nach oben

The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

17.08.2023

Individual Differences in Females’ Adherence to Public Health Measures and Psychopathology Symptoms During a Global Health Crisis: the Role of Triarchic Psychopathic Traits

verfasst von: Gisele Magarotto Machado, MS, Emily R. Perkins, PhD, Thalytha Padulla Gerodo, MS, João Victor Martins Miranda, BS, Claudio Sica, PhD, Christopher J. Patrick, PhD, Lucas de Francisco Carvalho, PhD

Erschienen in: The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The two broad aims of this study were to (a) investigate how the three traits of the triarchic model—boldness, meanness, and disinhibition—relate to compliance with public health measures, as well as to internalizing and externalizing psychopathology, during a public health crisis, and (b) test for associations between psychopathology and compliance with public health measures. Participants were 947 Brazilian adult females aged 18–75 years who completed measures of the triarchic traits, internalizing and externalizing symptoms/problems, and a COVID-19 behaviors and beliefs questionnaire. Multiple regression and path analyses showed meanness to be the only triarchic trait significantly predictive of compliance with public health measures, in a negative direction, when controlling for the other traits. Results also demonstrated that compliance with public health measures was associated with levels of distress (negatively), obsessions/fear (positively), and positive mood (negatively). Overall, the results demonstrate the contributions of the triarchic traits to understanding complex phenomena, highlighting meanness as the most essential triarchic trait predictor of adherence to public health measures among females.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

To limit the use of stigmatizing language, this scale is referred as “problematic substance use” throughout.⁷⁰^.

Statistics regarding region effects are available from the first author upon request.

The analysis was limited to these variables since meanness was the only triarchic trait significantly related to both compliance with public health measures and some facets of psychopathology (i.e., obsessions/fear and positive mood, see Fig. 2).

Public Health: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2007. Available at https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/public-health. Accessed March 3, 2023.

Wagaman A, Segal EA. The relationship between empathy and attitudes toward government intervention. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare. 2014;41(4). Available at https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.3984. Accessed 10 February, 2023.

Sica C, Latzman RD, Caudek C, et al. Facing distress in Coronavirus era: the role of maladaptive personality traits and coping strategies. Personality and Individidual Differences. 2021;177:110833. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110833. Acessed 03 March, 2023.

Devereux PG, Miller MK, Kirshenbaum JM. Moral disengagement, locus of control, and belief in a just world: individual differences relate to adherence to COVID-19 guidelines. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;182:111069. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111069. Acessed 03 March, 2023.

Patrick CJ, Fowles DC, Krueger RF. Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology. 2009;21(3):913–938. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000492. Acessed 10 January, 2023.

Patrick CJ. Psychopathy: current knowledge and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2022;18(1):387–415. Available at https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072720-012851. Acessed 10 January, 2023.

Latzman RD, Palumbo IM, Krueger RF, et al. Modeling relations between triarchic biobehavioral traits and DSM internalizing disorder dimensions. Assessment. 2020;27(6):1100–1115. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119876022. Acessed 11 January, 2023.

Reidy DE, Bogen KW. Chapter 22, Public health considerations in psychopathy. In: JE Vitale (Ed.). The complexity of psychopathy. Switzerland: Springer, Cham, 2022, pp. 611–635. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83156-1_22. Acessed 20 February, 2023.

Reidy DE, Bogen KW, Lilienfeld SO. Chapter 11, The impact of youth with psychopathic traits on health: a social-ecological perspective. In: MG Vaughn, CP Salas-Wright, DB Jackson (Eds). Routledge International Handbook of Delinquency and Health. New York: Routledge, 2019, pp. 145–159. Available at https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429289194-11/impact-youth-psychopathic-traits-health-dennis-reidy-katherine-bogen-scott-lilienfeld. Acessed 17 February, 2023.

10.

Hare RD, Neumann CS. Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2008;4(1):217–246. Available at https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452. Acessed 12 January, 2023.

11.

Cleckley HM. Mask of Sanity. 5th ed. Mosby Medical Library; 1976. Available at https://gwern.net/doc/psychology/personality/psychopathy/1941-cleckley-maskofsanity.pdf. Acessed 7 January, 2023.

12.

Coronavirus. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020. Available at https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_3. Accessed September 8, 2022.

13.

Wilder-Smith A, Chiew CJ, Lee VJ. Can we contain the COVID-19 outbreak with the same measures as for SARS? The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2020;20(5):e102-e107. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30129-8. Acessed 12 January, 2023.

14.

