Erschienen in:
01.12.2011 | Original Article
Urinary incontinence self-report questions: reproducibility and agreement with bladder diary
verfasst von:
Catherine S. Bradley, Jeanette S. Brown, Stephen K. Van Den Eeden, Michael Schembri, Arona Ragins, David H. Thom
Erschienen in:
International Urogynecology Journal
|
Ausgabe 12/2011
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
This study aims to measure self-report urinary incontinence questions’ reproducibility and agreement with bladder diary.
Methods
Data were analyzed from the Reproductive Risk of Incontinence Study at Kaiser. Participating women reporting at least weekly incontinence completed self-report incontinence questions and a 7-day bladder diary. Self-report question reproducibility was assessed and agreement between self-reported and diary-recorded voiding and incontinence frequency was measured. Test characteristics and area under the curve were calculated for self-reported incontinence types using diary as the gold standard.
Results
Five hundred ninety-one women were included and 425 completed a diary. The self-report questions had moderate reproducibility and self-reported and diary-recorded incontinence and voiding frequencies had moderate to good agreement. Self-reported incontinence types identified stress and urgency incontinence more accurately than mixed incontinence.
Conclusions
Self-report incontinence questions have moderate reproducibility and agreement with diary, and considering their minimal burden, are acceptable research tools in epidemiologic studies.