Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Gefässchirurgie 1/2024

22.01.2024 | Karotisstenose | CME

Karotisrevaskularisation

Evidenzbasiertes Management

verfasst von: PD Dr. Barbara Rantner, PhD, Dr. Nikolaos Konstantinou, Tugce Öz, Prof. Dr. Nikolaos Tsilimparis

Erschienen in: Gefässchirurgie | Ausgabe 1/2024

zum CME-Kurs Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Der Schlaganfall stellt trotz intensivierter Bemühungen mit Ausbau von Stroke Units weiterhin einen relevanten gesundheitsökonomischen Aspekt dar und führt die Liste der Gründe für eine Invalidisierung des alternden Menschen nach wie vor an. Mit verbesserten medikamentösen Maßnahmen („best medical treatment“, BMT) konnte das natürliche Schlaganfallrisiko bei extrakraniellen Stenosen der Arteria carotis interna in den vergangenen Jahren relevant gesenkt werden. Damit erhöht sich der Leistungsanspruch an revaskularisierende Verfahren (Karotisendarterektomie und Stentbehandlung). Trotz intensivierter BMT gibt es jedoch weiterhin Patienten, die Plaquecharakteristika und morphologische Kriterien aufweisen, welche ein erhöhtes Schlaganfallrisiko im natürlichen Verlauf bedingen. Für Patienten mit symptomatischen Karotisstenosen stellt die Operation weiterhin das Therapieverfahren der ersten Wahl dar. In Abhängigkeit vom zerebralen Befund sollte die Operation 3 bis 7 Tage nach neurologischem Index-Event durchgeführt werden. Die TCAR („trans carotid artery revascularization“) wird seit einigen Jahren als Alternative zum transfemoralen Karotisstent eingesetzt. Randomisierte Evidenz zur Beurteilung der Vergleichbarkeit dieses Verfahrens mit der Operation oder dem klassischen CAS („carotid artery stenting“) fehlt bislang. Auswertungen aus Registerdaten deuten auf bessere Ergebnisse für TCAR als für die transfemorale Stentbehandlung hin.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Naylor R et al (2023) European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 clinical practice guidelines on the management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 65:7–111CrossRefPubMed Naylor R et al (2023) European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 clinical practice guidelines on the management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 65:7–111CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hackam DG, Spence JD (2018) Decline in the severity of carotidatherosclerosis and associated risk factors from 2002 to 2014. Stroke 49:2786–2788CrossRefPubMed Hackam DG, Spence JD (2018) Decline in the severity of carotidatherosclerosis and associated risk factors from 2002 to 2014. Stroke 49:2786–2788CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng TW et al (2020) Natural history of non-operative management in asymptomatic patients with 70 %–80 % internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex criteria. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 60(3):339–346CrossRefPubMed Cheng TW et al (2020) Natural history of non-operative management in asymptomatic patients with 70 %–80 % internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex criteria. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 60(3):339–346CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonati LH et al (2021) European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Eur Stroke J 6:I–eXLVIICrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bonati LH et al (2021) European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Eur Stroke J 6:I–eXLVIICrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat - (1995) Executive committee for the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273:1421–1428CrossRefPubMed - (1995) Executive committee for the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273:1421–1428CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Halliday A et al (2010) 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 376:1074–1084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Halliday A et al (2010) 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 376:1074–1084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Klarin D et al (2018) Risk factor profile and anatomic features of previously asymptomatic patients presenting with carotid-related stroke. J Vasc Surg 68:1390–1395CrossRefPubMed Klarin D et al (2018) Risk factor profile and anatomic features of previously asymptomatic patients presenting with carotid-related stroke. J Vasc Surg 68:1390–1395CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Silver FL et al (2011) Safety of stenting and endarterectomy by symptomatic status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Stroke 42:675–680CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Silver FL et al (2011) Safety of stenting and endarterectomy by symptomatic status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Stroke 42:675–680CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Eckstein HH, SPACE 2 Investigators et al (2016) SPACE-2: a missed opportunity to compare carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenting, and best medical treatment in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenoses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 51:761–765CrossRefPubMed Eckstein HH, SPACE 2 Investigators et al (2016) SPACE-2: a missed opportunity to compare carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenting, and best medical treatment in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenoses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 51:761–765CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Halliday A, ACST‑2 Collaborative Group. (2021) Second Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy. Lancet 398:1065–1073CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Halliday A, ACST‑2 Collaborative Group. (2021) Second Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy. Lancet 398:1065–1073CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwolek CJ et al (2015) Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stentingwith dynamic flow