nach oben

Techniques in Coloproctology

Erschienen in:

11.12.2017 | Review

Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: R. Blanco-Colino, E. Espin-Basany

Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been proven to be an effective tool to assess anastomotic perfusion. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate its efficacy in reducing the anastomotic leakage (AL) rate after colorectal surgery.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, WOS, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2017 for studies comparing fluorescence imaging with standard care. ClinicalTrials.gov register was searched for ongoing trials. The primary outcome measure was AL rate with at least 1 month of follow-up. ROBINS-I tool was used for quality assessment. A meta-analysis with random-effects model was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) from the original data.

Results

One thousand three hundred and two patients from 5 non-randomized studies were included. Fluorescence imaging significantly reduced the AL rate in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (OR 0.34; CI 0.16–0.74; p = 0.006). Low AL rates were shown in rectal cancer surgery (ICG 1.1% vs non-ICG 6.1%; p = 0.02). There was no significant decrease in the AL rate when colorectal procedures for benign and malignant disease were combined. To date, there are no published randomized control trials (RCTs) on this subject, though 3 ongoing RCTs were identified.

Conclusions

ICG fluorescence imaging seems to reduce AL rates following colorectal surgery for cancer. However, the inherent bias of the non-randomized studies included, and their differences in AL definition and diagnosis could have influenced results. Large well-designed RCTs are needed to provide evidence for its routine use in colorectal surgery.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Vallance A, Wexner S, Berho M et al (2017) A collaborative review of the current concepts and challenges of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 19(1):O1–O12. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13534 CrossRefPubMed

Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26(4):499–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0256-4 CrossRefPubMed

McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102(5):462–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9697 CrossRefPubMed

Phitayakorn R, Delaney CP, Reynolds HL et al (2008) Standardized algorithms for management of anastomotic leaks and related abdominal and pelvic abscesses after colorectal surgery. World J Surg 32(6):1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9468-1 CrossRefPubMed

European Society of Coloproctology collaborating group (2017) The relationship between method of anastomosis and anastomotic failure after right hemicolectomy and ileo-caecal resection: an international snapshot audit. Colorectal Dis 38(1):42–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13646

Ortiz H, Biondo S, Codina A et al (2016) 001. Cir Esp 94(4):213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2015.11.008 CrossRefPubMed

Tiernan J, Cook A, Geh I et al (2014) Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities for the association of coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Colorectal Dis 16(12):965–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12790 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208(2):269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.015 CrossRefPubMed

Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Ramos Rodríguez JL et al (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262(2):321–330. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000973 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Chadi SA, Fingerhut A, Berho M et al (2016) Emerging trends in the etiology, prevention, and treatment of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. J Gastrointest Surg 20(12):2035–2051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3255-3 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Vignali A, Gianotti L, Braga M, Radaelli G, Malvezzi L, Di Carlo V (2000) Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):76–82CrossRefPubMed

12.

Rutegård M (2015) Anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: the role of blood perfusion. World J Gastrointest Surg 7(11):289–292. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v7.i11.289 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Sparreboom CL, Wu ZQ, Ji JF, Lange JF (2016) Integrated approach to colorectal anastomotic leakage: communication, infection and healing disturbances. World J Gastroenterol 22(32):7226–7235. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i32.7226 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Nachiappan S, Askari A, Currie A, Kennedy RH, Faiz O (2014) Intraoperative assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 28(9):2513–2530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3520-z CrossRefPubMed

15.

Karliczek A, Benaron DA, Baas PC et al (2008) Intraoperative assessment of microperfusion with visible light spectroscopy in esophageal and colorectal anastomoses. Eur Surg Res 41(3):303–311. https://doi.org/10.1159/000155880 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Hirst NA, Tiernan JP, Millner PA, Jayne DG (2014) Systematic review of methods to predict and detect anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 16(2):95–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12411 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Karliczek A, Harlaar N, Zeebregts C, Wiggers T, Baas P, van Dam G (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(5):569–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0658-6 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Bae SU, Min BS, Kim NK (2015) Robotic low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery for rectal cancer using the firefly technique. Yonsei Med J 56(4):1028–1035. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.1028 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Boni L, David G, Dionigi G, Rausei S, Cassinotti E, Fingerhut A (2016) Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence to assess bowel perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 30(7):2736–2742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4540-z CrossRefPubMed

20.

Foppa C, Denoya PI, Tarta C, Bergamaschi R (2014) Indocyanine green fluorescent dye during bowel surgery: are the blood supply “guessing days” over? Tech Coloproctol 18(8):753–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1130-3 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Gröne J, Koch D, Kreis ME (2015) Impact of intraoperative microperfusion assessment with Pinpoint Perfusion Imaging on surgical management of laparoscopic low rectal and anorectal anastomoses. Colorectal Dis 17(3, SI):22–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13031 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Nishigori N, Koyama F, Nakagawa T et al (2016) Visualization of lymph/blood flow in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery by ICG fluorescence imaging (Lap-IGFI). Ann Surg Oncol 23:266–274. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4509-0 CrossRef

23.

