Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 3/2022

13.10.2021 | Breast

Predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer and identifying interpretable imaging features using machine learning algorithms

verfasst von: Mengwei Ma, Renyi Liu, Chanjuan Wen, Weimin Xu, Zeyuan Xu, Sina Wang, Jiefang Wu, Derun Pan, Bowen Zheng, Genggeng Qin, Weiguo Chen

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the performance of interpretable machine learning models in predicting breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 600 patients with invasive breast carcinoma between 2012 and 2019. The patients were randomly divided into a training (n = 450) and a testing (n = 150) set. The five constructed models were trained based on clinical characteristics and imaging features (mammography and ultrasonography). The model classification performances were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) technique was used to interpret the optimal model output. Then we choose the optimal model as the assisted model to evaluate the performance of another four radiologists in predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer with or without model assistance, according to mammography and ultrasound images.

Results

The decision tree (DT) model performed the best in distinguishing triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from other breast cancer subtypes, yielding an AUC of 0.971; accuracy, 0.947; sensitivity, 0.905; and specificity, 0.941. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of all radiologists in distinguishing TNBC from other molecular subtypes and Luminal breast cancer from other molecular subtypes have significantly improved with the assistance of DT model. In the diagnosis of TNBC versus other subtypes, the average sensitivity, average specificity, and average accuracy of less experienced and more experienced radiologists increased by 0.090, 0.125, 0.114, and 0.060, 0.090, 0.083, respectively. In the diagnosis of Luminal versus other subtypes, the average sensitivity, average specificity, and average accuracy of less experienced and more experienced radiologists increased by 0.084, 0.152, 0.159, and 0.020, 0.100, 0.048.

Conclusions

This study established an interpretable machine learning model to differentiate between breast cancer molecular subtypes, providing additional values for radiologists.

Key Points

Interpretable machine learning model (MLM) could help clinicians and radiologists differentiate between breast cancer molecular subtypes.
The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) technique can select important features for predicting the molecular subtypes of breast cancer from a large number of imaging signs.
Machine learning model can assist radiologists to evaluate the molecular subtype of breast cancer to some extent.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogell A, Evans ML (2019) Cancer screening in women. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 46(3):485–499CrossRef Vogell A, Evans ML (2019) Cancer screening in women. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 46(3):485–499CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zardavas D, Irrthum A, Swanton C et al (2015) Clinical management of breast cancer heterogeneity. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12(7):381–394CrossRefPubMed Zardavas D, Irrthum A, Swanton C et al (2015) Clinical management of breast cancer heterogeneity. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12(7):381–394CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22(8):1736–1747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22(8):1736–1747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Huber KE, Carey LA, Wazer DE (2009) Breast cancer molecular subtypes in patients with locally advanced disease: impact on prognosis, patterns of recurrence, and response to therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 19(4):204–210CrossRefPubMed Huber KE, Carey LA, Wazer DE (2009) Breast cancer molecular subtypes in patients with locally advanced disease: impact on prognosis, patterns of recurrence, and response to therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 19(4):204–210CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald ES, Clark AS, Tchou J et al (2016) Clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer. J Nucl Med 57(Suppl 1):9S-16SCrossRefPubMed McDonald ES, Clark AS, Tchou J et al (2016) Clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer. J Nucl Med 57(Suppl 1):9S-16SCrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Niell BL, Freer PE, Weinfurtner RJ et al (2017) Screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin N Am 55(6):1145–1162CrossRefPubMed Niell BL, Freer PE, Weinfurtner RJ et al (2017) Screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin N Am 55(6):1145–1162CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Taneja S, Evans AJ, Rakha EA et al (2008) The mammographic correlations of a new immunohistochemical classification of invasive breast cancer. Clin Radiol 63(11):1228–1235CrossRefPubMed Taneja S, Evans AJ, Rakha EA et al (2008) The mammographic correlations of a new immunohistochemical classification of invasive breast cancer. Clin Radiol 63(11):1228–1235CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rashmi S, Kamala S, Murthy SS et al (2018) Predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer based on mammography and ultrasound findings. Indian J Radiol Imaging 28(3):354–361CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rashmi S, Kamala S, Murthy SS et al (2018) Predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer based on mammography and ultrasound findings. Indian J Radiol Imaging 28(3):354–361CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat An YY, Kim SH, Kang BJ et al (2015) Breast cancer in very young women (<30 years): Correlation of imaging features with clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical subtypes. Eur J Radiol 84(10):1894–1902CrossRefPubMed An YY, Kim SH, Kang BJ et al (2015) Breast cancer in very young women (<30 years): Correlation of imaging features with clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical subtypes. Eur J Radiol 84(10):1894–1902CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Choy G, Khalilzadeh O, Michalski M et al (2018) Current applications and future impact of machine learning in radiology. Radiology 288(2):318–328CrossRefPubMed Choy G, Khalilzadeh O, Michalski M et al (2018) Current applications and future impact of machine learning in radiology. Radiology 288(2):318–328CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo Y, Hu Y, Qiao M et al (2018) Radiomics analysis on ultrasound for prediction of biologic behavior in breast invasive ductal carcinoma. Clin Breast Cancer 18(3):e335–e344CrossRefPubMed Guo Y, Hu Y, Qiao M et al (2018) Radiomics analysis on ultrasound for prediction of biologic behavior in breast invasive ductal carcinoma. Clin Breast Cancer 18(3):e335–e344CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Son J, Lee SE, Kim EK et al (2020) Prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes using radiomics signatures of synthetic mammography from digital breast tomosynthesis. Sci Rep 10(1):21566CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Son J, Lee SE, Kim EK et al (2020) Prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes using radiomics signatures of synthetic mammography from digital breast tomosynthesis. Sci Rep 10(1):21566CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Elshawi R, Al-Mallah MH, Sakr S (2019) On the interpretability of machine learning-based model for predicting hypertension. BMC Medical Inform Decis Mak 19(1):146CrossRef Elshawi R, Al-Mallah MH, Sakr S (2019) On the interpretability of machine learning-based model for predicting hypertension. BMC Medical Inform Decis Mak 19(1):146CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebedev AV, Westman E, Van Westen GJP et al (2014) Random forest ensembles for detection and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease with a good between-cohort robustness. Neuroimage Clin 6:115–125CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lebedev AV, Westman E, Van Westen GJP et al (2014) Random forest ensembles for detection and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease with a good between-cohort robustness. Neuroimage Clin 6:115–125CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodríguez-Pérez R, Bajorath J (2020) Interpretation of compound activity predictions from complex machine learning models using local approximations and Shapley values. J Med Chem 63(16):8761–8777CrossRefPubMed Rodríguez-Pérez R, Bajorath J (2020) Interpretation of compound activity predictions from complex machine learning models using local approximations and Shapley values. J Med Chem 63(16):8761–8777CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C et al (2016) A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition. Radiographics 36(3):623–639CrossRefPubMed Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C et al (2016) A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition. Radiographics 36(3):623–639CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Elkin EB, Klem ML, Gonzales AM et al (2011) Characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer in women with and without a history of radiation for Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a multi-institutional, matched cohort study. J Clin Oncol 29(18):2466–2473CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elkin EB, Klem ML, Gonzales AM et al (2011) Characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer in women with and without a history of radiation for Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a multi-institutional, matched cohort study. J Clin Oncol 29(18):2466–2473CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakha EA, Green AR (2017) Molecular classification of breast cancer: what the pathologist needs to know. Pathology 49(2):111–119CrossRefPubMed Rakha EA, Green AR (2017) Molecular classification of breast cancer: what the pathologist needs to know. Pathology 49(2):111–119CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang K, Zhu Q, Sheng D et al (2020) A new model incorporating axillary ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to predict non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer. Cancer Manag Res 12:965–972CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang K, Zhu Q, Sheng D et al (2020) A new model incorporating axillary ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to predict non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer. Cancer Manag Res 12:965–972CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Prieto L, Lamarca R, Casado A et al (1997) The evaluation of agreement on continuous variables by the intraclass correlation coefficient. J Epidemiol Community Health 51(5):579–581CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prieto L, Lamarca R, Casado A et al (1997) The evaluation of agreement on continuous variables by the intraclass correlation coefficient. J Epidemiol Community Health 51(5):579–581CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Boisserie-Lacroix M, Mac GG, Debled M et al (2012) Radiological features of triple-negative breast cancers (73 cases). Diagn Interv Imaging 93(3):183–190CrossRefPubMed Boisserie-Lacroix M, Mac GG, Debled M et al (2012) Radiological features of triple-negative breast cancers (73 cases). Diagn Interv Imaging 93(3):183–190CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Ikeda DM, Narasimhan B et al (2008) Estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression. Radiology 246(2):367–375CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Ikeda DM, Narasimhan B et al (2008) Estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression. Radiology 246(2):367–375CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ko ES, Lee BH, Kim HA et al (2010) Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between imaging and pathological findings. Eur Radiol 20(5):1111–1117CrossRefPubMed Ko ES, Lee BH, Kim HA et al (2010) Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between imaging and pathological findings. Eur Radiol 20(5):1111–1117CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang J, Lin Q, Cui C et al (2020) Correlation between imaging features and molecular subtypes of breast cancer in young women (≤30 years old). Jpn J Radiol 38(11):1062–1074CrossRefPubMed Huang J, Lin Q, Cui C et al (2020) Correlation between imaging features and molecular subtypes of breast cancer in young women (≤30 years old). Jpn J Radiol 38(11):1062–1074CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SH, Chang JM, Shin SU et al (2017) Imaging features of breast cancers on digital breast tomosynthesis according to molecular subtype: association with breast cancer detection. Br J Radiol 90(1080):20170470CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee SH, Chang JM, Shin SU et al (2017) Imaging features of breast cancers on digital breast tomosynthesis according to molecular subtype: association with breast cancer detection. Br J Radiol 90(1080):20170470CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Killelea BK, Chagpar AB, Bishop J et al (2013) Is there a correlation between breast cancer molecular subtype using receptors as surrogates and mammographic appearance? Ann Surg Oncol 20(10):3247–3253CrossRefPubMed Killelea BK, Chagpar AB, Bishop J et al (2013) Is there a correlation between breast cancer molecular subtype using receptors as surrogates and mammographic appearance? Ann Surg Oncol 20(10):3247–3253CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou J, Tan H, Bai Y et al (2019) Evaluating the HER-2 status of breast cancer using mammography radiomics features. Eur J Radiol 121:108718CrossRefPubMed Zhou J, Tan H, Bai Y et al (2019) Evaluating the HER-2 status of breast cancer using mammography radiomics features. Eur J Radiol 121:108718CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleury E, Marcomini K (2019) Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images. Eur Radiol Exp 3(1):34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fleury E, Marcomini K (2019) Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images. Eur Radiol Exp 3(1):34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma W, Zhao Y, Ji Y et al (2019) Breast cancer molecular subtype prediction by mammographicradiomic features. Acad Radiol 26(2):196–201CrossRefPubMed Ma W, Zhao Y, Ji Y et al (2019) Breast cancer molecular subtype prediction by mammographicradiomic features. Acad Radiol 26(2):196–201CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Li H, Zhu Y, Burnside ES et al (2016) Quantitative MRI radiomics in the prediction of molecular classifications of breast cancer subtypes in the TCGA/TCIA data set. NPJ Breast Cancer 2:16012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li H, Zhu Y, Burnside ES et al (2016) Quantitative MRI radiomics in the prediction of molecular classifications of breast cancer subtypes in the TCGA/TCIA data set. NPJ Breast Cancer 2:16012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Xin Y, Li Q et al (2017) Empirical study of seven data mining algorithms on different characteristics of datasets for biomedical classification applications. Biomed Eng Online 16(1):125CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang Y, Xin Y, Li Q et al (2017) Empirical study of seven data mining algorithms on different characteristics of datasets for biomedical classification applications. Biomed Eng Online 16(1):125CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu M, Zhong X, Peng Q et al (2019) Prediction of molecular subtypes of breast cancer using BI-RADS features based on a “white box” machine learning approach in a multi-modal imaging setting. Eur J Radiol 114:175–184CrossRefPubMed Wu M, Zhong X, Peng Q et al (2019) Prediction of molecular subtypes of breast cancer using BI-RADS features based on a “white box” machine learning approach in a multi-modal imaging setting. Eur J Radiol 114:175–184CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Tagliafico AS, Bignotti B, Rossi F et al (2019) Breast cancer Ki-67 expression prediction by digital breast tomosynthesis radiomics features. Eur Radiol Exp 3(1):36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tagliafico AS, Bignotti B, Rossi F et al (2019) Breast cancer Ki-67 expression prediction by digital breast tomosynthesis radiomics features. Eur Radiol Exp 3(1):36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer and identifying interpretable imaging features using machine learning algorithms
verfasst von
Mengwei Ma
Renyi Liu
Chanjuan Wen
Weimin Xu
Zeyuan Xu
Sina Wang
Jiefang Wu
Derun Pan
Bowen Zheng
Genggeng Qin
Weiguo Chen
Publikationsdatum
13.10.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08271-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

European Radiology 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.