Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Erschienen in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 9/2010

01.09.2010 | Original Paper

Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends

verfasst von: Tilman Steinert, Peter Lepping, Renate Bernhardsgrütter, Andreas Conca, Trond Hatling, Wim Janssen, Alice Keski-Valkama, Fermin Mayoral, Richard Whittington

Erschienen in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | Ausgabe 9/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify quantitative data on the use of seclusion and restraint in different countries and on initiatives to reduce these interventions.

Methods

Combined literature review on initiatives to reduce seclusion and restraint, and epidemiological data on the frequency and means of use in the 21st century in different countries. Unpublished study was detected by contacting authors of conference presentations. Minimum requirements for the inclusion of data were reporting the incidence of coercive measures in complete hospital populations for defined periods and related to defined catchment areas.

Results

There are initiatives to gather data and to develop new clinical practice in several countries. However, data on the use of seclusion and restraint are scarcely available so far. Data fulfilling the inclusion criteria could be detected from 12 different countries, covering single or multiple hospitals in most counties and complete national figures for two countries (Norway, Finland). Both mechanical restraint and seclusion are forbidden in some countries for ethical reasons. Available data suggest that there are huge differences in the percentage of patients subject to and the duration of coercive interventions between countries.

Conclusions

Databases on the use of seclusion and restraint should be established using comparable key indicators. Comparisons between countries and different practices can help to overcome prejudice and improve clinical practice.
Literatur
1.
Jones K (1984) Robert Gardiner Hill and the non-restraint movement. Can J Psychiatry 29:121–124PubMed
2.
Colaizzi J (2005) Seclusion and restraint: a historical perspective. J Psychosoc Nurs mental Health Serv 43:31–37
3.
Sailas E, Fenton M (2000) Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses. The cochrane database systematic reviews p.CD 001163
4.
Hem E, Steen O, Opjordsmoen S (2001) Thrombosis associated with physical restraints. Acta Psychiatr Scand 103:73–75CrossRefPubMed
5.
Fisher WA (1984) Restraint and seclusion: a review of the literature. Am J Psychiatry 151:1585–1591
6.
Needham I, Abderhalden C (2002) Coercive procedures and facilities in Swiss psychiatry. Swiss Med Wkly 132:253–258PubMed
7.
Salib E, Ahmed AG, Cope M (1998) Practice of seclusion: a five-year retrospective review in North Cheshire. Med Sci Law 38:321–327PubMed
8.
Savage L, Salib E (1999) Seclusion in psychiatry. Nurs Stand 13:34–37PubMed
9.
10.
11.
Steering Committee on Bioethics of the Council of Europe (2005) White paper on the protection of the human rights and dignity of people suffering from mental disorders, especially those placed as involuntary patients in a psychiatric establishment. Council of Europe. http://​www.​ijic.​org/​docs/​psychiatry.​pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2009
12.
13.
Donat DC (2003) An analysis of successful efforts to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint at a public psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric Serv 54:1119–1123CrossRef
14.
Martin V, Kuster W, Baur M, Bohnet U, Hermelink G, Knopp M, Kronstorfer R, Martinez-Funk B, Roser M, Voigtländer W, Brandecker R, Steinert T (2007) Die Inzidenz von Zwangsmaßnahmen als Qualitätsindikator in psychiatrischen Kliniken. Probleme der Datenerfassung und–verarbeitung und erste Ergebnisse. Psychiat Prax 34:26–32CrossRef
15.
16.
Steinert T, Martin V, Baur M, Bohnet U, Goebel R, Hermelink G, Kronstorfer R, Kuster W, Martinez-Funk B, Roser M, Schwink A, Voigtländer W (2007) Diagnosis-related frequencies of compulsory measures in 10 German psychiatric hospitals and correlates with hospital characteristics. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:140–145CrossRefPubMed
17.
Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, Koivisto AM, Lönnqvist J, Kaltiala-Heino R (2007) A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:747–752CrossRefPubMed
18.
Ketelsen R, Zechert C, Klimitz H, Rauwald C (2001) Entwicklung eines Kooperationsmodells zwischen 3 psychiatrischen Kliniken mit dem Ziel der Qualitätssicherung bei Zwangsmaßnahmen am Beispiel der Fixierungsdokumentation. Psychiat Prax 28:69–74CrossRef
19.
Martin V, Bernhardsgrütter R, Goebel R, Steinert T (2007) The use of mechanical restraint and seclusion in patients with schizophrenia: a comparison of the practice in Germany and Switzerland. Clin Pract Epid Ment Health 3:1CrossRef
20.
Bowers L (2000) The expression and comparison of ward incident rates. Issues Ment Health Nurs 21:365–374CrossRefPubMed
21.
Steinert T, Sippach T, Gebhardt RP (2000) How common is violence in schizophrenia despite neuroleptic treatment? Pharmacopsychiat 33:98–102CrossRef
22.
Smith GM, Davis RH, Bixler EO, Lin HM, Altenor A, Altenor RJ, Hardentstine BD, Kopchick GA (2005) Pennsylvania state hospital system’s seclusion and restraint reduction program. Psychiatr Serv 56:1115–1122CrossRefPubMed
23.
Berghmans R, Elfahmi D, Goldsteen M, Widdershoven G (2001) Quality of coercion in general psychiatry (Kwaliteit van dwang en drang in de psychiatrie). Instituut voor gezondheidsethiek Universiteit van Maastricht (Dutch), Maastricht
24.
CBO Verpleegkundig Wetenschappelijk Raad (2001) Directives for freedom restrictions (Richtlijnen voor vrijheidsbeperkende interventies). Kwaliteitsinstituut voor gezondheidszorg CB (Dutch), Utrecht
25.
Abma T, Widdershoven G, Lendemeijer B (2005) Restraint in psychiatric hospitals. The quality of interventions restricting patient’s freedom (Dwang en drang in de psychiatrie; kwaliteit van vrijheidsbeperkende interventies). Lemma (Dutch), Utrecht
26.
27.
28.
29.
El-Badri S, Mellsop G (2008) Patient and staff perspectives on the use of seclusion. Australas Psychiatry 16:248–252CrossRefPubMed
30.
Kumar S, Ng B, Simpson A, Fischer J, Robinson E (2008) No evidence for restrictive care practices in Maori admitted to a New Zealand psychiatric inpatient unit: do specialist cultural teams have a role? Soc Psych Psychiatr Epid 43:387–391CrossRef
31.
Curie CG (2005) SAMHSA’s commitment to eliminating the use of seclusion and restraint. Psychiatr Serv 56:1139–1140CrossRefPubMed
32.
Huckshorn KA (2006) Re-designing state mental health policy to prevent the use of seclusion and restraint. Adm Policy Ment Health 33:482–491CrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
35.
Steinert T, Eisele F, Goeser U, Tschoeke S, Uhlmann C, Schmid P (2008) Successful interventions on an organisational level to reduce violence and coercive interventions in in-patients with adjustment disorders and personality disorders. Clin Pract Epid Ment Health 4:27CrossRef
36.
Snorrason J (2007) Observations in acute psychiatric units in Landspitali University Hospital in Reykjavik. In Violence in clinical psychiatry. In: Callaghan P, Nijman H, Palmstierna T, Oud N (eds) Proceedings of the 5th European congress on violence in clinical psychiatry, Kavanah, Amsterdam, p 277
37.
Steinert T, Lepping P (2009) Legal provisions and practice in the management of violent patients. A case vignette study in 16 European countries. Eur Psychiatry 24:135–141CrossRefPubMed
38.
Nijman HLI, Palmstierna T, Almvik R, Stolker JJ (2005) Fifteen years of research with the staff observation aggression scale—A review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 111:12–21CrossRefPubMed
39.
Janssen WA, Noorthoorn EO, de Vries WJ, Hutschmaekers GHM, Widdershoven GAM, Lendemeijer HHGM (2008) The use of seclusion in the Netherlands compared to countries in and outside Europe. Int J Law Psychiatry 31:463–470 CrossRefPubMed
40.
Ryan C, Bowers L (2005) Coercive manoeuvres in a psychiatric intensive care unit. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 12:695–702CrossRefPubMed
41.
Waaler AE, Morken G, Linaker OM (2005) Effects of different interior decorations in the seclusion area of a psychiatric acute ward. Nord J Psychiatry 59:19–24CrossRef
42.
Betemps EJ, Somoza E (1993) Hospital characteristics, diagnoses and staff reasons associated with use of seclusion and restraint. Hosp Comm Psychiatry 44:367–371
43.
Crenshaw WB, Cain KA, Francis PS (1997) An updated national survey on seclusion and restraint. Psychiatr Serv 48:395–397PubMed
44.
Hatta K, Nogi W, Igarashi Y, Kon H, Sawa Y, Seki K, Masuko S, Wakejima T, Asai K (2003) The review of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric practice. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi 105:252–273 (Japanese)PubMed
45.
El-Badri SM, Mellsop G (2002) A study of the use of seclusion in an acute psychiatric service. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 36:399–403CrossRef
46.
Pedersen, PB, Hatling T, Røhme K (2007) Bruk av tvangsmidler i psykisk helsevern i 2001, 2003 og 2005. Hva kan forklare institusjons—og avdelingsforskjeller? SINTEF Helse rapport A686 (Norwegian)
Metadaten
Titel
Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends
verfasst von
Tilman Steinert
Peter Lepping
Renate Bernhardsgrütter
Andreas Conca
Trond Hatling
Wim Janssen
Alice Keski-Valkama
Fermin Mayoral
Richard Whittington
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology / Ausgabe 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0933-7954
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-9285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0132-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2010

