Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2015

01.06.2015 | Original Article

The correlation between plasma aprepitant concentration and antiemetic effect in Japanese gastric or esophageal cancer patients

verfasst von: Kosuke Nishizawa, Hideaki Shimada, Masaaki Ito, Yoko Oshima, Satoshi Yajima, Yoshinori Kikuchi, Yasukiyo Sumino, Hironori Kaneko, Kenji Nishizawa, Masahiko Obayashi

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are significant problems in cancer patients, but a correlation between plasma aprepitant concentration and antiemetic effect has not been reported. This study aimed to characterize the correlation between plasma aprepitant concentration and clinical antiemetic effect in a limited group of Japanese gastric or esophageal cancer patients.

Methods

Thirty-three Japanese cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy for the first time following oral aprepitant (125 mg on day 1 and 80 mg on days 2 and 3) were enrolled. The plasma aprepitant concentrations 48 h after the first administration were determined using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Patients were allocated to the high-concentration group (plasma aprepitant concentration was >331.1 ng/ml) or the low-concentration group (plasma aprepitant concentration was ≤331.1 ng/ml) to investigate the relationship between plasma aprepitant concentration and antiemetic effects.

Results

No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of percentage of CINV prevention. Of 13 patients who experienced CINV [MASCC Antiemesis Tool (MAT) score >3], those in the high-concentration group showed a significant improvement in CINV following aprepitant administration (days 1–3).

Conclusion

The present study suggests that the antiemetic effect of aprepitant is associated with plasma aprepitant concentration. A plasma aprepitant concentration of 331.1 ng/ml may be a valid threshold for identifying its optimal antiemetic effects in Japanese gastric or esophageal cancer patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergström M, Hargreaves RJ, Burns HD et al (2004) Human positron emission tomography studies of brain neurokinin 1 receptor occupancy by aprepitant. Biol Psychiatry 55:1007–1012PubMedCrossRef Bergström M, Hargreaves RJ, Burns HD et al (2004) Human positron emission tomography studies of brain neurokinin 1 receptor occupancy by aprepitant. Biol Psychiatry 55:1007–1012PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat (2014) Interview form of Emend® capsules 125 mg, revised 7th edn. Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka (2014) Interview form of Emend® capsules 125 mg, revised 7th edn. Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi T, Nakamura Y, Tsuya A et al (2011) Pharmacokinetics of aprepitant and dexamethasone after administration of chemotherapeutic agents and effects of plasma substance P concentration on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Japanese cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 68:653–659PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Takahashi T, Nakamura Y, Tsuya A et al (2011) Pharmacokinetics of aprepitant and dexamethasone after administration of chemotherapeutic agents and effects of plasma substance P concentration on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Japanese cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 68:653–659PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Motohashi S, Mino Y, Hori K et al (2013) Interindividual variations in aprepitant plasma pharmacokinetics in cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy for the first time. Biol Pharm Bull 36:676–681PubMedCrossRef Motohashi S, Mino Y, Hori K et al (2013) Interindividual variations in aprepitant plasma pharmacokinetics in cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy for the first time. Biol Pharm Bull 36:676–681PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakade S, Ohno T, Kitagawa J et al (2008) Population pharmacokinetics of aprepitant and dexamethasone in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 63:75–83PubMedCrossRef Nakade S, Ohno T, Kitagawa J et al (2008) Population pharmacokinetics of aprepitant and dexamethasone in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 63:75–83PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H et al (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74PubMedCrossRef Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H et al (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato H, Sato A, Fukuda H et al (2009) A phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9708). Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:638–643PubMedCrossRef Kato H, Sato A, Fukuda H et al (2009) A phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9708). Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:638–643PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221PubMedCrossRef Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Molassiotis A, Coventry PA, Stricker CT et al (2007) Validation and psychometric properties of a short clinical scale to measure chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: the MASCC Antiemesis Tool. J Pain Symptom Manag 34:148–159CrossRef Molassiotis A, Coventry PA, Stricker CT et al (2007) Validation and psychometric properties of a short clinical scale to measure chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: the MASCC Antiemesis Tool. J Pain Symptom Manag 34:148–159CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez RI, Wang RW, Newton DJ et al (2004) Cytochrome P450 3A4 is the major enzyme involved in the metabolism of the substance P receptor antagonist aprepitant. Drug Metab Dispos 32:1287–1292PubMedCrossRef Sanchez RI, Wang RW, Newton DJ et al (2004) Cytochrome P450 3A4 is the major enzyme involved in the metabolism of the substance P receptor antagonist aprepitant. Drug Metab Dispos 32:1287–1292PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rolia F, Tonato M, Basurto C et al (1989) Protection from nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients: high-dose metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone vs. metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine: a study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. J Clin Oncol 7:1693–1700 Rolia F, Tonato M, Basurto C et al (1989) Protection from nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients: high-dose metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone vs. metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine: a study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. J Clin Oncol 7:1693–1700
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Majumdar AK, Howard L, Goldberg MR et al (2006) Pharmacokinetics of aprepitant after single and multiple oral doses in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 46:291–300PubMedCrossRef Majumdar AK, Howard L, Goldberg MR et al (2006) Pharmacokinetics of aprepitant after single and multiple oral doses in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 46:291–300PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The correlation between plasma aprepitant concentration and antiemetic effect in Japanese gastric or esophageal cancer patients
verfasst von
Kosuke Nishizawa
Hideaki Shimada
Masaaki Ito
Yoko Oshima
Satoshi Yajima
Yoshinori Kikuchi
Yasukiyo Sumino
Hironori Kaneko
Kenji Nishizawa
Masahiko Obayashi
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0747-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Introduction to Review Articles

Recent advances in multiple myeloma

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.