reversal. J Vasc Surg 62:1227–1234CrossRefPubMed Kwolek CJ et al (2015) Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stentingwith dynamic flow reversal. J Vasc Surg 62:1227–1234CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Malas M et al (2018) One-year results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal. J Vasc Surg 67:e5CrossRef Malas M et al (2018) One-year results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal. J Vasc Surg 67:e5CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Malas MB et al (2022) TransCarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal versus carotid endarterectomy in the vascular quality initiative surveillance project. Ann Surg 1;276(2):398–403CrossRefPubMed Malas MB et al (2022) TransCarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal versus carotid endarterectomy in the vascular quality initiative surveillance project. Ann Surg 1;276(2):398–403CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat AbuRahma AF et al (2022) Society for vascular surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease. J Vasc Surg 75:26S–e98SCrossRefPubMed AbuRahma AF et al (2022) Society for vascular surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease. J Vasc Surg 75:26S–e98SCrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener HC et al (1985) European stroke prevention study‑2. Dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of stroke. J Neurol Sci 143:1–13CrossRef Diener HC et al (1985) European stroke prevention study‑2. Dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of stroke. J Neurol Sci 143:1–13CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y et al (2013) Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack. N Engl J Med 369:11–19CrossRefPubMed Wang Y et al (2013) Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack. N Engl J Med 369:11–19CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Batchelder A et al (2019) Overview of primary and secondary analyses from randomised controlled trials comparing carotid artery stenting with carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 58:479–493CrossRefPubMed Batchelder A et al (2019) Overview of primary and secondary analyses from randomised controlled trials comparing carotid artery stenting with carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 58:479–493CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard G et al (2016) Association between age and risk of stroke or death from carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting: a metaanalysis of pooled patient data from four randomised trials. Lancet 387:1305–1311CrossRefPubMed Howard G et al (2016) Association between age and risk of stroke or death from carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting: a metaanalysis of pooled patient data from four randomised trials. Lancet 387:1305–1311CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Strömberg S, Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc) Steering Committee et al (2012) Very urgent carotid endarterectomy confers increased procedural risk. Stroke 43(5):1331–1335CrossRefPubMed Strömberg S, Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc) Steering Committee et al (2012) Very urgent carotid endarterectomy confers increased procedural risk. Stroke 43(5):1331–1335CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Loftus IM et al (2016) Delays to surgery and procedural risks following carotid endarterectomy in the UK national vascular registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 52:438–443CrossRefPubMed Loftus IM et al (2016) Delays to surgery and procedural risks following carotid endarterectomy in the UK national vascular registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 52:438–443CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsantilas P et al (2016) Short time interval between neurologic event and carotid surgery is not associated with an increased procedural risk. Stroke 47:2783–2790CrossRefPubMed Tsantilas P et al (2016) Short time interval between neurologic event and carotid surgery is not associated with an increased procedural risk. Stroke 47:2783–2790CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rantner B et al (2017) Early endarterectomy carries a lower procedural risk than early stenting in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery results from 4 randomized controlled trials. Stroke 48:1580–1587CrossRefPubMed Rantner B et al (2017) Early endarterectomy carries a lower procedural risk than early stenting in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery results from 4 randomized controlled trials. Stroke 48:1580–1587CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Schermerhorn ML et al (2020) In-Hospital outcomes of transccrotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in the society of vascular surgery vascular quality initiative. J Vasc Surg 71(1):87–95CrossRefPubMed Schermerhorn ML et al (2020) In-Hospital outcomes of transccrotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in the society of vascular surgery vascular quality initiative. J Vasc Surg 71(1):87–95CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cui CL et al (2021) Effects of timing on in-hospital and one-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization. J Vasc Surg 73(5):1649–1657CrossRefPubMed Cui CL et al (2021) Effects of timing on in-hospital and one-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization. J Vasc Surg 73(5):1649–1657CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Karotisrevaskularisation
Evidenzbasiertes Management
verfasst von
PD Dr. Barbara Rantner, PhD
Dr. Nikolaos Konstantinou
Tugce Öz
Prof. Dr. Nikolaos Tsilimparis
Publikationsdatum
22.01.2024
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Gefässchirurgie / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0948-7034
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-023-01075-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Gefässchirurgie 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe