Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 10/2016

20.01.2016 | Head and Neck

Head and neck reconstructive surgery: what the radiologist needs to know

verfasst von: Faiz Syed, Matthew E. Spector, Rebecca Cornelius, Ashok Srinivasan

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Head and neck reconstructive surgery after cancer ablative surgery is now commonly performed with closure of the surgical defects by microvascular free tissue transfer. The most common flaps used for reconstruction are the radial forearm flap, the anterolateral thigh flap and fibula flap. Radiographic appearance of these flaps depends on the individual components of the flap, and may consist of skin, fat, muscle and/or bone. There are various adverse outcomes in these patients, the most significant being tumour recurrence that typically occurs at the flap margins. Other flap complications include flap necrosis from vascular thrombosis or infection. The goal of this article is to enhance radiologists’ familiarity with different methods of flap reconstruction, flap margins and vascular anastomoses that will lead to a better appreciation of expected postoperative radiographic appearance.

Key Points

Flaps are the most common reconstructive techniques used in neck cancer surgery.
Imaging appearance of flaps depends on their components and time since surgery.
Most tumour recurrence after reconstruction occurs at the margins of the flap.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomura N et al (2002) MR imaging of recurrent head and neck tumours following flap reconstructive surgery. Clin Radiol 57:109–113CrossRefPubMed Tomura N et al (2002) MR imaging of recurrent head and neck tumours following flap reconstructive surgery. Clin Radiol 57:109–113CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Butler CE (2009) Head and neck reconstruction. Procedures in reconstructive surgery. Saunders/Elsevier, Edinburgh Butler CE (2009) Head and neck reconstruction. Procedures in reconstructive surgery. Saunders/Elsevier, Edinburgh
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeffers L, Basu CB (2012) Plastic surgery essentials for students. 8 Jeffers L, Basu CB (2012) Plastic surgery essentials for students. 8
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasconez HC, Habash A (2010) In: Doherty GM (ed) Chapter 41. Plastic & reconstructive surgery. The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York Vasconez HC, Habash A (2010) In: Doherty GM (ed) Chapter 41. Plastic & reconstructive surgery. The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Soudry E et al. (2014) Complications associated with the pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction. The laryngoscope, 2014: p. n/a-n/a Soudry E et al. (2014) Complications associated with the pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction. The laryngoscope, 2014: p. n/a-n/a
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kansy K et al. Microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck – current concepts of maxillofacial surgery in Europe. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg (0) Kansy K et al. Microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck – current concepts of maxillofacial surgery in Europe. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg (0)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakatsuka T et al (2003) Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 19:363–368CrossRefPubMed Nakatsuka T et al (2003) Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 19:363–368CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hidalgo DA et al. (1998) A review of 716 consecutive free flaps for oncologic surgical defects: refinement in donor-site selection and technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(3) Hidalgo DA et al. (1998) A review of 716 consecutive free flaps for oncologic surgical defects: refinement in donor-site selection and technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(3)
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Roostaeian J et al (2005) Factors affecting cancer recurrence after microvascular flap reconstruction of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 115:1391–1394CrossRefPubMed Roostaeian J et al (2005) Factors affecting cancer recurrence after microvascular flap reconstruction of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 115:1391–1394CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Spiegel JH, Polat JK (2007) Microvascular flap reconstruction by otolaryngologists: prevalence, postoperative care, and monitoring techniques. Laryngoscope 117:485–490CrossRefPubMed Spiegel JH, Polat JK (2007) Microvascular flap reconstruction by otolaryngologists: prevalence, postoperative care, and monitoring techniques. Laryngoscope 117:485–490CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong C-H, Wei F-C (2010) Microsurgical free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 32:1236–1245CrossRefPubMed Wong C-H, Wei F-C (2010) Microsurgical free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 32:1236–1245CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Learned KO, Malloy KM, Loevner LA (2012) Myocutaneous flaps and other vascularized grafts in head and neck reconstruction for cancer treatment. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 20:495–513CrossRefPubMed Learned KO, Malloy KM, Loevner LA (2012) Myocutaneous flaps and other vascularized grafts in head and neck reconstruction for cancer treatment. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 20:495–513CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Neligan PC Head and neck reconstruction. 0401 Neligan PC Head and neck reconstruction. 0401
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Urken Ml WHBD et al (1994) Microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstruction: report of 200 cases and review of complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:633–640CrossRefPubMed Urken Ml WHBD et al (1994) Microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstruction: report of 200 cases and review of complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:633–640CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee T et al (2015) Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes using pectoralis major and cutaneous free flaps for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Plast Surg 42:608–613CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee T et al (2015) Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes using pectoralis major and cutaneous free flaps for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Plast Surg 42:608–613CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Disa JJ et al (2003) Microvascular reconstruction of the hypopharynx: defect classification, treatment algorithm, and functional outcome based on 165 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:652–60, discussion 661-3CrossRefPubMed Disa JJ et al (2003) Microvascular reconstruction of the hypopharynx: defect classification, treatment algorithm, and functional outcome based on 165 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:652–60, discussion 661-3CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia MR et al (2015) Postsurgical imaging of the oral cavity and oropharynx: what radiologists need to know. Radiographics: Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 35:804–818CrossRef Garcia MR et al (2015) Postsurgical imaging of the oral cavity and oropharynx: what radiologists need to know. Radiographics: Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 35:804–818CrossRef
