Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2020

13.04.2020

Is the American College of Surgeons Online Communities a safe and useful venue to ask for surgical advice?

verfasst von: Karla Bernardi, Puja Shah, Erik P. Askenasy, Courtney Balentine, Mark M. Crabbe, Mario A. Cerame, John A. Harvin, Lillian Huang, Stefanos G. Millas, Patrick Molt, Tamara E. Saunders, Shinil K. Shah, Jerry Schwartz, Tien C. Ko, Tyler G. Hughes, Mike K. Liang, Surgical Social Media Study Group

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Many surgeons rely on the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Community Forums for advice on managing complex patients. Our objective was to assess the safety and usefulness of advice provided on the most popular surgical forum.

Methods

Overall, 120 consecutive, deidentified clinical threads were extracted from the General Surgery community in reverse chronological order. Three groups of three surgeons (mixed academic and community perspectives) evaluated the 120 threads for unsafe or dangerous posts. Positive and negative controls for safe and unsafe answers were included in 20 threads, and reviewers were blinded to their presence. Reviewers were free to access all online and professional resources.

Results

There were 855 unique responses (median 7, 2–15 responses per thread) to the 120 clinical threads/scenarios. The review teams correctly identified all positive and negative controls for safety. While 58(43.3%) of threads contained unsafe advice, the majority (33, 56.9%) were corrected. Reviewers felt that a there was a standard of care response for 62/120 of the threads of which 50 (80.6%) were provided by the responses. Of the 855 responses, 107 (12.5%) were considered unsafe/dangerous.

