nach oben

Erschienen in:

02.03.2021 | Original Article

Effectiveness of preoperative group education for patients with colorectal cancer: managing expectations

verfasst von: Lesley Larissa Koet, Annelot Kraima, Ilona Derksen, Bas Lamme, Eric Jacobus Theodorus Belt, Joost van Rosmalen, Robert Matthijs Smeenk, Joost Alexander Boreas van der Hoeven

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 9/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the potential beneficial effect of preoperative face-to-face group education after colonic surgery in a pre-existing ERAS pathway environment.

Methods

Patients were randomized to cohorts for 3 weeks to either the standard preoperative counseling by the colorectal surgeon and the nurse practitioner (control group) or to the additional group education (intervention group). Patients scored EORTC-QLQ-info25 after the preoperative information was completed and the EORTC-QLQ-30 and EORTC-QLQ-29 prior to surgery and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.

Results

A significantly better level of information was scored considering the expectations and patient involvement in the intervention group. This coincided with a significant reduction of the in-hospital stay, enhanced return to the preoperative global health status, and persistent improved body image after surgery.

Conclusion

By investing in the preoperative group education patients develop more realistic expectations resulting in a perceived improved quality of life and body image 1 month after operation coinciding with a statistically significant reduction in duration of in-hospital stay in this study.

Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198CrossRef

Kehlet H, Mogensen T (1999) Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 86(2):227–230CrossRef

Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Hendry P, Spies C, von Meyenfeldt M, Fearon K, Revhauq A, Norderval S, Ljunqqvist O, Lobo D, DeJong C, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144(10):961–969CrossRef

Taal E, Rasker JJ, Wiegman O (1996) Patient education and self-management in the rheumatic diseases: a self-efficacy approach. Arthritis Care Res 9(3):229–238CrossRef

Lorig K (2001) Patient education. A practical approach, 3rd edn. Sage publications Inc

Bäuml J, Froböse T, Kraemer S, Rentrop M, Pitschel-Walz G (2006) Psychoeducation: a basic psychotherapeutic intervention for patients with schizophrenia and their families. Schizophr Bull 32(1):S1–S9CrossRef

Poland F, Spalding N, Gregory S, McCulloch J, Sargen K, Vicary P (2017) Developing patient education to enhance recovery after colorectal surgery through action research: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 7(6):e013498CrossRef

Fecher-Jones I, Taylor C (2015) Lived experience, enhanced recovery and laparoscopic colonic resection. Br J Nurs 24:223–228CrossRef

Suls J, Wan C (1989) Effects of sensory and procedural information on coping with stressful medical procedures and pain. J Consult Clin Psychol 57:372–375CrossRef

10.

Hathaway D (1989) Effect of preoperative instruction on post operative outcomes. Nurs Res 35:269–275

11.

Spalding (2003) Reducing anxiety by preoperative education. Occup Ther Int 10:278–293CrossRef

12.

Waller F (2015) Preparatory education for cancer patients undergoing surgery. Patient Educ Couns 98:1540–1549CrossRef

13.

Ronco M, Iona L, Fabbro C, Bulfone G, Palese A (2012) Patient education outcomes in surgery. Int J Evid Based Healthc 10(4):309–323CrossRef

14.

Sherman AC, Mosier J, Leszcz M, Burlingame GM, Ulman K, Cleary T, Simonton S, Latif U, Hazelton L, Strauss B (2004) Group intervention for patients with cancer and HIV disease: Part 1: effects on psychosocial and functional outcomes at different phases of illness. Int J Group Psychother 54(1):29–82CrossRef

15.

Lepore S, Helgeson V, Eton D, Schulz R (2003) Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions. Health Psychol 22(5):443–452CrossRef

16.

Faller H, Koch G, Reusch A, Pauli P, Allgayer H (2009) Effectiveness of education for gastric cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 76(1):91–98CrossRef

17.

Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, Schillinger D (2011) Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures. Med Decis Mak 31(1):151–173CrossRef

18.

van der Hout A, Neijenhuijs K, Jansen F, van Uden-Kraan C, Aaronson N, Groenvold M, Holzner B, Terwee C, van de Poll-Franse L, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-deLeeuw I (2019) Measuring health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: systematic review of measurement properties of the EORTC QLQ-CR29. Support Care Cancer 27(7):2395–2412CrossRef

19.

Van de Poll-Franse L, Mols F, Gundy C, Creutzberg C, Nout R, Verdonck-de Leeuw I, Taphoorn M, Aaronson N (2011) Normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer 47:667–675CrossRef

20.

Derogar M, van der Schaaf M, Lagergren P (2012) Reference values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire in a random sample of the Swedish Population. Acta Oncol 51(1):10–16CrossRef

21.

Holzer B, Gyasi A, Schiessel R, Rosen H (2006) Patients’ expectations of colorectal surgery for cancer. Color Dis 8(3):186–191CrossRef

22.

Carlsson E, Berndtsson I, Hallen AM, Lindholm E, Persson E (2010) Concerns and quality of life before surgery and during the recovery period in patients with rectal cancer and an ostomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 37(6):654–661CrossRef

23.

Carvalho Moreira da Silva J (2012) EORTC QLQ CR-29 evaluation in 500 patients with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(4 suppl):429–429CrossRef

24.

Arraras J, Suárez J, Arias de la Vega F, Vera R, Asín G, Arrazubi V, Rico M, Teijeira L, Azparren J (2011) The EORTC Quality of life questionnaire for patients with colorectal cancer. Validation study for Spanish patients. Clin Transl Oncol 13(1):50–56CrossRef

25.

Arving C, Glimelius B, Brandberg Y (2008) Four weeks of daily assessments of anxiety, depression and activity compared to a point assessment with the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Qual Life Res 17(1):95–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9275-4CrossRef

26.

van Scheppingen C, Schroevers M, Smink A, van der Linden Y, Mul V, Langendijk J, Coyne J, Sanderman R (2011) Does screening for distress efficiently uncover meetable unmet needs in cancer patients? Psycho-Oncology 20(6):655–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1939CrossRef

27.

Arving C, Sjoden P, Bergh J, Hellbom M, Johansson B, Glimelius B, Brandberg Y (2007) Individual psychosocial support for breast cancer patients: a randomized study of nurse versus psychologist interventions and standard care. Cancer Nurs 30(3):E10–E19CrossRef

28.

Govaert J, van Dijk W, Fiocco M, Scheffer A, Gietelink L, Wouters M, Tollenaar R (2016) Nationwide outcomes measurement in colorectal cancer surgery: improving quality and reducing costs. J Am Coll Surg 222(1):19–29.e2CrossRef

Titel: Effectiveness of preoperative group education for patients with colorectal cancer: managing expectations
verfasst von: Lesley Larissa Koet
Annelot Kraima
Ilona Derksen
Bas Lamme
Eric Jacobus Theodorus Belt
Joost van Rosmalen
Robert Matthijs Smeenk
Joost Alexander Boreas van der Hoeven
Publikationsdatum: 02.03.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 9/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06072-5

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Effectiveness of preoperative group education for patients with colorectal cancer: managing expectations