nach oben

Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion

Erschienen in:

Open Access 07.04.2023 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

In-vitro Modulation of mTOR-HIF-1α Axis by TLR7/8 Agonist (Resiquimod) in B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

verfasst von: Rana M. Hanafy, Soheir R. Demian, Lobna A. Abou-Shamaa, O. Ghallab, Eman M. Osman

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion | Ausgabe 4/2023

Abstract

Targeting toll-like receptors (TLRs), via TLR agonists, has been implicated in the regulation of immunometabolism. B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) represents a suitable model for B-cell derived malignancies with shifted metabolic adaptations. Several signaling pathways have been found to be critical in metabolic reprogramming of CLL, including mechanistic target of rapamycin- hypoxia inducible factor-1α (mTOR- HIF-1α) pathway, the main metabolic regulator of glycolysis. Here, we investigated the effect of TLR7/8 agonist (Resiquimod) on the expression of mTOR and HIF-1α in patients with CLL. B cells were purified using Rosettesep Human B cell Enrichment Cocktail (Stem cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada#15,024) from peripheral venous blood of CLL patients (n = 20) and healthy individuals (n = 15). Isolated B cells were then cultured in both presence and absence of Resiquimod. Gene expression of mTOR and HIF-1α were assessed using qRT-PCR. Resiquimod significantly decreased mTOR and HIF-1α gene expression in both CLL (p < 0.001and p < 0.001, respectively) and Normal B cells (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively). Resiquimod may reprogram immunometabolism of malignant B-CLL cells via down-regulation of key glycolytic metabolic actors, mTOR and HIF-1α genes. Accordingly, Resiquimod may be an adjuvant as a therapeutic tool for CLL, which needs to be studied further.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 99 kb)

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-023-01649-y.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia in adults [1]. It is characterized by clonal proliferation and accumulation of malignant B-lymphocytes in the peripheral blood and in immune tissues such as lymphoid organs and bone marrow [2]. It has been reported that B cells, isolated from peripheral blood of CLL patients, express high and intermediate levels of TLR7 and TLR8, respectively [3]. Being highly malignant, CLL cells are characterized by shifted immunometabolic adaptations supporting malignant cell proliferation and resistance to apoptosis. Several signaling pathways have been found to be critical in metabolic reprogramming of CLL, including mTOR-HIF-1α pathway [4]. Thus, development of novel immunotherapeutic agents that interfere with any of these signaling pathways would be of great interest.

Altered metabolism plays an important role in the malignant biological behaviors of different types of cancer. This contributes in favoring the survival, proliferation, invasion, metastasis and chemoresistance of cancer cells. For instance, tumor cells use glycolysis, even in the presence of oxygen and fully functioning mitochondria. This process of aerobic glycolysis or “Warburg effect” has been suggested to be an adaptation mechanism supplying tumor cells with their biosynthetic requirements [5]. Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key metabolic regulator of multiple cellular functions including cell proliferation, differentiation, nutrient uptake and energy metabolism. In response to fluctuating levels of nutrients and energy, mTOR regulates cell growth through coordination of different metabolic pathways such as lipid and protein synthesis [6]. At the molecular level, mTOR directly stimulates mRNA translation and ribosomal bio-macromolecular synthesis of other key metabolic transcription factors such as hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α), a master regulator of oxygen homeostasis [7].

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are prototypic pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [8]. The latter are responsible for induction of specific immune response to pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) [9]. Till now, ten functional TLRs subtypes (i.e. TLR1-TLR10) have been found to be expressed in humans that can be further functionally categorized according to subcellular localization and sensed ligands. TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6 and TLR10 comprise the group localized at the cell surface. Alternatively, TLR3, TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9 are expressed intracellularly, particularly in endosomal microcompatment [8]. It has been proposed that signaling via TLRs is a critical factor involved in carcinogenesis, regulating both tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells [10]. Of note, the majority of clinical trials, phases (1, 2 and 3), have evaluated TLR ligands as immune adjuvants to improve the immunogenicity of various cancer or immunomodulatory vaccines; such as TLR3 agonist in low grade B-cell lymphoma, melanoma and metastatic colon cancer and TLR7 agonist in Hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) and Human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine[11]. Resiquimod is a TLR7/8 agonist mainly applied as an adjuvant with immunomodulatory effect in the context of cancer therapy (e.g. metastatic lung cancer, colon cancer) [12]. This is done via induction of interferon α (IFNα), interleuk-12 (IL-12) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [13]. In addition, it results in stimulation of antigen-specific- cell mediated immune response via activation of natural killer (NK) cells with indirect induction of IFN-γ [14].

