Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2021

03.08.2020

Laparoscopic hepatectomy enhances recovery for small hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis by postoperative inflammatory response attenuation: a propensity score matching analysis with a conventional open approach

verfasst von: Xiu-Tao Fu, Zheng Tang, Jia-Feng Chen, Ying-Hong Shi, Wei-Ren Liu, Qiang Gao, Guang-Yu Ding, Kang Song, Xiao-Ying Wang, Jian Zhou, Jia Fan, Zhen-Bin Ding

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The concurrent presence of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a challenge for laparoscopic surgeons to establish a routine practice. The aim of this study was to gather evidence and produce recommendations on the safe and effective practice of laparoscopic hepatectomy for patients with solitary HCC (≤ 5 cm) and liver cirrhosis.

Methods

Between October 2013 and October 2014, 356 curative hepatectomies were performed for patients pathologically diagnosed with solitary HCC (≤ 5 cm) accompanied by cirrhosis (stage 4 fibrosis). To overcome selection bias, a 1:2 match using propensity score matching analysis was conducted between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups, including hospitalization, operation time, blood loss, and surgical complications. Perioperative inflammation-based markers, including systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were collected from medical records and analyzed.

Results

There were 43 and 77 patients in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. The laparoscopic group had less hepatic inflow occlusion (16.3% vs. 61%; P < 0.001), shorter operation time (155 vs. 170 min; P = 0.004), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (4 vs. 7 days; P < 0.001). Although the difference was not significant (P = 0.154), the rate of postoperative complications tended to be lower in the laparoscopic group (2.3%) compared with the open group (9.1%). The increase in postoperative SII, NLR, and LMR for laparoscopic hepatectomy were significantly lower than for open hepatectomy. NLR < 5.8 on postoperative day 3 was significantly correlated with shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Compared with open hepatectomy, laparoscopic hepatectomy for selected HCC patients, even in the presence of cirrhosis, might result in better perioperative outcomes and postoperative inflammatory response attenuation, and ultimately promote faster recovery. This provides evidence for considering routine laparoscopic hepatectomy through careful selection of patients with HCC.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108CrossRef Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuen MF, Hou JL, Chutaputti A, Asia Pacific Working Party on Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2009) Hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asia pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:346–353CrossRef Yuen MF, Hou JL, Chutaputti A, Asia Pacific Working Party on Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2009) Hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asia pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:346–353CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou J, Sun HC, Wang Z, Cong WM, Wang JH, Zeng MS, Yang JM, Bie P, Liu LX, Wen TF, Han GH, Wang MQ, Liu RB, Lu LG, Ren ZG, Chen MS, Zeng ZC, Liang P, Liang CH, Chen M, Yan FH, Wang WP, Ji Y, Cheng WW, Dai CL, Jia WD, Li YM, Li YX, Liang J, Liu TS, Lv GY, Mao YL, Ren WX, Shi HC, Wang WT, Wang XY, Xing BC, Xu JM, Yang JY, Yang YF, Ye SL, Yin ZY, Zhang BH, Zhang SJ, Zhou WP, Zhu JY, Liu R, Shi YH, Xiao YS, Dai Z, Teng GJ, Cai JQ, Wang WL, Dong JH, Li Q, Shen F, Qin SK, Fan J (2018) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer in China (2017 edition). Liver Cancer 7:235–260CrossRef Zhou J, Sun HC, Wang Z, Cong WM, Wang JH, Zeng MS, Yang JM, Bie P, Liu LX, Wen TF, Han GH, Wang MQ, Liu RB, Lu LG, Ren ZG, Chen MS, Zeng ZC, Liang P, Liang CH, Chen M, Yan FH, Wang WP, Ji Y, Cheng WW, Dai CL, Jia WD, Li YM, Li YX, Liang J, Liu TS, Lv GY, Mao YL, Ren WX, Shi HC, Wang WT, Wang XY, Xing BC, Xu JM, Yang JY, Yang YF, Ye SL, Yin ZY, Zhang BH, Zhang SJ, Zhou WP, Zhu JY, Liu R, Shi YH, Xiao YS, Dai Z, Teng GJ, Cai JQ, Wang WL, Dong JH, Li Q, Shen F, Qin SK, Fan J (2018) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer in China (2017 edition). Liver Cancer 7:235–260CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pessaux P (2016) Techniques and innovations in liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:277–278CrossRef Pessaux P (2016) Techniques and innovations in liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:277–278CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagasue N, Kohno H, Tachibana M, Yamanoi A, Ohmori H, El-Assal ON (1999) Prognostic factors after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with Child-Turcotte class B and C cirrhosis. Ann Surg 229:84–90CrossRef Nagasue N, Kohno H, Tachibana M, Yamanoi A, Ohmori H, El-Assal ON (1999) Prognostic factors after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with