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 9/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

The Dresden Predictor Study of anxiety and depression: objectives, design, and methods

Original Paper

Community-based cross-cultural adaptation of mental health measures in emergency settings: validating the IES-R and HSCL-37A in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo

Original Paper

Knowledge and preferences regarding schizophrenia among Chinese-speaking Australians in Melbourne, Australia

Original Paper

Temporal relationships between Gulf War deployment and subsequent psychological disorders in Royal Australian Navy Gulf War veterans

Original Paper

Epidemiology of antidepressant medication use in the Canadian diabetes population

Original Paper

A comparison of quality of life and depression between female married immigrants and native married women in Taiwan

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

23.04.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

23.04.2024 Depression antepartal oder postpartal Nachrichten

Bislang gibt es kein Medikament zur Prävention von Wochenbettdepressionen. Das Injektionsanästhetikum Esketamin könnte womöglich diese Lücke füllen.

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Kombination aus Medikamenten und Psychotherapie gilt als effektivster Ansatz bei Depressionen. Das ist bei betagten Menschen nicht anders, trotz Besonderheiten.

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Um Menschen nach der Flucht aus einem Krisengebiet bestmöglich medizinisch betreuen zu können, ist es gut zu wissen, welche Erkrankungen im jeweiligen Herkunftsland häufig sind. Dabei hilft eine Internetseite der CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise