Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2008

Open Access 01.12.2008 | Case report

Intra-abdominal pectus bar migration – a rare clinical entity: case report

verfasst von: Ramon Tahmassebi, Hutan Ashrafian, Caner Salih, Ranjit P Deshpande, Thanos Athanasiou, Julian E Dussek

Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2008

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

We present the case of a 20-year-old male who underwent successful surgical correction of pectus excavatum with the Highly Modified Ravitch Repair (HMRR). At 29 months the attempted operative removal of the Ravitch bar was unsuccessful despite the impression of adequate bar location on chest x-ray. Subsequent imaging with computed tomography was unclear in determining whether the bar was supra or infra-diaphragmatic due to the tissue distortion subsequent to initial surgery. Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) successfully retrieved the bar and revealed that it was not in the thorax, but had migrated to the intra-abdominal bare area of the liver, with no evidence of associated diaphragmatic defect or hernia. Intra-abdominal pectus bar migration is a rare clinical entity, and safe removal can be facilitated by the use of the VATS technique.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1749-8090-3-39) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed equally to this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Background

Pectus excavatum is a congenital sternal depression that occurs in approximately 8 per 1000 live births. Complications include symptoms of restrictive respiratory difficulties, mediastinal compression and body image disorders. Treatment options include conservative management for mild cases and surgery for severe symptoms or deformity [1].
Currently two surgical methods are most commonly used for correcting pectus excavatum: the Ravitch type repair and the Nuss Procedure. The most frequently applied Ravitch type procedure is the Highly Modified Ravitch Repair (HMRR), this requires an inframammary approach, resection of the deformed cartilages (perichodrectomy) followed by a sternal wedge osteotomy and placement of a retrosternal metallic bar typically stabilised by wires. The Nuss procedure avoids cartilage resection and is performed by placing a wide U-shaped bar behind the sternum through small bilateral thoracic incisions, and turning it in such a way that it protrudes the sternum and deformed costal cartilages to a desired thoracic contour [2].
Patient satisfaction can be as high as 96.5% although early postoperative complications can include pneumothorax and wound problems, whereas later complications include thoracic contour overcorrection and bar displacement [3]. We report on the late complication of pectus bar migration, which is a rare clinical entity and has only been described sporadically in the literature (Table 1).
Table 1
Cases of pectus bar or stabilising wire migration.
Author
Procedure
Presentation
Time
Migration Site
Foreign
Material
Mechanism
Outcome
Elami et el.[4] 1991
Lieberman
Procedure
24 months
Right Atrium
Metallic Bar
Bar Fracture
Removed at sternotomy
McWilliams et al.[6] 1992
Ravitch Type
48 months
Right Costophrenic Angle
Stabilising Wire
Unknown
Removed at thoracotomy
Dalrymple-Hay et al.[7] 1997
Ravitch Type
9 months
Left Ventricle
Ravitch Bar
Unknown
Removed at sternotomy
Stefani et al.[8] 1998
Lodi Procedure
3 months
Peritoneum
Kirschner Wire (used as a Bar)
Unknown
Removed at Video Laparoscopy
Onursal et al.[5] 1999
Ravitch Type
48 months
Right Ventricle
Ravitch Bar
Bar Fracture
Removed at thoracotomy
Kanegaonkar et al.[9] 2001
Ravitch Type
14 months
Deep to the Sixth Rib
Ravitch Bar
Unknown
Removed at Video Thoracoscopy
Kanegaonkar et al.[9] 2001
Ravitch Type
10 months
Thoracic Cavity
Ravitch Bar
Unknown
Removed at Video Thoracoscopy
Barakat et al.[10] 2004
Morgan Procedure
24 months
Right Ventricular Epicardium
Sternal Wire
Broken Wire
Removed at sternotomy
Hoel at al.[11] 2006
Nuss Procedure
2 months
Ascending Aorta
Nuss Bar
Unknown
Removed at sternotomy
Morimoto et al.[12] 2007
Nuss Procedure
36 months
Ossified rib tissue
Nuss Bar
Unknown
Mini-thoracotomy at insertion site
Morimoto et al.[12] 2007
Nuss Procedure
36 months
Into underlying rib
Nuss Bar
Unknown
Mini-thoracotomy at insertion site
Morimoto et al.[12] 2007
Nuss Procedure
36 months
Underneath underlying rib
Nuss Bar
Unknown
Mini-thoracotomy at insertion site
Tahmassebi et al. 2008 (This case)
Ravitch Type
29 months
Bare area of Liver
Ravitch Bar
Unknown
Removed at Video Thoracoscopy

Case Presentation

A healthy 20-year-old builder underwent surgical correction of his pectus excavatum deformity by the Highly Modified Ravitch Repair using a stainless steel pectus bar. This was placed horizontally under the sternum with its lateral extremities resting on the outer aspect of the ribs in a routine fashion. The patient was electively readmitted 29 months after surgery for removal of the bar without adverse symptoms on readmission. Pre-removal chest x-ray was unremarkable (Figure 1a).
At operative removal, the exact location of the bar could not be identified, and it was not detectable at the previous insertion site incisions. On-table X-ray image intensification simply corroborated with the original chest film that the bar was at the level of the diaphragm, but was unable to differentiate whether it was supra- or infra-diaphragmatic.
Consequently the patient underwent computed tomography (CT) in order to accurately localize the bar (Figure 1b). However, due to the nature of the corrected pectus shaped chest and the tissue distortion subsequent to surgery, its anatomical position with respect to the diaphragm was still uncertain.
A decision was made to locate the bar utilising video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The patient underwent general anaesthesia with a double-lumen endotracheal tube, and was placed in the left lateral decubitus position with his right arm abducted. Video thoracoscopy was initiated with the introduction of the thoracoscope at the 5th intercostals space along the mid-axillary line. The other two ports were created and utilized at the 8th intercostal space along the anterior and posterior axillary lines. After sequential deflation of the lungs, thoracoscopic evaluation revealed no evidence of the bar within the chest. In conjunction with image intensification, and with guided instrument palpation the bar was located sub-diaphragmatically. To improve access, the anterior port incision was extended. A 3 cm incision was made on the diaphragm over the palpable lateral end of the bar, which was visualized, and noted to be at the superior and lateral aspect of the liver over the bare area, where it was noted to be supported by the falciform and right coronary ligaments. The bar was removed with ease, and the diaphragm was repaired using an absorbable suture. The patient had no postoperative complications.

Conclusion

There are currently no well defined criteria to differentiate bar displacement from migration, but we propose displacement to be the movement within the boundaries of original operative tissue planes, whereas migration to occur where there is passage of foreign material through other organs, or tissues not incised during the initial operation.
Occasionally the cause of bar migration is known, when for example the sharp end of a broken metallic bar penetrates local tissues and thereby travels through them [4, 5]. In other cases such as the one we report here, the cause of migration is unknown.
Possible mechanisms can include poor surgical stabilisation of operative material, trauma or local tissue erosion. This can become more likely in the presence of underlying congenital tissue defects, herniae or with raised intrathoracic pressure facilitating bar travel. The latter may have occurred in our case, as the patient was a builder and typically lifted heavy weights as part of his profession.
When bar migration does occur, its anatomical location should be confirmed by x-ray or CT. If the patient is haemodynamically uncompromised, and the bar lies within the thoracic cavity, then we advocate a minimally-invasive VATS retrieval. If however, imaging is unable to accurately discern bar location, then VATS exploration can again be beneficial, particularly as this modality can track the potential route of bar migration and retrieve it from the entry-points of destination tissues. In our case, if VATS had not been employed, laparoscopy would not have been feasible at the bare area of the liver, and an open approach via the abdomen or thorax would have become necessary.
We report this case as it is a rare complication of pectus excavatum repair, but highlights the importance of vigilant follow-up in these patients. If pectus migration does occur, then x-ray, CT and VATS may all prove beneficial in the management of such a complication.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed equally to this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Anhänge

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Molik KA, Engum SA, Rescorla FJ, West KW, Scherer LR, Grosfeld JL: Pectus excavatum repair: experience with standard and minimal invasive techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2001, 36 (2): 324-328. 10.1053/jpsu.2001.20707. 2001/02/15CrossRefPubMed Molik KA, Engum SA, Rescorla FJ, West KW, Scherer LR, Grosfeld JL: Pectus excavatum repair: experience with standard and minimal invasive techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2001, 36 (2): 324-328. 10.1053/jpsu.2001.20707. 2001/02/15CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fonkalsrud EW: Current management of pectus excavatum. World J Surg. 2003, 27 (5): 502-508. 10.1007/s00268-003-7025-5. 2003/04/26CrossRefPubMed Fonkalsrud EW: Current management of pectus excavatum. World J Surg. 2003, 27 (5): 502-508. 10.1007/s00268-003-7025-5. 2003/04/26CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hebra A, Swoveland B, Egbert M, Tagge EP, Georgeson K, Othersen HB, Nuss D: Outcome analysis of minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: review of 251 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2000, 35 (2): 252-7; discussion 257-8. 10.1016/S0022-3468(00)90019-8. 2000/02/29CrossRefPubMed Hebra A, Swoveland B, Egbert M, Tagge EP, Georgeson K, Othersen HB, Nuss D: Outcome analysis of minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: review of 251 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2000, 35 (2): 252-7; discussion 257-8. 10.1016/S0022-3468(00)90019-8. 2000/02/29CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Elami A, Lieberman Y: Hemopericardium: a late complication after repair of pectus excavatum. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1991, 32 (4): 539-540. 1991/07/01 Elami A, Lieberman Y: Hemopericardium: a late complication after repair of pectus excavatum. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1991, 32 (4): 539-540. 1991/07/01
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalrymple-Hay MJ, Calver A, Lea RE, Monro JL: Migration of pectus excavatum correction bar into the left ventricle. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997, 12 (3): 507-509. 10.1016/S1010-7940(97)00209-1. 1997/10/23CrossRefPubMed Dalrymple-Hay MJ, Calver A, Lea RE, Monro JL: Migration of pectus excavatum correction bar into the left ventricle. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997, 12 (3): 507-509. 10.1016/S1010-7940(97)00209-1. 1997/10/23CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Stefani A, Morandi U, Lodi R: Migration of pectus excavatum correction metal support into the abdomen. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998, 14 (4): 434-436. 10.1016/S1010-7940(98)00190-0. 1998/12/09CrossRefPubMed Stefani A, Morandi U, Lodi R: Migration of pectus excavatum correction metal support into the abdomen. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998, 14 (4): 434-436. 10.1016/S1010-7940(98)00190-0. 1998/12/09CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Onursal E, Toker A, Bostanci K, Alpagut U, Tireli E: A complication of pectus excavatum operation: endomyocardial steel strut. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999, 68 (3): 1082-1083. 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00655-4. 1999/10/06CrossRefPubMed Onursal E, Toker A, Bostanci K, Alpagut U, Tireli E: A complication of pectus excavatum operation: endomyocardial steel strut. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999, 68 (3): 1082-1083. 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00655-4. 1999/10/06CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanegaonkar RG, Dussek JE: Removal of migrating pectus bars by video-assisted thoracoscopy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001, 19 (5): 713-715. 10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00651-0. 2001/05/10CrossRefPubMed Kanegaonkar RG, Dussek JE: Removal of migrating pectus bars by video-assisted thoracoscopy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001, 19 (5): 713-715. 10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00651-0. 2001/05/10CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Barakat MJ, Morgan JA: Haemopericardium causing cardiac tamponade: a late complication of pectus excavatum repair. Heart. 2004, 90 (4): e22-10.1136/hrt.2003.029983. 2004/03/17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barakat MJ, Morgan JA: Haemopericardium causing cardiac tamponade: a late complication of pectus excavatum repair. Heart. 2004, 90 (4): e22-10.1136/hrt.2003.029983. 2004/03/17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoel TN, Rein KA, Svennevig JL: A life-threatening complication of the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006, 81 (1): 370-372. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.09.008. 2005/12/22CrossRefPubMed Hoel TN, Rein KA, Svennevig JL: A life-threatening complication of the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006, 81 (1): 370-372. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.09.008. 2005/12/22CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Morimoto K, Imai K, Yamada A, Fujimoto T, Matsumoto H, Niizuma K: Migration of a pectus bar into the ribs. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008, 61 (2): 225-227. 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.09.003. 2007/11/14CrossRefPubMed Morimoto K, Imai K, Yamada A, Fujimoto T, Matsumoto H, Niizuma K: Migration of a pectus bar into the ribs. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008, 61 (2): 225-227. 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.09.003. 2007/11/14CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Intra-abdominal pectus bar migration – a rare clinical entity: case report
verfasst von
Ramon Tahmassebi
Hutan Ashrafian
Caner Salih
Ranjit P Deshpande
Thanos Athanasiou
Julian E Dussek
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2008
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2008
Elektronische ISSN: 1749-8090
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-3-39

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.