Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2005

01.02.2005 | Review Article

Antiemetic therapy for multiple-day chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant: review and consensus statement

verfasst von: Lawrence H. Einhorn, Bernardo Rapoport, Jim Koeller, Steven M. Grunberg, Petra Feyer, Cynthia Rittenberg, Matti Aapro

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 2/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of modern antiemetic therapy for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting for patients receiving multiple-day or high-dose chemotherapy. Published phase II and phase III studies as well as their personal experiences were evaluated by the authors to develop this consensus statement. The largest published experience with multiple-day chemotherapy is with 5-day cisplatin combination chemotherapy. The introduction of 5-HT3 antagonists greatly improved emetic control. However, day 4–5 nausea as well as delayed nausea and vomiting remains a clinical problem despite the inclusion of dexamethasone. A 5-HT3 antagonist plus dexamethasone is the preferred current option for patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant. However, the results do not appear as successful as for highly emetic standard-dose chemotherapy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Aapro MS (2002) How do we manage patients with refractory or breakthrough emesis? Supp Care Cancer 10:106–109CrossRef Aapro MS (2002) How do we manage patients with refractory or breakthrough emesis? Supp Care Cancer 10:106–109CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbott B, Ippoliti C, Bruton J, et al (1999) Antiemetic efficacy of granisetron plus dexamethasone in bone marrow transplant patients receiving chemotherapy and total body irradiation. Bone Marrow Trans 23:265–269CrossRef Abbott B, Ippoliti C, Bruton J, et al (1999) Antiemetic efficacy of granisetron plus dexamethasone in bone marrow transplant patients receiving chemotherapy and total body irradiation. Bone Marrow Trans 23:265–269CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballen KK, Hesketh AM, Heyes C, et al (2001) Prospective evaluation of antiemetic outcome following high dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support. Bone Marrow Trans 28:1061–1066CrossRef Ballen KK, Hesketh AM, Heyes C, et al (2001) Prospective evaluation of antiemetic outcome following high dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support. Bone Marrow Trans 28:1061–1066CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baltzer L, Pisters KMW, Kris MG, et al (1993) High dose ondansetron plus dexamethasone for the prevention of nausea and vomiting with multiple day cisplatin chemotherapy. Proc Amer Soc Clin Oncol 12:462 Baltzer L, Pisters KMW, Kris MG, et al (1993) High dose ondansetron plus dexamethasone for the prevention of nausea and vomiting with multiple day cisplatin chemotherapy. Proc Amer Soc Clin Oncol 12:462
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbounis V, Koumakis G, Hatzichristou H, et al (1999) The antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron plus dexamethasone in patients treated with high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Supp Care Cancer 7:79–83 Barbounis V, Koumakis G, Hatzichristou H, et al (1999) The antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron plus dexamethasone in patients treated with high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Supp Care Cancer 7:79–83
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Climent MA, Palau J, Ruiz A, Soriano V, et al (1998) The antiemetic efficacy of granisetron plus dexamethasone haloperidol and loracepam in breast cancer patients treated with high dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support. Supp Care Cancer 6:287–290CrossRef Climent MA, Palau J, Ruiz A, Soriano V, et al (1998) The antiemetic efficacy of granisetron plus dexamethasone haloperidol and loracepam in breast cancer patients treated with high dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support. Supp Care Cancer 6:287–290CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat deWit R, de Boer AC, vd Linden GHM, et al (2001) Effective cross-over to granisetron after failure to ondansetron, a randomized double-blkind study in patients failing ondansetron plus dexamethasone during the first 24 hours following highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 85:1099–1101CrossRefPubMed deWit R, de Boer AC, vd Linden GHM, et al (2001) Effective cross-over to granisetron after failure to ondansetron, a randomized double-blkind study in patients failing ondansetron plus dexamethasone during the first 24 hours following highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 85:1099–1101CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Einhorn LH, Nagy C, Werner K and Finn AL (1990) Ondansetron: A new antiemetic for patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 8:731–735PubMed Einhorn