nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.02.2015 | Review

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery confers lower mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 66,483 patients

verfasst von: Stavros Athanasios Antoniou, George Athanasios Antoniou, Oliver Owen Koch, Rudolph Pointner, Frank-Alexander Granderath

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Increasing life expectancy requires specific attention on geriatric patients. Data support a potential reduction of surgical morbidity for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery as compared to conventional surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the comparative effect of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery on geriatric patients.

Methods

A systematic review of electronic information sources was undertaken. Studies that provided outcome data on patients aged 65 years or older, subjected to laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery, were considered. Mortality, morbidity, cardiac and pulmonary complications were the outcome measures of treatment effect. The methodological quality of selected studies was independently appraised by two reviewers. Random effects model was applied to synthesize outcome data.

Results

Twenty-seven articles providing data for 66,592 patients were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery had a decreased risk for mortality (2.2 vs. 5.4 %; OR 0.55, 95 % CI 0.44–0.67), overall morbidity (19.3 vs. 26.7 %; OR 0.54, 95 % CI 0.46–0.63), cardiac (4.7 vs. 7.7 %; OR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.39–0.92) and respiratory complications (3.9 vs. 6.3 %; OR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.47–0.95). Sensitivity analysis including reports with similar age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score and/or similar prevalence of cardiopulmonary morbidity between the laparoscopic and the open treatment arm validated the outcome estimates of the primary analysis.

Conclusions

This analysis supports a substantial benefit for elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic in comparison with open colorectal surgery. The comparative effect of either approach on geriatric patients with pulmonary and cardiac comorbidities is a subject of further investigation.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW (2009) Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 374:1196–1208PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Evers BM, Townsend CM Jr, Thompson JC (1994) Organ physiology of aging. Surg Clin North Am 74:23–39PubMed

Shamburek RD, Farrar JT (1990) Disorders of the digestive system in the elderly. N Engl J Med 322:438–443PubMedCrossRef

Rasool S, Kadla SA, Rasool V, Ganai BA (2013) A comparative overview of general risk factors associated with the incidence of colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol 34:2469–2476PubMedCrossRef

Korzenik JR, NDSG (2008) Diverticulitis: new frontiers for an old country: risk factors and pathogenesis. J Clin Gastroenterol 42:1128–1129PubMedCrossRef

Weber DM (2003) Laparoscopic surgery: an excellent approach in elderly patients. Arch Surg 138:1083–1088PubMedCrossRef

Lawrence VA, Cornell JE, Smetana GW, American College of Physicians (2006) Strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 144:596–608PubMedCrossRef

Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer 3:49–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Li MZ, Lian L, Xiao LB, Wu WH, He YL, Song XM (2012) Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 204:779–786PubMedCrossRef

10.

Wang G, Jiang Z, Zhao K, Li G, Liu F, Pan H, Li J (2012) Immunologic response after laparoscopic colon cancer operation within an enhanced recovery program. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1379–1388PubMedCrossRef

11.

Efron DT, Bender JS (2001) Laparoscopic surgery in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:658–663PubMedCrossRef

12.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

13.

Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012PubMedCrossRef

14.

Higgins JP, Altman DG (2009) Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 187–235

15.

Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2003) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [Ottawa Hospital/Research Institute web site]. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford. asp. Accessed 11 June 2013

16.

DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188PubMedCrossRef

17.

Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86:938–941PubMedCrossRef

18.

Delgado S, Lacy AM, García Valdecasas JC, Balagué C, Pera M, Salvador L, Momblan D, Visa J (2000) Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 14:22–26PubMedCrossRef

19.

Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332PubMedCrossRef

20.

Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Rouge C, Regenet N, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP (2000) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14:1031–1033PubMedCrossRef

21.

Law WL, Chu KW, Tung PH (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 195:768–773PubMedCrossRef

22.

Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Delaney CP (2003) Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 138:252–256PubMedCrossRef

23.

Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929PubMedCrossRef

24.

Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Mori T, Nakashima M, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2004) Laparoscopy-assisted surgery for colorectal neoplasm is justifiable regardless of advanced age. Hepatogastroenterology 51:152–155PubMed

25.

Feng B, Zheng MH, Mao ZH, Li JW, Lu AG, Wang ML, Hu WG, Dong F, Hu YY, Zang L, Li HW (2006) Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 18:191–195PubMedCrossRef

26.

Frasson M, Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Di Carlo V (2008) Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:296–300PubMedCrossRef

27.

Person B, Cera SM, Sands DR, Weiss EG, Vernava AM, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2008) Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 22:401–405PubMedCrossRef

28.

Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Yamaguchi T (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1614–1618PubMedCrossRef

29.

Tei M, Ikeda M, Haraguchi N, Takemasa I, Mizushima T, Ishii H, Yamamoto H, Sekimoto M, Doki Y, Mori M (2009) Postoperative complications in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: comparison of open and laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:488–492PubMedCrossRef

30.

Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Hewett PJ, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stevenson AR, Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study Group (2010) Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study shows that elderly patients may benefit from lower postoperative complication rates following laparoscopic versus open resection. Br J Surg 97:86–91PubMedCrossRef

31.

Kurian AA, Suryadevara S, Vaughn D, Zebley DM, Hofmann M, Kim S, Fassler SA (2010) Laparoscopic colectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians: a preferable option to open surgery? J Surg Educ 67:161–166PubMedCrossRef

32.

Lian L, Kalady M, Geisler D, Kiran RP (2010) Laparoscopic colectomy is safe and leads to a significantly shorter hospital stay for octogenarians. Surg Endosc 24:2039–2043PubMedCrossRef

33.

Faiz O, Haji A, Bottle A, Clark SK, Darzi AW, Aylin P (2011) Elective colonic surgery for cancer in the elderly: an investigation into postoperative mortality in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2007. Colorectal Dis 13:779–785PubMedCrossRef

34.

Issa N, Grassi C, Melki Y, Powsner E, Dreznik Z (2011) Laparoscopic colectomy for carcinoma of the colon in octogenarians. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2011–2015PubMedCrossRef

35.

Kennedy GD, Rajamanickam V, O’connor ES, Loconte NK, Foley EF, Leverson G, Heise CP (2011) Optimizing surgical care of colon cancer in the older adult population. Ann Surg 253:508–514PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

36.

Martinek L, Dostalik J, Gunka I et al (2011) Is age a risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Zentralbl Chir 136:264–268PubMedCrossRef

37.

Robinson CN, Balentine CJ, Marshall CL, Wilks JA, Anaya D, Artinyan A, Berger DH, Albo D (2011) Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes in elderly colorectal cancer patients. J Surg Res 166:182–188PubMedCrossRef

38.

Tomimaru Y, Ide Y, Murata K (2011) Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients. Asian J Endosc Surg 4:1–6PubMedCrossRef

39.

Clark CE 3rd, Jupiter DC, Thomas JS, Papaconstantinou HT (2012) Rectal prolapse in the elderly: trends in surgical management and outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Am Coll Surg 215:709–714PubMedCrossRef

40.

Cummings LC, Delaney CP, Cooper GS (2012) Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 10:31PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

41.

Tan WS, Chew MH, Lim IA, Ng KH, Tang CL, Eu KW (2012) Evaluation of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery in elderly patients more than 70 years old: an evaluation of 727 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:773–780PubMedCrossRef

42.

White SI, Wright D, Taylor CJ (2012) A comparison of laparoscopic versus open rectal surgery in 114 consecutive octogenarians. Colorectal Dis 14:e395–e399PubMedCrossRef

43.

She WH, Poon JT, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL (2013) Outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in elderly patients. Surg Endosc 27:308–312PubMedCrossRef

44.

World Health Organization. Men ageing and health: achieving health across the life span. [World Health Organization web site]. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/who_nmh_nph_01.2.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2013

45.

McKay GD, Morgan MJ, Wong SK, Gatenby AH, Fulham SB, Ahmed KW, Toh JW, Hanna M, Hitos K, South Western Sydney Colorectal Tumor Group (2012) Improved short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection for colon and rectal cancer in an area health service: a multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum 55:42–50PubMedCrossRef

46.

Kolfschoten NE, van Leersum NJ, Gooiker GA, Marang van de Mheen PJ, Eddes EH, Kievit J, Brand R, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA, Tollenaar RA, Meijerink J, Wouters MW (2013) Successful and safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Dutch hospitals. Ann Surg 257:916–921PubMedCrossRef

47.

Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, Padbury RT, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Langcake M (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20:263–266PubMedCrossRef

48.

Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006231PubMed

49.

Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J (2006) Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93:921–928PubMedCrossRef

50.

Wang W, Li Z, Tang J, Wang M, Wang B, Xu Z (2013) Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 139:1721–1734PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery confers lower mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 66,483 patients
verfasst von: Stavros Athanasios Antoniou
George Athanasios Antoniou
Oliver Owen Koch
Rudolph Pointner
Frank-Alexander Granderath
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3672-x

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Symptomatic diaphragmatic herniation following open and minimally invasive oesophagectomy: experience from a UK specialist unit

Laparoscopic liver resection using a rubber band retraction technique: usefulness and perioperative outcome in 100 consecutive cases

Long-term outcomes of radiologic recurrence after paraesophageal hernia repair with mesh

What are the risk factors for residual tumor cells after endoscopic complete resection in gastric epithelial neoplasia?

Complete closure of artificial gastric ulcer after endoscopic submucosal dissection by combined use of a single over-the-scope clip and through-the-scope clips (with videos)

Near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography facilitates identification of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Update Chirurgie