Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Esophagus 3/2023

24.03.2023 | Original Article

Prognostic impact of endoscopic response evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a nationwide validation study

verfasst von: Satoru Matsuda, Yuko Kitagawa, Jun Okui, Akihiko Okamura, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Ryo Takemura, Koji Kono, Manabu Muto, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Hiroya Takeuchi, Masayuki Watanabe, Yuichiro Doki

Erschienen in: Esophagus | Ausgabe 3/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Our previous study reported the prognostic significance of endoscopic response (ER) evaluation, defined ER, and revealed ER as an independent prognostic factor of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery. The present study aimed to validate the prognostic impact of ER using a nationwide database from the authorized institute for board-certified esophageal surgeons by the Japan Esophageal Society.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed patients with ESCC who underwent subtotal esophagectomy at 85 authorized institutes for esophageal cancer from 2010 to 2015. Patients were classified as ER when the tumor size was markedly reduced post-NAC compared to pre-NAC. The correlation between OS and RFS was investigated.

Results

Of 4781 patients initially enrolled, 3636 were selected for subsequent analysis. Of them, 642 (17.7%) patients were classified as the ER group. Patients with ER showed significantly better OS and RFS. Subgroup analysis revealed the statistical difference in OS and RFS in cStage II and III, while the magnitude of survival difference between ER and non-ER was not evident in cStage I and IV. The percentage of ER varied from 46 to 87% among groups when institutions were classified into 3 subgroups based on the hospital volume, which would indicate the interinstitutional inconsistency.

Conclusions

The prognostic impact of ER was validated using a nationwide database. Standardization of ER evaluation is required to improve the interinstitutional consistency and clinical validity of the ER evaluation.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeuchi H, Fujii H, Ando N, et al. Validation study of radio-guided sentinel lymph node navigation in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(5):757–63.CrossRefPubMed Takeuchi H, Fujii H, Ando N, et al. Validation study of radio-guided sentinel lymph node navigation in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(5):757–63.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Akutsu Y, Kato K, Igaki H, et al. The prevalence of overall and initial lymph node metastases in clinical T1N0 thoracic esophageal cancer: from the results of JCOG0502, a prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2016;264(6):1009–15.CrossRefPubMed Akutsu Y, Kato K, Igaki H, et al. The prevalence of overall and initial lymph node metastases in clinical T1N0 thoracic esophageal cancer: from the results of JCOG0502, a prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2016;264(6):1009–15.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Current advancement in multidisciplinary treatment for resectable cStage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Japan. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;22(5):275–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Current advancement in multidisciplinary treatment for resectable cStage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Japan. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;22(5):275–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe M, Otake R, Kozuki R, et al. Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2020;50(1):12–20.CrossRefPubMed Watanabe M, Otake R, Kozuki R, et al. Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2020;50(1):12–20.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):68–74.CrossRefPubMed Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):68–74.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato K, Ito Y, Daiko H, et al. A randomized controlled phase III trial comparing two chemotherapy regimen and chemoradiotherapy regimen as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, JCOG1109 NExT study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(4_suppl):238.CrossRef Kato K, Ito Y, Daiko H, et al. A randomized controlled phase III trial comparing two chemotherapy regimen and chemoradiotherapy regimen as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, JCOG1109 NExT study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(4_suppl):238.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2074–84.CrossRefPubMed van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2074–84.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1948–57.CrossRefPubMed Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1948–57.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Three-field lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(Suppl 8):S731–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Three-field lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(Suppl 8):S731–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Marubashi S, Takahashi A, Kakeji Y, et al. Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan: report of the national clinical database 2011–2019. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;5(5):639–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marubashi S, Takahashi A, Kakeji Y, et al. Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan: report of the national clinical database 2011–2019. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;5(5):639–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimada H, Fukagawa T, Haga Y, et al. Does postoperative morbidity worsen the oncological outcome after radical surgery for gastrointestinal cancers? A systematic review of the literature. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017;1(1):11–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shimada H, Fukagawa T, Haga Y, et al. Does postoperative morbidity worsen the oncological outcome after radical surgery for gastrointestinal cancers? A systematic review of the literature. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017;1(1):11–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Noordman BJ, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus active surveillance for oesophageal cancer: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):142.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Noordman BJ, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus active surveillance for oesophageal cancer: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):142.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Katada C, Hara H, Fujii H, et al. A phase II study of chemoselection with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5–fluorouracil as a strategy for organ preservation in patients with resectable esophageal cancer (CROC trial). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl):4027.CrossRef Katada C, Hara H, Fujii H, et al. A phase II study of chemoselection with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5–fluorouracil as a strategy for organ preservation in patients with resectable esophageal cancer (CROC trial). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl):4027.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda S, Kawakubo H, Tsuji T, et al. Clinical significance of endoscopic response evaluation to predict the distribution of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(4):2673–80.CrossRefPubMed Matsuda S, Kawakubo H, Tsuji T, et al. Clinical significance of endoscopic response evaluation to predict the distribution of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(4):2673–80.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kadota T, Abe S, Yoda Y, et al. Clinical outcomes according to the modified endoscopic criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dig Endosc. 2020;32(3):337–45.CrossRefPubMed Kadota T, Abe S, Yoda Y, et al. Clinical outcomes according to the modified endoscopic criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dig Endosc. 2020;32(3):337–45.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagai Y, Yoshida N, Baba Y, et al. Clinical significance of evaluating endoscopic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dig Endosc. 2020;32(1):39–48.CrossRefPubMed Nagai Y, Yoshida N, Baba Y, et al. Clinical significance of evaluating endoscopic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dig Endosc. 2020;32(1):39–48.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cools-Lartigue J, Markar S, Mueller C, et al. An international cohort study of prognosis associated with pathologically complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy of surgical treated esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2022;276:799–805.CrossRefPubMed Cools-Lartigue J, Markar S, Mueller C, et al. An international cohort study of prognosis associated with pathologically complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy of surgical treated esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2022;276:799–805.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):1–24.CrossRefPubMed Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):1–24.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):25–43.CrossRefPubMed Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):25–43.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part I. Esophagus. 2017;14(1):1–36.CrossRef Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part I. Esophagus. 2017;14(1):1–36.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part II and III. Esophagus. 2017;14(1):37–65.CrossRef Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part II and III. Esophagus. 2017;14(1):37–65.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawahara D, Murakami Y, Tani S, et al. A prediction model for pathological findings after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on endoscopic images using deep learning. Br J Radiol. 2022;95(1135):20210934.CrossRefPubMed Kawahara D, Murakami Y, Tani S, et al. A prediction model for pathological findings after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on endoscopic images using deep learning. Br J Radiol. 2022;95(1135):20210934.CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Aoyama J, Kawakubo H, Mayanagi S, et al. Discrepancy between the clinical and final pathological findings of lymph node metastasis in superficial esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:2874–81.CrossRefPubMed Aoyama J, Kawakubo H, Mayanagi S, et al. Discrepancy between the clinical and final pathological findings of lymph node metastasis in superficial esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:2874–81.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashimoto T, Makino T, Yamasaki M, et al. The pattern of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer and its clinical significance. Ann Surg. 2020;271(5):875–84.CrossRefPubMed Hashimoto T, Makino T, Yamasaki M, et al. The pattern of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer and its clinical significance. Ann Surg. 2020;271(5):875–84.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Corcoran RB, Chabner BA. Application of cell-free DNA analysis to cancer treatment. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(18):1754–65.CrossRefPubMed Corcoran RB, Chabner BA. Application of cell-free DNA analysis to cancer treatment. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(18):1754–65.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kristman V, Manno M, Côté P. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much? Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19:751–60.CrossRefPubMed Kristman V, Manno M, Côté P. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much? Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19:751–60.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prognostic impact of endoscopic response evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a nationwide validation study
verfasst von
Satoru Matsuda
Yuko Kitagawa
Jun Okui
Akihiko Okamura
Hirofumi Kawakubo
Ryo Takemura
Koji Kono
Manabu Muto
Yoshihiro Kakeji
Hiroya Takeuchi
Masayuki Watanabe
Yuichiro Doki
Publikationsdatum
24.03.2023
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in
Esophagus / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Elektronische ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-00998-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

Esophagus 3/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Perioperative Checkpointhemmer-Therapie verbessert NSCLC-Prognose

28.05.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Eine perioperative Therapie mit Nivolumab reduziert das Risiko für Rezidive und Todesfälle bei operablem NSCLC im Vergleich zu einer alleinigen neoadjuvanten Chemotherapie um über 40%. Darauf deuten die Resultate der Phase-3-Studie CheckMate 77T.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.