Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Esophagus 3/2023

06.01.2023 | Original Article

Surgical outcomes and quality of life assessment of esophagectomy for cancer with colon conduit via retrosternal route

verfasst von: Vo Duy Long, Dang Quang Thong, Nguyen Viet Hai, Tran Quang Dat, Ho Le Minh Quoc, Doan Thuy Nguyen, Nguyen Vu Tuan Anh, Tran Anh Minh, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Jimmy Bok-Yan So, Nguyen Hoang Bac, Ichiro Uyama

Erschienen in: Esophagus | Ausgabe 3/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Colon conduit is an alternative to a gastric conduit for esophagectomy in patients that stomach is not available. Surgical technique is complex and has a high risk of morbidities and mortality. Outcomes of patients are still lacking in the literature, thus aims of this study are to evaluate the safety, feasibility and long-term functional outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer with colon conduit via retrosternal route.

Methods

Twenty-six patients underwent operation between August 2016 and June 2021 for malignancies. Minimally invasive esophagectomy and laparotomy were performed in accordance with the 2017 Japan Esophageal Society’s guidelines. Colonic interposition was used for esophageal replacement. Outcomes were technical success, complications assessed using Clavien-Dindo classification, and patient’s quality of life (QOL) based on EORTC-QOL-OES18 questionnaire.

Results

Mean age was 56.0 ± 9.9 years and 21 patients (80.8%) were men. Mean operating time was 432 ± 66 min. Technical success was 100%. The average number of resected lymph nodes was 26 ± 14. Twelve patients (46.2%) experienced postoperative complications: 7/12 were classified as grade I-II, 3/12 as grade III, 1/12 as grade IV, and 1/12 as grade V (death). Patient’s QOL improved during the follow-up period with median (25–75th percentiles) global EORTC-QOL-OES18 score was 29 (17–34); 13 (9–21), and 9 (6–16) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. During the follow-up period, there were 4 late complications, 3 lymphatic recurrences, 5 distant metastases, and 6 deaths.

Conclusions

Colon conduit via retrosternal route after esophagectomy is feasible, safe, and could provide acceptable long-term functional outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown J, Lewis WG, Foliaki A, Clark GWB, Blackshaw G, Chan DSY. Colonic interposition after adult oesophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of conduit choice and outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(6):1104–11.CrossRefPubMed Brown J, Lewis WG, Foliaki A, Clark GWB, Blackshaw G, Chan DSY. Colonic interposition after adult oesophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of conduit choice and outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(6):1104–11.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Doki Y, Okada K, Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Fujiwara Y, Takiguchi S, et al. Long-term and short-term evaluation of esophageal reconstruction using the colon or the jejunum in esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(2):132–8.CrossRefPubMed Doki Y, Okada K, Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Fujiwara Y, Takiguchi S, et al. Long-term and short-term evaluation of esophageal reconstruction using the colon or the jejunum in esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(2):132–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Irino T, Tsekrekos A, Coppola A, Scandavini CM, Shetye A, Lundell L, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after replacement of the esophagus with gastric, colonic, or jejunal conduits: a systematic literature review. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(12):1–11.CrossRefPubMed Irino T, Tsekrekos A, Coppola A, Scandavini CM, Shetye A, Lundell L, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after replacement of the esophagus with gastric, colonic, or jejunal conduits: a systematic literature review. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(12):1–11.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang S, Guo C, Zou B, Xie J, Xiong Z, Kuang Y, et al. Comparison of outcomes of pedicled jejunal and colonic conduit for esophageal reconstruction. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jiang S, Guo C, Zou B, Xie J, Xiong Z, Kuang Y, et al. Comparison of outcomes of pedicled jejunal and colonic conduit for esophageal reconstruction. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Boukerrouche A. Isoperistaltic left colic graft interposition via a retrosternal approach for esophageal reconstruction in patients with a caustic stricture: mortality, morbidity, and functional results. Surg Today. 2014;44(5):827–33.CrossRefPubMed Boukerrouche A. Isoperistaltic left colic graft interposition via a retrosternal approach for esophageal reconstruction in patients with a caustic stricture: mortality, morbidity, and functional results. Surg Today. 2014;44(5):827–33.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ceroni M, Norero E, Henríquez JP, Viñuela E, Briceño E, Martínez C, et al. Total esophagogastrectomy plus extended lymphadenectomy with transverse colon interposition: a treatment for extensive esophagogastric junction cancer. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(22):2411–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ceroni M, Norero E, Henríquez JP, Viñuela E, Briceño E, Martínez C, et al. Total esophagogastrectomy plus extended lymphadenectomy with transverse colon interposition: a treatment for extensive esophagogastric junction cancer. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(22):2411–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat DeMeester TR, Johansson KE, Franze I, Eypasch E, Lu CT, McGill JE, et al. Indications, surgical technique, and long-term functional results of colon interposition or bypass. Ann Surg. 1988;208(4):460–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral DeMeester TR, Johansson KE, Franze I, Eypasch E, Lu CT, McGill JE, et al. Indications, surgical technique, and long-term functional results of colon interposition or bypass. Ann Surg. 1988;208(4):460–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee K, Kim HR, Park SI, Kim DK, Kim YH, Choi SH. Surgical outcome of colon interposition in esophageal cancer surgery: analysis of risk factors for conduit-related morbidity. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66(5):384–9.CrossRefPubMed Lee K, Kim HR, Park SI, Kim DK, Kim YH, Choi SH. Surgical outcome of colon interposition in esophageal cancer surgery: analysis of risk factors for conduit-related morbidity. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66(5):384–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mine S, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Ueno M, Ehara K, et al. Colon interposition after esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(5):1647–53.CrossRefPubMed Mine S, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Ueno M, Ehara K, et al. Colon interposition after esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(5):1647–53.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Motoyama S, Kitamura M, Saito R, Maruyama K, Sato Y, Hayashi K, et al. Surgical outcome of colon interposition by the posterior mediastinal route for thoracic esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(4):1273–8.CrossRefPubMed Motoyama S, Kitamura M, Saito R, Maruyama K, Sato Y, Hayashi K, et al. Surgical outcome of colon interposition by the posterior mediastinal route for thoracic esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(4):1273–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Renzulli P, Joeris A, Strobel O, Hilt A, Maurer CA, Uhl W, et al. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: a single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389(2):128–33.CrossRefPubMed Renzulli P, Joeris A, Strobel O, Hilt A, Maurer CA, Uhl W, et al. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: a single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389(2):128–33.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Reslinger V, Tranchart H, D’Annunzio E, Poghosyan T, Quero L, Munoz-Bongrand N, et al. Esophageal reconstruction by colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer analysis of current indications, operative outcomes, and long-term survival. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(2):159–64.CrossRefPubMed Reslinger V, Tranchart H, D’Annunzio E, Poghosyan T, Quero L, Munoz-Bongrand N, et al. Esophageal reconstruction by colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer analysis of current indications, operative outcomes, and long-term survival. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(2):159–64.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):1–24.CrossRefPubMed Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):1–24.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):25–43.CrossRefPubMed Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019;16(1):25–43.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, Fayers P, Sezer O, Koller M, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(10):1384–94.CrossRefPubMed Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, Fayers P, Sezer O, Koller M, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(10):1384–94.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hüttl TP, Wichmann MW, Geiger TK, Schildberg FW, Fürst H. Techniques and results of esophageal cancer surgery in Germany. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002;387(3–4):125–9.CrossRefPubMed Hüttl TP, Wichmann MW, Geiger TK, Schildberg FW, Fürst H. Techniques and results of esophageal cancer surgery in Germany. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002;387(3–4):125–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, Ishihara R, Matsubara H, Muro K, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2012. Esophagus. 2019;16(3):221–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, Ishihara R, Matsubara H, Muro K, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2012. Esophagus. 2019;16(3):221–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Okamura A, Watanabe M, Mukoyama N, Ota Y, Shiraishi O, Shimbashi W, et al. A nationwide survey on digestive reconstruction following pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;6:1–9. Okamura A, Watanabe M, Mukoyama N, Ota Y, Shiraishi O, Shimbashi W, et al. A nationwide survey on digestive reconstruction following pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;6:1–9.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yasuda T, Shiozaki H. Esophageal reconstruction with colon tissue. Surg Today. 2011;41(6):745–53.CrossRefPubMed Yasuda T, Shiozaki H. Esophageal reconstruction with colon tissue. Surg Today. 2011;41(6):745–53.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bothereau H, Munoz-Bongrand N, Lambert B, Montemagno S, Cattan P, Sarfati E. Esophageal reconstruction after caustic injury: is there still a place for right coloplasty? Am J Surg. 2007;193(6):660–4.CrossRefPubMed Bothereau H, Munoz-Bongrand N, Lambert B, Montemagno S, Cattan P, Sarfati E. Esophageal reconstruction after caustic injury: is there still a place for right coloplasty? Am J Surg. 2007;193(6):660–4.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Isolauri J, Markkula H, Autio V. Colon interposition in the treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;43(4):420–4.CrossRefPubMed Isolauri J, Markkula H, Autio V. Colon interposition in the treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;43(4):420–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Popovici Z. A new philosophy in esophageal reconstruction with colon Thirty-years experience. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16(4):323–7.CrossRefPubMed Popovici Z. A new philosophy in esophageal reconstruction with colon Thirty-years experience. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16(4):323–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Athanasiou A, Hennessy M, Spartalis E, Tan BHL, Griffiths EA. Conduit necrosis following esophagectomy: an up-to-date literature review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;11(3):155–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Athanasiou A, Hennessy M, Spartalis E, Tan BHL, Griffiths EA. Conduit necrosis following esophagectomy: an up-to-date literature review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;11(3):155–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Cense HA, Visser MR, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Lamme B, Obertop H, et al. Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement. J Surg Oncol. 2004;88(1):32–8.CrossRefPubMed Cense HA, Visser MR, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Lamme B, Obertop H, et al. Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement. J Surg Oncol. 2004;88(1):32–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Yildirim S, Koksal H, Celayir F, et al. Colonic interposition vs. gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:675–8.CrossRefPubMed Yildirim S, Koksal H, Celayir F, et al. Colonic interposition vs. gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:675–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Greene CL, DeMeester SR, Augustin F, et al. Long-term quality of life and alimentary satisfaction after esophagectomy with colon interposition. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1713–9.CrossRefPubMed Greene CL, DeMeester SR, Augustin F, et al. Long-term quality of life and alimentary satisfaction after esophagectomy with colon interposition. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1713–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical outcomes and quality of life assessment of esophagectomy for cancer with colon conduit via retrosternal route
verfasst von
Vo Duy Long
Dang Quang Thong
Nguyen Viet Hai
Tran Quang Dat
Ho Le Minh Quoc
Doan Thuy Nguyen
Nguyen Vu Tuan Anh
Tran Anh Minh
Nguyen Lam Vuong
Jimmy Bok-Yan So
Nguyen Hoang Bac
Ichiro Uyama
Publikationsdatum
06.01.2023
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in
Esophagus / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Elektronische ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-00984-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

Esophagus 3/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

RAS-Blocker bei Hyperkaliämie möglichst nicht sofort absetzen

14.05.2024 Hyperkaliämie Nachrichten

Bei ausgeprägter Nierenfunktionsstörung steigen unter der Einnahme von Renin-Angiotensin-System(RAS)-Hemmstoffen nicht selten die Serumkaliumspiegel. Was in diesem Fall zu tun ist, erklärte Prof. Jürgen Floege beim diesjährigen Allgemeinmedizin-Update-Seminar.

Gestationsdiabetes: In der zweiten Schwangerschaft folgenreicher als in der ersten

13.05.2024 Gestationsdiabetes Nachrichten

Das Risiko, nach einem Gestationsdiabetes einen Typ-2-Diabetes zu entwickeln, hängt nicht nur von der Zahl, sondern auch von der Reihenfolge der betroffenen Schwangerschaften ab.

Labor, CT-Anthropometrie zeigen Risiko für Pankreaskrebs

13.05.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Gerade bei aggressiven Malignomen wie dem duktalen Adenokarzinom des Pankreas könnte Früherkennung die Therapiechancen verbessern. Noch jedoch klafft hier eine Lücke. Ein Studienteam hat einen Weg gesucht, sie zu schließen.

Battle of Experts: Sport vs. Spritze bei Adipositas und Typ-2-Diabetes

11.05.2024 DDG-Jahrestagung 2024 Kongressbericht

Im Battle of Experts traten zwei Experten auf dem Diabeteskongress gegeneinander an: Die eine vertrat die Auffassung „Sport statt Spritze“ bei Adipositas und Typ-2-Diabetes, der andere forderte „Spritze statt Sport!“ Am Ende waren sie sich aber einig: Die Kombination aus beidem erzielt die besten Ergebnisse.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.