Although previous studies investigated the effect of multiple TLRs on CLL cells, targeting the metabolic pathways employed by malignant and normal B cells using TLRs, particularly TLR7/8 agonist, represents a novel research point. In our study, we examined the effect of Resiquimod on metabolic mediators (mTOR and HIF-1α) in normal B cells isolated from healthy individuals and malignant B cells isolated from CLL patients.

Materials & Methods

Study Population

The current study was conducted on twenty CLL patients (CLL group) and fifteen healthy normal age and sex matched individuals (Normal group) (Table 1). All individuals under study were subjected to complete history taking and thorough clinical examination. All participants were asked to freely volunteer in the study and informed written consents were gathered prior to their inclusion in study protocol according to ESM (Supplementary material).

Table 1

Demographic data of study population

	CLL (n = 20)	Normal (n = 15)	P
Sex (n)			0.181
Male	15	8
Female	5	7
Age (year)			0.692
Min–Max	40.0–67.0	51.0–69.0
Mean ± SD	58.40 ± 6.52	57.60 ± 4.82

B-CLL were diagnosed according to the standard clinical and laboratory criteria [15]. Patients were either untreated or did not receive treatment for three months before enrolment in the study and any other malignancy or autoimmune diseases were excluded. CLL patients were classified into three groups according to Rai staging system as shown in (Table 2).

Table 2

Distribution of CLL patients (n = 20) according to Rai Staging

Rai stages	No.	%
Low risk	1	5.0
Intermediate risk	8	40.0
High risk	11	55.0

Peripheral Blood Samples

Peripheral venous blood samples were collected from fasting patients (1 ml) or normal individuals (20 ml, to overcome the problem of relative lower B cell count) into sterile heparinized vacutainers. For normal samples, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were first isolated using centrifugation over ficoll-hypaque density medium and then re-suspended in 1 ml autologous whole blood for further B cell isolation [16].

Isolation of Peripheral B Cells

B cells were isolated by negative selection using RosetteSep Human B cell Enrichment Cocktail (Stem cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada#15,024) following the manufacturer’s instructions. In short, The RosetteSep™ antibody cocktail crosslinks unwanted non-B cells in human whole blood to multiple RBCs, forming immunorosettes. This increases the density of the unwanted (rosetted) cells, such that they pellet along with the free RBCs when centrifuged over ficoll-hypaque density medium. Desired cells are never labeled with antibody and are easily collected as a highly enriched population at the interface between the plasma and the density gradient medium [17]. Cell viability and numbers were then determined using Trypan Blue dye exclusion technique.

In vitro Treatment of B cells Resiquimod

B cells were treated with Resiquimod according to [18] with minor modifications. Briefly, isolated B cells (2 × 10⁶cells/ml/well) were suspended in complete culture media (RPMI supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum and (1%) penicillin/streptomycin) and cultured in both presence and absence of 1 μg/ml Resiquimod (Sigma, USA). Cultured cells were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO₂incubator. At the end of the culture period, culture yield was collected and stored at − 80 °C for RNA extraction and subsequent gene expression determination.

Gene Expression mTOR and HIF-1α mRNA in B Cells

First, total cellular RNA was extracted using QIAamp RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to manufacturer recommendation. Total extracted RNA concentration and purity was determined using Nano Drop Thermo spectrophotometry (Thermo Scientific, USA). Second, Reverse transcription was done using RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo scientific, USA) according to manufacturer recommendations. Finally, Quantitative-real time-PCR for quantification of mTOR [19] and HIF-1α [20] gene expressions were performed using StepOne™ Real Time PCR system, (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, USA).

Differences in threshold cycle (Ct) values between gene of interest and housekeeping gene GAPDH (∆Ct) were converted into fold gene expression by 2^−∆∆Ct using the following equations:

$$\begin{gathered} {\text{Delta Ct }}\left( {\Delta {\text{Ct}}} \right) \, = {\text{ Ct}}_{{({\text{target}}\;{\text{ gene}})}} {-}{\text{ Ct}}_{{\left( {{\text{housekeeping}}\;{\text{ gene}}} \right)}} \hfill \\ {\text{Delta Delta Ct }}\left( {\Delta \Delta {\text{Ct}}} \right) \, = \, \Delta {\text{Ct}}_{{({\text{target gene}})}} - \, \Delta {\text{Ct}}\;{\text{ of }}\;{\text{calibrator}}_{{\left( {{\text{average}}\; \, \Delta {\text{Ct }}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{ untreated}}\;{\text{ control}}} \right)}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$

The expression of both genes in Normal group in absence of TLR7/8 agonist was considered as 1 (normalization). The corresponding values of gene expression in presence and absence of TLR7/8 agonist in (Normal/CLL groups) and (CLL group), respectively were calculated as a fold change [21].