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hudgins PA (2002) Flap reconstruction in the head and neck: expected appearance, complications, and recurrent disease. Eur J Radiol 44:130–138CrossRefPubMed Hudgins PA (2002) Flap reconstruction in the head and neck: expected appearance, complications, and recurrent disease. Eur J Radiol 44:130–138CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong J et al (2001) MR imaging of the muscular component of myocutaneous flaps in the head and neck. AJNR. Am J Neuroradiol 22:170–174PubMed Chong J et al (2001) MR imaging of the muscular component of myocutaneous flaps in the head and neck. AJNR. Am J Neuroradiol 22:170–174PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Som PM, Lawson W, Genden EM (2011) The posttreatment neck. In: Som PM, Curtin HD (eds) Head and neck imaging. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 2771–2822CrossRef Som PM, Lawson W, Genden EM (2011) The posttreatment neck. In: Som PM, Curtin HD (eds) Head and neck imaging. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 2771–2822CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chikui T et al (2000) Tumor recurrence criteria for postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography after surgical treatment of oral cancer and flap repair. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology 90:369–376CrossRef Chikui T et al (2000) Tumor recurrence criteria for postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography after surgical treatment of oral cancer and flap repair. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology 90:369–376CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hudgins PA et al (1994) CT and MR appearance of recurrent malignant head and neck neoplasms after resection and flap reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:1689–1694PubMed Hudgins PA et al (1994) CT and MR appearance of recurrent malignant head and neck neoplasms after resection and flap reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:1689–1694PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Branstetter BFT et al (2005) Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? Radiology 235:580–586CrossRefPubMed Branstetter BFT et al (2005) Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? Radiology 235:580–586CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Evangelista L et al (2014) Comparison between anatomical cross-sectional imaging and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the staging, restaging, treatment response, and long-term surveillance of squamous cell head and neck cancer: a systematic literature overview. Nucl Med Commun 35:123–134CrossRefPubMed Evangelista L et al (2014) Comparison between anatomical cross-sectional imaging and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the staging, restaging, treatment response, and long-term surveillance of squamous cell head and neck cancer: a systematic literature overview. Nucl Med Commun 35:123–134CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Suenaga Y et al (2015) FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT as a post-treatment tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT. Eur Radiol Suenaga Y et al (2015) FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT as a post-treatment tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT. Eur Radiol
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang I et al (2013) Differentiation of recurrent tumor and posttreatment changes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: application of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:2343–2348CrossRefPubMed Hwang I et al (2013) Differentiation of recurrent tumor and posttreatment changes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: application of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:2343–2348CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Albrecht MH et al (2015) Assessment of an advanced monoenergetic reconstruction technique in dual-energy computed tomography of head and neck cancer. Eur Radiol 25:2493–2501CrossRefPubMed Albrecht MH et al (2015) Assessment of an advanced monoenergetic reconstruction technique in dual-energy computed tomography of head and neck cancer. Eur Radiol 25:2493–2501CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sumi M, Nakamura T (2014) Head and neck tumours: combined MRI assessment based on IVIM and TIC analyses for the differentiation of tumors of different histological types. Eur Radiol 24:223–231CrossRefPubMed Sumi M, Nakamura T (2014) Head and neck tumours: combined MRI assessment based on IVIM and TIC analyses for the differentiation of tumors of different histological types. Eur Radiol 24:223–231CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Jia QJ et al (2014) Initial experience of correlating parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Radiol 24:3076–3087CrossRefPubMed Jia QJ et al (2014) Initial experience of correlating parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Radiol 24:3076–3087CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishiyama M et al (2015) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer: differentiation of new H&N cancer, recurrent disease, and benign post-treatment changes. Clin Imaging 39:566–570CrossRefPubMed Ishiyama M et al (2015) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer: differentiation of new H&N cancer, recurrent disease, and benign post-treatment changes. Clin Imaging 39:566–570CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Semiz Oysu A et al (2005) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the differentiation of posttreatment fibrosis from recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Imaging 29:307–312CrossRefPubMed Semiz Oysu A et al (2005) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the differentiation of posttreatment fibrosis from recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Imaging 29:307–312CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Head and neck reconstructive surgery: what the radiologist needs to know
verfasst von
Faiz Syed
Matthew E. Spector
Rebecca Cornelius
Ashok Srinivasan
Publikationsdatum
20.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4184-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2016

European Radiology 10/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.