Host–pathogen interactions in bacterial meningitis
verfasst von:
Kelly S. Doran, Marcus Fulde, Nina Gratz, Brandon J. Kim, Roland Nau, Nemani Prasadarao, Alexandra Schubert-Unkmeir, Elaine I. Tuomanen, Peter Valentin-Weigand
Bacterial meningitis is a devastating disease occurring worldwide with up to half of the survivors left with permanent neurological sequelae. Due to intrinsic properties of the meningeal pathogens and the host responses they induce, infection can cause relatively specific lesions and clinical syndromes that result from interference with the function of the affected nervous system tissue. Pathogenesis is based on complex host–pathogen interactions, some of which are specific for certain bacteria, whereas others are shared among different pathogens. In this review, we summarize the recent progress made in understanding the molecular and cellular events involved in these interactions. We focus on selected major pathogens, Streptococcus pneumonia, S. agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus), Neisseria meningitidis, and Escherichia coli K1, and also include a neglected zoonotic pathogen, Streptococcus suis. These neuroinvasive pathogens represent common themes of host–pathogen interactions, such as colonization and invasion of mucosal barriers, survival in the blood stream, entry into the central nervous system by translocation of the blood–brain and blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier, and induction of meningeal inflammation, affecting pia mater, the arachnoid and subarachnoid spaces.
Introduction
Bacterial meningitis is a serious threat to global health. Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type b are most commonly associated with bacterial meningitis in infants and adults [150]. In sub-Saharan Africa, also called the ‘meningitis belt’, N. meningitidis is a leading cause of large epidemics of meningococcal meningitis. Further bacteria that cause meningitis in children and adults include Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Escherichia coli K1, non-typhoideal Salmonella, Klebsiella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the neglected porcine zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. Many of the meningeal pathogens are able to colonize the skin and different mucosal surfaces of healthy individuals. In certain cases, bacteria penetrate host cellular barriers to initiate a local infection that can result in systemic spread. An association between high-level bacteremia and development of meningitis has been suggested for some bacteria [83, 108]. This implies that survival in the blood is an important virulence trait of meningeal pathogens. Following bloodstream survival or by spread from infectious foci in the vicinity of the brain (mastoiditis, sinusitis), bacteria will ultimately invade the central nervous system (CNS), resulting in inflammation of the meninges, increased blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis, and infiltration of the nervous tissue (Fig. 1). Subsequent CNS tissue injury (Fig. 1) results from apoptotic neuronal injury, cerebral ischemia, edema, hydrocephalus and increased intracranial pressure [96] and is caused by both toxic bacterial products and host inflammatory pathways initiated to clear the infection. In particular, the excessive inflammatory response of neutrophils (PMNs) has been associated with increased CNS injury [57] (Fig. 1). This review summarizes recent progress made in our understanding of host–pathogen interactions in bacterial meningitis, exemplified by four of the most common pathogens, S. pneumoniae, Meningococcus, GBS, and E. coli K1, and a rare but neglected pathogen, S. suis).
Fig. 1
Inflammation and neuronal injury in human bacterial meningitis. a Strong infiltration of the right lateral ventricle by granulocytes and monocytes in Neisseria meningitidis meningitis. The double-strand DNA breaks in the nuclei of apoptotic granulocytes are stained black (in situ tailing counterstained with nuclear fast red, ×10). b Macrophage after phagocytosis of apoptotic granulocytes (black, arrowheads) and granulocyte at the beginning of the apoptotic process indicated by partial staining of its nucleus (arrow) (N. meningitidis meningitis, in situ tailing counterstained with nuclear fast red, ×100). c Thrombosis of two small vessels (arrows) and strong perivascular mainly granulocytic infiltrates in the thalamus, Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis (haematoxylin–eosin, ×20). d Apoptosis of granule cells in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampal formation, otogenic bacterial meningitis (in situ tailing counterstained with nuclear fast red, ×40). e Diffuse axonal injury, S. pneumoniae meningitis (amyloid precursor protein immunohistochemistry, counterstaining with hemalum, ×20). Bars represent 120 μm (a), 12 μm (b), 60 μm (c), 30 μm (d), 60 μm (e)
×
Common steps and mechanisms in pathogenesis of bacterial meningitis
Pathogens causing meningitis often colonize mucosal surfaces and show similar patterns of disease progression. Thus, it is plausible that they share common strategies to advance from the mucosa into the blood stream and further into the brain. An overview of main similarities and differences of the pathogens described in following chapters is given in Table 1. Many bacteria bind to extracellular matrix proteins, e.g., laminin, collagen or fibronectin, to facilitate initial attachment preceding invasion. In addition, some bacterial adhesins, e.g., of N. meningitidis, also bind to members of the CEACAM family of cell adhesion molecules, others, e.g., OmpA of E. coli K1, recognize specific glycoproteins in a lectin-like fashion. Binding of bacterial adhesins to specific host cell receptors may lead to a signal transduction resulting in tight bacterial attachment to or internalization by the host cells. As outlined above (see “S. pneumoniae meningitis”) “innate invasion” is a common entry mechanism that counteracts innate immune mechanisms and employs molecular mimicry, as exemplified by PCho mimicking the chemokine PAF. A hallmark of many bacteria infecting the CNS is their ability to survive in the blood stream by either avoiding or protecting against phagocytosis, e.g., by expression of a capsule (S. suis) or by entering and persisting in PMNs or macrophages (E. coli K1). However, sustained bacteremia is not always a prerequisite for bacterial entrance to the CNS, since meningitis can also be caused by direct invasion from neighboring infected tissues. Nevertheless, all bacteria have to breach certain barriers, such as the BBB and blood–CSF barrier (B-CSFB), to get access to the brain. Translocation across such barriers may occur via a para- or transcellular process, depending on the virulence traits expressed by the pathogen. Cytolytic toxins, e.g., those expressed by S. pneumoniae, GBS, S. suis and E. coli, can damage host cells thereby leading to disruption of the barrier and mediation of paracellular invasion. Transcellular breaching of barriers is based on intracellular invasion, which often involves bacterial exploitation or “hijacking” of signal platforms and pathways, as exemplified by N. meningitidis. Once the pathogen has reached the brain, bacteria (or bacterial components) are recognized by resident immune cells, such as microglia and astrocytes, leading to their activation. Furthermore, circulating professional immune cells, such as granulocytes and monocytes/ macrophages, are attracted and subsequently infiltrate the infected brain parenchyma (Fig. 1). Especially in the neonate host, the resulting antibacterial immune response might be overwhelming and not well orchestrated, leading to a pronounced neuronal damage and even death. If the host survives infection, pathogen-specific post-infectious sequelae, such as deafness, blindness or certain kinds of retardation might be the result.
Table 1
Main similarities and differences of bacterial pathogens causing meningitis
aS. suis can cause meningitis in pigs and humans. This table only shows features of human infections
Anzeige
Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis
Streptococcus pneumoniae, a Gram-positive extracellular pathogen, is one of the most common etiologic agents of bacterial meningitis worldwide affecting predominantly young children and the elderly. While more commonly a quiescent colonizer of the nasopharynx, this bacterium causes mild infections such as otitis media and sinusitis but also life-threatening conditions such as pneumonia, bacteremia and meningitis. Pneumococcal meningitis is characterized by a high mortality rate (20–30 %) due to complications such as brain edema, cerebral ischemia and increased intracranial pressure arising by an excessive immune response as well as damage by the pathogen itself. Survivors suffer from long-term neurological deficits such as hearing loss and cognitive impairment. Recently discovered reasons for long-term neurological sequelae in pneumococcal meningitis may be focal or diffuse axonal injury (Fig. 1) [87] and synapto- and dendritotoxicity mediated by pneumolysin and glutamate [155].
Most of the findings regarding the pathophysiology of pneumococcal meningitis are either derived from brain autopsies (representing only fatal cases) or from animal models that aim to closely mimic clinical features of human disease. The most prominent models are the mouse, the rabbit and the rat. The use of knockout technology made the mouse a useful model to study the host response to the pneumococcus during meningitis [94]. Also, hippocampal neuronal apoptosis [78] and cortical brain damage have been observed [55] with this model. The rabbit was used to study meningitis-related processes within the CSF, e.g., bacterial growth, antibiotic penetration and components of the immune response [24, 92]. In the rabbit model, apoptotic damage occurs in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampal formation [14, 161]. This form of neuronal injury is present in approx. 70 % of human autopsy cases [88] (Fig. 1d). In the infant rat model, cortical and hippocampal damage have been observed that closely resembles the pattern of necrotic and apoptotic neuronal injury in human pneumococcal meningitis [66, 67]. Results in the adult rat are less consistent, since some studies see significant damage in the cortex [13, 135] whereas others not [56]. This might be due to differences in the pneumococcal strain used for the study and also the parameters that have been chosen as a readout.
Bacterial invasion and dissemination
To cause infection of the CNS, the pneumococcus has to enter the respiratory tract, escape mucous defenses and either translocate into the bloodstream to cause invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) or cause mastoiditis or sinusitis and spread locally through skull defects or along vessels penetrating the skull. To enter the bloodstream, an armory of virulence factors is used including surface proteins, polysaccharide capsule and cell wall. Interestingly, the two other major meningeal pathogens of children, the meningococcus and Haemophilus influenzae, share the same pattern of disease progression, which led to the hypothesis that these pathogens use a common strategy to advance from the respiratory mucosa into the bloodstream and further into the brain. This common entry mechanism, called “innate invasion”, counteracts innate immune mechanisms and employs molecular mimicry to promote invasion.
