standards, with the recommended cut-offs for screening using the WHO Child Growth Standard for infants and children to 59 months of age and the WHO Reference for children 5 to 19 years of age. A section on interpretation of growth charts is included. • Dietitians of Canada, Canadian Paediatric Society, The College of Family Physicians of Canada, Community Health Nurses of Canada. Collaborative Statement. Promoting optimal growth monitoring of child growth in Canada: using the new WHO growth charts. Available at www.​dieitians.​ca. This paper provides definitions of growth measures and growth monitoring, the WHO Growth Study, and the percentile and z-score measures on all of the WHO Child Growth Standards, with the recommended cut-offs for screening using the WHO Child Growth Standard for infants and children to 59 months of age and the WHO Reference for children 5 to 19 years of age. A section on interpretation of growth charts is included.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmet P, Alberi KG, Kaufman F, et al. The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents—an IDF consensus report. Pediatr Diabetes. 2007;8:299–306.PubMedCrossRef Zimmet P, Alberi KG, Kaufman F, et al. The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents—an IDF consensus report. Pediatr Diabetes. 2007;8:299–306.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Garza C, de Onis M. A new international growth reference for young children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:169S–72S. Garza C, de Onis M. A new international growth reference for young children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:169S–72S.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dewey KG, Heineg MJ, Nommsen LA, et al. Growth of breast-fed and formula-fed infants from 0–18 months: the DARLING study. Pediatrics. 1992;89:1035–41.PubMed Dewey KG, Heineg MJ, Nommsen LA, et al. Growth of breast-fed and formula-fed infants from 0–18 months: the DARLING study. Pediatrics. 1992;89:1035–41.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dewey KG, Peerson JM, Brown KH, et al. Growth of breast-fed infants deviates from current reference data: a pooled analysis of US, Canadian and European data sets. World Health Organization Working Group on Infant Growth. Pediatrics. 1995;96:495–503.PubMed Dewey KG, Peerson JM, Brown KH, et al. Growth of breast-fed infants deviates from current reference data: a pooled analysis of US, Canadian and European data sets. World Health Organization Working Group on Infant Growth. Pediatrics. 1995;96:495–503.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat van Dijk CE, Innis SM. Growth-curve standards and the assessment of early excess weight gain in infancy. Pediatrics. 2009;123:102–8.PubMedCrossRef van Dijk CE, Innis SM. Growth-curve standards and the assessment of early excess weight gain in infancy. Pediatrics. 2009;123:102–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in secular trends for childhood BMI, weight and height. Obesity. 2006;14:301–8.PubMedCrossRef Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in secular trends for childhood BMI, weight and height. Obesity. 2006;14:301–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, et al. (2004) Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA. 2004;291:2847–50.PubMedCrossRef Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, et al. (2004) Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA. 2004;291:2847–50.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mei Z, Grummer-Strawn LM: Comparison of Changes in Growth Percentiles of US Children on CDC 2000 Growth Charts With Corresponding Changes on WHO 2006 Growth Charts. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011 Jan 17 [Epub ahead of print]. Mei Z, Grummer-Strawn LM: Comparison of Changes in Growth Percentiles of US Children on CDC 2000 Growth Charts With Corresponding Changes on WHO 2006 Growth Charts. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011 Jan 17 [Epub ahead of print].
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirschman C, Hendershot GE. Trends in breast feeding among American mothers. Vital Health Stat. 1979;23(3):1–39. Hirschman C, Hendershot GE. Trends in breast feeding among American mothers. Vital Health Stat. 1979;23(3):1–39.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Claris O, Beltrand J, Levy-Marchal C. Consequences of intrauterine growth and early neonatal catch-up growth. Semin Perinatol. 2010;34:207–10.PubMedCrossRef Claris O, Beltrand J, Levy-Marchal C. Consequences of intrauterine growth and early neonatal catch-up growth. Semin Perinatol. 2010;34:207–10.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Nobili V, Alisi A, Panera N, Agostoni C. Low birth weight and catch-up-growth associated with metabolic syndrome: a ten year systematic review. Pediatr Endocrinol. 2008;6:241–7. Nobili V, Alisi A, Panera N, Agostoni C. Low birth weight and catch-up-growth associated with metabolic syndrome: a ten year systematic review. Pediatr Endocrinol. 2008;6:241–7.
Metadaten
Titel
Growth Assessment in Clinical Practice: Whose Growth Curve?
verfasst von
Howard G. Parsons
Michael A. George
Sheila M. Innis
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2011
Verlag
Current Science Inc.
Erschienen in
Current Gastroenterology Reports / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1522-8037
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-312X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-011-0187-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Current Gastroenterology Reports 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

17.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

17.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.