Bezerra ACV, da Silva CEM, Soares FRG, et al.. Factors associated with people’s behavior in social isolation during the covid-19 pandemic. Ciênica e Saude Coletiva. 2020;25:2411–2421. Available at https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020256.1.10792020, Acessed 9 December, 2022.

15.

Hallal PC. SOS Brazil: science under attack. Lancet. 2021;397(10272):373–374. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00141-0. Acessed 5 December, 2022.

16.

Stosic MD, Helwig S, Ruben MA. Greater belief in science predicts mask-wearing behavior during COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;176. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110769. Acessed 12 January, 2023.

17.

Carvalho L de F, Machado GM. Differences in adherence to covid-19 pandemic containment measures: Psychopathy traits, empathy, and sex. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. 2020;42(4):389–392. Available at https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2020-0055. Acessed 7 December, 2022.

18.

Miguel FK, Machado GM, Pianowski G, et al. Compliance with containment measures to the COVID-19 pandemic over time: Do antisocial traits matter? Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;168:110346. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110346. Acessed 7 December, 2022.

19.

Zajenkowski M, Jonason PK, Leniarska M, et al.. Who complies with the restrictions to reduce the spread of COVID-19?: personality and perceptions of the COVID-19 situation. Personality and Individual Differences. 2020;166:110199. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110199. Acessed 7 December, 2022.

20.

Martin-Storey A, Temcheff C, Déry M, et al. Conduct problems and adherence to COVID-19 guidelines: a developmental psychopathology-informed approach. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology. 2021;(0123456789). Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-021-00807-y. Acessed 10 December, 2022.

21.

Patrick CJ, Drislane LE. Triarchic model of psychopathy: origins, operationalizations, and observed linkages with personality and general psychopathology. Journal of Personality. 2015;83(6):627–643. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12119. Acessed 6 November, 2022.

22.

Benning SD, Patrick CJ, Iacono WG. Psychopathy, startle blink modulation, and electrodermal reactivity in twin men. Psychophysiology. 2005;42(6). Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00353.x. Accessed 6 November, 2022.

23.

Harper CA, Satchell LP, Fido D, et al. Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2020:1–14. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5. Acessed 15 January, 2023.

24.

Paiva TO, Cruz-Martins N, Pasion R, et al. Boldness personality traits are associated with reduced risk perceptions and adoption of protective behaviors during the first COVID-19 outbreak. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:633555. Available at https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633555. Acessed 8 February, 2023.

25.

Kypta-Vivanco A, Fairchild G. Psychopathic traits predict lower adherence to COVID-19 containment measures. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences. 2022;3:100082. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2022.100082. Acessed 4 March, 2023.

26.

Blagov PS. Adaptive and dark personality in the COVID-19 pandemic: predicting health-behavior endorsement and the appeal of public-health messages. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2021;12(5):697–707. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620936439. Acessed 10 January, 2023.

27.

Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912–920. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. Acessed 29 November, 2022.

28.

Serafini G, Parmigiani B, Amerio A, et al. The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population. QJM : Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians. 2020;113(8):229–235. Available at https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa201. Acessed 02 January 2023.

29.

Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research. 2020;287. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934. Acessed 02 January, 2023.

30.

Czeisler MÉ, Lane RI, Petrosky E, et al. Mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic — United States, June 24–30, 2020. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2020;69(32):1049–1057. Available at https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1. Acessed 15 January, 2023.

31.

Gonçalves AP, Zuanazzi AC, Salvador AP, et al. Preliminary findings on the associations between mental health indicators and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. 2020;2:10–19. Available at https://doi.org/10.12740/APP/122576. Acessed 18 November, 2022.

32.

Luo M, Guo L, Yu M, et al. The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry research. 2020;291:113190. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190. Acessed 18 November, 2022.

33.

Kujawa A, Green H, Compas BE, et al. Exposure to COVID-19 pandemic stress: associations with depression and anxiety in emerging adults in the United States. Depression and Anxiety. 2020;37(12):1280–1288. Available at https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23109. Acessed 18 November, 2022.

34.

Salvador AP, Jaloto A, Zuanazzi AC, et al. Impact of anxiety, stress, and burnout symptoms in Brazilian health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. 2021;1:7–13. Available at https://doi.org/10.12740/APP/133639. Acessed 19 November, 2022.

35.

Charles NE, Strong SJ, Burns LC, et al. Increased mood disorder symptoms, perceived stress, and alcohol use among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Research. 2021;296:113706. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113706. Acessed 25 November, 2022.

36.

MacMillan T, Corrigan MJ, Coffey K, et al. Exploring factors associated with alcohol and/or substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2021;20(03): 1814–1823. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00482-y. Acessed 02 January, 2023.

37.

McKay D, Asmundson GJG. COVID-19 stress and substance use: current issues and future preparations. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2020;74:102274. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102274. Acessed 25 November, 2022.

38.

Gottfried ED, Harrop TM, Anestis JC, et al. An examination of triarchic psychopathy constructs in female offenders. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2019;101(5):455–467. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1502193. Acessed 10 Junuary, 2023.

39.

Gray NS, Blumenthal S, Shuker R, et al. The triarchic model of psychopathy and antisocial behavior: results from an offender population with personality disorder. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2019;36(17). Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519853404. Acessed 22 November, 2022.

40.

Thornton LC, Frick PJ, Ray J V, et al. Risky sex, drugs, sensation seeking, and callous unemotional traits in justice-involved male adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology : the Official Journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53. 2019;48(1):68–79. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1399398. Acessed 22 November, 2022.

41.

Smith PN, Selwyn CN, Wolford-Clevenger C, et al. Psychopathic personality traits, suicide ideation, and suicide attempts in male prison inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2014;41(3):364–379. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813506884. Acessed 20 November, 2022.

42.

Sica C, Perkins ER, Latzman RD, et al. Psychopathy and COVID-19: triarchic model traits as predictors of disease-risk perceptions and emotional well-being during a global pandemic. Personalitty and Individual Differences. 2021;176. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110770. Acessed 20 November, 2022.

43.

World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. Available at https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053. Acessed 03 January, 2023.

44.

Drislane LE, Patrick CJ. Integrating alternative conceptions of psychopathic personality: a latent variable model of triarchic psychopathy constructs. Journal of Personality Disorders. 2017;31(1):110–132. Available at https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2016_30_240. Acessed 14 December, 2022.

45.

Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1994;51(1):8–19. Available at https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950010008002. Acessed 05 February, 2023.

46.

Leys C, Klein O, Dominicy Y, et al. Detecting multivariate outliers: use a robust variant of the Mahalanobis distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2018;74:150–156. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.011. Acessed 09 November, 2022.

47.

Mowle EN, Kelley SE, Edens JF, et al. Development of an inconsistent responding scale for the triarchic psychopathy measure. Psychological Assessment. 2017;29(8):990–1000. Available at https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000395. Acessed 09 November, 2022.

48.

Fleischer A, Mead AD, Huang J. Inattentive responding in MTurk and other online samples. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice. 2015;8(2):196–202. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.25. Acessed 11 November, 2022.

49.

Travassos C, Williams DR. The concept and measurement of race and their relationship to public health: a review focused on Brazil and the United States. Cadernos de saude publica. 2004;20(3):660–678. Available at https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2004000300003. Acessed 07 July, 2023.

50.

Operationalizing the Triarchic Conceptualization of Psychopathy: Preliminary Description of Brief Scales for Assessment of Boldness, Meanness, and Disinhibition. Florida: Christopher J. Patrick, 2010. Available at https://patrickcnslab.psy.fsu.edu/wiki/images/b/b2/TPMmanual.pdf. Acessed 02 Novemeber, 2022.

51.

van Dongen JDM, Drislane LE, Nijman H, et al. Further evidence for reliability and validity of the triarchic psychopathy measure in a forensic sample and a community sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2017;39(1):58–66. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9567-5. Acessed 09 November, 2022.

52.

Carvalho HCW de, Pinheiro ÂMV, Patrick C, et al. Tradução, adaptação cultural e análise de consistência interna do inventário de externalização. Avaliação Psicológica. 2007;6(2):217–227. Available at http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712007000200011. Acessed 02 November, 2022.

53.

Monteiro RP, Gouveia RSV, Patrick CJ, et al. A psicopatia no contexto dos cinco grandes fatores. Psico. 2015;46(4):461. Available at http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2015.3.20314. Acessed 11 November, 2022.

54.

Watson D, O’Hara MW, Naragon-Gainey K, et al. Development and validation of new anxiety and bipolar symptom scales for an expanded version of the IDAS (the IDAS-II). Assessment. 2012;19(4):399–420. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112449857. Acessed 08 November, 2022.

55.

Miller JD, Lynam DR. Psychopathy and the five-factor model of personality: a replication and extension. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2003;81(2):168–178. Available at https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8102_08. Acessed 18 December, 2022.