Innate invasion is initiated by the binding of the bacteria to the respiratory epithelium. The adhesin, choline-binding protein A (CbpA), binds to the polymeric immunoglobin receptor (pIgR) thereby initiating bacterial translocation across the nasopharyngeal epithelium [159]. High titer bacteremia then promotes the development of meningitis by bacterial host interactions at the BBB. At the cerebrovascular endothelium, CbpA binds laminin receptor (LR) [91]. Importantly, Neisseria meningitidis and H. influenzae use a CbpA homolog to bind LR for attachment to the BBB [91]. This observation led to the development of a CbpA-based-vaccine that crossprotects against these pathogens [75]. In addition to LR, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1, also known as CD31) and the lectin-like domain of the pneumococcal neuraminidase A (NanA) have been shown to contribute to pneumococcal attachment to BBB endothelial cells [47, 142].
Anzeige
Bacterial translocation into the CNS
After bacterial attachment to epithelial or endothelial cells, translocation across the barriers is again mediated by the innate invasion process. Phosphorylcholine (PCho) is displayed on the surface of virtually all respiratory pathogens and, by mimicking the chemokine PAF, mediates binding to the human platelet activating factor receptor (PAFr) [21]. In the case of the pneumococcus, PCho is added to cell wall teichoic acid and lipoteichoic acid in a phase variable manner [22]. Binding of PCho to the PAFr leads to clathrin-mediated uptake of bacteria into a vacuole, thereby facilitating intracellular bacterial translocation from the bloodstream into the brain [103]. Experiments using PAFr antagonists or PAFr-deficient mice revealed that bacteria fail to invade the bloodstream or CNS when this receptor is not available [36, 107]. The interaction of PCho with PAFr is counteracted by the host innate immunity components C-reactive protein (CRP) and surfactant, both of which target PCho [43]. The pneumococcus has also been described to use the vitronectin-αvβ3 integrin complex for invasion of epithelial and endothelial cells [9].
In addition to receptor-mediated uptake into host cells, the pneumococcus gains access into the CNS paracellularly by disruption of BBB integrity. This process is mediated by the cholesterol-dependent cytolysin pneumolysin [162] and the α-glycerophosphate oxidase GlpO [71] that creates H2O2 thereby causing apoptosis of brain microvascular endothelial cells. Hyaluronidase might also contribute to meningitis by degradation of components of the extracellular matrix [59]. Further, a secreted version of NanA appears to modulate tight junction protein expression by activation of TGF-β resulting in an increase of BBB permeability (unpublished results). But sustained bacteremia is not always a prerequisite for the pneumococcus to enter the CNS. In adults, meningitis can be caused by direct invasion from neighboring infected tissues. A recent study revealed that pneumococcal carriage in the nasopharynx can lead to pneumococcal invasion of the brain via retrograde axonal transport along olfactory neurons [146].
Immune activation and inflammatory response in the brain
Once the pneumococcus gains access to the CNS, it takes advantage of the limited host defense mechanisms in this compartment and rapidly multiplies within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). During multiplication, bacteria release components that are highly immunogenic and are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on the surface of antigen-presenting cells that are present in low numbers in the CSF. Immune recognition of these bacterial components results in a strong inflammatory response leading to BBB impairment due to recruitment of leukocytes (Fig. 1a), vascular deregulation, vasculitis and occlusion of vessels (Fig. 1c) which cause increased intracranial pressure. Interestingly, inflammation within the CNS is detectable at high titer bacteremia even prior to when bacteria cross the BBB [48].
The entire symptom complex of meningitis can be triggered in the absence of live bacteria, when only components of the bacterial cell wall are intracisternally inoculated into animals [141]. This observation is especially important in the clinical setting since bacterial lysis caused by antibiotic treatment leads to explosive cell wall release, resulting in an increased host response and disease severity [86]. The most important PRRs responsible for the detection of the pneumococcus in the CNS are members of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family (TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9) and NOD2 that belongs to the family of NOD-like receptors (NLRs) [82]. TLR2 recognizes pneumococcal cell wall, lipoproteins as well as lipoteichoic acid, whereas TLR4 detects pneumolysin and TLR9 senses bacterial DNA that is released during autolysis [58]. In addition, muramyl peptides from pneumococcal peptidoglycan are recognized by intracellular NOD2 [69] and PCho-bearing teichoic acids bind to the PAFr [21]. Inflammasome-mediated recognition of the pneumococcus also contributes to the host innate immune response. The inflammasome component NALP3 has been shown to be a critical player in this process [45].
Engagement of the inflammatory response activates various signaling cascades resulting in the production of pro-inflammatory mediators that orchestrate an efficient immune response. Patients with pneumococcal meningitis show high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-6 and IL-12, anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and TGF-β) and chemokines such as CXCL8 (IL-8) CCL3 (MIP-1a) and CCL2 (MCP-1) in their CSF [19]. The secreted chemokines act together with other chemoattractants (e.g., PAF, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species) and the complement system to attract highly activated PMNs to the brain. These cells cross the BBB through the tight junctions of the endothelial cells that form this barrier in a multistep process involving integrins and selectins, leading to CSF pleocytosis [82]. Matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) produced by neutrophils, neurons, glia cells and endothelial cells upon infection have been shown to play an important role in this process by lysing the subendothelial basement membrane thereby promoting BBB breakdown and leukocyte invasion [67]. However, the invading leukocytes present in the CSF do not efficiently phagocytose the pneumococcus. This might partly be due to the lack of sufficient concentrations of complement components and immunoglobulin to opsonize the pathogen.
Activation of the immune response and the rapid influx of leukocytes into the brain also come at a cost for the host. Activated immune cells within the brain, such as microglia, astrocytes and infiltrating leukocytes as well as microvascular endothelial cells, amplify the cascade of pro-inflammatory cytokines and cytotoxic agents that cause tissue damage in cortical and subcortical structures [82]. Inhibition of many steps in the inflammatory cascade, such as neutrophil recruitment, improves the clinical outcome of meningitis by decreasing neuronal loss [5]. Therefore, antibiotic treatment of community-acquired meningitis is most often accompanied by administration of dexamethasone, to protect the brain from the abrupt increase of inflammation during early bacterial death.
Meningococcal meningitis
Neisseria meningitidis (meningococci) is a frequently found asymptomatic colonizer of the upper respiratory tract, which under certain circumstances may penetrate the mucosal membrane, reach the bloodstream and cause severe septicemia and/or meningitis. The interaction of N. meningitidis with human endothelial cells lining the blood vessels of the blood–CSF barrier (B-CSFB) is a prerequisite for the development of meningitis. Over the past decade, important advances have been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of the interaction of N. meningitidis with endothelial cells of the B-CSFB. The following chapter will highlight the current knowledge about the specific adhesion-receptor interactions that allow N. meningitidis to tightly bind to the targeted host cell with a focus on the induced signaling pathways.
Bacterial invasion and dissemination
Bacterial binding to brain endothelial cells is a prerequisite for successful penetration into the CSF. Large colonies of N. meningitidis have been found on the capillaries of the subarachnoideal space, in the parenchyma and in the choroid plexus in histological sections of brain tissues of postmortem samples [100]. To establish binding to host cells, N. meningitidis possess a variety of determinants that contribute to these interactions including type IV pili, outer membrane proteins (Opa and Opc), and a number of newly described so-called minor adhesion or adhesion-like proteins, such as the adhesin complex protein (ACP) or the autotransporter meningococcal serine protease A (MspA) (for a review see [148]).
Anzeige
Type IV pili (Tfp) are polymeric filaments that are found in a variety of Gram-negative bacteria. They mediate the initial contact of N. meningitidis to eukaryotic cell surfaces, and are involved in bacterial movement, also known as ‘twitching motility’, and transformation competence. Tfp in Neisseria spp. are composed of one main component, the major pilin, PilE, that assembles into a helical fiber. The helical assembly of pilin into fibers relies on proteins located in or in the vicinity of the cytoplasmatic membrane.
Considerable efforts have been undertaken to determine the binding receptor of Tfp on eukaryotic cells. CD46 or membrane co-factor protein has been described as a proposed host cell receptor for Tfp [51], but the role of CD46 as a host cell receptor has been controversial. In addition, the platelet activating factor (PAFr) was described as a pilus receptor targeted on airway epithelial cells [49]. Recent published data now shed new light on a possible pilus receptor targeted on brain endothelial cells. Bernard et al. [11] showed that N. meningitidis utilizes CD147, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, for Tfp-dependent adhesion to endothelial cells and demonstrated the central role of CD147 for vascular colonization of pathogenic meningococci. Tfp-mediated adhesion to CD147 was shown to involve both PilE and the minor pilin PilV. Interfering with Tfp/CD147 interaction blocked binding of meningococci to human endothelial cells in vitro and importantly also prevented colonization of vessels in human brain tissue explants ex vivo [11]. Furthermore, PilE- and PilV-dependent colonization of N. meningitidis to endothelial vessels was verified in vivo using a model of severe combined immunodeficiency mice grafted with human skin [11]. Interestingly, both pilins have also been reported to activate the G protein-coupled β2-adrenergic receptor (β2-AR) that serves primarily as a signaling receptor [17]. In response to bacterial adhesion and the formation of meningococcal microcolonies, β2-AR is recruited to the apical surface of the endothelial cell underneath the microcolonies [17]. The interaction of PilE and PilV with the extracellular N-terminal domain of β2-AR most likely modifies the conformation of the receptor resulting in the activation of β-arrestin-mediated signaling pathways [17]. However, N. meningitidis-induced activation of β2-AR does not elicit G protein-mediated signal transduction. The receptor activation by meningococci is biased toward the β-arrestin pathway. Trapped β-arrestin recruits ezrin and the non-receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) c-Src, which phosphorylate cortactin (Fig. 2). Secondly, β-arrestin leads to the accumulation of β-arrestin-interacting proteins, such as VE-cadherin and p120-catenin, into so-called ‘cortical plaques’ underneath bacterial microcolonies. This accumulation was shown to result in depletion of intercellular junctions, a mechanism described in more detail below.
