Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Im April diskutierten die Herz-Kreislauf-Spezialisten aus der ganzen Welt auf dem  Kongress des American College of Cardiology (ACC) u.a. neue Therapieansätze bei akutem Myokardinfarkt, koronarer Herzerkrankung, kardiogenem Schock oder Aortenklappenstenose. In unserem Kongress-Dossier haben wir für Sie Berichte über die „Late-Breaking Trials“ und andere wichtige Studien zusammengestellt. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Spine Journal
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 10/2011

01.10.2011 | Original Article

Leg pain and psychological variables predict outcome 2–3 years after lumbar fusion surgery

verfasst von: Allan D. Abbott, Raija Tyni-Lenné, Rune Hedlund

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 10/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Prediction studies testing a thorough range of psychological variables in addition to demographic, work-related and clinical variables are lacking in lumbar fusion surgery research. This prospective cohort study aimed at examining predictions of functional disability, back pain and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) 2–3 years after lumbar fusion by regressing nonlinear relations in a multivariate predictive model of pre-surgical variables. Before and 2–3 years after lumbar fusion surgery, patients completed measures investigating demographics, work-related variables, clinical variables, functional self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, fear of movement/(re)injury, mental health and pain coping. Categorical regression with optimal scaling transformation, elastic net regularization and bootstrapping were used to investigate predictor variables and address predictive model validity. The most parsimonious and stable subset of pre-surgical predictor variables explained 41.6, 36.0 and 25.6% of the variance in functional disability, back pain intensity and HRQOL 2–3 years after lumbar fusion. Pre-surgical control over pain significantly predicted functional disability and HRQOL. Pre-surgical catastrophizing and leg pain intensity significantly predicted functional disability and back pain while the pre-surgical straight leg raise significantly predicted back pain. Post-operative psychomotor therapy also significantly predicted functional disability while pre-surgical outcome expectations significantly predicted HRQOL. For the median dichotomised classification of functional disability, back pain intensity and HRQOL levels 2–3 years post-surgery, the discriminative ability of the prediction models was of good quality. The results demonstrate the importance of pre-surgical psychological factors, leg pain intensity, straight leg raise and post-operative psychomotor therapy in the predictions of functional disability, back pain and HRQOL-related outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Abbott AD, Tyni-Lenné R, Hedlund R (2010) The influence of psychological factors on pre-operative levels of pain intensity, disability and HRQOL in lumbar spinal fusion surgery patients. Physiotherapy 96(3):213–221
2.
Abbott AD, Tyni-Lenné R, Hedlund R (2010) Early rehabilitation targeting cognition, behaviour and motor function after lumbar fusion. A randomized controlled trial. Spine 35(8):848–857PubMedCrossRef
3.
Block AR, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD et al (2001) The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery. Spine J 1:274–282PubMedCrossRef
4.
Christensen F, Laurberg I, Bunger C (2003) Importance of the back-café concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomised clinical study with a 2-year follow-up. Spine 28:2561–2569PubMedCrossRef
5.
de Groot KI, Boeke S, Passchier J (1999) Preoperative expectations of pain and recovery in relation to postoperative disappointment in patients undergoing lumbar surgery. Med Care 37:149–156PubMedCrossRef
6.
Devillé WL, van der Windt DA, Dzaferagic A et al (2000) The test of Laségue: a systematic review of accuracy in diagnosing herniated discs. Spine 25:1140–1147PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
Efron BE (1983) Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvements in cross-validation. J Am Stat Assoc 78:313–316CrossRef
9.
Ekman P, Möller H, Hedlund R (2009) Predictive factors for the outcome of fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine 11:1204–1210CrossRef
10.
Elfving B (2006) Back Beleifs Questionnaire (BBQ) Translation to Swedish and pilot test of reliability and validity. Nordisk Fysioterapi 10:1–12
11.
Estlander A, Vanharanta H, Moneta G et al (1994) Anthropometric variables, self-efficacy beliefs, and pain and disability ratings on the isokinetic performance of low back pain patients. Spine 19:941–947PubMedCrossRef
12.
Group EuroQol (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRef
13.
Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB et al (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed
14.
15.
Gifi A (1990) Nonlinear multivariate analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chilchester
16.
Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK (2003) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. J Rehab Med 35:241–247CrossRef
17.
18.
Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20PubMed
19.
Hägg O, Fritzell P, Ekselius L et al (2003) Swedish Lumbar Spine Study. Predictors of outcome in fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:22–33PubMed
20.
Iversen MD, Daltroy LH, Fossel AH et al (1998) The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient Educ Couns 34:169–178PubMedCrossRef
21.
Jensen I, Linton SJ (1993) Coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ): reliability of the Swedish version of the CSQ. Scand J Behav Ther 22:139–145
22.
Johansson E, Lindberg P (2000) Low back pain patients in primary care: subgroups based on the Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Int J Behav Med 7:340–352CrossRef
23.
LaCaille RA, DeBerard MS, Masters KS et al (2005) Presurgical biopsychosocial factors predict multidimensional patient: outcomes of interbody cages lumbar fusion. Spine J 5:71–78PubMedCrossRef
24.
Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C et al (2006) Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations. Eur Spine J 15:1705–1716PubMedCrossRef
25.
Leeuw M, Goosens MEJB, Linton SJ et al (2007) The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence. J Behav Med 30:77–94PubMedCrossRef
26.
Lundberg M, Styf J, Carlsson S (2004) A psychometric evaluation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia—from a physiotherapeutic perspective. Physiother Theory Pract 20:121–133CrossRef
27.
Mannion AF, Elfering A (2006) Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J 15:93–108CrossRef
28.
Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R et al (2007) Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 16:777–786PubMedCrossRef
29.
Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A et al (2009) Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery? Spine 34:1590–1599PubMedCrossRef
30.
Price D, McGrath P, Rafii A et al (1983) The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 17:45–46PubMedCrossRef
31.
Riley JI, Robinson ME, Geisser ME et al (1995) Relationship between MMPI-2 cluster profiles and surgical outcome in low-back pain patients. J Spinal Disord 8:213–219PubMedCrossRef
32.
Rosenstiel A, Keefe F (1983) The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationships to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain 17:33–44PubMedCrossRef
33.
Saban KL, Penckofer SM (2007) Patient expectations of quality of life following lumbar spinal surgery. J Neurosci Nurs 39:180–189PubMedCrossRef
34.
Steyerberg EW (2009) Clinical Prediction Models: a practical approach to development validation and updating. Springer, New York
35.
Stromqvist B, Fritzell P, Hagg O et al (2007) Follow-up of lumbar surgery in Sweden 2007, The Swedish National Spine Register. The Swedish Spinal Surgery Society. http://​4s.​nu. Accessed 20 Dec 2008
36.
Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE (1992) The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey—1. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 41:1349–1358CrossRef
37.
Symonds T, Burton A, Tillotson K, Main C (1996) Do attitudes and beliefs influence work loss due to low back trouble? Occup Med 46:25–32
38.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights
39.
Toyone T, Tanaka T, Kato D et al (2005) Patients’ expectations and satisfaction with lumbar spine surgery. Spine 30:2689–2694PubMedCrossRef
40.
Trief PM, Grant W, Fredrickson BE (2000) A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine 25:2616–2621PubMedCrossRef
41.
Trief PM, Ploutz-Snyder R, Fredrickson BE (2006) Emotional health predicts pain and function after fusion: a prospective multicenter study. Spine 31:823–830PubMedCrossRef
42.
Van der Kooij A, Meulman JJ (2004) Regression with optimal scaling. In: Meulman JJ, Heiser WJ (eds) SPSS categories 13.0, 10th edn. SPSS, Chicago, pp 107–157
43.
44.
Van Susante J, Van de Schaaf D, Pavlov P (1998) Psychological distress deteriorates the subjective outcome of lumbosacral fusion. A prospective study. Acta Orthop Belg 64:371–377PubMed
45.
Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG et al (1995) Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioural performance. Pain 62:363–372PubMedCrossRef
46.
Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ (2000) Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 85:317–332PubMedCrossRef
47.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473
48.
Yee A, Adjei N, Do J, Ford M et al (2008) Do patient expectations of spinal surgery relate to functional outcome? Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1154–1161PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zou H, Hastie TJ (2005) Regulatization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 67:301–320CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Leg pain and psychological variables predict outcome 2–3 years after lumbar fusion surgery
verfasst von
Allan D. Abbott
Raija Tyni-Lenné
Rune Hedlund
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1709-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2011