Protyniak B, Dinallo AM, Boyan WP, Dressner RM, Arvanitis ML (2015) Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography—an objective evaluation of anastomotic perfusion in colorectal surgery. Am Surg 81(6):580–584PubMed

24.

Hellan M, Spinoglio G, Pigazzi A, Lagares-Garcia JA (2014) The influence of fluorescence imaging on the location of bowel transection during robotic left-sided colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 28(5):1695–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3377-6 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Sherwinter DA, Gallagher J, Donkar T (2013) Intra-operative transanal near infrared imaging of colorectal anastomotic perfusion: a feasibility study. Colorectal Dis 15(1):91–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03101.x CrossRefPubMed

26.

Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE et al (2015) Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 220(1):82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.09.015 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Ris F, Hompes R, Lindsey I, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ, Cahill RA (2014) Near infra-red laparoscopic assessment of the adequacy of blood perfusion of intestinal anastomosis—a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 16(8):646–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12593 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Guraieb-Trueba M, Frering T, Atallah S (2016) Combined endoscopic and laparoscopic real-time intra-operative evaluation of bowel perfusion using fluorescence angiography. Tech Coloproctol 20(12):883–884CrossRefPubMed

29.

Keller DS, Joshi HM, Rodriguez-Justo M, Walsh D, Coffey JC, Chand M (2017) Using fluorescence lymphangiography to define the ileocolic mesentery: proof of concept for the watershed area using real-time imaging. Tech Coloproctol 21(9):757–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1677-x CrossRefPubMed

30.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 8(5):336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Kudszus S, Roesel C, Schachtrupp A, Höer JJ (2010) Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 395(8):1025–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0699-x CrossRef

32.

Kin C, Vo H, Welton L, Welton M (2015) Equivocal effect of intraoperative fluorescence angiography on colorectal anastomotic leaks. Dis Colon Rectum 58(6):582–587. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000320 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. Br Med J 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 CrossRef

34.

Jafari MD, Lee KH, Halabi WJ et al (2013) The use of indocyanine green fluorescence to assess anastomotic perfusion during robotic assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27(8):3003–3008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2832-8 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Kim JC, Lee JL, Yoon YS, Alotaibi AM, Kim J (2016) Utility of indocyanine-green fluorescent imaging during robot-assisted sphincter-saving surgery on rectal cancer patients. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 12:710–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1710 CrossRef

36.

Boni L, Fingerhut A, Marzorati A, Rausei S, Dionigi G, Cassinotti E (2017) Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during laparoscopic low anterior resection: results of a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 31(4):1836–1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5181-6 CrossRefPubMed

37.

ClinicalTrials.gov (2015) The role of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging on anastomotic leak in robotic colorectal surgery. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02598414. Accessed 24 Jan 2017

38.

ClinicalTrials.gov (2017) Evaluation of intestinal vascolarization with indocianine green angiography during rectal resection or left colectomy. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02662946. Accessed 24 Jan 2017

39.

ClinicalTrials.gov (2017) A study assessing perfusion outcomes with PINPOINT^® near infrared fluorescence imaging in low anterior resection (PILLAR III). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02205307. Accessed 24 Jan 2017

40.

Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253(5):890–899. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182128929 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Katoh H, Yamashita K, Wang G, Sato T, Nakamura T, Watanabe M (2011) Anastomotic leakage contributes to the risk for systemic recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15(1):120–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1379-4 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Espín E, Ciga MA, Pera M, Ortiz H (2015) Oncological outcome following anastomotic leak in rectal surgery. Br J Surg 102(4):416–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9748 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Wada T et al (2017) Evaluation of intestinal perfusion by ICG fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic colorectal surgery with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc 31(3):1061–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5064-x CrossRefPubMed

44.

Ris F, Hompes R, Cunningham C et al (2014) Near-infrared (NIR) perfusion angiography in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 28(7):2221–2226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3432-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Diana M, Agnus V, Halvax P et al (2015) Intraoperative fluorescence-based enhanced reality laparoscopic real-time imaging to assess bowel perfusion at the anastomotic site in an experimental model. Br J Surg 102(2):e169–e176. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9725 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von: R. Blanco-Colino
E. Espin-Basany
Publikationsdatum: 11.12.2017
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Elektronische ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1731-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome due to rectocele and rectal intussusception with a high volume stapler (TST STARR-plus)

Virtual reality simulation for surgery: from video games to transanal total mesorectal excision

The case of the inside-out J-pouch: an incarcerated, prolapsed ileal pouch

Outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without primary diverting loop ileostomy if postoperative sepsis develops

Staplers for obstructed defecation syndrome

Efficacy of autologous fat graft injection in the treatment of anovaginal fistulas

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“