Statistical Analysis

Data were fed to the computer and analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Qualitative data were described using number and percent. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of distribution Quantitative data were described using range (minimum and maximum), mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile range (IQR). Significance of the obtained results was judged at the 5% level. The applied tests include: Chi-square test (for categorical variables, to compare between different groups), Student t-test (for normally distributed quantitative variables, to compare between two studied groups), Mann Whitney test (for abnormally distributed quantitative variables, to compare between two studied groups), Wilcoxon signed ranks test (for abnormally distributed quantitative variables, to compare between two periods, and Spearman coefficient (to correlate between two distributed abnormally quantitative variables).

Results

Resiquimod Inhibits the mTOR-HIF-1α Axis in Both Malignant and Normal B Cells

We analyzed the expression levels of mTOR and HIF-1α in both isolated normal and malignant B cells after culturing for 48 h in presence and absence of TLR7/8 agonist. Regarding mTOR gene expression (Fig. 1a), mTOR expression median (IQR) values were 0.83 (0.47–3.45) in CLL group and 1.0 (1.0–1.01) in Normal group in untreated samples as shown in (Table 3). No statistically significant difference was found between both groups (p = 0.681). In treated samples (with TLR7/8 agonist), mTOR expression median (IQR) values were 0.31 (0.16–1.04) in CLL group and 0.49 (0.34–0.73) in Normal group with o statistically significant difference (p = 0.479). However, intra-group analysis revealed that median (IQR) values of mTOR gene expression were significantly lower in both CLL and Normal groups (p < 0.001, = 0.004) (Fig. 1a).

Table 3

mTOR and HIF-1α gene expression (fold change) in peripheral blood B cells with and without in vitro Resiquimod treatment in CLL and Normal groups

	CLL (n = 20)	Normal (n = 15)	P
mTOR
Without TLR7/8 agonist
Min.–Max	0.16–11.66	0.70–1.37	0.681
Median (IQR)	0.83 (0.47–3.45)	1.0 (1.0–1.01)	0.681
With TLR7/8 agonist
Min.–Max	0.12–3.20	0.12–1.30	0.479
Median (IQR)	0.31 (0.16–1.04)	0.49 (0.34–0.73)	0.479
P₀	< 0.001^*	0.004^*
HIF-1α
Without TLR7/8 agonist
Min.–Max	0.23–9.70	0.77—1.25
Median (IQR)	0.78 (0.50–1.95)	1.0 (1.0–1.16)	0.610
With TLR7/8 agonist
Min.–Max	0.17–6.06	0.10–1.04
Median (IQR)	0.44 (0.28–0.84)	0.39 (0.33–0.59)	0.681
P₀	< 0.001^*	0.001^*

IQR: Inter quartile range

P₀: p value for Wilcoxon signed ranks test for comparing between with/without TLR7/8 agonist treatment in each of CLL and Normal groups separately

P: P value for Mann Whitney test for comparing between CLL and Normal groups

*: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05

As for HIF-1α gene expression (Fig. 1b), gene expression median (IQR) values were 0.78 (0.50–1.95) in CLL group and 1.0 (1.0–1.16) in Normal group in untreated samples as shown in (Table 3). No statistically significant difference in the expression of HIF-1α was found between both groups (p = 0.610). In treated samples (with TLR7/8 agonist), HIF-1α expression median (IQR) values were 0.44 (0.28–0.84) in CLL group and 0.39 (0.33–0.59) in Normal group. No statistically significant difference was observed between both groups (p = 0.681). However, intra-group analysis revealed that median (IQR) values of HIF-1α gene expression were significantly lower in both CLL and Normal groups (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1b).

No Difference was Found in mTOR and HIF-1α Gene Expression Between Different Disease Risk Groups According to Rai staging

We next compared the expression levels of both genes (mTOR and HIF-1α) in malignant B cells isolated from CLL patients with different disease-risk groups according to Rai staging system (Table 4). CLL patients (n = 20) were classified into three groups according to Rai staging system as shown in (Fig. 2a). Although high-risk disease patients had relatively higher expression levels of both genes when compared to (low + intermediate-) disease risk groups, no statistically significant difference was calculated whether in the presence or absence of TLR7/8 agonist (mTOR: p = 0.331; 0.456, Fig. 2b) (HIF-1α: p = 0.603; 0.331, Fig. 2c).