Fig. 2
Schematic illustration of the initial steps of the interaction of Neisseria meningitidis with brain endothelial cells. aN. meningitidis adheres to brain microvascular endothelial cells via type IV pili. (b, Detailed) following initial bacterial adhesion, type IV pili (Tfp) mediate the recruitment and the activation of several transmembrane proteins, including ICAM-1 and CD44 as well as accumulation of ezrin and moesin, two members of the ezrin–radixin–moesin protein family. The formation of these so-called ‘cortical plaques’ induces the formation of microvilli-like protrusions that surround the bacteria, protect bacterial colonies from the blood flow shear stress and initiate their internalization within vacuoles. A result of the formation of ‘cortical plaques’ is the replacement of the polarity complex proteins PAR3/PAR6/αPKC that are usually localized at the intercellular junctions. Moreover, the meningococcal Opc protein confers a tight association of the bacterium to fibronectin and/or vitronectin mediating binding to endothelial integrins (light and dark green ovals). This interaction leads to activation of non-receptor tyrosine kinases (Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase c-Src and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and receptor tyrosine kinases (ErbB2), resulting in phosphorylation and activation of cortactin and cytoskeletal rearrangement (actin monomers, red globules)
×
The outer membrane proteins comprise the colony opacity-associated (Opa) proteins and Opc. Though outer membrane proteins are partially masked by the polysaccharide capsule, they also efficiently support adhesion and invasion to eukaryotic cells especially on cells of high receptor density as would be induced in inflammatory conditions and/or lateral receptor aggregation [12]. Most Opa proteins have been demonstrated to bind to members of the human carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM) family on epithelial cells (for reviews see [111]). In addition, some Opa proteins can bind to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) or to integrins via the extracellular matrix proteins vitronectin and fibronectin or saccharides [147]. Although binding of the Opa proteins to CEACAM receptors has been described in detailed for epithelial cells, there is only limited information about the role of CEACAMs on brain endothelial cells and the contribution of the Opa/CEACAM receptor interaction during meningococcal adhesion and/or invasion into brain endothelial vessel cells.
The outer membrane protein Opc is particularly implicated in host cell invasion of endothelial cells, including brain endothelial cells [148]. Opc is a beta barrel protein with five surface loops encoded by a single gene (opcA) and is antigenically stable. The level of Opc protein expression is phase variable, due to the transcriptional regulation of a homopolymeric polycytidine (Poly-C) stretch, within the promoter region [112]. The number of nucleotide repeats determines the promotor strength and binding efficacy of the RNA polymerase. Opc is expressed by several virulent N. meningitidis lineages, but is absent from certain epidemic clones (ET-37/ST-11 clonal complex) and a few random endemic isolates [112]. Interestingly, two epidemiological studies reported outbreaks where meningococcal strains of the ST-11 complex tend to cause severe sepsis with fatal outcome, but rarely meningitis [153], suggesting Opc as a major candidate that enhances the bacterial ability to cause meningitis.
Anzeige
The Opc protein can bind directly to components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and serum proteins, such as vitronectin or fibronectin [110, 143]. In addition, Opc may indirectly bind to fibronectin and vitronectin via heparin, since both fibronectin and vitronectin are heparin-binding proteins. By binding to fibronectin or vitronectin bacterial adhesins can also target proteoglycans. The tight association of Opc to vitronectin and/or fibronectin in turn mediates binding of meningococci to their cognate receptor, endothelial αVβ3 integrin (vitronectin receptor) [110] and/or α5β1-integrin (fibronectin receptor) [143] on brain vessel cells.
Besides the activation of the non-RTK c-Src in a Tfp-dependent manner, meningococcal binding to integrins via Opc also leads to activation of c-Src. Detailed analysis revealed that pharmacological inhibition of c-Src activity as well as genetic interference with c-Src expression interfered with bacterial uptake [125]. The role of this kinase in bacterial uptake was further verified in Src-deficient fibroblasts that are impaired in their ability to internalize N. meningitidis. Similar to the role of c-Src, pharmacological inhibition and genetic ablation of the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) also blocked bacterial uptake [124]. As a downstream target cortactin is phosphorylated downstream of integrin-Src activation, demonstrating that a cooperative interplay between FAK, Src and cortactin occurs during meningococcal uptake by brain endothelial cells (Fig. 2) [124].
Beside activation of non-RTKs N. meningitidis can activate RTKs and thus modulate host cell signaling pathways for their purposes. A phosphorarray screen demonstrated activation of further interesting RTKs and key signaling nodes [126]; however, their functional significance in the context of N. meningitidis interaction with brain endothelial cells remains to be determined. Interestingly, the signaling mechanisms which are involved in bacterial entry into brain endothelial cells may differ from those that are involved in the release of cytokines and chemokines: this is evidenced for example for the N. meningitidis infection of the cell line HBMEC, which requires c-Jun kinases 1 and 2 (JNK1 and JNK2) activation for bacterial uptake, but not for cytokine release. Cytokine release instead, such as IL-6 and IL-8 from infected HBMEC involves the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [128].
Bacterial translocation into the CNS
The tight interactions of the bacterial adhesins/invasins with their respective receptors on brain endothelial cells and subsequent induced uptake favor the strategy for a transcellular pathway for meningococcal transversal across the tight B-CSFB. A paracellular pathway would require opening of the tight junctions or even breakdown of the barrier as a consequence of induced apoptosis or cytotoxicity. The latter is unlikely, since subarachnoid hemorrhage is a rare complication of bacterial meningitis. Recent publications have highlighted mechanisms that facilitate a paracellular route for N. meningitidis translocation into the CNS [18, 114]. When adhering to endothelial cells, N. meningitidis induces local elongation of the cell resembling epithelial microvilli structures [33]. These microvilli-like structures surround the bacteria and initiate their internalization within vacuoles [33]. They increase the cell membrane surface to facilitate bacterial adhesion and contribute to resistance against shear stresses in the bloodstream [72]. Interestingly, formation of these cellular protrusions was also observed ex vivo in histological section of a choroid plexus capillary from a postmortem sample [85]. These protrusions are enriched in ezrin and moesin, two members of the ezrin–radixin–moesin (ERM) protein family, and several transmembrane proteins, including ICAM-1, ICAM-2 and CD44 [33]. Recruited integral membrane proteins, adapter proteins and the actin cytoskeleton form specific molecular complexes also referred to as ‘cortical plaques’. Interestingly, as a result of the formation of ‘cortical plaques’ replacement of proteins usually localized at the intercellular junctions occurs. In particular, the polarity complex PAR3/PAR6/αPKC proteins are recruited at the meningococcal adhesion site [18] with depletion at the cell–cell interface and opening of the intercellular junctions of the brain–endothelial interface. The formation of the mislocated adherence junctions may open up a paracellular route for N. meningitidis transversal into the CNS [18]. Further altering of cellular junctional proteins in vitro has been shown for the tight junction protein occludin using the HBMEC cell line as an in vitro model [114]. Prolonged time of infection resulted in proteolytic cleavage of occludin by the matrix-metalloproteinase MMP-8 [114]. As a consequence of proteolytic cleavage occludin disappears from the cell periphery and is cleaved to a smaller sized 50-kDa protein in infected cells resulting in endothelial cell detachment and increased paracellular permeability [114].
Anzeige
Bacterial binding and subsequent uptake by the host cells not only implicates binding to specific ligand receptor, but requires a re-organization of receptor molecules and of signaling molecules in the cell membrane. Recent studies indicate that specialized domains of the cell membrane, termed rafts, are central for the spatial organization of receptors and signaling molecules. Bacteria can hijack and take advantage of these signaling platforms activated within specialized membrane domains.
Studies in the last years revealed that lipids in the cell membrane are not randomly distributed but seem to be organized. Sphingomyelin is the most prevalent sphingolipid and predominantly localizes in the anti-cytoplasmatic leaflet of cell membranes and intracellular vesicles. It is composed of a highly hydrophobic ceramide moiety and a hydrophilic phosphorylcholine headgroup. Hydrolysis of sphingomyelin results in the release of ceramide which alters the biophysical properties of membranes. Ceramide molecules spontaneously interact with each other to form ceramide-enriched domains and, due to their biophysical properties, ceramide-enriched membrane domains then fuse into extended platforms which span a few hundred nanometers to several micrometers. In addition to altering membrane fluidity and rigidity, ceramide-enriched platforms serve to sort and eventually concentrate membrane receptors and membrane proximal signaling components thereby amplifying cellular responses and signal transduction. Ceramide-enriched platforms have been implicated in the internalization of different bacteria [44]. Recent published data now revealed that N. meningitidis is also capable to activate the acid sphingomyelinase (ASM) in brain microvessels thus leading to generation of ceramide and the formation of ceramide-enriched platforms [123]. Mechanistically, ASM activation relies on binding of N. meningitidis to its attachment receptor, HSPG, followed by activation of the phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C. In addition, N. meningitidis infection promoted receptor (ErbB2) recruitment in ceramide-enriched platforms. Interestingly, meningococcal isolates of the ST-11 clonal complex, which rarely cause meningitis (see above), barely induced ASM and ceramide release correlating with significant lower bacterial uptake by brain endothelial cells [123]. These data indicate a differential activation of the ASM/ceramide system by the species N. meningitidis determining its invasiveness into brain endothelial cells.
Immune activation and inflammatory response in the brain
Cytokine activation is an important event in the pathogenesis of meningococcal disease [149]. The acute inflammatory response is compartmentalized within the subarachnoid space and is characterized by the release of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, MIP-α and G-CSF [149]. Interestingly, based on experiments with meningioma cells, N. meningitidis induce higher levels of the cytokines than the same number of S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae or E. coli K1 [46]. LPS is the major inflammatory modulin produced by N. meningitidis, however, several studies have shown that non-LPS components also contribute to cytokine secretion. The release of cytokines results in alteration of the vasculature of the meninges and in upregulation of different adhesion molecules on the endothelial cells, including selectins, intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAMs) and the vascular endothelial adhesion molecules (VECAMs). Circulating leukocytes, primarily neutrophils, are attracted by IL-8 and can pass between the activated endothelial cells entering the subarachnoid space. In parallel, proteins (mainly albumin), immunoglobulins and complement factors leak into the CSF. TNF-α and IL-1β are produced at the very early stage and can be found in a bioactive form in half of the patients on admission. The release of IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1 and MIP-α continues for a longer time or are upregulated to higher levels and can be detected in the majority of the patients during hospital admission.
Group B Streptococcus meningitis
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a Gram-positive encapsulated bacterium possessing an array of virulence factors that enable it to produce serious disease in susceptible hosts, in particular the human newborn [73]. Notably, GBS is the leading cause of meningitis in the neonatal period [73]. Although advances in intensive care management and antibiotic therapy have changed GBS meningitis from a uniformly fatal disease to a frequently curable one, the overall outcome remains unfavorable. Morbidity is high with 25–50 % of surviving infants suffering permanent neurological sequelae, including cerebral palsy, mental retardation, blindness, deafness, or seizures [32]. The pathogenesis of neonatal GBS infection begins with the asymptomatic colonization of the female genital tract. Approximately 20–30 % of healthy women are colonized with GBS on their vaginal or rectal mucosa, and 50–70 % of infants born to these women will themselves become colonized with the bacterium [3]. Of the 10 different GBS capsular serotypes described, five (Ia, Ib, II, III, and V) are typically more associated with disease and account for the majority of cases worldwide [31]. GBS has more recently also been classified by sequence type (ST) based on an allelic profile of seven different loci, with the majority of GBS human isolates being ST-1, ST-17, ST-19, or ST-23 [50]. Interestingly there is a disproportionate burden of serotype III, ST-17 strains associated with neonatal invasive disease and meningitis [136]. The type III, ST-17 GBS clone has been referred to as the hypervirulent strain and accounts for the majority of GBS meningitis cases [136]. In this section, we review the mechanisms by which GBS is able to gain access to, and penetrate the BBB as well as highlight the response of the BBB to GBS with particular emphasis on newly described mechanisms of GBS BBB penetration.
Neonatal GBS infections are traditionally classified as two forms: early-onset disease (EoD) and late-onset disease (LoD). Early-onset infections typically occur in the first week of life, presenting acutely with pneumonia and respiratory failure complicated by bloodstream infection, septicaemia and sometimes meningitis. In contrast, GBS LoD occurs in infants up to 7 months of age, with more indolent symptom progression related to bacteremia and a high incidence (~50 %) of meningitis [3]. The pathophysiology of GBS meningitis varies according to age of onset. In EoD, autopsy studies demonstrate little or no evidence of leptomeningeal inflammation, despite the presence of abundant bacteria, vascular thrombosis and parenchymal hemorrhage [102]. By contrast, infants with LoD usually have diffuse purulent arachnoiditis with prominent involvement of the base of the brain [10]. These histopathological differences reflect underdevelopment of the host immunological response in the immediate neonatal period, with a higher proportion of deaths resulting from overwhelming septicemia. Clinical and neuropathologic studies have documented the clear association between bacterial meningitis and brain edema formation, increased intracranial pressure, seizure activity, arterial and venous cerebral vascular insults, and other neurologic sequelae [113]. A recent study found that GBS meningitis can be complicated by severe cerebrovascular disease, including arterial ischemic stroke and cerebral sinovenous thrombosis, and that these complications may be underestimated [140].
To produce meningitis, blood-borne GBS must typically penetrate the BBB and/or the B-CSFB. Ultimate disruption of BBB integrity may be due to the combined effect of bacterial entry and penetration of brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMEC), direct cellular injury by bacterial cytotoxins, and/or activation of host inflammatory pathways that compromise barrier function. It is apparent that the host immune response is incapable of controlling infection within the CNS and that this host inflammatory response may be responsible for many adverse events during bacterial meningitis. A very complex and integrated series of events involving host cytokines, chemokines, proteolytic enzymes, and oxidants appears to be responsible for meningitis-induced brain dysfunction. The development of GBS meningitis progresses through phases including (1) bloodstream survival and the development of bacteremia, (2) direct GBS invasion and disruption of the BBB, and (3) GBS multiplication in the CSF-containing subarachnoid and ventricular spaces, which induces inflammation with associated pathophysiologic alterations leading to the development of neural damage.
Bacterial invasion and dissemination
An association between sustained high-level bacteremia and development of GBS meningitis has been suggested in humans and in experimental models of hematogeneous meningitis [73]. This observation implies that GBS bloodstream survival is an important virulence trait to avoid immune clearance by host immune cells, prior to CNS penetration. Neonates are particularly prone to invasive disease because of their quantitative or qualitative deficiencies in phagocytic cell function, specific antibody, or the classic and alternative complement pathways. In addition to these newborn host susceptibilities, GBS possess a number of virulence determinants that promote bloodstream survival by thwarting key components of effective opsonophagocytic killing by host leukocytes [73]. The sialylated GBS capsular polysaccharide (CPS) represents one of the most critical factors for limiting the effectiveness of host complement and phagocytic defense. While serotype III GBS strains have accounted for a majority of LoD and meningitis [3, 136], all serotypes contain a terminal-linked sialic acid bound to galactose in an α2 → 3 linkage [73]. Bacterial surface sialylation may have evolved to mimic host ‘self’ antigens, allowing GBS to avoid immune detection, manipulate phagocyte function and dampen the immune response to GBS infection. The sialic acid moiety provides anti-phagocytic protection by impairing deposition of opsonically active complement C3 on the bacterial surface, but also activates anti-inflammatory receptors on host leukocytes promoting GBS persistence in the blood stream [73]. Isogenic GBS mutants lacking CPS or capsular sialylation are more susceptible to neutrophil killing and are less virulent in rodent and zebrafish infection models [93, 109].
Once GBS is engulfed by phagocytic cells, the bacterium may be able to resist toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced in the phagolysosome to survive intracellularly. GBS produces an orange carotenoid pigment, a property unique to GBS among hemolytic streptococci, associated with the cyl operon encoding the β-hemolysin/cytolysin cytotoxin [73]. The free-radical scavenging properties of this associated carotenoid neutralize hydrogen peroxide, superoxide, hypochlorite and singlet oxygen, and thereby provide a shield against several elements of phagocyte ROS killing [68]. GBS transcriptional regulators CovR [20] and CiaR [101] have also been linked to survive inside phagocytic cells, likely acting to coordinate expression of acid and stress survival genes.
Bacterial translocation into the CNS
Following bloodstream survival, GBS interacts directly with BBB endothelium, which can result in bacterial invasion of the BBB with subsequent infection of the CNS. This process can result from increased permeability of the BBB and/or the direct invasion of BMEC by the pathogen (Fig. 3). With the availability of in vitro tissue culture models of human BMEC (HBMEC) and animal models of GBS infection, significant progress has been made identifying and characterizing the molecular determinants that promote GBS–BBB interaction. GBS enter or “invade” brain endothelium apically and exit the cell on the basolateral side, thereby crossing the BBB transcellularly [90]. Electron microscopic (EM) studies have demonstrated the presence of the meningeal pathogen in membrane-bound vacuoles within HBMEC [23, 90], suggesting the involvement of endocytic pathways as well as avoidance of lysosomal fusion for BBB traversal. This process may be accomplished, at least in part, by tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which occurs upon GBS infection. Phosphorylation of FAK induces its association with PI3K and paxillin, an actin filament adaptor protein, and is required for efficient GBS HBMEC invasion.
Fig. 3
Group B Streptococcus interaction with the blood–brain barrier. a The GBS capsule promotes blood stream survival by preventing deposition of complement and ultimately phagocytosis. b GBS response regulators, CovR and CiaR, have been shown to further promote survival within phagocytic cells which will aid in GBS bloodstream survival. c GBS adhesins Srr, HvgA and SfbA promote GBS interaction with brain microvascular endothelial cells some by associating with extracellular matrix (ECM) components. d Another key GBS adhesin, the pilus tip protein PilA, binds collagen to bridge an interaction with α2β1 integrins on the endothelial cell surface. This initiates bacterial uptake and immune activation. e The GBS β-hemolysin activates brain microvascular endothelial cells including autophagy that may contribute to clearance of GBS by shuttling intracellular bacteria to the lysosome, although the exact mechanism of GBS transcytosis is unknown. f The host transcription factor, Snail1, which is a repressor of tight junctional components, is induced during GBS infection and results in the loss of tight junctions. This contributes to GBS penetration and BBB permeability during disease progression
×
To elucidate the GBS determinants involved in the pathogenesis of meningitis, many groups have focused on the characterization of serotype III, ST-17 GBS isolates responsible for CNS disease. Screening of a GBS ST-17 mutant library revealed a unique requirement for the novel “invasion associated gene”, iagA, in BBB penetration by GBS [29]. Decreased invasion of HBMEC by the GBS ∆iagA mutant in vitro was correlated with a reduced risk for development of meningitis and markedly diminished lethality in vivo. The iagA gene encodes an enzyme for biosynthesis of diglucosyldiacylglycerol, a membrane glycolipid that functions as an anchor for lipoteichoic acid (LTA), indicating that proper LTA anchoring is important to facilitate GBS BBB penetration [29]. Interestingly, clinical GBS isolates from infants with EoD or LoD possess higher quantities of cell-associated LTA than strains isolated from mucosal surfaces of asymptomatically colonized infants [89]. The availability of GBS genome sequences has enabled the identification of genes restricted to the ST-17 lineage. One gene, now called hypervirulent GBS adhesion (HvgA), was shown to be required for GBS hypervirulence [136]. GBS strains that express HvgA are more efficient in crossing the intestinal and blood–brain barriers in neonates, including choroid plexus epithelial cells and brain microvascular endothelium [136].
Proteins targeted for cell surface expression in GBS are predicted to share a C-terminal sequence (L/IPXTG) for sortase recognition and anchoring to the Gram-positive cell wall. In a paradigm-shifting study, it was discovered that GBS express cell wall-anchored pili [65]. Among the sequenced GBS genomes, two genetic loci encoding pili have been identified, Pilus Island (PI)-1 and PI-2, the second existing in one of two variants (PI-2a and PI-2b), and not all genomes contain both loci [73]. GBS PI-2a includes the genes encoding PilB, an LP(x)TG-motif-containing protein that polymerizes to form a pilus backbone, and accessory pilus proteins PilA and PilC that are incorporated in the pilus [73]. Both PilA and PilB promote adherence to and invasion of brain endothelium, respectively [74]. It has been demonstrated that PilA binds the extracellular matrix (ECM) component, collagen, and that collagen binding enhanced GBS attachment as well as uptake into HBMEC in a dose-dependent manner [4]. Further, the PilA–collagen complex engages α2-β1 integrins on brain endothelium to promote bacterial attachment and pro-inflammatory chemokine release [4]. As a result, increased neutrophil infiltration was correlated with increased BBB permeability and higher levels of bacterial CNS penetration in vivo [4].
In addition to PilA, other GBS factors interact with various ECM proteins and constituents to promote bacteria–BBB interactions. The GBS surface anchored alpha C protein (APC) was shown to interact directly with glucosaminoglycans (GAGs) on brain endothelium, and promote the establishment of GBS meningitis [15]. More recently, a GBS fibronectin-binding protein, Streptococcal fibronectin-binding factor A (SfbA), was shown to contribute to GBS invasion of HBMEC in vitro and to the development of meningitis in vivo [84]. Interestingly, studies have suggested that adherence to fibrinogen may be a general property of GBS to promote bloodstream survival and host cell interactions [120]. An important determinant recently implicated in fibrinogen binding and BBB interaction is the GBS serine-rich repeat (Srr) glycoprotein [120]. GBS strains carry 1 of 2 srr gene alleles, designated srr1 and srr2, which are similar in architecture but show only limited homology (<20 % identity). Expression of the Srr-2 protein seems to be restricted to serotype III and ST-17 strains. Recent structural studies demonstrated that both Srr1 and Srr2 interact with tandem repeats of the fibrinogen Aα chain via a “dock, lock, and latch” mechanism [119]. Moreover, increased affinity between Srr2 and fibrinogen was observed, suggesting that a greater affinity for fibrinogen may contribute to the increased virulence associated with Srr2-expressing strains [119].
Immune activation and inflammatory response in the brain
The host inflammatory response to GBS contributes significantly to the pathogenesis of meningitis and CNS injury. The first comprehensive microarray analysis of the BBB endothelium transcriptional response to a bacterial pathogen was examined during GBS infection [30]. Highly induced genes were those involved in the inflammatory response, including Interleukin (IL)-8, CXCL1, and CXCL2, ICAM-1, and GM-CSF, which function to orchestrate neutrophil recruitment, activation and enhanced survival [30]. Several studies have shown an association between leukocyte trafficking and BBB permeability and increased GBS penetration of the CNS, suggesting that PMN-mediated damage of the BBB has a significant role in the pathogenesis of GBS meningitis [4, 30]. It is clear that the GBS β-haemolysin/cytolysin (β-h/c) toxin contributes to immune activation and much of the observed disease pathology. Hemolysin expression has been shown to directly damage brain cells including brain endothelial cells [90], leptomeninges (meningioma cells) and astrocytes [2], and primary neurons [106]. Further, toxin expression was identified as a principal provocative factor for BBB activation, contributing to the development of meningitis [30]. Recently GBS β-h/c was also shown to activate autophagy in BBB endothelium [23]. Although results demonstrated that antibacterial autophagy provided a BBB cellular defense against invading and toxin producing bacteria, GBS was not completely eliminated, suggesting that GBS may actively thwart the autophagic pathway [23].
Microarray analysis of brain endothelium has also indicated that HBMEC respond to GBS infection by upregulating Snail1, a global transcriptional repressor of tight junction proteins [52]. Recent studies have demonstrated that during GBS infection transcript and protein levels of tight junction components ZO-1, Claudin-5 and Occludin were decreased in vitro in HBMEC and in vivo using murine and zebrafish models of GBS infection [52]. This was dependent on Snail1 induction, which was sufficient to facilitate tight junction disruption, promoting bacterial passage and disruption of the BBB [52]. Interestingly host integrins, ECM components and glycosaminoglycans involved in GBS–BBB interactions all preferentially localize to the basolateral surface of polarized endothelium. The subsequent loss of tight junctions may represent the critical first step to disrupting cell polarity that enables bacterial pathogens like GBS to engage basolaterally expressed host receptors and promote BBB permeability and progression to meningitis.
Streptococcus suis meningitis
Streptococcus suis is one of the most important porcine bacterial pathogens responsible for high economic losses in the swine industry worldwide. It causes a wide variety of diseases, including meningitis, septicaemia and endocarditis. Among the 33 serotypes originally described based on CPS antigens, serotype 2 is not only prevalent in swine diseases but is also considered to be an emerging zoonotic agent causing meningitis and streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome in humans [42]. S. suis gained more attention since recent recognition of its high prevalence in human meningitis cases in South East and East Asia, and reports of outbreaks which resulted in high mortality rates [151]. Patients suffering from S. suis meningitis have cerebrospinal fluid with high numbers of neutrophils. One of the most striking sequel of S. suis meningitis is the establishment of deafness and/or vestibular dysfunction. In fact, the incidence of deafness following infection caused by this pathogen is consistently higher than that reported for other meningitis-causing bacteria, such as S. pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis and Haemophilus influenza. Following, host–pathogen interactions in the establishment of S. suis meningitis are summarized (depicted as a model in Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis meningitis. 1 ApuA degrades glycogen and mediates adhesion to mucus. 2S. suis harbors the cholesterol-dependent cytolysin SLY, which induces pore-formation in eukaryotic cells. 3 For a more effective adhesion and invasion, S. suis actively downregulates its polysaccharide capsule (CPS). 4S. suis co-opts host proteins, such as serum and/or extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and specifically interacts with epithelial cells by molecular bridges (e.g., with integrins). 5S. suis evolves the proteases IGA1 and IdeSuis, which inactivate IgA and IgM, respectively, and thus prevents opsonization. 6 The Arginine Deiminase System (ADS) facilitates bacterial survival under acidic (intra-phagolysosomal) conditions in myeloid and non-myeloid cells. 7 CPS expression depends on nutrient availability and is high in blood but low in CSF. 8 Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET) formation is an ancient mechanism to combat bacterial infection. S. suis harbors to DNAses to circumvent NETosis. 9S. suis uses monocytes to for dissemination. 10S. suis-activated monocytes upregulate cellular adhesion molecules to interact with BMECs. 11 During infection, granulocytes overcome the B-CSFB by transmigration, thus serving as a vehicle for S. suis to disseminate into the CSF. 12 Upon S. suis infection, microglia upregulate innate immune pattern recognition receptors, such as TLR2, TLR3, CD14 and NOD2
×
Bacterial invasion and dissemination
As an opportunistic pathogen, S. suis colonizes the mucosal surfaces of the oropharyngeal and gastrointestinal tract of swine without inducing any clinical symptoms. However, since the mucosa constitutes a physical and immunological barrier to protect the host from invading pathogens, homeostasis between bacterium and host is a prerequisite for stable colonization. Additionally, inter- and intrabacterial competition for nutrients might also determine the success of an opportunist to permanently populate its preferred host. On the other hand, breakage of the epithelial barrier is often required for bacterial dissemination into deeper tissue sites. How S. suis interferes with the immune system of the mucosa and facilitates epithelial transmigration is only poorly characterized. Ferrando et al. [35] identified ApuA, an amylopullulanase with α(1,4)- and α(1,6)-glycolytic activity that allows S. suis to degrade glycogen and food-derived starch under in vivo conditions. Furthermore, ApuA mediates adhesion to mucus and, thus, displays an initial step in bacterial colonization. Immunoglobulins (Igs), such as IgA and IgM, are constituents of mucosal surfaces. By specifically coating the bacteria, Igs shape the microbiome and are involved in maintaining the bacteria–host homeostasis. S. suis has evolved two enzymes which specifically interact with mucosa-associated Igs. The IgA1 protease IGA is expressed in vivo and specifically cleaves IgA. Furthermore, its presence is strongly correlated with an invasive phenotype of S. suis suggesting an important role in pathogenesis [158]. Recently, the surface-associated IgM protease IdeSsuis was identified in a highly pathogenic serotype 2 strain. IdeSsuis specifically cleaves porcine IgM in vivo and, thereby, evades opsonization and complement-mediated killing when reaching the blood stream (see below) [115].
To reach systemic sites, S. suis has to breach the epithelial barrier. This may occur by different processes depending on expression of the CPS. Adhesion and invasion are significantly enhanced in unencapsulated isolates which is probably the result of a better accessibility of bacterial adhesins and invasins [8]. A variety of different bacterial cell-interacting proteins have been described (for review see [6]). Interestingly, in a recent study, Meng et al. [77] showed that capsule-dependent adhesion seems to be abrogated in co-infections of S. suis with highly pathogenic swine influenza virus. The underlying mechanisms, though not known in detail, might be based on different cellular receptor expression in complex primary multi-cellular precision-cut lung slices as compared to immortalized epithelial cell lines. In addition, interaction between the bacterium and the epithelial cell could also be of indirect nature. By co-opting host proteins of the extracellular matrix or serum proteins, S. suis is able to use them as a molecular bridge for adherence and invasion to/in host cells by receptor-mediated mechanisms (reviewed in [37]).
Epithelial transmigration might also be facilitated by cellular damage. S. suis possesses a thiol-activated cytolysin, suilysin (SLY), which can induce pore-formation in cholesterol-containing eukaryotic membranes. However, since bacterial mutants defective in SLY are still able to disseminate in the host [70], SLY activity seems to be important but not essential for systemic S. suis infections. Recently we discovered that SLY can promote adherence and host cell invasion of S. suis and that these effects also occurred at sublytic toxin concentrations [116]. However, the underlying mechanisms of SLY-mediated effects in adherence and invasion are yet unknown.
In the subepithelial environment, S. suis faces changing nutritional and immunological conditions. For example, whereas the capsule hinders bacterial adhesion (and invasion) to epithelial cells, it is essential for survival in blood due to its strong anti-phagocytic properties. Moreover, CPS mediates S. suis evasion of opsonization by immunoglobulins and activities of the complement system. Finally, a lower phagocytosis inevitably leads to reduced pro-inflammatory response and, thus, to a diminished tissue destruction and recruitment of immune cells. The fact that the capsule hinders transepithelial migration but enhances bacterial survival in the blood strongly indicates a tight regulation of CPS expression during pathogenesis. Indeed, Wu et al. [157] reported an increase in CPS expression when bacteria were grown in blood. In contrast, CPS gene transcription was low when S. suis was cultured in CSF, a compartment which is poor in nutrients. Accordingly, genes involved in carbohydrate and amino acid transport and metabolism were highly transcribed under such circumstances. Willenborg et al. [154] described a direct link between carbohydrate metabolism and CPS expression. A lack in the Carbon Control Protein A, the central regulator of Carbon Catabolite Repression in Gram-positive bacteria, led to a low capsule expression and attenuated survival in the presence of primary phagocytes [154]. Accordingly, other studies also revealed a link between nutrient starvation and enhanced virulence properties of S. suis. Thus, further work on metabolic adaptation will surely contribute to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of S. suis infections.
Similar to GBS, highly virulent and zoonotic serotype 2 S. suis strains possess neuraminidase activity to terminally link the CPS chains with sialic acid. However, in contrast to GBS, the sialic acid of S. suis is not α(2,3)-, but α(2,6)-linked to galactose moieties [145]. Whether this different sialyation pattern has an impact on immune recognition has to be proven in further studies. In addition to CPS expression and modification, other factors might be involved in survival in blood and bacterial dissemination. For example, modification of the bacterial cell wall by N-deacetylation of the peptidoglycan or D-alanylation of the lipoteichoic acid (LTA) leads to resistance against neutrophil-derived lysozyme and antimicrobial peptides [38, 39]. The generation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs), an “ancient” antimicrobial mechanism of eukaryotic cells, is combated by S. suis with the expression of at least two different DNA-degrading enzymes. Consequently, inactivation of the extracellular S. suis-secreted nuclease A (SsnA) and the endonuclease A (EndAsuis) led to a reduced bacterial survival after co-cultivation with porcine granulocytes [25, 26]. Nevertheless, despite these anti-phagocytic factors, S. suis cannot prevent uptake by neutrophils. Eventually, some bacteria will be phagocytosed and inactivated in acidified phagolysosomes. However, S. suis also evolved strategies to overcome such inhospitable conditions. The pathogen possesses an Arginine Deiminase System (ADS), which increases intracellular survival of S. suis by neutralizing the intraphagolysomal pH [40]. The ADS is characterized as a metabolic enzymatic system, which catalyzes the degradation from arginine to ornithine and thereby producing ATP, citrulline, CO2 and NH4+. Thus, the ADS represents a multifunctional system important for bacterial metabolism and biological fitness in the host.
Bacterial translocation into the CNS
S. suis bacteremia might result in the establishment of meningo-encephalitis in men and swine. However, to finally reach the cerebrospinal space or the brain parenchyma, respectively, S. suis is faced with two different cellular barriers, the BBB and the B-CSFB. The BBB is composed of a non-fenestrated monolayer of BMEC, which separates the brain from the intravascular space. BMECs are highly polarized with an apical and basolateral site expressing different surface proteins. This might be the reason why concordant in vitro studies revealed an effective adhesion but only a very low invasion of S. suis in porcine and human BMEC [7, 16]. The different kind of host cell interaction is further underlined by the fact that, in contrast to epithelial cells, the CPS seems to play only a minor role in the primary adhesion process [16]. Thus, alternative bacterial and/or cellular factors might be necessary to overcome the BBB. Nevertheless, similar to the interaction with epithelial cells, LPXTG-anchored surface proteins, lipoproteins as well as “moonlighting” proteins seem to be involved in binding and invasion of S. suis to BMEC to a certain extent (reviewed in [37]). BMEC respond to a S. suis infection by an upregulation of a variety of different cytokines and chemokines, such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and TNFα [144]. Furthermore, Al-Numani et al. [1] showed an upregulation of the cellular adhesion molecules ICAM-1, CD11a/CD18 and CD11c/CD18 on human THP-1 monocytes upon S. suis infection. These stimulated monocytes exhibit a significantly increased adherence to endothelial cells, thus supporting the (modified) “Trojan horse” theory as a mechanism to overcome the BBB. However, although binding and invasion of S. suis to porcine monocytes was shown in vitro, in vivo evidence is still lacking.
In contrast to the BBB, the B-CSFB is a two-layer barrier made up of a fenestrated endothelium followed by the choroid plexus epithelial cells (CPEC). Significant work was done on the interaction of S. suis with human and porcine CPEC. Though it turned out that bacterial adhesion and invasion is similar to epithelial cells from other tissues, unique differences were observed in the preferred route of bacterial transmigration. S. suis adheres and invades CPEC significantly better when applied from the basolateral site than from the apical site [138]. This is most likely due to subcellular-specific receptor expression. Nevertheless, this in vitro phenotype reflects the in vivo situation where S. suis enters the cerebrospinal fluid from the blood via the plexus choroideus. The interaction of S. suis with CPEC goes along with distinct cellular and immunological responses. For example, infections with S. suis lead to rearrangements of tight junction proteins and induction of stress fiber formation, thus leading to a loss of barrier integrity and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [137]. Expression of TNFα as well as cell adhesion molecules, such as VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, promotes adhesion and subsequent transmigration of PMNs through CPEC [152]. Interestingly, transmigration of PMNs occurs via the transcellular route. Since the authors also detected S. suis inside PMNs, the “Trojan horse” theory should be carefully revisited.
Immune activation and inflammatory response in the brain
The pathogenesis of S. suis in the brain and its subsequent interactions with intracranial immune cells is only poorly understood. Dominguez-Punaro et al. [27] reported multifocal lesions from all areas of the brain as well as the meninges in mice upon S. suis infection. Lesions were accompanied by positive bacterial antigen reactions in immune-histochemical analysis and enhanced pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, which could later be reconstituted in vitro by infection of murine microglial cells with pathogenic serotype 2 S. suis [27, 28]. Interestingly, two independent studies reported an upregulation of innate immune pattern recognition receptors, such as TLR2, TLR3, CD14 and NOD2 in microglia upon S. suis infection [28, 160]. The mechanisms and functional relevance are unknown, but this may be a hint towards an intracellular fate of S. suis. It seems that S. suis does not actively invade astrocytes. However, a CPS- and SLY-dependent upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines in these cells was shown, a response that appears to be mainly TLR2 driven. Nevertheless, more detailed work is highly demanded to get better insights into the mechanism of S. suis–glial cell interactions.
Escherichia coli K1-induced neonatal meningitis
E. coli K1 (E. coli) is the second leading cause of meningitis in neonates, but it is the leading pathogen in low-birth weight infants. Despite the drop in mortality rates from 50 % in 1970 to <20 % currently, the morbidity rates remain unchanged even with the use of effective antibiotics and supportive care [41]. The ever increasing numbers of antibiotic-resistant E. coli strains make the situation worrisome. An astounding 30–58 % of survivors suffer from serious neurological complications such as mental retardation, hearing loss and cortical blindness [41]. Although removal of bacteria from the circulation is the mainstay of antibiotic use, the release of large quantities of endotoxin from the dead bacteria triggers a massive inflammatory response resulting in septic shock. The use of corticosteroids to reduce this inflammatory response is ineffective in alleviating the neurological deficits associated with this disease. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis of E. coli meningitis is critical for the development of new therapeutic strategies.
Among E. coli, K1 CPS-decorated strains, a polymer of sialic acid residues, predominantly cause neonatal meningitis [54]. Besides K1 CPS, E. coli contains several surface structures such as pili, lipopolysaccharide, and outer membrane proteins that potentially interact with host tissues during the establishment of meningitis. Outer membrane protein A (OmpA) is the major protein of E. coli, and it is structurally conserved throughout the evolution [95]. However, recent studies have shown that pathogenic E. coli show minor differences in the extracellular loops of OmpA compared to non-pathogenic strains [127]. Several studies have demonstrated that OmpA plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of various diseases [62]. Other virulence factors of E. coli include IbeA, IbeB, yijiP, TraJ, aslA and cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF-1) [53]. Here, we review the interactions of OmpA with various cells for binding to and invasion of E. coli and how they contribute to the pathogenesis of meningitis.
To gain insights into the pathophysiology of bacterial diseases, a careful selection and usage of animal models is clearly required. Newborn rat and mouse models have routinely used to study the pathogenesis of E. coli. These models mimic the human disease as they both depend on age for infection and cause the disease by hematogenous spread. The pathology of the brain in rats or mice is similar to infected humans showing edema, neutrophil infiltration, neuronal apoptosis and meningeal damage [80]. Therefore, the studies presented here are from in vitro experiments or very relevant newborn rat and mouse models.
Bacterial invasion and dissemination
The colonization of mucosa by E. coli followed by invasion and crossing of the epithelial surfaces is critical for eventual spreading to intravascular space. Hek protein expressed by E. coli mediates adherence to and invasion of epithelial cells by binding to heparin sulfate glycosaminoglycans [34]. Succeeding invasion of mucosal surfaces allows E. coli to disseminate via hematogenous spread at which stage the bacterium must avoid initial serum bactericidal activity. Complement activation results in opsonization of bacteria for the formation of membrane attack complexes on the surface of pathogens, which mediates bacteriolysis. Opsonization with complement proteins also presents the bacteria to immune cells for phagocytosis. The K1 CPS of E. coli is shown to be necessary for the survival of the bacterium in the blood [54]. Subsequent studies using OmpA−E. coli additionally revealed that lack of OmpA renders the bacterium serum sensitive [97]. The bactericidal activity of serum against OmpA−E. coli appears to be mediated by classical complement pathway. Follow-up studies revealed that OmpA of E. coli binds to C4-binding protein (C4 bp), a classical complement pathway regulator to block the complement cascade reaction, and thereby avoids bacteriolysis and recognition by immune cells [97]. OmpA bound C4 bp acts as a co-factor for Factor I to cleave both C3b and C4b, which are important to present the bacterium to phagocytes [156].
The survival of E. coli in PMNs appears to be the first step in the pathogenic process as PMN depletion prevents the onset of meningitis in newborn mice [81]. The expression of OmpA is critical for survival inside PMNs after phagocytosis as OmpA−E. coli failed to survive. The phagocytosis of OmpA−E. coli by PMNs produces an enormous amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [122]. In contrast, OmpA+E. coli suppressed the release of ROS even in the presence of external stimuli such as LPS, indicating that E. coli overrides PMN machinery to prevent antimicrobial activity. Lack of other virulence factors such as S-fimbriae, IbeA, type-1 fimbriae and CNF-1 had no effect on the suppression of ROS production. Rac1, rac2 and gp91Phox, the components of NADPH oxidase, an enzyme complex required for the production of ROS, were suppressed by E. coli K1 at the transcriptional levels in PMNs [81].
Analysis of various surface receptors such as TLRs, Fc-gamma receptors and complement receptors on PMNs after infection with E. coli revealed that the bacterium increases the expression of gp96, an Hsp90 β-form but had no effect on other surface structures [81]. Again the OmpA of E. coli interacted with gp96 for entry and survival in PMNs, whereas, in the absence of gp96 expression, phagocytosed bacteria were killed efficiently. Moreover, entry of E. coli mediated by OmpA and gp96 interaction is required for reducing the levels of ROS. Substantiating the role of gp96 in E. coli-induced meningitis, suppression of gp96 using in vivo siRNA in three-day-old mice rendered them resistant to infection and prevented the brain damage. These gp96 knockdown mice could not develop bacteremia levels required to cross the BBB, suggesting that E. coli survival in PMNs is a critical step during the initial phases of infection.
Since PMNs are short-lived cells dying predominantly by apoptosis (Fig. 1b), E. coli must have alternative routes for survival and multiplication in neonates to reach high-grade bacteremia. Phagocytosis assays using RAW 264.7 and primary macrophages revealed that E. coli enters, survives and multiplies inside the cells, whereas OmpA−E. coli were killed by the cells immediately [134]. Of note, macrophage-depleted newborn mice became resistant to E. coli infection despite the presence of PMNs, suggesting that macrophages also provide a niche for bacterial multiplication. In macrophages, OmpA of E. coli binds to the alpha chain of Fc-gamma receptor I (CD64), the high-affinity IgG binding receptor via N-glycosylation sites [61]. Validating these studies, CD64−/− newborn mice were resistant to E. coli-induced meningitis and adoptive transfer of wild-type macrophages into these mice sensitizes them to infection. Apoptosis of infected immune cells limits the dissemination of intracellular pathogens, thus preventing the spread of bacteria in the host. However, pathogens also developed strategies to manipulate the apoptotic mechanism in macrophages (Fig. 5). One such strategy E. coli utilized for an anti-apoptotic mechanism in macrophages was by increasing the expression of Bcl-XL, an anti-apoptotic protein [133]. OmpA−E. coli, on the other hand, enhanced the expression of Bax and Caspase 6 in infected macrophages, which eventually undergo apoptosis. E. coli infection of monocytes not only allows the bacteria to survive but also prevents the production of various cytokines and chemokines from the cells [118]. The blocking effect of pro-inflammatory cytokines by E. coli is due to the degradation of IκB followed by inhibition of NF-κB activity. Furthermore, E. coli controls ERK1/2 and p38 MAP kinases by modulating their phosphorylation status, and thus regulating IκB degradation. In that context, infection of three-day-old mice triggered the production of IL-10 at early stages of infection, indicating that suppression of pro-inflammatory response in replication stage is advantageous to E. coli for the establishment of meningitis [80]. Administration of a single dose of 5 µg of recombinant human IL-10 during bacteremia stages completely cleared the bacteria from the circulation and reversed sustained brain damage within four days post-infection.
Fig. 5
Mechanisms involved in Escherichia coli K1 manipulation of macrophages. The outer membrane protein A (OmpA) of E. coli K1 interacts with chitobiose moieties (GlcNAc1-4GlcNAc) in CD64 for inducing actin rearrangements to the sites of bacterial attachment for internalization of E. coli. During this process, the intracellular domain of CD64 triggers the upregulation of B cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-XL), an anti-apoptotic protein by an unknown mechanism to prevent apoptosis of the infected macrophages. In addition, toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) ligands such as peptidoglycan (PGN) interaction with TLR2 also induces inducible nitric oxide (NO) production by activation of iNOS. Parallel to Bcl-XL upregulation, OmpA interaction with CD64 also enhances guanidine cyclohydrolase I (GCH1), which in turn produces biopterin. The biopterin subsequently acts as a co-factor for more inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activation and produce greater amounts of NO, which triggers the expression of CD64 to the cells surface. Thus, more E. coli bind to the receptor and enter the macrophages. The OmpA-CD64-mediated entry also avoids the fusion of lysosome with endosome, thereby finding a niche for survival and multiplication. To prevent the hostile conditions for bacterial survival, E. coli also suppresses mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2), and p38, thereby the activity of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB). This arm of signaling prevents the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in macrophages. Red lines indicate inhibition of specific signaling pathway
×
Bacterial translocation into the CNS
BMEC form the BBB that prevents the transport of harmful substances and pathogenic microorganisms from the blood to the brain. The development of high-grade bacteremia is a prerequisite for E. coli to interact with the BBB. All of the surface structures of E. coli K1 have potential to interact with BMEC for invasion and entry to the CNS. One of the surface appendages in E. coli, S-fimbriae (Sfa) that specifically interacts with NeuAcα2, 3Gal1, 3GlcNAc epitopes present on glycoproteins is shown to be responsible for binding to BMEC via SfaS adhesin present at the tip of Sfa [129]. However, Sfa plays no significant role in the invasion of HBMEC. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that type-1 fimbriae, which bind to mannose residues of glycoproteins, also contribute to the invasion of E. coli in HBMEC [139]. Nonetheless, when the type-1 fimbriae expression was similar to wild-type E. coli by keeping the fimH operon, which encodes the tip of type-1 fimbriae, in “ON” phase in an OmpA−E. coli, the bacterium could not invade. Furthermore, pretreatment of E. coli with α-methyl mannoside (an inhibitor of type-1 fimbriae) did not show any difference in the invasion, indicating that OmpA is the major determinant in E. coli invasion of HBMEC [63].
OmpA has been shown to bind to HBMEC for invasion via a lectin-like activity specific to GlcNAc1, 4GlcNAc (chitobiose) epitopes attached to asparagine-linked glycoproteins [99]. Corroborating the requirement of chitobiose moieties for the pathogenesis, treatment of E. coli with chitooligomers prior to infecting newborn rats prevented the occurrence of meningitis. Subsequent studies have identified a β-form of gp96, a heat-shock protein, present in HBMEC (designated as Ecgp96), which acts as a receptor for OmpA binding to and invasion of the cells. Ecgp96 is an 803 amino acid protein with a weak transmembrane domain [98]. The interaction of OmpA of E. coli with two N-glycosylation sites of Ecgp96 further enhances the expression of the receptor to which additional bacteria bind and invade HBMEC [63]. Additionally, the C-terminal domains of Ecgp96 are required for induction of signaling network to enter HBMEC [76]. E. coli interaction with HBMEC also triggers the expression of TLR2 at the surface, which forms a complex with Ecgp96 while OmpA−E. coli enhanced TLR4 expression and does not associate with the receptor [60]. Consistent with the requirement of TLR2 interaction with Ecgp96 TLR2−/− newborn mice are resistant to infection while TLR4−/− animals are very vulnerable to the development of meningitis.
For internalization, E. coli induces actin cytoskeletal rearrangements to trigger zipper-like mechanism in HBMEC, which engulfs the bacterium into the cell. Besides actin microfilaments, E. coli K1 also requires microtubules for invasion, which probably provides pulling force in HBMEC to internalize the bacteria. E. coli entry induces the phosphorylation of tyrosine residues of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which is independent of Src kinase activity [105]. PI3-kinase activity is also critical for E. coli invasion of HBMEC, which subsequently activates PLCγ for the influx of extracellular calcium and mobilization of intracellular calcium [104, 130]. This calcium mobilization activates PKC-α, which interacts with caveolin-1, a 22 kDa protein present in caveolae of plasma membranes inducing the ingestion of E. coli by HBMEC [132]. Activated PKC-α associates with VE-cadherin, an adherens junction molecule, and releases β-catenin from the junctions, thereby increasing the permeability of HBMEC monolayers [131]. Pre-incubation of E. coli with anti-OmpA antibodies or HBMEC with anti-Ecgp96 antibodies decreased E. coli-induced permeability confirming that OmpA-Ecgp96 interaction is critical for tight junction disruption.
There is an ample evidence that nitric oxide (NO) acts as an antimicrobial molecule and a mediator of cerebral vascular permeability. E. coli upon invasion of HBMEC also produces higher amounts of NO by activating inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and generating cyclic GMP (cGMP), an important target downstream of NO [79]. Moreover, increased production of cGMP resulted in the activation of PKC-α, indicating that there might be two pools of PKC-α, one that is regulated by Ecgp96, and the second modulated by NO to enhance the permeability of HBMEC monolayers. Inhibition of iNOS by a specific inhibitor, aminoguanidine, prevented E. coli invasion by suppressing the expression of Ecgp96 [79]. Thus, inducible NO promotes E. coli invasion in HBMEC, unlike many other bacterial pathogens. Further studies have demonstrated that a rate limiting enzyme, GTP cyclohydrolase (GCH1), which produces a co-factor tetrahydrobiopterin required for iNOS activation, is also associated with intracellular Ecgp96 [121]. An inhibitor of GCH1, 2, 4-diamino hydroxyl pyrimidine (DAHP) pretreatment of HBMEC blocked the invasion in the cells. Both aminoguanidine and DAHP inhibited the onset of meningitis in 3-day-old mice by E. coli, highlighting the significance of NO production in the pathogenesis [79, 121]. In addition, screening of a small molecule library using HBMEC invasion assays recognized Telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor 1 (AT1R) blocker as a potent inhibitor of invasion [64]. Follow-up experiments demonstrated that AT1R forms a complex with Ecgp96 during E. coli invasion of HBMEC. Newborn mice pretreated with TS are resistant to both the development of bacteremia and the entry of bacteria into the brain. These experiments clearly demonstrate that targeting Ecgp96 would be beneficial for averting E. coli-induced meningitis.
Immune activation and inflammatory response in the brain
The survival and multiplication of E. coli in PMNs and macrophages result in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the blood, which upregulates the expression of intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) on the BBB. In addition, the interaction of OmpA of E. coli with Ecgp96 on HBMEC induces ICAM-1 expression, thereby enhancing the binding of THP-1 cells in culture [117]. This upregulation of ICAM-1 expression aids in the infiltration of PMNs during the onset of meningitis. Furthermore, gliosis and neuronal apoptosis in both cortex and hippocampus and the production of greater amounts of TNF-α and IL1β have been observed in the brains of newborn mice infected with E. coli [80]. Nonetheless, the interaction of E. coli with neuronal cells and glial cells is poorly studied. Further studies are clearly needed to gain a better understanding of whether the bacteria directly damages the brain or the damage is a causal effect of pro-inflammatory response.
Conclusions and outlook
In summary, despite advances in antimicrobial therapy and vaccine development, bacterial meningitis represents a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, mainly in infants, children and in the elderly or immunocompromised patient. The emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains, e.g., E. coli and S. pneumoniae, phenotypic heterogeneity, e.g., meningococci, the lack of effective vaccines, e.g., GBS, or the occurrence of new emerging diseases as a results of zoonotic species jumps, e.g., S. suis, demands alternative strategies to prevent as many cases of bacterial meningitis and the associated neurological sequelae as possible. Significant progress has been made in identifying molecular mechanisms that contribute to host–pathogen interactions during the progression of CNS disease. Identification of common pathways employed by bacterial pathogens to breach mucosal barriers, survive in the blood stream and cross the BBB or B-CSF barrier will assist in the identification of important bacterial and host cell targets for the development of effective therapies. The identification of molecular patterns used by several bacterial species to cross the B-CSFB and BBB may lead to the systemic application of antibodies or antagonists blocking barrier epitopes involved in the attachment and transcytosis of bacteria. Vaccination against these bacterial patterns or prophylactic application of an antagonistic drug with low side effects can be an option, particularly in persons at a high risk of acquiring meningitis. Thus, targeting bacterial components and their associated signaling events should offer novel therapeutic strategies. A multi-disciplinary approach is necessary to incorporate all this knowledge into new testable hypotheses that will provide insight into the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of bacterial meningitis and the discovery of novel therapeutic and control strategies.
Acknowledgments
Authors are listed in alphabetical order and contributed to this review by providing following chapters: Abstract and Introduction (all authors), S. pneumoniae meningitis (E.I. Tuomanen, N. Gratz), Group B Streptococcus meningitis (K.S. Doran, B.J. Kim), Meningococcal meningitis (A. Schubert-Unkmeir), S. suis meningitis (M. Fulde, P. Valentin-Weigand), E. coli K1 meningitis (N.V. Prasadarao), Common steps and mechanisms in pathogenesis of bacterial meningitis (M. Fulde, P. Valentin-Weigand) and Conclusions and Outlook (R. Nau, P. Valentin-Weigand). Figure 1 was provided by R. Nau. All other figures were provided by respective chapter authors. Elizabeth Rossi is gratefully acknowledged for artwork in Fig. 3. This study was in part supported by Niedersachsen-Research Network on Neuroinfectiology (N-RENNT) of the Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony, Germany, to M. Fulde and P. Valentin-Weigand. The work on pneumococcal meningitis in E.I. Tuomanen’s laboratory is supported by funding from NIH/NIAD R01 27913 and ALSAC. The work presented here from Dr. Prasadarao’s lab has been supported by the grants from the National Institutes of Health, USA (AI40567, NS73115, and HD41525), American Heart Association and Children’s Hospital Los Angeles Career Development Fellowships. Work on the BBB and GBS meningitis in K.S. Doran’s laboratory is supported by funding from the NIH/NINDS (Grant No. RO1NS051247). M. Fulde received support by the Freie Universität Berlin within the Excellence Initiative of the German Research Foundation. The work on neuronal injury in Dr. Nau’s lab has been supported by Sparkasse Göttingen. The authors acknowledge their laboratory members and researchers whose work has not been discussed here in detail due to space constraints.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Mit e.Med Neurologie & Psychiatrie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Mit e.Med Neurologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes, den Premium-Inhalten der neurologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Neurologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Host–pathogen interactions in bacterial meningitis
verfasst von
Kelly S. Doran Marcus Fulde Nina Gratz Brandon J. Kim Roland Nau Nemani Prasadarao Alexandra Schubert-Unkmeir Elaine I. Tuomanen Peter Valentin-Weigand