European Spine Journal 10/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

In vivo three-dimensional segmental analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Original Article

Estimates of success in patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation depend upon outcome measure

Original Article

Vertebral column decancellation for the management of sharp angular spinal deformity

Grand Rounds

A traumatic, high-energy and unstable fracture of the C5 vertebra managed with kyphoplasty: a previously unreported case

Original Article

The aetiology behind torticollis and variable spine defects in patients with Müllerian duct/renal aplasia-cervicothoracic somite dysplasia syndrome: 3D CT scan analysis

Original Article

Role of ‘low cost Indian implants’ in our practice: our experience with 1,572 pedicle screws

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

TEP mit Roboterhilfe führt nicht zu größerer Zufriedenheit

15.05.2024 Knie-TEP Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Operationsrobotern für den Einbau von Totalendoprothesen des Kniegelenks hat die Präzision der Eingriffe erhöht. Für die postoperative Zufriedenheit der Patienten scheint das aber unerheblich zu sein, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Lever-Sign-Test hilft beim Verdacht auf Kreuzbandriss

15.05.2024 Vordere Kreuzbandruptur Nachrichten

Mit dem Hebelzeichen-Test lässt sich offenbar recht zuverlässig feststellen, ob ein vorderes Kreuzband gerissen ist. In einer Metaanalyse war die Vorhersagekraft vor allem bei positivem Testergebnis hoch.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

03.05.2024 Fibromyalgiesyndrom Nachrichten

Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise