Intraoperative nerve identification and chronic postherniorrhaphy pain

Excerpt

First of all, we thank Drs. Chen and Amid [1] for their very thoughtful comments and update on the role of intraoperative nerve identification during groin hernia repair and the risk of development of chronic pain. We agree with all their comments, except that our conclusions in the abstract does not “conclude that nerve identification does not decrease rates of pain in routine practice” as quoted, but rather that “although intraoperative inguinal nerve identification should be aimed at, other factors may contribute to the risk of nerve damage and persistent pain after open groin hernia repair” [2]. This conclusion supports the comments by Chen and Amid [1], despite that we in the present study were not able to demonstrate any influence of nerve identification on signs of nerve damage or on development of persistent pain. The discussion on identification of the “genitofemoral nerve” (which we entirely agree should be named “genital branch”) is to some extent semantic as we agree that routine direct identification should not be done, but only if necessary for the herniotomy per se. This may explain our low identification rate of the genital branch (21.3 %) which, interestingly, is within the same range as reported from a recent hernia specialist publication on persistent pain problems, with an identification rate of 26.5 % [3]. Also, we agree that the use of heavy-weight mesh may have contributed to the pain problems, but when the study was conducted there was little conclusive evidence for differences between mesh type and persistent pain. …