nach oben

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Erschienen in:

15.01.2021 | Original Articles

Feasibility and quality of life assessment of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy using double-tract reconstruction

verfasst von: Reo Sato, Takahiro Kinoshita, Eigo Akimoto, Mitsumasa Yoshida, Yukiko Nishiguchi, Junichiro Harada

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

As the frequency of cancer in the proximal stomach or around the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) increases worldwide, the use of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) has expanded. This study evaluated the safety of LPG with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DT) and the resulting quality of life (QOL) of patients.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the data of patients who underwent LPG-DT via linear-stapled esophagojejunostomy for gastric or EGJ cancer between 2013 and 2019, and outcomes were compared with those of laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (LTG-RY) peMME000372rformed over the same period. Surgical outcomes, changes of nutritional parameters, and chronological QOL as evaluated using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS-37) questionnaire were compared in the propensity-matched cohorts.

Results

In total, 289 patients (99 LPG-DT and 190 LTG-RY) were eligible and the outcomes were evaluated in the propensity-matched cohorts (n = 75 each). Operative time and the incidence of complications (≥ grade III) were comparable. Reflux esophagitis was more frequent in the LPG-DT group (8.0% vs. 0%), whereas the incidence of anastomotic stricture did not differ. The percentage rates of body weight loss and hemoglobin reduction were lower in the LPG-DT group at any time point within postoperative 2 years but show no statistical differences. In PGSAS-37 (n = 26, n = 23), the diarrhea and quality of ingestion scores were slightly better in the LPG-DT group.

Conclusions

The present study suggested that our LPG-DT is feasible and safe in appropriately selected patients, and it may provide slightly better outcomes in nutrition and QOL compared with LTG-RY.

Ahn HS, Lee H-J, Yoo M-W, Jeong SH, Park DJ, Kim HH, Kim WH, Lee KU, Yang HK (2011) Changes in clinicopathological features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer over a 20-year period. Br J Surg 98:255–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7310CrossRefPubMed

Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Wu J, Ren D, Yan X, Wang Q, Wang Y, Wang H, Zhang J, Zhu X, Yang Y, Luo C, Guo X, Tang C, Qiao L (2008) A rising trend of gastric cardia cancer in Gansu Province of China. Cancer Lett 269:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.04.013CrossRefPubMed

Isobe Y, Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, Oda I, Hayashi K, Miyashiro I, Katai H, Tsujitani S, Kodera Y, Seto Y, Kaminishi M (2011) Gastric cancer treatment in Japan: 2008 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer 14:301–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0085-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Association JGC (2020) Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y

Katai H, Morita S, Saka M, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T (2010) Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for suspected early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg 97(558):562–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6944CrossRef

An JY, Youn HG, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S (2008) The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer. Am J Surg 196(587):591–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.040CrossRef

Kinoshita T, Gotohda N, Kato Y, Takahashi S, Konishi M, Kinoshita T (2012) Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer in the proximal third of the stomach: a retrospective comparison with open surgery. Surg Endosc 27(146):153–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2401-6CrossRef

Nakada K, Ikeda M, Takahashi M, Kinami S, Yoshida M, Uenosono Y, Kawashima Y, Oshio A, Suzukamo Y, Terashima M, Kodera Y (2014) Characteristics and clinical relevance of Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45: newly developed integrated questionnaires for assessment of living status and quality of life in postgastrectomy patients. Gastric Cancer 18:147–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0344-4CrossRefPubMed

Brierley JD, Gospodarwicz MK, Wittekind C, Amin MB (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 8th edn. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken

10.

Association JGC (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5CrossRef

11.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.aeCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Armstrong D, Bennett J, Blum A, Dent J, de Dombal FT, Galmiche JP, Lundell L, Margulies M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ, Tytgat GN, Wallin L (1996) The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 111:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8698230CrossRefPubMed

13.

Nagai E, Ohuchida K, Nakata K, Miyasaka Y, Maeyama R, Toma H, Shimizu S, Tanaka M (2013) Feasibility and safety of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: inverted T-shaped anastomosis using linear staplers. Surgery 153:732–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.10.012CrossRefPubMed

14.

Inaba K, Satoh S, Ishida Y, Taniguchi K, Isogaki J, Kanaya S, Uyama I (2010) Overlap method: novel intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211:e25–e29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.005CrossRefPubMed

15.

Kanda Y (2012) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Murakami K, Obama K, Tsunoda S, Hisamori S, Nishigori T, Hida K, Kanaya S, Satoh S, Manaka D, Yamamoto M, Kadokawa Y, Itami A, Okabe H, Hata H, Tanaka E, Yamashita Y, Kondo M, Hosogi H, Hoshino N, Tanaka S, Sakai Y (2019) Linear or circular stapler? A propensity score-matched, multicenter analysis of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy following totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 34:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07313-9CrossRef

17.