56.

Venables NC, Foell J, Yancey JR, et al. Quantifying inhibitory control as externalizing proneness: a cross-domain model. Clinical Psychological Science. 2018;6(4):561–580. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618757690. Acessed 09 November, 2022.

57.

Darren G, Mallery P (Eds). SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple study, guide and reference. Boston, Boston, United States: Pearson; 2010. Available at https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3-euw1-ap-pe-ws4-cws-documents.ri-prod/9780367174354/SPSS_Statistics_26_Step_by_Step_Answers_to_Selected_Exercises.pdf. Acessed 08 November, 2023.

58.

Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118. Acessed 10 November, 2022.

59.

MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods. 1996;1(2):130–149. Available at https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130. Acessed 09 November, 2022.

60.

McDonald RP, Ho MHR. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological methods. 2002;7(1):64–82. Available at https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64. Acessed 08 November, 2022.

61.

Schreiber JB, Stage FK, King J, et al. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. The Journal of Educational Research. 2006;99(6):323–338. Available at https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338. Acessed 09 November, 2022.

62.

Viding E, McCrory E. Towards understanding atypical social affiliation in psychopathy. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(5):437–444. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30049-5. Acessed 12 January, 2023.

63.

Baroncelli A, Perkins ER, Ciucci E, et al. Triarchic model traits as predictors of bullying and cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2022;37(5–6): NP3242–NP3268. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520934448. Acessed 02 February, 2023.

64.

Fernández D, Zabala MC, Ros L, et al. Testing the properties of the triarchic model of psychopathy in a community sample: self-reported trait aggression and drug consumption associations. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2019;60(4):377–385. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12542. Acessed 02 February 2023.

65.

Hicks BM, Iacono WG., McGue M. Identifying childhood characteristics that underlie premorbid risk for substance use disorders: socialization and boldness. Development and Psychopathology. 2014;26(1):141–157. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000862. Acessed 20 December, 2022.

66.

Sica C, Perkins ER, Joyner KJ, et al. Testing for sex differences in the nomological network of the triarchic model of psychopathy in incarcerated individuals. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2021;43(4):960–976. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-021-09897-w. Acessed 19 November, 2022.

67.

Anestis JC, Preston OC, Harrop TM, et al. The intersection of sociodemographic characteristics within the nomological network of the triarchic psychopathy model in a forensic sample. Journal of Criminal Justice. 2019;61:13–25. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.02.001. Acessed 19 November, 2022.

68.

Brislin SJ, Venables NC, Drislane LE, et al. Further validation of triarchic psychopathy scales from the multidimensional personality questionnaire: setting the stage for large-sample etiological studies: Assessment. 2015;24(5):575–590. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115621790. Acessed 16 November, 2022.

69.

Sica C, Drislane L, Caudek C, et al. A test of the construct validity of the triarchic psychopathy measure in an italian community sample. Personalitty and Individual Differences. 2015;82:163–168. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.015. Acessed 08 November, 2022.

70.

Kelly JF, Saitz R, Wakeman S. Language, substance use disorders, and policy: the need to reach consensus on an “addiction-ary.” Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly. 2016;34(1):116–123. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2016.1113103. Acessed 21 January 2023.

Titel: Individual Differences in Females’ Adherence to Public Health Measures and Psychopathology Symptoms During a Global Health Crisis: the Role of Triarchic Psychopathic Traits
verfasst von: Gisele Magarotto Machado, MS
Emily R. Perkins, PhD
Thalytha Padulla Gerodo, MS
João Victor Martins Miranda, BS
Claudio Sica, PhD
Christopher J. Patrick, PhD
Lucas de Francisco Carvalho, PhD
Publikationsdatum: 17.08.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Print ISSN: 1094-3412
Elektronische ISSN: 2168-6793
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-023-09858-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

23.04.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

23.04.2024 Depression antepartal oder postpartal Nachrichten

Bislang gibt es kein Medikament zur Prävention von Wochenbettdepressionen. Das Injektionsanästhetikum Esketamin könnte womöglich diese Lücke füllen.

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Kombination aus Medikamenten und Psychotherapie gilt als effektivster Ansatz bei Depressionen. Das ist bei betagten Menschen nicht anders, trotz Besonderheiten.

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Um Menschen nach der Flucht aus einem Krisengebiet bestmöglich medizinisch betreuen zu können, ist es gut zu wissen, welche Erkrankungen im jeweiligen Herkunftsland häufig sind. Dabei hilft eine Internetseite der CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen