Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2016

10.12.2015 | Original Article

Efficacy of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with a moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimen: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study in patients with gynecologic cancer receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin

verfasst von: Hideaki Yahata, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Kenzo Sonoda, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Tatsuhiro Ohgami, Toshiaki Saito, Shinji Ogawa, Kunihiro Sakai, Akimasa Ichinoe, Yousuke Ueoka, Yasuyuki Hasuo, Makoto Nishida, Satohiro Masuda, Kiyoko Kato

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Substance P contributes to the hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) to paclitaxel in a rat model. Aprepitant acts as an inhibitor of the binding of substance P to the neurokinin-1 receptor and, consequently, may reduce the frequency of paclitaxel-induced HSR. While aprepitant has a prophylactic effect against vomiting caused by high-dose cisplatin, the benefits of aprepitant have not been clearly demonstrated in patients receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) combination chemotherapy.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study in Japanese patients with gynecologic cancer who received TC combination chemotherapy. Patients received aprepitant or placebo together with both a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone prior to chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HSR, and the secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with “no vomiting”, “no significant nausea”, and complete response, respectively.

Results

Of the 324 randomized patients, 297 (151 in the aprepitant group; 146 in the placebo group) were evaluated. The percentage of patients with HSR (9.2 vs. 7.5 %, respectively; P = 0.339) was not significantly different between the groups. The percentage of “no vomiting” patients (78.2 vs. 54.8 %; P < 0.0001), “no significant nausea” patients (85.4 vs. 74.7 %; P = 0.014), and patients showing complete response (61.6 vs. 47.3 %, P = 0.0073) was significantly higher in the aprepitant group than in the placebo group.

Conclusion

The administration of aprepitant did not have a prophylactic effect on the HSR but was effective in reducing nausea and vomiting in gynecologic cancer patients receiving TC combination chemotherapy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiderpas E, Sandin S, Inoue M et al (2012) Risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer in Japan: results from the Japan public health center-based prospective study cohort. Int J Oncol 40(1):21–30 Weiderpas E, Sandin S, Inoue M et al (2012) Risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer in Japan: results from the Japan public health center-based prospective study cohort. Int J Oncol 40(1):21–30
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR et al (2006) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006. J Clin Oncol 24:2932–2947CrossRefPubMed Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR et al (2006) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006. J Clin Oncol 24:2932–2947CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Roila F, Fatigoni S (2006) New antiemetic drugs. Ann Oncol 17[Suppl 2]:ii96–ii100PubMed Roila F, Fatigoni S (2006) New antiemetic drugs. Ann Oncol 17[Suppl 2]:ii96–ii100PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (2014) Guidelines for appropriate use of antiemetic drugs, version 1.2. Kanehara, Tokyo Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (2014) Guidelines for appropriate use of antiemetic drugs, version 1.2. Kanehara, Tokyo
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ettinger DS, Armstrong DK, Barbour S et al (2012) Antiemesis. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 10:456–485 Ettinger DS, Armstrong DK, Barbour S et al (2012) Antiemesis. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 10:456–485
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Campos D, Pereira JR, Reinhardt RR et al (2001) Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis by the oral neurokinin-1 antagonist, MK-869, in combination with granisetron and dexamethasone or with dexamethasone alone. J Clin Oncol 19(6):1759–1767PubMed Campos D, Pereira JR, Reinhardt RR et al (2001) Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis by the oral neurokinin-1 antagonist, MK-869, in combination with granisetron and dexamethasone or with dexamethasone alone. J Clin Oncol 19(6):1759–1767PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21(22):4112–4119CrossRefPubMed Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21(22):4112–4119CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD et al (2003) Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting. Results from a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97(12):3090–3098CrossRefPubMed Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD et al (2003) Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting. Results from a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97(12):3090–3098CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi T, Hoshi E, Takagi M et al (2010) Multicenter, phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of aprepitant in Japanese patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Cancer Sci 101(11):2455–2461CrossRefPubMed Takahashi T, Hoshi E, Takagi M et al (2010) Multicenter, phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of aprepitant in Japanese patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Cancer Sci 101(11):2455–2461CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat du Bois A, Luck HJ, Meier W et al (2003) A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(17):1320–1329CrossRefPubMed du Bois A, Luck HJ, Meier W et al (2003) A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(17):1320–1329CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasey PA, Jayson GC, Gordon A et al (2004) Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel-carboplatin versus paclitaxel-carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(22):1682–1691CrossRefPubMed Vasey PA, Jayson GC, Gordon A et al (2004) Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel-carboplatin versus paclitaxel-carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(22):1682–1691CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Furukawa N, Akasaka J, Shigemitsu A et al (2014) Evaluation of the relation between patient characteristics and the state of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with gynecologic cancer receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin. Gynecol Oncol 289(4):859–864 Furukawa N, Akasaka J, Shigemitsu A et al (2014) Evaluation of the relation between patient characteristics and the state of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with gynecologic cancer receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin. Gynecol Oncol 289(4):859–864
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Itoh Y, Sendo T, Hirakawa T et al (2004) Sensory nerve peptides rather than mast cell histamine are involved in paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 169:113–119CrossRefPubMed Itoh Y, Sendo T, Hirakawa T et al (2004) Sensory nerve peptides rather than mast cell histamine are involved in paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 169:113–119CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Itoh Y, Sendo T, Hirakawa T et al (2004) Pemirolast potently attenuates paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions through inhibition of the release of sensory neuropeptides in rats. Neuropharmacology 46:888–894CrossRefPubMed Itoh Y, Sendo T, Hirakawa T et al (2004) Pemirolast potently attenuates paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions through inhibition of the release of sensory neuropeptides in rats. Neuropharmacology 46:888–894CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yahata H, Saito M, Sendo T et al (2006) Prophylactic effect of pemirolast, an antiallergic agent, against hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel in patients with ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 118(10):2636–2638CrossRefPubMed Yahata H, Saito M, Sendo T et al (2006) Prophylactic effect of pemirolast, an antiallergic agent, against hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel in patients with ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 118(10):2636–2638CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernaldo L, Rapoport BL, Jordan K et al (2010) Aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with a broad range of moderately emetogenic chemotherapies and tumor types: a randomized, double-blind study. Support Care Cancer 18(4):423–431CrossRef Bernaldo L, Rapoport BL, Jordan K et al (2010) Aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with a broad range of moderately emetogenic chemotherapies and tumor types: a randomized, double-blind study. Support Care Cancer 18(4):423–431CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiernik PH, Schwartz EL, Strauman JJ et al (1987) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of taxol. Cancer Res 47:2486–2493PubMed Wiernik PH, Schwartz EL, Strauman JJ et al (1987) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of taxol. Cancer Res 47:2486–2493PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Markman M, Kennedy A, Webster K et al (1999) An effective and more convenient drug regimen for prophylaxis against paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reactions. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 125:427–429CrossRefPubMed Markman M, Kennedy A, Webster K et al (1999) An effective and more convenient drug regimen for prophylaxis against paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reactions. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 125:427–429CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Roila F, Herrstedt J, Aapro M et al (2010) Guideline update for MASCC and ESMO in the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results of the Perugia consensus conference. Ann Oncol 21[Suppl 5]:v232–v243CrossRefPubMed Roila F, Herrstedt J, Aapro M et al (2010) Guideline update for MASCC and ESMO in the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results of the Perugia consensus conference. Ann Oncol 21[Suppl 5]:v232–v243CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ et al. (2012) Antiemetic use in oncology: updated guideline recommendations from ASCO. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 53:2–540 Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ et al. (2012) Antiemetic use in oncology: updated guideline recommendations from ASCO. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 53:2–540
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Roscoe JA, Heckler CE, Morrow GR et al (2012) Prevention of delayed nausea: a University of Rochester cancer center community clinical oncology program study of patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 30(27):3389–3395CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roscoe JA, Heckler CE, Morrow GR et al (2012) Prevention of delayed nausea: a University of Rochester cancer center community clinical oncology program study of patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 30(27):3389–3395CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamura K, Aiba K, Saeki T et al (2015) Testing the effectiveness of antiemetic guidelines: results of a prospective registry by the CINV Study Group of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 20(5):855–865CrossRefPubMed Tamura K, Aiba K, Saeki T et al (2015) Testing the effectiveness of antiemetic guidelines: results of a prospective registry by the CINV Study Group of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 20(5):855–865CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with a moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimen: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study in patients with gynecologic cancer receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin
verfasst von
Hideaki Yahata
Hiroaki Kobayashi
Kenzo Sonoda
Mototsugu Shimokawa
Tatsuhiro Ohgami
Toshiaki Saito
Shinji Ogawa
Kunihiro Sakai
Akimasa Ichinoe
Yousuke Ueoka
Yasuyuki Hasuo
Makoto Nishida
Satohiro Masuda
Kiyoko Kato
Publikationsdatum
10.12.2015
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0928-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.