Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020

15.10.2019

Is robotic right colectomy economically sustainable? a multicentre retrospective comparative study and cost analysis

verfasst von: Giovanni Merola, Antonio Sciuto, Felice Pirozzi, Jacopo Andreuccetti, Giusto Pignata, Francesco Corcione, Marco Milone, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Rossana Castaldo, Leandro Pecchia, Graziano Ceccarelli, Umberto Bracale

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Following the Food and Drug Administration approval, robot-assisted colorectal surgery has gained more acceptance among surgeons. One of the open issues about robotic surgery is the economic sustainability. The aim of our study is to evaluate the economic sustainability of robotic as compared to laparoscopic right colectomy for the Italian National Health System.

Methods

We performed a retrospective multicentre case-matched study including 94 patients for each group from four different Italian surgical departments. An economic evaluation gathered from a real-world data was performed to assess the sustainability of the robotic approach for right colectomy in the Italian National Health System. In particular, a differential cost analysis between the two procedures was performed.

Results

No statistical differences were found between the two groups for postoperative outcomes. After a careful review of the literature on the cost assessment for the operative room, medical devices and hospital stay according with our data, we estimated the followings: (a) the mean operative room cost for robotic group was 2179 ± 476 € vs. 1376 ± 322 € for laparoscopic group; (b) the mean hospital stay cost for robotic group was 3143 ± 1435 € vs. 3292 ± 1123 € for laparoscopic group; and (c) the mean cost for instruments was 6280 € for robotic group vs. 1504 € for laparoscopic group. The total mean cost of robotic right colectomy was 11,576 ± 1915 € vs. 6196 ± 1444 € for laparoscopic right colectomy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, to date, robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis does not provide any significant clinical advantages, which may justify the additional costs, as compared to its laparoscopic counterpart. Further evolution of robotic technology and experience may lead to a reduction of costs, especially if the robotic platform is used in an appropriate healthcare setting.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracale U et al (2013) Single access laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with or without inferior mesenteric artery preservation: our preliminary experience. Minerva Chir 68(3):315–320PubMed Bracale U et al (2013) Single access laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with or without inferior mesenteric artery preservation: our preliminary experience. Minerva Chir 68(3):315–320PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracale U et al (2016) Reply to early colon cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ESMO Open 1(6):e000110PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bracale U et al (2016) Reply to early colon cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ESMO Open 1(6):e000110PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Milone M et al (2015) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers. Surg Endosc 29(8):2314–2320PubMedCrossRef Milone M et al (2015) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers. Surg Endosc 29(8):2314–2320PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Casciola L et al (2003) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosi. Technical aspects and personal experience. Minerva Chir 58(4):621–627PubMed Casciola L et al (2003) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosi. Technical aspects and personal experience. Minerva Chir 58(4):621–627PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Damle A et al (2017) Diffusion of technology: trends in robotic-assisted colorectal surgery. Am J Surg 214(5):820–824PubMedCrossRef Damle A et al (2017) Diffusion of technology: trends in robotic-assisted colorectal surgery. Am J Surg 214(5):820–824PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fung AK, Aly EH (2013) Robotic colonic surgery: is it advisable to commence a new learning curve? Dis Colon Rectum 56(6):786–796PubMedCrossRef Fung AK, Aly EH (2013) Robotic colonic surgery: is it advisable to commence a new learning curve? Dis Colon Rectum 56(6):786–796PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballantyne GH, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin N Am 83(6):1293–1304PubMedCrossRef Ballantyne GH, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin N Am 83(6):1293–1304PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittekind C, Oberschmid B (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumors 2010: General aspects and amendments in the general section. Pathologe 31(5):333–338PubMedCrossRef Wittekind C, Oberschmid B (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumors 2010: General aspects and amendments in the general section. Pathologe 31(5):333–338PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA et al (2009) The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA et al (2009) The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracale U et al (2018) The use of barbed suture for intracorporeal mechanical anastomosis during a totally laparoscopic right colectomy: is it safe? a retrospective nonrandomized comparative multicenter study. Surg Innov 25(3):267–273PubMedCrossRef Bracale U et al (2018) The use of barbed suture for intracorporeal mechanical anastomosis during a totally laparoscopic right colectomy: is it safe? a retrospective nonrandomized comparative multicenter study. Surg Innov 25(3):267–273PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw DD et al (2018) Robotic colorectal surgery learning curve and case complexity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(10):1163–1168PubMedCrossRef Shaw DD et al (2018) Robotic colorectal surgery learning curve and case complexity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(10):1163–1168PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracale U et al (2015) Single-access laparoscopic rectal resection versus the multiport technique: a retrospective study with cost analysis. Surg Innov 22(1):46–53PubMedCrossRef Bracale U et al (2015) Single-access laparoscopic rectal resection versus the multiport technique: a retrospective study with cost analysis. Surg Innov 22(1):46–53PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracale U et al (2014) Beneficial effects of fibrin glue (Quixil) versus Lichtenstein conventional technique in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. Hernia 18(2):185–192PubMedCrossRef Bracale U et al (2014) Beneficial effects of fibrin glue (Quixil) versus Lichtenstein conventional technique in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. Hernia 18(2):185–192PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rayburn L, Rayburn J (1984) Using the differential costing concept for healthcare decisions. Healthc comput commun 1(11):26PubMed Rayburn L, Rayburn J (1984) Using the differential costing concept for healthcare decisions. Healthc comput commun 1(11):26PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Edelman DS, Hodde JP (2011) Update on bioactive prosthetic material for the treatment of hernias. Surg Technol Int 21:135–139PubMed Edelman DS, Hodde JP (2011) Update on bioactive prosthetic material for the treatment of hernias. Surg Technol Int 21:135–139PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuccurullo D et al (2015) Relaparoscopy for management of postoperative complications following colorectal surgery: ten years experience in a single center. Surg Endosc 29(7):1795–1803PubMedCrossRef Cuccurullo D et al (2015) Relaparoscopy for management of postoperative complications following colorectal surgery: ten years experience in a single center. Surg Endosc 29(7):1795–1803PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Milone M et al (2015) Colorectal resection in deep pelvic endometriosis: surgical technique and post-operative complications. World J Gastroenterol 21(47):13345–13351PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Milone M et al (2015) Colorectal resection in deep pelvic endometriosis: surgical technique and post-operative complications. World J Gastroenterol 21(47):13345–13351PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Reggio S et al (2015) Single-layer versus double-layer closure of the enterotomy in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a single-center study. Tech Coloproctol 19(12):745–750PubMedCrossRef Reggio S et al (2015) Single-layer versus double-layer closure of the enterotomy in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a single-center study. Tech Coloproctol 19(12):745–750PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Roscio F et al (2012) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer. Int J Surg 10(6):290–295PubMedCrossRef Roscio F et al (2012) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer. Int J Surg 10(6):290–295PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Spinoglio G et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for the treatment of colon cancer: perioperative outcomes and 5-year survival in a consecutive series of 202 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 25(12):3580–3586PubMedCrossRef Spinoglio G et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for the treatment of colon cancer: perioperative outcomes and 5-year survival in a consecutive series of 202 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 25(12):3580–3586PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Solaini L et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a multicenter comparative analysis on short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 33(6):1898–1902PubMedCrossRef Solaini L et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a multicenter comparative analysis on short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 33(6):1898–1902PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat de’Angelis N et al (2016) Laparoscopic extended right colectomy versus laparoscopic left colectomy for carcinoma of the splenic flexure: a matched case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(3):623–630PubMedCrossRef de’Angelis N et al (2016) Laparoscopic extended right colectomy versus laparoscopic left colectomy for carcinoma of the splenic flexure: a matched case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(3):623–630PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Armijo PR et al (2018) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons’ conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32(4):2106–2113PubMedCrossRef Armijo PR et al (2018) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons’ conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32(4):2106–2113PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Solaini L et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32(3):1104–1110PubMedCrossRef Solaini L et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32(3):1104–1110PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrucciani N et al (2015) Robotic right colectomy: a worthwhile procedure? results of a meta-analysis of trials comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy. J Minim Access Surg 11(1):22–28PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Petrucciani N et al (2015) Robotic right colectomy: a worthwhile procedure? results of a meta-analysis of trials comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy. J Minim Access Surg 11(1):22–28PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99(9):1219–1226PubMedCrossRef Park JS et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99(9):1219–1226PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Khorgami Z et al (2018) The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc 33(7):2217–2221PubMedCrossRef Khorgami Z et al (2018) The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc 33(7):2217–2221PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Tillou J et al (2018) The impact of surgeon choices on costs associated with uncomplicated minimally invasive colectomy: you are not as important as you think. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 6(2):108–113CrossRef Tillou J et al (2018) The impact of surgeon choices on costs associated with uncomplicated minimally invasive colectomy: you are not as important as you think. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 6(2):108–113CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins RM et al (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 31(1):185–192PubMedCrossRef Higgins RM et al (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 31(1):185–192PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Berto P et al (2012) Cost of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 26(5):1444–1453PubMedCrossRef Berto P et al (2012) Cost of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 26(5):1444–1453PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemanu DP et al (2014) A systematic review to assess cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 16(5):338–346PubMedCrossRef Lemanu DP et al (2014) A systematic review to assess cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 16(5):338–346PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Toh JWT et al (2018) Association of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics before elective colorectal surgery with surgical site infection: a network meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 1(6):e183226PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Toh JWT et al (2018) Association of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics before elective colorectal surgery with surgical site infection: a network meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 1(6):e183226PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Angelis N et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: analysis of the initial simultaneous learning curve of a surgical fellow. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(11):882–892CrossRef Angelis N et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: analysis of the initial simultaneous learning curve of a surgical fellow. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(11):882–892CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Is robotic right colectomy economically sustainable? a multicentre retrospective comparative study and cost analysis
verfasst von
Giovanni Merola
Antonio Sciuto
Felice Pirozzi
Jacopo Andreuccetti
Giusto Pignata
Francesco Corcione
Marco Milone
Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Rossana Castaldo
Leandro Pecchia
Graziano Ceccarelli
Umberto Bracale
Publikationsdatum
15.10.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07193-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.