Table 4

Rai Staging of CLL patients (n = 20) in relation to mTOR and HIF-1α gene expression in B cells with and without TLR7/8 agonist treatment

	Rai staging		P
	High (n = 11)	Low + Intermediate (n = 9)	P
mTOR
Without TLR7/8 agonist
Min.–Max	0.16–11.66	0.43–10.80	0.456
Median	1.24	0.62	0.456
With TLR7/8 agonist
Min.–Max	0.12–2.77	0.12–3.20	0.331
Median	0.71	0.24	0.331
HIF-1α
Without TLR7/8 agonist
Min.–Max	0.39–8.81	0.23–9.70	0.610
Median	0.80	0.61	0.610
With TLR7/8 agonist
Min.–Max	0.18–6.06	0.17–0.85	0.331
Median	0.48	0.33	0.331

P: P value for comparing between High and Low + Intermediate

Discussion

Although treatable, CLL remains incurable with most patients relapsing or developing resistance to first-line treatment. Similar to most tumor cells, malignant CLL cells possess a distinct metabolic profile promoting their survival, chemo-resistance and immunoevasion mechanisms [22]. This metabolic reprogramming which follows aberrant activation of several metabolic checkpoint regulators, including mTOR and HIF-1α, represents a possible target for novel immunotherapeutic agents [23].

Eminent research evidence points to the involvement of TLR signaling in the regulation of immunometabolism in malignant cells and related microenvironment [8]. It has been proven that TLR8 signaling activation inhibits the immunosuppressive effect of melanoma and breast cancer-derived Treg cells. This metabolic rewiring was proven to be mediated via inhibition of glycolysis, used to fuel these immune-suppressive cells, by molecularly down-regulating mTOR-HIF-1α axis [24]. As for CD8⁺ T cell, stimulation of TLR7 signaling using its respective agonist (R848), was found to enhance the effector functions of murine and human CD8⁺ T cell in vitro. When investigating immunometabolic changes in TLR7-treated CD8⁺ T cells, up-regulation of glycolysis was found to be coordinated via Akt-mTOR-IRF4 pathway [25].

In the current study, we investigated the in-vitro effect of a TLR7/8 agonist, Resiquimod, on the gene expression of mTOR and HIF-1α as an indicator of metabolic reprogramming in malignant CLL B cells as compared to normal B cells. No significant difference was observed in mTOR and HIF-1α gene expression between CLL and normal groups either in absence or presence of Resiquimod. Similarly, no relation was observed between Rai staging of CLL patients and the gene expression of either mTOR or HIF-1α. However, intragroup analysis revealed that in vitro treatment of B cells with Resiquimod significantly decreased the expression of mTOR and HIF-1α genes in both CLL and normal groups.

Our findings go in accordance with previous studies reporting no significant alterations in HIF-1α mRNA expression levels in CLL patients compared to normal controls [20]. In addition, recent studies in CLL patients also reported insignificant associations between mTOR and HIF-1α expression levels and patients’ clinicopathological variables. However, a strong association was found between genetic aberrations such as Tumor protein 53 (TP53)-^dis and mutated-immunoglobulin heavy variable region (M-IGHV), which weren’t assigned in our study, and expression levels of mTOR and HIF-1α in CLL patients [20, 26, 27].

Accumulating data have proven that unlike normal B cells, CLL cells undergo metabolic alteration to support their pathological proliferation and chemo-resistance [22]. Among these metabolic alterations, several investigators have explored the functional aerobic glycolysis exhibited by CLL cells. For example, Ryland and his team proved that targeting Warburg effect in CLL cells was capable of inducing cell death in-vitro by down-regulation of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), an enzyme involved in glycolysis pathway [28]. Another team explored metabolic plasticity of CLL cells using a panel of metabolic inhibitors. These Metabolic inhibitors, including glycolysis inhibitor (2-deoxyglucose) and oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) inhibitor (oligomycin), also resulted in cytotoxicity of CLL cells in-vitro [29]. These observations opened the door for the development of novel immune-therapeutics specifically targeting metabolic rewiring of malignant B cells.

In order to target the operational hyper-glycolysis observed in hematological malignancies, key metabolic regulators have been identified. Central to these metabolic regulators is the (mTOR-HIF-1α) pathway [30]. mTOR signaling is central in a variety of fundamental cellular processes including regulating cell growth, cell cycle control, autophagy and metabolism [31]. The latter involves multiple metabolic pathways such as glucose, lipid, amino acid and nucleotides metabolism. Thus, aberrant activation of mTOR signaling has been documented in a number of tumors including hematologic malignancies [30]. Furthermore, mTOR enhances the translation of HIF1α, the master oxygen sensing molecule, which fosters multiple tumor-promoting mechanisms such as angiogenesis, metastasis, cell proliferation and glucose metabolism [32]. The action of mTOR on cellular glycolysis includes induction of glucose transporters (GLUTs) such as GLUT-1 and other glycolytic enzymes promoting both cellular glucose uptake and glycolytic flux of cancer cells [33]. For instance, Frolova et al. showed that mTOR blockade, using Everolimus, diminished the glycolytic rate in acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) cells. This effect was mediated by downregulating HIF-1α expression which resulted in restoration of chemo-sensitivity of ALL cells [34]. Another study in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines showed that targeted inhibition of mTOR led to sensitization of AML cells to Aurora kinase inhibitors. Underlying mechanism was shown to involve glycolysis suppression leading to enhanced autophagy [35].

As for CLL, Hayun and his team were among the first researchers to examine the effect of mTOR inhibitor, Rapamycin, on CLL cells. They reported that CLL cells underwent apoptosis after treatment with Rapamycin through up-regulation of pro-apoptotic proteins and activating caspases machinery [36]. This was reassured by Marignac et al. through investigating the metabolic pattern exhibited by Desatinib-resistant CLL samples. Enhanced expression of glucose transporters was found to be associated with Desatinib resistant cells, which was targeted using inhibitors of mTORC1 or its downstream signaling pathways, leading to enhanced sensitization of these cells [37]. Consistent with previous study, Sharma and his team found that Fludarabine-resistant CLL cells experienced higher rates of glycolysis and OxPhos. Upon treatment with mTOR inhibitors, Rapamycin and Everolimus, cell death and sensitivity to Fludarabine was achieved in these cells [38]. Another study regarding Fludarabine resistant CLL cells found that HIF-1α was overexpressed, specifically in TP53- disrupted cells. Thus, its inhibition, using BAY87-2243, exerted a potent anti-tumor function within these cells overcoming Fludarabine resistance [27]. Furthermore, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/mTOR dual inhibiton in primary CLL cells was found to induce caspase-dependent apoptosis thus representing a powerful approach for treatment of CLL [39]. Finally, a recent study performed by Lu et al. analyzed proliferative drivers associated with CLL disease outcome. Their research proved that upregulation of mTOR signaling was linked to higher CLL- proliferative drive which is indicative of shorter lymphocyte doubling time, accumulation of genetic mutations and worse disease outcome in respective patients (Lu et al., 2021).

Preliminary studies on TLRs agonists in CLL mainly focused on TLR7 and TLR9, which showed heterogenous results. Early efforts studying the effect of TLR9 agonist, Cytosine-phosphorothioate-guanine oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN), showed that treated samples experienced enhanced apoptosis. Apoptosis of treated CLL cells was proven to be caspase-dependent in addition to up-regulation of death receptors, such as Fas ligands [40]. Another group found an up-regulation of co-stimulatory molecules, CD80, CD86, pro-inflammatory cytokines production, especially TNFα, and sensitization to cytotoxic drugs in response to stimulation with TLR7 agonist using imidazoquinolines [41]. These findings were hypothesized to participate in the microenvironmental alteration of malignant CLL cells by enhancing the activity of tumor-reactive T cells as well as natural killer cells [42]. Subsequent deeper investigations on CLL subsets revealed that TLR7 and TLR9 stimulation results in heterogenous response according to IGHV mutation status. Mutated (M)-CLL cells were found to be more sensitive towards apoptosis after treatment with TLR ligands in contrast to unmutated (UM)-CLL [43]. However, subsequent studies uncovered paradoxical detrimental results of TLR1/2/6 resulted in survival of CLL leukemic cells through nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) signaling [44]. In a similar manner, treatment of CLL cells with TLR7 and TLR9 agonists promoted their clonal expansion [45]. Lastly, indirect TLR antagonist interfering with TLR signaling pathways has been developed and tested in CLL. Recent inhibition of IL-1 receptor associated kinases-4 (IRAK4), an important signaling protein involved along TLR activation pathway, showed promising results by preferentially killing CLL cells [3].

Previous studies reported that B lymphocytes were activated upon culturing with TLR7/8 agonist in regard to cytokine and chemokine expression as well as the expression of co-stimulatory molecules and immunoglobulin production [46, 47]. By dissecting the metabolic profile of activated B cell population, an increase in glucose uptake following B cell stimulation has been reported by several studies. Doughty et al. found that upon BCR crosslinking, B lymphocytes rapidly increase their glucose uptake and subsequent glycolysis. BCR-mediated enhanced glycolysis was found to involve PI3K pathway as evidenced by the inhibition of glycolysis upon PI3K deficiency [48]. Cho S. and his team reassured previous findings by proving that survival and proliferation of B cells were dependent upon glucose metabolism [49]. A later study investigated the effect of glycolytic inhibition, using a pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) kinase inhibitor, on the activation and proliferation of B cells. Their findings showed a sharp suppression in B cells proliferation and antibody secretion in vivo and in-vitro. Furthermore, deletion of Glut-1 in B cells led to reduction in numbers as well as impairment in functions [50]. These data led to assuming that glycolysis is increased, by default, to support B cell activation. However, a subsequent study proved that although the uptake of glucose is increased, glycolytic metabolites along with lactate levels were found to decrease upon activation. These results suggested that glucose is being routed into alternative pathways in activated B cells. Further analysis showed that OxPhos and Tri-carboxylic acid (TCA) cycle pathways were up-regulated signifying their key roles in stimulated B cells [51]. This latter finding goes in accordance with our results showing a decrease in glycolytic metabolic mediators, mTOR and HIF-1α, upon stimulation of naïve B cells with TLR7/8 agonist.

