Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Im April diskutierten die Herz-Kreislauf-Spezialisten aus der ganzen Welt auf dem  Kongress des American College of Cardiology (ACC) u.a. neue Therapieansätze bei akutem Myokardinfarkt, koronarer Herzerkrankung, kardiogenem Schock oder Aortenklappenstenose. In unserem Kongress-Dossier haben wir für Sie Berichte über die „Late-Breaking Trials“ und andere wichtige Studien zusammengestellt. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2009

01.06.2009 | Original Article

The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases

verfasst von: Andre Chow, Henry S. Tilney, Paraskevas Paraskeva, Santhini Jeyarajah, Emmanouil Zacharakis, Sanjay Purkayastha

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 6/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aims

Loop ileostomies are used currently in surgical practice to reduce the consequences of distal anastomotic failure following colorectal resection. It is often assumed that reversal of a loop ileostomy is a simple and safe procedure. However, many studies have demonstrated high morbidity rates following loop ileostomy closure. The aims of this systematic review were to examine all the existing evidence in the literature on morbidity and mortality following closure of loop ileostomy.

Method

A literature search of Ovid, Embase, the Cochrane database, Google Scholar™ and Medline using Pubmed as the search engine was used to identify studies reporting on the morbidity of loop ileostomy closure (latest at June 15th 2008), was performed. Outcomes of interest included demographics, the details regarding the original indication for operation, operative and hospital-related outcomes, post-operative bowel-related complications, and other surgical and medical complications.

Results

Forty-eight studies from 18 countries satisfied the inclusion criteria. Outcomes of a total of 6,107 patients were analysed. Overall morbidity following closure of loop ileostomy was found to be 17.3% with a mortality rate of 0.4%. 3.7% of patients required a laparotomy at the time of ileostomy closure. The most common post-operative complications included small bowel obstruction (7.2%) and wound sepsis (5.0%).

Conclusion

The consequences of anastomotic leakage following colorectal resection are severe. However, the consequences of stoma reversal are often underestimated. Surgeons should adopt a selective strategy regarding the use of defunctioning ileostomy, and counsel patients further prior to the original surgery. In this way, patients at low risk may be spared the morbidity of stoma reversal.
Literatur
1.
Turnbull RB Jr, Hawk WA, Weakley FL (1971) Surgical treatment of toxic megacolon. Ileostomy and colostomy to prepare patients for colectomy. Am J Surg 122(3):325–331PubMedCrossRef
2.
Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE, Reese GE, Heriot AG, Tekkis PP (2007) Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. World J Surg 31(5):1142–1151PubMedCrossRef
3.
Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ et al (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90(10):1261–1266PubMedCrossRef
4.
Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, Ho JW, Seto CL (2007) Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg 11(1):8–15PubMedCrossRef
5.
Kanellos I, Blouhos K, Demetriades H et al (2004) The failed intraperitoneal colon anastomosis after colon resection. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 1):s53–s55PubMedCrossRef
6.
Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Holdsworth PJ, Heald RJ (1991) Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis. Br J Surg 78(2):196–198PubMedCrossRef
7.
Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81(8):1224–1226PubMedCrossRef
8.
Shellito PC (1998) Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 41(12):1562–1572PubMedCrossRef
9.
Lertsithichai P, Rattanapichart P (2004) Temporary ileostomy versus temporary colostomy: a meta-analysis of complications. Asian J Surg 27(3):202–210 discussion 211–212PubMed
10.
Kaidar-Person O, Person B, Wexner SD (2005) Complications of construction and closure of temporary loop ileostomy. J Am Coll Surg 201(5):759–773PubMedCrossRef
11.
Leung TT, MacLean AR, Buie WD, Dixon E (2008) Comparison of stapled versus handsewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12(5):939–944PubMedCrossRef
12.
Garcia-Botello SA, Garcia-Armengol J, Garcia-Granero E et al (2004) A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown. Dig Surg 21(5–6):440–446PubMedCrossRef
13.
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA et al (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:10PubMedCrossRef
14.
Amin SN, Memon MA, Armitage NC, Scholefield JH (2001) Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83(4):246–249PubMed
15.
Bain IM, Patel R, Keighley MR (1996) Comparison of sutured and stapled closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78(6):555–6PubMed
16.
Bakx R, Busch OR, van Geldere D, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Lanschot JJ (2003) Feasibility of early closure of loop ileostomies: a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 46(12):1680–1684PubMedCrossRef
17.
Barry M, Mealy K, Hyland J (1992) The role of the defunctioning ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Ir J Med Sci 161(9):559–560PubMedCrossRef
18.
Bell C, Asolati M, Hamilton E et al (2005) A comparison of complications associated with colostomy reversal versus ileostomy reversal. Am J Surg 190(5):717–720PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
Carlsen E, Bergan AB (1999) Loop ileostomy: technical aspects and complications. Eur J Surg 165(2):140–143 discussion 144PubMedCrossRef
21.
Chen F, Stuart M (1996) The morbidity of defunctioning stomata. Aust N Z J Surg 66(4):218–221PubMedCrossRef
22.
Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2001) Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88(3):360–363PubMedCrossRef
23.
Fasth S, Hulten L, Palselius I (1980) Loop ileostomy—an attractive alternative to a temporary transverse colostomy. Acta Chir Scand 146(3):203–207PubMed
24.
Feinberg SM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z (1987) Complications of loop ileostomy. Am J Surg 153(1):102–107PubMedCrossRef
25.
Fonkalsrud EW, Thakur A, Roof L (2000) Comparison of loop versus end ileostomy for fecal diversion after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. J Am Coll Surg 190(4):418–422PubMedCrossRef
26.
Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, Wolff S, Koeckerling F, Lippert H (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92(9):1137–1142PubMedCrossRef
27.
Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG (1998) Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 85(1):76–79PubMedCrossRef
28.
Gunnarsson U, Karlbom U, Docker M, Raab Y, Pahlman L (2004) Proctocolectomy and pelvic pouch—is a diverting stoma dangerous for the patient? Colorectal Dis 6(1):23–27PubMedCrossRef
29.
Haase O, Raue W, Bohm B, Neuss H, Scharfenberg M, Schwenk W (2005) Subcutaneous gentamycin implant to reduce wound infections after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 48(11):2025–2031PubMedCrossRef
30.
Hainsworth PJ, Bartolo DC (1998) Selective omission of loop ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 13(3):119–123PubMedCrossRef
31.
Hallbook O, Matthiessen P, Leinskold T, Nystrom PO, Sjodahl R (2002) Safety of the temporary loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 4(5):361–364PubMedCrossRef
32.
Hasegawa H, Radley S, Morton DG, Keighley MR (2000) Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 231(2):202–204PubMedCrossRef
33.
Hull TL, Kobe I, Fazio VW (1996) Comparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures. Dis Colon Rectum 39(10):1086–1089PubMedCrossRef
34.
Ikeuchi H, Nakano H, Uchino M et al (2005) Safety of one-stage restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 48(8):1550–1555PubMedCrossRef
35.
Kaiser AM, Israelit S, Klaristenfeld D et al (2008) Morbidity of ostomy takedown. J Gastrointest Surg 12(3):437–441PubMedCrossRef
36.
Khoo RE, Cohen MM, Chapman GM, Jenken DA, Langevin JM (1994) Loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion. Am J Surg 167(5):519–522PubMedCrossRef
37.
Krand O, Yalti T, Berber I, Tellioglu G (2008) Early vs. delayed closure of temporary covering ileostomy: a prospective study. Hepatogastroenterology 55(81):142–145PubMed
38.
Lahat G, Tulchinsky H, Goldman G, Klauzner JM, Rabau M (2005) Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques. Tech Coloproctol 9(3):206–208PubMedCrossRef
39.
Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 89(6):704–708PubMedCrossRef
40.
Lewis P, Bartolo DC (1990) Closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72(4):263–265PubMed
41.
Mala T, Nesbakken A (2008) Morbidity related to the use of a protective stoma in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 10(4):785–788PubMedCrossRef
42.
Mann LJ, Stewart PJ, Goodwin RJ, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL (1991) Complications following closure of loop ileostomy. Aust N Z J Surg 61(7):493–496PubMedCrossRef
43.
Mansfield SD, Jensen C, Phair AS, Kelly OT, Kelly SB (2008) Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients. World J Surg 32(9):2101–2106PubMedCrossRef
44.
Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246(2):207–214PubMedCrossRef
45.
O’Toole GC, Hyland JM, Grant DC, Barry MK (1999) Defunctioning loop ileostomy: a prospective audit. J Am Coll Surg 188(1):6–9PubMedCrossRef
46.
Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Seid VE et al (2006) Loop ileostomy morbidity: timing of closure matters. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10):1539–1545PubMedCrossRef
47.
Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ, Madoff RD, Gemlo BT (1999) Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 177(6):463–466PubMedCrossRef
48.
Platell C, Barwood N, Makin G (2005) Clinical utility of a de-functioning loop ileostomy. ANZ J Surg 75(3):147–151PubMedCrossRef
49.
Poon RT, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW, Law WL, Wong J (1999) Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. World J Surg 23(5):463–467 discussion 467–468PubMedCrossRef
50.
Rathnayake MM, Kumarage SK, Wijesuriya SR, Munasinghe BN, Ariyaratne MH, Deen KI (2008) Complications of loop ileostomy and ileostomy closure and their implications for extended enterostomal therapy: a prospective clinical study. Int J Nurs Stud 45(8):1118–1121PubMedCrossRef
51.
Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J (2001) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 25(3):274–277 discussion 277–278PubMedCrossRef
52.
Sakai Y, Nelson H, Larson D, Maidl L, Young-Fadok T, Ilstrup D (2001) Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion: a case-matched study. Arch Surg 136(3):338–342PubMedCrossRef
53.
Senapati A, Nicholls RJ, Ritchie JK, Tibbs CJ, Hawley PR (1993) Temporary loop ileostomy for restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 80(5):628–630PubMedCrossRef
54.
Thalheimer A, Bueter M, Kortuem M, Thiede A, Meyer D (2006) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomy in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49(7):1011–1017PubMedCrossRef
55.
Tsunoda A, Tsunoda Y, Narita K, Watanabe M, Nakao K, Kusano M (2008) Quality of life after low anterior resection and temporary loop ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51(2):218–222PubMedCrossRef
56.
van de Pavoordt HD, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL (1987) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2(4):214–217PubMedCrossRef
57.
Welten RJ, Jansen A, van de Pavoordt HD (1991) A future role for loop ileostomy in colorectal surgery? Neth J Surg 43(5):192–194PubMed
58.
Wexner SD, Taranow DA, Johansen OB et al (1993) Loop ileostomy is a safe option for fecal diversion. Dis Colon Rectum 36(4):349–354PubMedCrossRef
59.
Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH (1986) De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 73(7):566–570PubMedCrossRef
60.
Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E et al (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1, 504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48(2):243–250PubMedCrossRef
61.
Williams LA, Sagar PM, Finan PJ, Burke D (2008) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study. Colorectal Dis 10(5):460–464PubMedCrossRef
62.
Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85(3):355–358PubMedCrossRef
63.
Chambers WM, Mortensen NJ (2004) Postoperative leakage and abscess formation after colorectal surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18(5):865–880PubMed
64.
Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 83(1):60–62PubMedCrossRef
65.
McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92(9):1150–1154PubMedCrossRef
66.
Guenaga KF, Lustosa SA, Saad SS, Saconato H, Matos D (2007) Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD004647PubMed
67.
68.
Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248(1):52–60PubMedCrossRef
69.
Weston-Petrides GK, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS et al (2008) Comparison of outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Arch Surg 143(4):406–412PubMedCrossRef
70.
70. Department_of_Health: Hospital Episode Statistics: Inpatient Data, Main Operations: 4 Character 2005–2006.
71.
O’Leary DP, Fide CJ, Foy C, Lucarotti ME (2001) Quality of life after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and temporary loop ileostomy for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 88(9):1216–1220PubMedCrossRef
72.
Silva MA, Ratnayake G, Deen KI (2003) Quality of life of stoma patients: temporary ileostomy versus colostomy. World J Surg 27(4):421–424PubMedCrossRef
73.
Kairaluoma M, Rissanen H, Kultti V, Mecklin JP, Kellokumpu I (2002) Outcome of temporary stomas. A prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996. Dig Surg 19(1):45–51PubMedCrossRef
74.
Kanellos I, Zacharakis E, Christoforidis E, Demetriades H, Betsis D (2002) Low anterior resection without defunctioning stoma. Tech Coloproctol 6(3):153–156 discussion 156–157PubMedCrossRef
75.
Grobler SP, Hosie KB, Keighley MR (1992) Randomized trial of loop ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 79(9):903–906PubMedCrossRef
76.
Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW (2000) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 179(2):92–96PubMedCrossRef
77.
Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (2003) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46(5):653–660PubMedCrossRef
78.
Schrock TR, Deveney CW, Dunphy JE (1973) Factor contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses. Ann Surg 177(5):513–518PubMedCrossRef
79.
Rudinskaite G, Tamelis A, Saladzinskas Z, Pavalkis D (2005) Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage following the resection of sigmoid and rectal cancer. Medicina (Kaunas) 41(9):741–746
80.
Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC et al (1997) Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1, 014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 185(2):105–113PubMed
81.
Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345(9):638–646PubMedCrossRef
82.
Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351(17):1731–1740PubMedCrossRef
83.
Mealy K, Burke P, Hyland J (1992) Anterior resection without a defunctioning colostomy: questions of safety. Br J Surg 79(4):305–307PubMedCrossRef
84.
Parker MC, Wilson MS, van Goor H et al (2007) Adhesions and colorectal surgery—call for action. Colorectal Dis 9(Suppl 2):66–72PubMedCrossRef
85.
Ellis H (2004) Medicolegal consequences of adhesions. Hosp Med 65(6):348–350PubMed
86.
Bakx R, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, Veldink GJ, Slors JF, van Lanschot JJ (2004) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies. Dig Surg 21(4):277–281PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases
verfasst von
Andre Chow
Henry S. Tilney
Paraskevas Paraskeva
Santhini Jeyarajah
Emmanouil Zacharakis
Sanjay Purkayastha
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0660-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2009

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Protein kinase C-beta II (PKC-βII) expression in patients with colorectal cancer

Letter to the Editor

Colonic manifestation of mantle cell lymphoma with multiple lymphomatous polyposis

Letter to the Editor

‘Flatus tube enema’ as an alternative to flexible sigmoidoscopy in reducing colonic volvulus and pseudo-obstruction: letter

Original Article

Perioperative fluid retention and clinical outcome in elective, high-risk colorectal surgery

Original Article

Genetic polymorphisms in the cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 genes and risk of colorectal adenoma

Original Article

Combined inhibition of Dnmt and mTOR signaling inhibits formation and growth of colorectal cancer

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.
Bildnachweise