Erschienen in:
19.02.2020 | Original Contribution
How well are DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD represented in standardized diagnostic instruments?
verfasst von:
Kris Evers, Jarymke Maljaars, Sarah J. Carrington, Alice S. Carter, Francesca Happé, Jean Steyaert, Susan R. Leekam, Ilse Noens
Erschienen in:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
|
Ausgabe 1/2021
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Five years after the publication of DSM-5 in 2013, three widely used diagnostic instruments have published algorithms designed to represent its (sub-)criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in children and adolescents. This study aimed to: (1) establish the content validity of these three DSM-5-adapted algorithms, and (2) identify problems with the operationalization of DSM-5 diagnostic criteria in measurable and observable behaviors. Algorithm items of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Second Edition (ADOS-2), Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview (3di) and Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders—11th edition (DISCO-11) were mapped onto DSM-5 sub-criteria. The development and decision-making rules integrated in their algorithms were then compared with DSM-5. Results demonstrated significant variability in the number and nature of sub-criteria covered by the ADOS-2, 3di and DISCO-11. In addition to differences in the development of algorithms and cut-off scores, instruments also differed in the extent to which they follow DSM-5 decision-making rules for diagnostic classification. We conclude that such differences in interpretation of DSM-5 criteria provide a challenge for symptom operationalization which will be most effectively overcome by consensus, testing and reformulation.