Kuroda S, Nishizaki M, Kikuchi S, Noma K, Tanabe S, Kagawa S, Shirakawa Y, Fujiwara T (2016) Double-flap technique as an antireflux procedure in esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 223:e7–e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.041CrossRefPubMed

18.

Yamashita Y, Yamamoto A, Tamamori Y, Yoshii M, Nishiguchi Y (2017) Side overlap esophagogastrostomy to prevent reflux after proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 20:728–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0674-5CrossRefPubMed

19.

Shoji Y (2019) Surgical outcomes and risk assessment for anastomotic complications after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for upper-third gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 22:1036–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00940-0CrossRefPubMed

20.

Shibasaki S, Suda K, Nakauchi M, Kikuchi K, Kadoya S, Ishida Y, Inaba K, Uyama I (2017) Robotic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy using double flap technique following proximal gastrectomy: technical aspects and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 31(4283):4297–4297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5489-xCrossRef

21.

Kuroda S, Choda Y, Otsuka S, Ueyama S, Tanaka N, Muraoka A, Hato S, Kimura T, Tanakaya K, Kikuchi S, Tanabe S, Noma K, Nishizaki M, Kagawa S, Shirakawa Y, Kamikawa Y, Fujiwara T (2019) Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double-flap technique as antireflux esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy (rD-FLAP Study). Ann Gastroenterol Surg 3:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12216CrossRefPubMed

22.

Nakamura M, Yamaue H (2016) Reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: a review of the literature published from 2000 to 2014. Surg Today 46(517):527–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1185-4CrossRef

23.

Ohyama S, Tokunaga M, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Fujisaki J, Seto Y, Yamaguchi T (2009) A clinicopathological study of gastric stump carcinoma following proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 12:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-009-0502-2CrossRefPubMed

24.

Nozaki I, Hato S, Kobatake T, Ohta K, Kubo Y, Kurita A (2012) Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy. World J Surg 37:558–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1894-4CrossRef

25.

Shimada H, Fukagawa T, Haga Y, Oba K (2015) Does remnant gastric cancer really differ from primary gastric cancer? A systematic review of the literature by the Task Force of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Gastric Cancer 19:339–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0582-0CrossRefPubMed

26.

Tokunaga M, Ohyama S, Hiki N, Hoshino E, Nunobe S, Fukunaga T, Seto Y, Yamaguchi T (2008) Endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy: comparison between esophagogastric anastomosis and jejunal interposition. World J Surg 32(1473):1477–1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9459-7CrossRef

27.

Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T, Ota M, Iwasaki Y, Uchida N, Kodera Y, Nakada K (2014) Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer 18(407):416–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0377-8CrossRef

28.

Hayashi T, Kinami S, Fushida S, Fujimura T, Miwa K, Inoue K (2006) Evaluation of residual stomach motility after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer by electrogastrography. Dig Dis Sci 51:268–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-3123-1CrossRefPubMed

29.

Nakabayashi T, Mochiki E, Garcia M, Haga N, Suzuki T, Asao T, Kuwano H (2002) Pyloric motility after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy with or without the pyloric branch of the vagus nerve. World J Surg 26:577–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0270-6CrossRefPubMed

30.

Park JY, Park KB, Kwon OK, Yu W (2018) Comparison of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and laparoscopic total gastrectomy in terms of nutritional status or quality of life in early gastric cancer patients. European J Surg Oncol 44:1963–1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.014CrossRef

31.

Jung DH, Lee Y, Kim DW, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH (2017) Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction is superior to laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 31:3961–3969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5429-9CrossRefPubMed

32.

Li S, Gu L, Shen Z, Mao D, Khadaroo PA, Su H (2019) A meta-analysis of comparison of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. BMC Surg 19:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0584-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Yamashita H, Seto Y, Sano T et al (2017) Results of a nation-wide retrospective study of lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction carcinoma. Gastric Cancer 20(69):83–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0663-8CrossRef

34.

Kurokawa Y, Takeuchi H, Doki Y, Mine S, Terashima M, Yasuda T, Yoshida K, Daiko H, Sakuramoto S, Yoshikawa T, Kunisaki C, Seto Y, Tamura S, Shimokawa T, Sano T, Kitagawa Y (2019) Mapping of lymph node metastasis from esophagogastric junction tumors. Ann Surg 1. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003499

Titel: Feasibility and quality of life assessment of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy using double-tract reconstruction
verfasst von: Reo Sato
Takahiro Kinoshita
Eigo Akimoto
Mitsumasa Yoshida
Yukiko Nishiguchi
Junichiro Harada
Publikationsdatum: 15.01.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02076-7

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Feasibility and quality of life assessment of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy using double-tract reconstruction