LH, Nagy C, Werner K and Finn AL (1990) Ondansetron: A new antiemetic for patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 8:731–735PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox SM, Einhorn LH, Cox E, Powell N, and Abdy A (1993) Ondansetron versus ondansetron, dexamethasone, and chlorpromazine in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with multiple-day cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 11:2391–2395PubMed Fox SM, Einhorn LH, Cox E, Powell N, and Abdy A (1993) Ondansetron versus ondansetron, dexamethasone, and chlorpromazine in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with multiple-day cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 11:2391–2395PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Herman TS, Einhorn LH, Jones SE, et al (1979) Superiority of Nabilone over prochlorperazine as antiemetics in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. N Eng J Med 300:1295–1297 Herman TS, Einhorn LH, Jones SE, et al (1979) Superiority of Nabilone over prochlorperazine as antiemetics in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. N Eng J Med 300:1295–1297
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Noble A, Bremer K, Goedhals L, et al (1994) A double-blind randomized crossover study of granisetron and ondansetron in 5-day fractionated chemotherapy: assessment of efficacy, safety, and patient preference. Eur J Cancer 30:1083–1088CrossRef Noble A, Bremer K, Goedhals L, et al (1994) A double-blind randomized crossover study of granisetron and ondansetron in 5-day fractionated chemotherapy: assessment of efficacy, safety, and patient preference. Eur J Cancer 30:1083–1088CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Passik SD, Loehrer PJ, Navari RJ, et al (2002) A phase I trial of Olanzapine zyprexa for the prevention of delayed emesis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: A HOG study. Proc ASCO 21:374 Passik SD, Loehrer PJ, Navari RJ, et al (2002) A phase I trial of Olanzapine zyprexa for the prevention of delayed emesis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: A HOG study. Proc ASCO 21:374
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Perez EA, Tiemeier T, and Solberg LA (1999) Antiemetic therapy for high dose chemotherapy with transplantation: report of a retrospective analysis of a 5-HT3 regimen and literature review. Supp Care Cancer 7:414–424 Perez EA, Tiemeier T, and Solberg LA (1999) Antiemetic therapy for high dose chemotherapy with transplantation: report of a retrospective analysis of a 5-HT3 regimen and literature review. Supp Care Cancer 7:414–424
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sledge GW, Einhorn LH, Nagy C, and House K (1992) Phase III double-blind comparison of intravenous Ondansetron and metoclopramide as antiemetic therapy for patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Cancer 70:2524–2528PubMed Sledge GW, Einhorn LH, Nagy C, and House K (1992) Phase III double-blind comparison of intravenous Ondansetron and metoclopramide as antiemetic therapy for patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Cancer 70:2524–2528PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinet CV, Selby PJ, Zulian GB, et al (1990) Ondansetron—a new, safe, and effective antiemetic in patients receiving high dose melphalan. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 25:449–453PubMed Vinet CV, Selby PJ, Zulian GB, et al (1990) Ondansetron—a new, safe, and effective antiemetic in patients receiving high dose melphalan. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 25:449–453PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Antiemetic therapy for multiple-day chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant: review and consensus statement
verfasst von
Lawrence H. Einhorn
Bernardo Rapoport
Jim Koeller
Steven M. Grunberg
Petra Feyer
Cynthia Rittenberg
Matti Aapro
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2005
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 2/2005
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0704-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2005

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2005 Zur Ausgabe

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Perioperative Checkpointhemmer-Therapie verbessert NSCLC-Prognose

28.05.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Eine perioperative Therapie mit Nivolumab reduziert das Risiko für Rezidive und Todesfälle bei operablem NSCLC im Vergleich zu einer alleinigen neoadjuvanten Chemotherapie um über 40%. Darauf deuten die Resultate der Phase-3-Studie CheckMate 77T.

Positiver FIT: Die Ursache liegt nicht immer im Dickdarm

27.05.2024 Blut im Stuhl Nachrichten

Immunchemischer Stuhltest positiv, Koloskopie negativ – in solchen Fällen kann die Blutungsquelle auch weiter proximal sitzen. Ein Forschungsteam hat nachgesehen, wie häufig und in welchen Lokalisationen das der Fall ist.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.