Child-Turcotte class B and C cirrhosis. Ann Surg 229:84–90CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno S, Tanabe G, Nuruki K, Oketani M, Komorizono Y, Hokotate H, Fukukura Y, Baba Y, Imamura Y, Aikou T (2002) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with Child class B and C cirrhosis in relation to treatment: a multivariate analysis of 411 patients at a single center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:469–477CrossRef Ueno S, Tanabe G, Nuruki K, Oketani M, Komorizono Y, Hokotate H, Fukukura Y, Baba Y, Imamura Y, Aikou T (2002) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with Child class B and C cirrhosis in relation to treatment: a multivariate analysis of 411 patients at a single center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:469–477CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Farges O, Malassagne B, Flejou JF, Balzan S, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J (1999) Risk of major liver resection in patients with underlying chronic liver disease: a reappraisal. Ann Surg 229:210–215CrossRef Farges O, Malassagne B, Flejou JF, Balzan S, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J (1999) Risk of major liver resection in patients with underlying chronic liver disease: a reappraisal. Ann Surg 229:210–215CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanazawa A, Tsukamoto T, Shimizu S, Kodai S, Yamazoe S, Yamamoto S, Kubo S (2013) Impact of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with F4-liver cirrhosis. Surg Endosc 27:2592–2597CrossRef Kanazawa A, Tsukamoto T, Shimizu S, Kodai S, Yamazoe S, Yamamoto S, Kubo S (2013) Impact of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with F4-liver cirrhosis. Surg Endosc 27:2592–2597CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hackl C, Schlitt HJ, Renner P, Lang SA (2016) Liver surgery in cirrhosis and portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 22:2725–2735CrossRef Hackl C, Schlitt HJ, Renner P, Lang SA (2016) Liver surgery in cirrhosis and portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 22:2725–2735CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jia W, Liu W, Qiao X (2019) Chinese expert consensus on enhanced recovery after hepatectomy (version 2017). Asian J Surg 42:11–18CrossRef Jia W, Liu W, Qiao X (2019) Chinese expert consensus on enhanced recovery after hepatectomy (version 2017). Asian J Surg 42:11–18CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Agarwal V, Divatia JV (2019) Enhanced recovery after surgery in liver resection: current concepts and controversies. Korean J Anesthesiol 72:119–129CrossRef Agarwal V, Divatia JV (2019) Enhanced recovery after surgery in liver resection: current concepts and controversies. Korean J Anesthesiol 72:119–129CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawaguchi Y, Honda G, Endo I, Cherqui D, Kokudo N (2016) Current technical issues for surgery of primary liver cancer. Liver cancer 6:51–58CrossRef Kawaguchi Y, Honda G, Endo I, Cherqui D, Kokudo N (2016) Current technical issues for surgery of primary liver cancer. Liver cancer 6:51–58CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung TT, Han HS, She WH, Chen KH, Chow PKH, Yoong BK, Lee KF, Kubo S, Tang CN, Wakabayashi G (2018) The Asia Pacific Consensus Statement on Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a report from the 7th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting Held in Hong Kong. Liver Cancer 7:28–39CrossRef Cheung TT, Han HS, She WH, Chen KH, Chow PKH, Yoong BK, Lee KF, Kubo S, Tang CN, Wakabayashi G (2018) The Asia Pacific Consensus Statement on Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a report from the 7th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting Held in Hong Kong. Liver Cancer 7:28–39CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh EL, Chidambaram S, Ma S (2018) Laparoscopic vs open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis of the long-term survival outcomes. Int J Surg 50:35–42CrossRef Goh EL, Chidambaram S, Ma S (2018) Laparoscopic vs open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis of the long-term survival outcomes. Int J Surg 50:35–42CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JM, Kwon CHD, Yoo H, Kim KS, Lee J, Kim K, Choi GS, Joh JW (2018) Which approach is preferred in left hepatocellular carcinoma? Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy using propensity score matching. BMC Cancer 18:668CrossRef Kim JM, Kwon CHD, Yoo H, Kim KS, Lee J, Kim K, Choi GS, Joh JW (2018) Which approach is preferred in left hepatocellular carcinoma? Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy using propensity score matching. BMC Cancer 18:668CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin B, Chen MT, Fei YT, Du SD, Mao YL (2018) Safety and efficacy for laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 27:A26–A34CrossRef Jin B, Chen MT, Fei YT, Du SD, Mao YL (2018) Safety and efficacy for laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 27:A26–A34CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46:399–424CrossRef Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46:399–424CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan ST (1998) Problems of hepatectomy in cirrhosis. Hepatogastroenterology 45(Suppl 3):1288–1290PubMed Fan ST (1998) Problems of hepatectomy in cirrhosis. Hepatogastroenterology 45(Suppl 3):1288–1290PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung TT, Lo CM (2015) Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 4:406–410PubMedPubMedCentral Cheung TT, Lo CM (2015) Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 4:406–410PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon YI, Kim KH, Kang SH, Kim WJ, Shin MH, Lee SK, Jung DH, Park GC, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Ha TY, Song GW, Hwang S, Lee SG (2017) Pure laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score matched analysis. Ann Surg 265:856–863CrossRef Yoon YI, Kim KH, Kang SH, Kim WJ, Shin MH, Lee SK, Jung DH, Park GC, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Ha TY, Song GW, Hwang S, Lee SG (2017) Pure laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score matched analysis. Ann Surg 265:856–863CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho JY, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Soubrane O, Geller D, O'Rourke N, Buell J, Cherqui D (2018) Practical guidelines for performing laparoscopic liver resection based on the second international laparoscopic liver consensus conference. Surg Oncol 27:A5–A9CrossRef Cho JY, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Soubrane O, Geller D, O'Rourke N, Buell J, Cherqui D (2018) Practical guidelines for performing laparoscopic liver resection based on the second international laparoscopic liver consensus conference. Surg Oncol 27:A5–A9CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung TT, Dai WC, Tsang SH, Chan AC, Chok KS, Chan SC, Lo CM (2016) Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in 110 patients with liver cirrhosis: a propensity analysis at a single center. Ann Surg 264:612–620CrossRef Cheung TT, Dai WC, Tsang SH, Chan AC, Chok KS, Chan SC, Lo CM (2016) Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in 110 patients with liver cirrhosis: a propensity analysis at a single center. Ann Surg 264:612–620CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue Y, Suzuki Y, Ota M, Fujii K, Kawaguchi N, Hirokawa F, Hayashi M, Uchiyama K (2018) Short- and long-term results of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy for small-sized hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative study using propensity score matching analysis. Am Surg 84:230–237CrossRef Inoue Y, Suzuki Y, Ota M, Fujii K, Kawaguchi N, Hirokawa F, Hayashi M, Uchiyama K (2018) Short- and long-term results of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy for small-sized hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative study using propensity score matching analysis. Am Surg 84:230–237CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng Y, Wang Z, Wang X, Chen F, Zhou J, Fan J, Shi Y (2019) A novel very simple laparoscopic hepatic inflow occlusion apparatus for laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 33:145–152CrossRef Peng Y, Wang Z, Wang X, Chen F, Zhou J, Fan J, Shi Y (2019) A novel very simple laparoscopic hepatic inflow occlusion apparatus for laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 33:145–152CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Selzner M, Rudiger HA, Graf R, Kadry Z, Rousson V, Jochum W (2003) A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients undergoing major liver resection with versus without ischemic preconditioning. Ann Surg 238:843–850; discussion 851–842 Clavien PA, Selzner M, Rudiger HA, Graf R, Kadry Z, Rousson V, Jochum W (2003) A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients undergoing major liver resection with versus without ischemic preconditioning. Ann Surg 238:843–850; discussion 851–842
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Neeff H, Mariaskin D, Spangenberg HC, Hopt UT, Makowiec F (2000s) Perioperative mortality after non-hepatic general surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis: an analysis of 138 operations in the 2000s using Child and MELD scores. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1–11CrossRef Neeff H, Mariaskin D, Spangenberg HC, Hopt UT, Makowiec F (2000s) Perioperative mortality after non-hepatic general surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis: an analysis of 138 operations in the 2000s using Child and MELD scores. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1–11CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuks D, Cauchy F, Fteriche S, Nomi T, Schwarz L, Dokmak S, Scatton O, Fusco G, Belghiti J, Gayet B, Soubrane O (2016) Laparoscopy decreases pulmonary complications in patients undergoing major liver resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 263:353–361CrossRef Fuks D, Cauchy F, Fteriche S, Nomi T, Schwarz L, Dokmak S, Scatton O, Fusco G, Belghiti J, Gayet B, Soubrane O (2016) Laparoscopy decreases pulmonary complications in patients undergoing major liver resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 263:353–361CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777CrossRef Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Guro H, Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Choi Y, Periyasamy M (2016) Current status of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 22:212–218CrossRef Guro H, Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Choi Y, Periyasamy M (2016) Current status of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 22:212–218CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Savikko J, Ilmakunnas M, Makisalo H, Nordin A, Isoniemi H (2015) Enhanced recovery protocol after liver resection. Br J Surg 102:1526–1532CrossRef Savikko J, Ilmakunnas M, Makisalo H, Nordin A, Isoniemi H (2015) Enhanced recovery protocol after liver resection. Br J Surg 102:1526–1532CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouxel P, Beloeil H (2019) Enhanced recovery after hepatectomy: a systematic review. Anaesthesia Crit Care Pain Med 38:29–34CrossRef Rouxel P, Beloeil H (2019) Enhanced recovery after hepatectomy: a systematic review. Anaesthesia Crit Care Pain Med 38:29–34CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Joliat GR, Labgaa I, Hubner M, Blanc C, Griesser AC, Schafer M, Demartines N (2016) Cost-benefit analysis of the implementation of an enhanced recovery program in liver surgery. World J Surg 40:2441–2450CrossRef Joliat GR, Labgaa I, Hubner M, Blanc C, Griesser AC, Schafer M, Demartines N (2016) Cost-benefit analysis of the implementation of an enhanced recovery program in liver surgery. World J Surg 40:2441–2450CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu P, Miao W, Gu F, Xing C (2018) Changes of serum and peritoneal inflammatory mediators in laparoscopic radical resection for right colon carcinoma. J Minim Access Surg 15:115–118 Zhu P, Miao W, Gu F, Xing C (2018) Changes of serum and peritoneal inflammatory mediators in laparoscopic radical resection for right colon carcinoma. J Minim Access Surg 15:115–118
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Naqvi SEH, Zaka-Ur-Rab A, Islam N, Ali E (2017) A prospective study of altered inflammatory response and its clinical outcome following laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Iran J Med Sci 42:347–353PubMedPubMedCentral Naqvi SEH, Zaka-Ur-Rab A, Islam N, Ali E (2017) A prospective study of altered inflammatory response and its clinical outcome following laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Iran J Med Sci 42:347–353PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Okholm C, Goetze JP, Svendsen LB, Achiam MP (2014) Inflammatory response in laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastric cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 49:1027–1034CrossRef Okholm C, Goetze JP, Svendsen LB, Achiam MP (2014) Inflammatory response in laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastric cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 49:1027–1034CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Qi X, Li J, Deng H, Li H, Su C, Guo X (2016) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for the prognostic assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Oncotarget 7:45283–45301CrossRef Qi X, Li J, Deng H, Li H, Su C, Guo X (2016) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for the prognostic assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Oncotarget 7:45283–45301CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, Sano K, Sugawara Y, Takayama T, Makuuchi M (2005) Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 242:252–259CrossRef Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, Sano K, Sugawara Y, Takayama T, Makuuchi M (2005) Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 242:252–259CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo PS, Enestvedt CK, Kulkarni S (2013) Anatomic considerations in the surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 47(Suppl):S11–15CrossRef Yoo PS, Enestvedt CK, Kulkarni S (2013) Anatomic considerations in the surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 47(Suppl):S11–15CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Qin LX, Tang ZY (2002) The prognostic significance of clinical and pathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 8:193–199CrossRef Qin LX, Tang ZY (2002) The prognostic significance of clinical and pathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 8:193–199CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic hepatectomy enhances recovery for small hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis by postoperative inflammatory response attenuation: a propensity score matching analysis with a conventional open approach
verfasst von
Xiu-Tao Fu
Zheng Tang
Jia-Feng Chen
Ying-Hong Shi
Wei-Ren Liu
Qiang Gao
Guang-Yu Ding
Kang Song
Xiao-Ying Wang
Jian Zhou
Jia Fan
Zhen-Bin Ding
Publikationsdatum
03.08.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07710-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.