Erschienen in:
22.11.2023 | Pancreatic Tumors
In Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Which Response is the More Reliable Indicator for Prognosis, Radiologic or Biochemical?
verfasst von:
Won-Gun Yun, MD, Youngmin Han, PhD, Young Jae Cho, MD, Hye-Sol Jung, MD, Mirang Lee, MD, Wooil Kwon, MD, PhD, Jin-Young Jang, MD, PhD
Erschienen in:
Annals of Surgical Oncology
|
Ausgabe 2/2024
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
In this era of increasing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, methods for evaluating responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are still diverse among institutions. Additionally, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. Therefore, this retrospective study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of methods for assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the need for adjuvant chemotherapy in treating patients with non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Methods
The study identified 150 patients who underwent neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy followed by curative-intent pancreatectomy. The patients were stratified by biochemical response based on the normalization of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and by radiologic response based on size change at imaging.
Results
The patients were classified into the following three groups based on their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis: biochemical responders (BR+), radiology-only responders (BR–/RR+), and non-responders (BR–/RR–). The 3-year overall survival rate was higher for BR+ (71.0%) than for BR–/RR+ (53.6%) or BR–/RR– (33.1%) (P < 0.001). Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy also was identified as a significant risk factor for recurrence in a comparison between BR–/RR+ and BR+ (hazard ratio [HR], 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19–3.88; P = 0.011) and BR–/RR– (HR, 3.82; 95% CI 2.41–6.08; P < 0.001). Additionally, regardless of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients who completed adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly higher 3-year overall survival rate than those who did not.
Conclusions
This response evaluation criterion for neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible and can significantly predict prognosis. Additionally, completion of adjuvant chemotherapy could be helpful to patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy regardless of their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.