Conclusion

The ACS Community Forums are generally a safe and useful resource for surgeons seeking advice for challenging cases. While unsafe or dangerous advice is not uncommon, other surgeons typically correct it. When utilizing the forums, advice should be taken as a congregate, and any single recommendation should be approached with healthy skepticism. However, social media such as the ACS Forums is self-regulating and can be an appropriate method for surgeons to communicate challenging problems.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mary Modahl LT, Tracey Moorhead. Doctors, Patients & Social Media. 2011. Accessed June, 2018 Mary Modahl LT, Tracey Moorhead. Doctors, Patients & Social Media. 2011. Accessed June, 2018
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Greene JA, Kesselheim AS (2010) Pharmaceutical marketing and the new social media. N Engl J Med 363(22):2087–2089CrossRef Greene JA, Kesselheim AS (2010) Pharmaceutical marketing and the new social media. N Engl J Med 363(22):2087–2089CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat George DR, Rovniak LS, Kraschnewski JL (2013) Dangers and opportunities for social media in medicine. Clin Obstet Gynecol 56(3):453–462CrossRef George DR, Rovniak LS, Kraschnewski JL (2013) Dangers and opportunities for social media in medicine. Clin Obstet Gynecol 56(3):453–462CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamm MP, Chisholm A, Shulhan J et al (2013) Social media use by health care professionals and trainees: a scoping review. Acad Med 88(9):1376–1383CrossRef Hamm MP, Chisholm A, Shulhan J et al (2013) Social media use by health care professionals and trainees: a scoping review. Acad Med 88(9):1376–1383CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR (2002) Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JAMA 287(21):2869–2871CrossRef Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR (2002) Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JAMA 287(21):2869–2871CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat DeCamp M (2012) Social media and medical professionalism: toward an expanded program. Arch Intern Med 172(18):1418–1419CrossRef DeCamp M (2012) Social media and medical professionalism: toward an expanded program. Arch Intern Med 172(18):1418–1419CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A (2018) Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review. JMIR Med Educ 4(1):e3CrossRef Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A (2018) Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review. JMIR Med Educ 4(1):e3CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Decamp M (2012) Social media guidance, conflicts of interest, and health inequalities. Lancet 380(9840):472–473CrossRef Decamp M (2012) Social media guidance, conflicts of interest, and health inequalities. Lancet 380(9840):472–473CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy CP, DeCamp M, McEvoy JW (2018) Social media and physician conflict of interest. Am J Med 131(8):859–860CrossRef McCarthy CP, DeCamp M, McEvoy JW (2018) Social media and physician conflict of interest. Am J Med 131(8):859–860CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shillcutt SK, Silver JK (2018) Social media and advancement of women physicians. N Engl J Med 378(24):2342–2345CrossRef Shillcutt SK, Silver JK (2018) Social media and advancement of women physicians. N Engl J Med 378(24):2342–2345CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat George DR, Green MJ (2012) Beyond good and evil: exploring medical trainee use of social media. Teach Learn Med 24(2):155–157CrossRef George DR, Green MJ (2012) Beyond good and evil: exploring medical trainee use of social media. Teach Learn Med 24(2):155–157CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Radcliffe K, Lyson HC, Barr-Walker J, Sarkar U (2019) Collective intelligence in medical decision-making: a systematic scoping review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 19(1):158CrossRef Radcliffe K, Lyson HC, Barr-Walker J, Sarkar U (2019) Collective intelligence in medical decision-making: a systematic scoping review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 19(1):158CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688CrossRef Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamm MP, Shulhan J, Williams G, Milne A, Scott SD, Hartling L (2014) A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of social media in child health. BMC Pediatr 14:138CrossRef Hamm MP, Shulhan J, Williams G, Milne A, Scott SD, Hartling L (2014) A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of social media in child health. BMC Pediatr 14:138CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Adilman R, Rajmohan Y, Brooks E et al (2016) Social media use among physicians and trainees: results of a national medical oncology physician survey. J Oncol Pract. 12(1):79–80 e52-60CrossRef Adilman R, Rajmohan Y, Brooks E et al (2016) Social media use among physicians and trainees: results of a national medical oncology physician survey. J Oncol Pract. 12(1):79–80 e52-60CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR (2011) The patient–doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 26(10):1168–1174CrossRef Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR (2011) The patient–doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 26(10):1168–1174CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Erzinger FL, de Araujo WJB, Ordinola AAM et al (2018) Vascular forum: collective intelligence in the resolution of vascular clinical cases. J Vasc Bras 17(3):193–200CrossRef Erzinger FL, de Araujo WJB, Ordinola AAM et al (2018) Vascular forum: collective intelligence in the resolution of vascular clinical cases. J Vasc Bras 17(3):193–200CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat DeCamp M (2015) Ethical issues when using social media for health outside professional relationships. Int Rev Psychiatry 27(2):97–105CrossRef DeCamp M (2015) Ethical issues when using social media for health outside professional relationships. Int Rev Psychiatry 27(2):97–105CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Steele S, Adcock C, Steel A (2016) Ethical, legal and professional issues arising from social media coverage by UK Helicopter Emergency Medical Services. Emerg Med J 33(1):57–60CrossRef Steele S, Adcock C, Steel A (2016) Ethical, legal and professional issues arising from social media coverage by UK Helicopter Emergency Medical Services. Emerg Med J 33(1):57–60CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett KG, Berlin NL, MacEachern MP, Buchman SR, Preminger BA, Vercler CJ (2018) The ethical and professional use of social media in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3):388e–398eCrossRef Bennett KG, Berlin NL, MacEachern MP, Buchman SR, Preminger BA, Vercler CJ (2018) The ethical and professional use of social media in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3):388e–398eCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438(7070):900–901CrossRef Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438(7070):900–901CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Is the American College of Surgeons Online Communities a safe and useful venue to ask for surgical advice?
verfasst von
Karla Bernardi
Puja Shah
Erik P. Askenasy
Courtney Balentine
Mark M. Crabbe
Mario A. Cerame
John A. Harvin
Lillian Huang
Stefanos G. Millas
Patrick Molt
Tamara E. Saunders
Shinil K. Shah
Jerry Schwartz
Tien C. Ko
Tyler G. Hughes
Mike K. Liang
Surgical Social Media Study Group
Publikationsdatum
13.04.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07299-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.