Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2020

10.12.2019 | 2019 SSAT Plenary Presentation

Is the New T1 Category as Defined in the Eighth Edition of the AJCC Pancreatic Cancer Staging System an Improvement?

verfasst von: Wooil Kwon, Taesung Park, Jin He, Ryota Higuchi, Donghee Son, Seung Yeoun Lee, Jaeri Kim, Yoonhyeong Byun, Hongbeom Kim, Sun-Whe Kim, Christopher L. Wolfgang, Masakazu Yamamoto, Jin-Young Jang

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The new T1 pancreatic cancer by the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system discards the concept of “extension beyond the pancreas” and focuses on size only. Furthermore, the new T1 is divided into T1a, T1b, and T1c based on size. The evidence pertaining to these changes has not been evaluated. This is to evaluate the feasibility of the new T1 definition in the pancreas head cancer cohort.

Methods

Data from 540 patients with T1 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma as defined by the eighth edition were collected from Korea, Japan, and the USA. Invasive IPMNs were excluded. Survival analyses were performed.

Results

Of the 540 patients, 181 patients were T1 according to the seventh edition and 359 were down-staged to T1 from the former T3 because the concept of “extension beyond the pancreas” was discarded. The 5-year survival rate and the median survival of T1 patients were 30.6% and 27 months, respectively. Comparing tumors that extend beyond the pancreas (new T1) and those confined within the pancreas (original T1), the latter showed significantly longer median survival (43 vs. 24 months, p < 0.001). In terms of T1a/b/c, there were no significant differences in survival. Using MaxStat, subdividing into two groups using 1.1 cm as the cut-off value, yielded significantly discrete prognostic groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The new T1 definition may be more practical, but the implications of the concept of “extension beyond the pancreas” should be re-investigated. Further, the subcategorization of T1a/b/c may not be adequate and may require revision or deletion.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB AJCoC. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. Edge SB AJCoC. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Amin MB AJCoC. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed: Springer; 2017. Amin MB AJCoC. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed: Springer; 2017.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Del Chiaro M, Segersvard R, Lohr M, Verbeke C. Early detection and prevention of pancreatic cancer: is it really possible today? World J Gastroenterol 2014;20(34):12118-12131.CrossRef Del Chiaro M, Segersvard R, Lohr M, Verbeke C. Early detection and prevention of pancreatic cancer: is it really possible today? World J Gastroenterol 2014;20(34):12118-12131.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleming ID AJCoC, American Cancer Society. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 5th ed: Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia; 1997. Fleming ID AJCoC, American Cancer Society. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 5th ed: Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia; 1997.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Greene FL AJCoC, American Cancer Society. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002. Greene FL AJCoC, American Cancer Society. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwon W, He J, Higuchi R, et al. Multinational validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition pancreatic cancer staging system in a pancreas head cancer cohort. J HBP Sci 2018;25(9):418-427. Kwon W, He J, Higuchi R, et al. Multinational validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition pancreatic cancer staging system in a pancreas head cancer cohort. J HBP Sci 2018;25(9):418-427.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat van Roessel S, Kasumova GG, Verheij J, et al. International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2018:e183617. van Roessel S, Kasumova GG, Verheij J, et al. International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2018:e183617.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, et al. Multi-institutional Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) Changes for T and N Staging in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2017;265(1):185-191.CrossRef Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, et al. Multi-institutional Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) Changes for T and N Staging in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2017;265(1):185-191.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Strobel O, Hank T, Hinz U, et al. Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: The New R-status Counts. Ann Surg 2017;265(3):565-573.CrossRef Strobel O, Hank T, Hinz U, et al. Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: The New R-status Counts. Ann Surg 2017;265(3):565-573.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Saka B, Balci S, Basturk O, et al. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma is Spread to the Peripancreatic Soft Tissue in the Majority of Resected Cases, Rendering the AJCC T-Stage Protocol (7th Edition) Inapplicable and Insignificant: A Size-Based Staging System (pT1: </=2, pT2: >2-</=4, pT3: >4 cm) is More Valid and Clinically Relevant. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(6):2010-2018.CrossRef Saka B, Balci S, Basturk O, et al. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma is Spread to the Peripancreatic Soft Tissue in the Majority of Resected Cases, Rendering the AJCC T-Stage Protocol (7th Edition) Inapplicable and Insignificant: A Size-Based Staging System (pT1: </=2, pT2: >2-</=4, pT3: >4 cm) is More Valid and Clinically Relevant. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(6):2010-2018.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Adsay NV, Basturk O, Saka B, et al. Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38(4):480-493.CrossRef Adsay NV, Basturk O, Saka B, et al. Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38(4):480-493.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Adsay NV, Bagci P, Tajiri T, et al. Pathologic staging of pancreatic, ampullary, biliary, and gallbladder cancers: pitfalls and practical limitations of the current AJCC/UICC TNM staging system and opportunities for improvement. Semin Diagn Pathol 2012;29(3):127-141.CrossRef Adsay NV, Bagci P, Tajiri T, et al. Pathologic staging of pancreatic, ampullary, biliary, and gallbladder cancers: pitfalls and practical limitations of the current AJCC/UICC TNM staging system and opportunities for improvement. Semin Diagn Pathol 2012;29(3):127-141.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka M, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2012;12(3):183-197.CrossRef Tanaka M, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2012;12(3):183-197.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Furukawa T, Hatori T, Fujita I, et al. Prognostic relevance of morphological types of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Gut. 2011;60(4):509-516.CrossRef Furukawa T, Hatori T, Fujita I, et al. Prognostic relevance of morphological types of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Gut. 2011;60(4):509-516.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Egawa S, Toma H, Ohigashi H, et al. Japan Pancreatic Cancer Registry; 30th year anniversary: Japan Pancreas Society. Pancreas. 2012;41(7):985-992.CrossRef Egawa S, Toma H, Ohigashi H, et al. Japan Pancreatic Cancer Registry; 30th year anniversary: Japan Pancreas Society. Pancreas. 2012;41(7):985-992.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Is the New T1 Category as Defined in the Eighth Edition of the AJCC Pancreatic Cancer Staging System an Improvement?
verfasst von
Wooil Kwon
Taesung Park
Jin He
Ryota Higuchi
Donghee Son
Seung Yeoun Lee
Jaeri Kim
Yoonhyeong Byun
Hongbeom Kim
Sun-Whe Kim
Christopher L. Wolfgang
Masakazu Yamamoto
Jin-Young Jang
Publikationsdatum
10.12.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04464-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.