As mentioned before, our study lacked genetic mutations’ investigations which is recommended to be collected and correlated with metabolic regulators on a larger sample size in future studies. Also, further metabolomic investigations to assure the observed effect of TLR7/8 agonist on immunometabolism of B cells such as measuring glucose levels or lactate levels are recommended. Moreover, further studies on the effect of TLR7/8 agonist on the metabolism of other types of leukemia will be of great value. In summary, we present a novel finding regarding the effect of Resiquimod on leukemic CLL cells’ metabolism. By employing genetic sequencing using qRT-PCR, we uncovered a significant decrease in genes supporting hyper-glycolytic capacity of malignant B cells when targeting them with TLR7/8 agonist. Accordingly, targeting metabolic pathways in leukemic B cells by TLR agonist could be used as a possible novel immunotherapeutic adjuvant.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt testen ¹

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ²

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 99 kb)

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A (2021) Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 71(1):7–33CrossRefPubMed

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (Version 1.2022). 2021. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cll.pdf

Giménez N, Schulz R, Higashi M, Aymerich M, Villamor N, Delgado J et al (2020) Targeting IRAK4 disrupts inflammatory pathways and delays tumor development in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia 34(1):100–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0507-8CrossRefPubMed

Haselager MV, Kater AP, Eldering E (2020) Proliferative signals in chronic lymphocytic leukemia; What are we missing? Front Oncol 10(October):1–15

Ma L, Zong X (2020) Metabolic symbiosis in chemoresistance: refocusing the role of aerobic glycolysis. Front Oncol 10(January):1–8

Valvezan AJ, Manning BD (2019) Molecular logic of mTORC1 signalling as a metabolic rheostat. Nat Metab 1(3):321–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-019-0038-7CrossRefPubMed

Samanta D, Semenza GL (2017) Maintenance of redox homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factors. Redox Biol 13(May):331–335CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mokhtari Y, Pourbagheri-Sigaroodi A, Zafari P, Bagheri N, Ghaffari SH, Bashash D (2021) Toll-like receptors (TLRs): an old family of immune receptors with a new face in cancer pathogenesis. J Cell Mol Med 25(2):639–651CrossRefPubMed

Żeromski J, Kaczmarek M, Boruczkowski M, Kierepa A, Kowala-Piaskowska A, Mozer-Lisewska I (2019) Significance and role of pattern recognition receptors in malignancy. Arch Immunol Therap Exp 67(3):133–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-019-00540-xCrossRef

10.

Li K, Qu S, Chen X, Wu Q, Shi M (2017) Promising targets for cancer immunotherapy: TLRs, RLRs, and STING-mediated innate immune pathways. Int J Mol Sci 18(2):404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Anwar MA, Shah M, Kim J, Choi S (2019) Recent clinical trends in Toll-like receptor targeting therapeutics. Med Res Rev 39(3):1053–1090CrossRefPubMed

12.

Kieffer ME, Patel AM, Hollingsworth SA, Seganish WM (2020) Small molecule agonists of toll-like receptors 7 and 8: a patent review 2014–2020. Expert Opin Ther Pat 30(11):825–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2020.1825687CrossRefPubMed

13.

Ruolin L, Groer C, Kleindl PA, Ryan Moulder K, Huang A, Hunt JR, Cai S, Aires DJ, Cory Berkland M, Forrest L (2019) Formulation and preclinical evaluation of a toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist as an anti-tumoral immunomodulator. J Controlled Release 306:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.06.003CrossRef

14.

Caron G, Duluc D, Frémaux I, Jeannin P, David C, Gascan H et al (2005) Direct stimulation of human T Cells via TLR5 and TLR7/8: Flagellin and R-848 up-regulate proliferation and IFN-γ production by memory CD4 + T cells. J Immunol 175(3):1551–1557CrossRefPubMed

15.

Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, Caligaris-Cappio F, Dighiero G, Döhner H et al (2018) iwCLL guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and supportive management of CLL. Blood 131(25):2745–2760CrossRefPubMed

16.

Warren HS, Rana PM (2003) An economical adaptation of the RosetteSep™ procedure for NK cell enrichment from whole blood, and its use with liquid nitrogen stored peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Immunol Methods 280(1–2):135–138CrossRefPubMed

17.

Hayes GM, Busch R, Voogt J, Siah IM, Gee TA, Hellerstein MK et al (2010) Isolation of malignant B cells from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) for analysis of cell proliferation: validation of a simplified method suitable for multi-center clinical studies. Leuk Res 34(6):809–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2009.09.032CrossRefPubMed

18.

Bishop GA, Ramirez LM, Baccam M, Busch LK, Pederson LK, Tomai MA (2001) The immune response modifier resiquimod mimics CD40-induced B cell activation. Cell Immunol 208(1):9–17CrossRefPubMed

19.

Khanna A, Bhushan B, Chauhan PS, Saxena S, Gupta DK, Siraj F (2018) High mTOR expression independently prognosticates poor clinical outcome to induction chemotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Exp Med 18(2):221–227CrossRefPubMed

20.

Kontos CK, Papageorgiou SG, Diamantopoulos MA, Scorilas A, Bazani E, Vasilatou D et al (2017) mRNA overexpression of the hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha subunit gene (HIF1A): an independent predictor of poor overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Res 53:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2016.11.014CrossRefPubMed

21.

Adams G (2020) A beginner’s guide to RT-PCR, qPCR and RT-qPCR. Biochem (London) 42(3):48–53. https://doi.org/10.1042/BIO20200034CrossRef

22.

Galicia-Vázquez G, Aloyz R (2019) Metabolic rewiring beyond Warburg in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: How much do we actually know? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 134:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.12.003CrossRefPubMed

23.

Jellusova J (2020) The role of metabolic checkpoint regulators in B cell survival and transformation. Immunol Rev 295(1):39–53CrossRefPubMed

24.

Li L, Liu X, Sanders KL, Edwards JL, Ye J, Si F et al (2019) TLR8-mediated metabolic control of human Treg function: a mechanistic target for cancer immunotherapy. Cell Metab 29(1):103–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.020CrossRefPubMed

25.

Li Q, Yan Y, Liu J, Huang X, Zhang X, Kirschning C et al (2019) Toll-like receptor 7 activation enhances CD8+ T cell effector functions by promoting cellular glycolysis. Front Immunol 10(September):2191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Lu J, Cannizzaro E, Meier-Abt F, Scheinost S, Bruch PM, Giles HAR et al (2021) Multi-omics reveals clinically relevant proliferative drive associated with mTOR-MYC-OXPHOS activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Cancer 2(8):853–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-021-00216-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Griggio V, Vitale C, Todaro M, Riganti C, Kopecka J, Salvetti C et al (2020) HIF-1α is over-expressed in leukemic cells from TP53-disrupted patients and is a promising therapeutic target in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica 105(4):1042–1054CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Ryland LK, Doshi UA, Shanmugavelandy SS, Fox TE, Aliaga C, Broeg K et al (2013) C6-ceramide nanoliposomes target the warburg effect in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. PLoS One 8(12):1–15CrossRef

29.

Galicia-vázquez G, Smith S, Aloyz R (2018) Del11q-positive CLL lymphocytes exhibit altered glutamine metabolism and differential response to GLS1 and glucose metabolism inhibition. Blood Cancer J 8(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-017-0039-2CrossRef

30.

Mirabilii S, Ricciardi MR, Tafuri A (2020) mTOR regulation of metabolism in hematologic malignancies. Cells 9(2):404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Saxton RA, Sabatini DM (2017) mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell 168(6):960–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Masoud GN, Li W (2015) HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B 5(5):378–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2015.05.007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Nagao A, Kobayashi M, Koyasu S, Chow CCT, Harada H (2019) HIF-1-dependent reprogramming of glucose metabolic pathway of cancer cells and its therapeutic significance. Int J Mol Sci 20(2):238CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Frolova O, Samudio I, Benito JM, Jacamo R, Kornblau SM, Markovic A, Schober W, Lu H, Qiu YH, Buglio D, McQueen T, Pierce S, Shpall E, Konoplev S, Thomas D, Kantarjian H, Lock R, Andreeff M, Konopleva M (2012) Regulation of HIF-1α signaling and chemoresistance in acute lymphocytic leukemia under hypoxic conditions of the bone marrow microenvironment. Cancer Biol Ther 13(10):858–870CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Liu LL, Long ZJ, Wang LX, Zheng FM, Fang ZG, Yan M et al (2013) Inhibition of mTOR pathway sensitizes acute myeloid leukemia cells to Aurora inhibitors by suppression of glycolytic metabolism. Mol Cancer Res 11(11):1326–1336CrossRefPubMed

36.

Hayun R, Okun E, Berrebi A, Shvidel L, Bassous L, Sredni B et al (2009) Rapamycin and curcumin induce apoptosis in primary resting B chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Leuk Lymphoma 50(4):625–632CrossRefPubMed

37.

Marignac VM, Smith S, Toban N, Bazile M, Aloyz R (2013) Resistance to Dasatinib in primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia lymphocytes involves AMPK-mediated energetic reprogramming. Oncotarget 4(12):2550–2566CrossRefPubMedCentral

38.

Sharma A, Janocha AJ, Hill BT, Smith MR, Erzurum SC, Almasan A (2014) Targeting mTORC1-mediated metabolic addiction overcomes fludarabine resistance in malignant B cells. Mol Cancer Res 12(9):1205–1215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Blunt MD, Carter MJ, Larrayoz M, Smith LD, Aguilar-Hernandez M, Cox KL et al (2015) The PI3K/mTOR inhibitor PF-04691502 induces apoptosis and inhibits microenvironmental signaling in CLL and the Eμ-TCL1 mouse model. Blood 125(26):4032–41. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-11-610329CrossRefPubMed

40.

Jahrsdörfer B, Wooldridge JE, Blackwell SE, Taylor CM, Griffith TS, Link BK et al (2005) Immunostimulatory oligodeoxynucleotides induce apoptosis of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. J Leukoc Biol 77(3):378–387CrossRefPubMed

41.

Spaner DE, Shi Y, White D, Mena J, Hammond C, Tomic J et al (2006) Immunomodulatory effects of Toll-like receptor-7 activation on chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Leukemia 20(2):286–295CrossRefPubMed

42.

Spaner DE, Masellis A (2007) Toll-like receptor agonists in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia 21(1):53–60CrossRefPubMed

43.

Chatzouli M, Ntoufa S, Papakonstantinou N, Chartomatsidou E, Anagnostopoulos A, Kollia P et al (2014) Heterogeneous functional effects of concomitant B Cell receptor and TLR stimulation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia with mutated versus unmutated Ig genes. J Immunol 192(10):4518–4524CrossRefPubMed

44.

Muzio M, Scielzo C, Bertilaccio MTS, Frenquelli M, Ghia P, Caligaris-Cappio F (2009) Expression and function of toll like receptors in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells. Br J Haematol 144(4):507–516CrossRefPubMed

45.

Gupta R, Yan XJ, Barrientos J, Kolitz JE, Allen SL, Rai K, Chiorazzi N, Mongini P (2019) Mechanistic Insights into CpG DNA and IL-15 synergy in promoting B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia clonal expansion. J Immunol 176(3):139–148

46.

Hanten JA, Vasilakos JP, Riter CL, Neys L, Lipson KE, Alkan SS et al (2008) Comparison of human B cell activation by TLR7 and TLR9 agonists. BMC Immunol 9:1–15CrossRef

47.

Vasilakos JP, Smith RMA, Gibson SJ, Lindh JM, Pederson LK, Reiter MJ et al (2000) Adjuvant activities of immune response modifier R-848: comparison with CpG ODN. Cell Immunol 204(1):64–74CrossRefPubMed

48.

Doughty CA, Bleiman BF, Wagner DJ, Dufort FJ, Mataraza JM, Roberts MF et al (2006) Antigen receptor-mediated changes in glucose metabolism in B lymphocytes: role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling in the glycolytic control of growth. Blood. 107(11):4458–65. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-12-4788CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Cho SH, Ahn AK, Bhargava P, Lee CH, Eischen CM, McGuinness O et al (2011) Glycolytic rate and lymphomagenesis depend on PARP14, an ADP ribosyltransferase of the B aggressive lymphoma (BAL) family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(38):15972–15977CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Caro-Maldonado A, Wang R, Nichols AG, Kuraoka M, Milasta S, Sun LD et al (2014) Metabolic reprogramming is required for antibody production that is suppressed in anergic but exaggerated in chronically BAFF-exposed B cells. J Immunol 192(8):3626–3636CrossRefPubMed

51.

Waters LR, Ahsan FM, Wolf DM, Shirihai O, Teitell MA (2018) Initial B Cell activation induces metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial remodeling. iScience 5:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2018.07.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: In-vitro Modulation of mTOR-HIF-1α Axis by TLR7/8 Agonist (Resiquimod) in B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
verfasst von: Rana M. Hanafy
Soheir R. Demian
Lobna A. Abou-Shamaa
O. Ghallab
Eman M. Osman
Publikationsdatum: 07.04.2023
Verlag: Springer India
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0971-4502
Elektronische ISSN: 0974-0449
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-023-01649-y

Springer Medizin

In-vitro Modulation of mTOR-HIF-1α Axis by TLR7/8 Agonist (Resiquimod) in B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Abstract

Supplementary Information

Publisher's Note

Introduction