Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2017

30.12.2016

Leadership development in a professional medical society using 360-degree survey feedback to assess emotional intelligence

verfasst von: Paul J. Gregory, Benjamin Robbins, Steven D. Schwaitzberg, Larry Harmon

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The current research evaluated the potential utility of a 360-degree survey feedback program for measuring leadership quality in potential committee leaders of a professional medical association (PMA). Emotional intelligence as measured by the extent to which self-other agreement existed in the 360-degree survey ratings was explored as a key predictor of leadership quality in the potential leaders.

Study Design

A non-experimental correlational survey design was implemented to assess the variation in leadership quality scores across the sample of potential leaders. A total of 63 of 86 (76%) of those invited to participate did so. All potential leaders received feedback from PMA Leadership, PMA Colleagues, and PMA Staff and were asked to complete self-ratings regarding their behavior.

Results

Analyses of variance revealed a consistent pattern of results as Under-Estimators and Accurate Estimators-Favorable were rated significantly higher than Over-Estimators in several leadership behaviors.

Conclusions

Emotional intelligence as conceptualized in this study was positively related to overall performance ratings of potential leaders. The ever-increasing roles and potential responsibilities for PMAs suggest that these organizations should consider multisource performance reviews as these potential future PMA executives rise through their organizations to assume leadership positions with profound potential impact on healthcare. The current findings support the notion that potential leaders who demonstrated a humble pattern or an accurate pattern of self-rating scored significantly higher in their leadership, teamwork, and interpersonal/communication skills than those with an aggrandizing self-rating.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Markakis KM, Beckman HB, Suchman AL, Frankel RM (2000) The path of professionalism: cultivating humanistic values and attitudes in residency training. Acad Med 75(2):141–149CrossRefPubMed Markakis KM, Beckman HB, Suchman AL, Frankel RM (2000) The path of professionalism: cultivating humanistic values and attitudes in residency training. Acad Med 75(2):141–149CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McAlearney AS, Fisher D, Heiser K, Robbins D, Kelleher K (2004) Developing effective physician leaders: changing cultures and transforming organizations. Hosp Top 83:8–11 McAlearney AS, Fisher D, Heiser K, Robbins D, Kelleher K (2004) Developing effective physician leaders: changing cultures and transforming organizations. Hosp Top 83:8–11
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams SJ (2000) What skills do physician leaders need now and in the future? Phys Exec 27(3):46–48 Williams SJ (2000) What skills do physician leaders need now and in the future? Phys Exec 27(3):46–48
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoller JK (2008) Developing physician-leaders: key competencies and available programs. J Health Adm Educ 25:307–328PubMed Stoller JK (2008) Developing physician-leaders: key competencies and available programs. J Health Adm Educ 25:307–328PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron RM (2006) The bar-on model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema 18(1):13–25 Baron RM (2006) The bar-on model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema 18(1):13–25
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT (eds) (2010) Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT (eds) (2010) Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Humphrey C (2010) Assessment and remediation for physicians with suspected performance problems: an international survey. J Contin Educ Health Prof 30(1):26–36CrossRefPubMed Humphrey C (2010) Assessment and remediation for physicians with suspected performance problems: an international survey. J Contin Educ Health Prof 30(1):26–36CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Alimo-Metcalfe B (1998) 360-degree feedback and leadership development. Int J Sel Assess 6:35–44CrossRef Alimo-Metcalfe B (1998) 360-degree feedback and leadership development. Int J Sel Assess 6:35–44CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Atwater L, Waldman D (1998) 360-degree feedback and leadership development. Leadersh Q 9(4):424CrossRef Atwater L, Waldman D (1998) 360-degree feedback and leadership development. Leadersh Q 9(4):424CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Thach EC (2002) The impact of executive coaching and 360 feedback on leadership effectiveness. Leadersh Organ Dev J 23(4):205–214CrossRef Thach EC (2002) The impact of executive coaching and 360 feedback on leadership effectiveness. Leadersh Organ Dev J 23(4):205–214CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleenor JW, Smither JW, Atwater LE, Braddy PW, Sturm RE (2010) Self–other rating agreement in leadership: a review. Leadersh Q 21(6):1005–1034CrossRef Fleenor JW, Smither JW, Atwater LE, Braddy PW, Sturm RE (2010) Self–other rating agreement in leadership: a review. Leadersh Q 21(6):1005–1034CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Atwater LE, Yammarino FJ (1997) Self-other rating agreement: a review and model. In: Ferris GR (ed) Research in personnel and human resources management, vol 15. Elsevier Science/JAI Press, New York Atwater LE, Yammarino FJ (1997) Self-other rating agreement: a review and model. In: Ferris GR (ed) Research in personnel and human resources management, vol 15. Elsevier Science/JAI Press, New York
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hageman MG, Ring DC, Gregory PJ, Rubash HE, Harmon L (2015) Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(5):1590–1597CrossRefPubMed Hageman MG, Ring DC, Gregory PJ, Rubash HE, Harmon L (2015) Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(5):1590–1597CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nurudeen SM, Kwakye G, Berry WR et al (2015) Can 360-degree reviews help surgeons? Evaluation of multisource feedback for surgeons in a multi-institutional quality improvement project. J Am Coll Surg 221(4):837–844CrossRefPubMed Nurudeen SM, Kwakye G, Berry WR et al (2015) Can 360-degree reviews help surgeons? Evaluation of multisource feedback for surgeons in a multi-institutional quality improvement project. J Am Coll Surg 221(4):837–844CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bratton VK, Dodd NG, Brown FW (2011) The impact of emotional intelligence on accuracy of self-awareness and leadership performance. Leadersh Organ Dev J 32(2):127–149CrossRef Bratton VK, Dodd NG, Brown FW (2011) The impact of emotional intelligence on accuracy of self-awareness and leadership performance. Leadersh Organ Dev J 32(2):127–149CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Coelho K (2012) Brief report: bridging the divide for better health harnessing the power of emotional intelligence to foster an enhanced clinician-patient relationship. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health 4:181–188 Coelho K (2012) Brief report: bridging the divide for better health harnessing the power of emotional intelligence to foster an enhanced clinician-patient relationship. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health 4:181–188
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammerly ME, Harmon L, Schwaitzberg SD (2014) Good to great: using 360-degree feedback to improve physician emotional intelligence. J Healthc Manag 59:354–366PubMed Hammerly ME, Harmon L, Schwaitzberg SD (2014) Good to great: using 360-degree feedback to improve physician emotional intelligence. J Healthc Manag 59:354–366PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Leadership development in a professional medical society using 360-degree survey feedback to assess emotional intelligence
verfasst von
Paul J. Gregory
Benjamin Robbins
Steven D. Schwaitzberg
Larry Harmon
Publikationsdatum
30.12.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5386-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.