nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.02.2011 | Preclinical study

Prognostic value of NDRG1 and SPARC protein expression in breast cancer patients

verfasst von: Maria Aparecida Nagai, Renê Gerhard, José Humberto T. G. Fregnani, Suely Nonogaki, Regina Barbosa Rierger, Mário Mourão Netto, Fernando A. Soares

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

An increasing number of studies have shown altered expression of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) and N-myc down-regulated gene (NDRG1) in several malignancies, including breast carcinoma; however, the role of these potential biomarkers in tumor development and progression is controversial. In this study, NDRG1 and SPARC protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays containing breast tumor specimens from patients with 10 years of follow-up. NDRG1 and SPARC protein expression was determined in 596 patients along with other prognostic markers, such as ER, PR, and HER2. The status of NDRG1 and SPARC protein expression was correlated with prognostic variables and patient clinical outcome. Immunostaining revealed that 272 of the 596 cases (45.6%) were positive for NDRG1 and 431 (72.3%) were positive for SPARC. Statistically significant differences were found between the presence of SPARC and NDRG1 protein expression and standard clinicopathological variables. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that NDRG1 positivity was directly associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, P < 0.001). In contrast, patients expressing low levels of SPARC protein had worse DFS (P = 0.001) and OS (P = 0.001) compared to those expressing high levels. Combined analysis of the two markers indicated that DFS (P < 0.001) and OS rates (P < 0.001) were lowest for patients with NDRG1-positive and SPARC-negative tumors. Furthermore, NDRG1 over-expression and SPARC down-regulation correlated with poor prognosis in patients with luminal A or triple-negative subtype breast cancer. On multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model, NDRG1 and SPARC protein expression were independent prognostic factors for both DFS and OS of breast cancer patients. These data indicate that NDRG1 over-expression and SPARC down-regulation could play important roles in breast cancer progression and serve as useful biomarkers to better define breast cancer prognosis.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

López-Otín C, Diamandis EP (1998) Breast and prostate cancer: an analysis of common epidemiological, genetic, and biochemical features. Endocr Rev 19(4):365–396PubMed

Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ (2008) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 58:71–96CrossRefPubMed

INCA (Instituto Nacional Do Câncer)—Ministério Da Saúde. Estimativas da Incidência e Mortalidade por Câncer no Brasil. http://www.inca.gov.br

Vargo-Gogola T, Rosen JM (2007) Modelling breast cancer: one size does not fit all. Nat Rev Cancer 7(9):659–672CrossRefPubMed

Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lønning PE, Børresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406(6797):747–752CrossRefPubMed

Bandyopadhyay S, Pai SK, Hirota S, Hosobe S, Takano Y, Saito K, Piquemal D, Commes T, Watabe M, Gross S, Wang Y, Ran S, Watabe K (2004) Role of the putative tumor metastasis suppressor gene Drg-1 in breast cancer progression. Oncogene 23:5675–5681CrossRefPubMed

Watkins G, Douglas-Jones A, Bryce R, Mansel RE, Jiang WG (2005) Increased levels of SPARC (osteonectin) in human breast cancer tissues and its association with clinical outcomes. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 72(4):267–272CrossRefPubMed

Leth-Larsen R, Lund R, Hansen HV, Laenkholm AV, Tarin D, Jensen ON, Ditzel HJ (2009) Metastasis-related plasma membrane proteins of human breast cancer cells identified by comparative quantitative mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 8(6):1436–1449CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bergamaschi A, Tagliabue E, Sørlie T, Naume B, Triulzi T, Orlandi R, Russnes HG, Nesland JM, Tammi R, Auvinen P, Kosma VM, Ménard S, Børresen-Dale AL (2008) Extracellular matrix signature identifies breast cancer subgroups with different clinical outcome. J Pathol 214(3):357–367CrossRefPubMed

10.

Maruyama Y, Ono M, Kawahara A, Yokoyama T, Basaki Y, Kage M, Aoyagi S, Kinoshita H, Kuwano M (2006) Tumor growth suppression in pancreatic cancer by a putative metastasis suppressor gene Cap43/NDRG1/Drg-1 through modulation of angiogenesis. Cancer Res 66(12):6233–6242CrossRefPubMed

11.

Stein S, Thomas EK, Herzog B, Westfall MD, Rocheleau JV, Jackson RS 2nd, Wang M, Liang P (2004) NDRG1 is necessary for p53-dependent apoptosis. J Biol Chem 279(47):48930–48940CrossRefPubMed

12.

Chlenski A, Liu S, Guerrero LJ, Yang Q, Tian Y, Salwen HR, Zage P, Cohn SL (2006) SPARC expression is associated with impaired tumor growth, inhibited angiogenesis and changes in the extracellular matrix. Int J Cancer 118(2):310–316CrossRefPubMed

13.

Puolakkainen PA, Brekken RA, Muneer S, Sage EH (2004) Enhanced growth of pancreatic tumors in SPARC-null mice is associated with decreased deposition of extracellular matrix and reduced tumor cell apoptosis. Mol Cancer Res 2(4):215–224PubMed

14.

dos Santos ML, Palanch CG, Salaorni S, Da Silva WA, Nagai MA Jr (2006) Transcriptome characterization of human mammary cell lines expressing different levels of ERBB2 by serial analysis of gene expression. Int J Oncol 28(6):1441–1461PubMed

15.

Lachat P, Shaw P, Gebhard S, van Belzen N, Chaubert P, Bosman FT (2002) Expression of NDRG1, a differentiation-related gene, in human tissues. Histochem Cell Biol 118:399–408CrossRefPubMed

16.

van Belzen N, Dinjens WNM, Diesveld MPG, Groen NA, van der Made ACJ, Nozawa Y, Vliestra R, Trapman J, Bosman FT (1997) A novel gene which is up-regulated during colon epithelial cell differentiation and down-regulated in colorectal neoplasms. Lab Invest 77:85–92PubMed

17.

Guan RJ, Ford HL, Fu Y, Li Y, Shaw LM, Pardee AB (2000) Drg-1 as a differentiation-related, putative metastatic suppressor gene in human colon cancer. Cancer Res 60(3):749–755PubMed

18.

Nishie A, Masuda K, Otsubo M, Migita T, Tsuneyoshi M, Kohno K, Shuin T, Naito S, Ono M, Kuwano M (2001) High expression of the Cap43 gene in infiltrating macrophages of human renal cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 7(7):2145–2151PubMed

19.

Cangul H (2004) Hypoxia upregulates the expression of the NDRG1 gene leading to its overexpression in various human cancers. BMC Genet 5:27–37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Chang JT, Wang HM, Chang KW, Chen WH, Wen MC, Hsu YM, Yung BY, Chen IH, Liao CT, Hsieh LL, Cheng AJ (2005) Identification of differentially expressed genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC): overexpression of NPM, CDK1 and NDRG1 and underexpression of CHES1. Int J Cancer 114(6):942–949CrossRefPubMed

21.

Caruso RP, Levinson B, Melamed J, Wieczorek R, Taneja S, Polsky D, Chang C, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Salnikow K, Yee H, Costa M, Osman I (2004) Altered N-myc downstream-regulated gene 1 protein expression in African-American compared with caucasian prostate cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 10:222–227CrossRefPubMed

22.

Chua MS, Sun H, Cheung ST, Mason V, Higgins J, Ross DT, Fan ST, So S (2007) Overexpression of NDRG1 is an indicator of poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mod Pathol 20(1):76–83CrossRefPubMed

23.

Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Herlyn M (2007) Unraveling mysteries of the multifunctional protein SPARC. J Invest Dermatol 127(11):2497–2498CrossRefPubMed

24.

Podhajcer OL, Benedetti L, Girotti MR, Prada F, Salvatierra E, Llera AS (2008) The role of the matricellular protein SPARC in the dynamic interaction between the tumor and the host. Cancer Metastasis Rev 27(3):523–537CrossRefPubMed

25.

Jones C, Mackay A, Grigoriadis A, Cossu A, Reis-Filho JS, Fulford L, Dexter T, Davies S, Bulmer K, Ford E, Parry S, Budroni M, Palmieri G, Neville AM, O’Hare MJ, Lakhani SR (2004) Expression profiling of purified normal human luminal and myoepithelial breast cells: identification of novel prognostic markers for breast cancer. Cancer Res 64(9):3037–3045CrossRefPubMed

26.

Beck AH, Espinosa I, Gilks CB, van de Rijn M, West RB (2008) The fibromatosis signature defines a robust stromal response in breast carcinoma. Lab Invest 88(6):591–601CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Netti PA, Berk DA, Swartz MA, Grodzinsky AJ, Jain RK (2000) Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors. Cancer Res 60(9):2497–2503PubMed

28.

Sung SY, Hsieh CL, Wu D, Chung LW, Johnstone PA (2007) Tumor microenvironment promotes cancer progression, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Curr Probl Cancer 31(2):36–100CrossRefPubMed

29.

McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM; Statistics Subcommittee of NCI-EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics (2006) Reporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100(2):229–235

30.

Norton AJ, Jordan S, Yeomans P (1994) Brief, high-temperature heat denaturation (pressure cooking): a simple and effective method of antigen retrieval for routinely processed tissues. J Pathol 173:371–379CrossRefPubMed

31.

Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clark GM (1998) Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11(2):155–168PubMed

32.

Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K, Cheang M, Karaca G, Hu Z, Hernandez-Boussard T, Livasy C, Cowan D, Dressler L, Akslen LA, Ragaz J, Gown AM, Gilks CB, van de Rijn M, Perou CM (2004) Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 10(16):5367–5374CrossRefPubMed

33.

Diaz LK, Gupta R, Kidwai N, Sneige N, Wiley EL (2004) The use of TMA for interlaboratory validation of FISH testing for detection of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer. J Histochem Cytochem 52(4):501–507CrossRefPubMed

34.

Strzelczyk B, Szulc A, Rzepko R, Kitowska A, Skokowski J, Szutowicz A, Pawelczyk T (2009) Identification of high-risk stage II colorectal tumors by combined analysis of the NDRG1 gene expression and the depth of tumor invasion. Ann Surg Oncol 16(5):1287–1294CrossRefPubMed

35.

Fotovati A, Fujii T, Yamaguchi M, Kage M, Shirouzu K, Oie S, Basaki Y, Ono M, Yamana H, Kuwano M (2006) 17Beta-estradiol induces down-regulation of Cap43/NDRG1/Drg-1, a putative differentiation-related and metastasis suppressor gene, in human breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 12(10):3010–3018CrossRefPubMed

36.

Brekken RA, Sage EH (2001) SPARC, a matricellular protein: at the crossroads of cell-matrix communication. Matrix Biol 19(8):816–827CrossRefPubMed

37.

Arnold SA, Brekken RA (2009) SPARC: a matricellular regulator of tumorigenesis. J Cell Commun Signal 3(3–4):255–273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Rempel SA, Golembieski WA, Ge S, Lemke N, Elisevich K, Mikkelsen T, Gutiérrez JA (1998) SPARC: a signal of astrocytic neoplastic transformation and reactive response in human primary and xenograft gliomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 57(12):1112–1121CrossRefPubMed

39.

Rumpler G, Becker B, Hafner C, McClelland M, Stolz W, Landthaler M, Schmitt R, Bosserhoff A, Vogt T (2003) Identification of differentially expressed genes in models of melanoma progression by cDNA array analysis: SPARC, MIF and a novel cathepsin protease characterize aggressive phenotypes. Exp Dermatol 12(6):761–771CrossRefPubMed

40.

Dawson SJ, Provenzano E, Caldas C (2009) Triple negative breast cancers: clinical and prognostic implications. Eur J Cancer 1:27–40CrossRef

41.

Barth PJ, Moll R, Ramaswamy A (2005) Stromal remodeling and SPARC (secreted protein acid rich in cysteine) expression in invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast. Virchows Arch 446(5):532–536CrossRefPubMed

42.

Sarrió D, Rodriguez-Pinilla SM, Hardisson D, Cano A, Moreno-Bueno G, Palacios J (2008) Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer relates to the basal-like phenotype. Cancer Res 68(4):989–997CrossRefPubMed

43.

Helleman J, Jansen MP, Ruigrok-Ritstier K, van Staveren IL, Look MP, Meijer-van Gelder ME, Sieuwerts AM, Klijn JG, Sleijfer S, Foekens JA, Berns EM (2008) Association of an extracellular matrix gene cluster with breast cancer prognosis and endocrine therapy response. Clin Cancer Res 14(17):5555–5564CrossRefPubMed

44.

Wong SY, Crowley D, Bronson RT, Hynes RO (2008) Analyses of the role of endogenous SPARC in mouse models of prostate and breast cancer. Clin Exp Metastasis 25(2):109–118CrossRefPubMed

45.

Socha MJ, Said N, Dai Y, Kwong J, Ramalingam P, Trieu V, Desai N, Mok SC, Motamed K (2009) Aberrant promoter methylation of SPARC in ovarian cancer. Neoplasia 11(2):126–135CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Tai IT, Dai M, Owen DA, Chen LB (2005) Genome-wide expression analysis of therapy-resistant tumors reveals SPARC as a novel target for cancer therapy. J Clin Invest 115(6):1492–1502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Cheetham S, Tang MJ, Mesak F, Kennecke H, Owen D, Tai IT (2008) SPARC promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancers can be reversed by 5-Aza-2’deoxycytidine to increase SPARC expression and improve therapy response. Br J Cancer 98(11):1810–1819CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Dhanesuan N, Sharp JA, Blick T, Price JT, Thompson EW (2002) Doxycycline-inducible expression of SPARC/Osteonectin/BM40 in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells results in growth inhibition. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75(1):73–85CrossRefPubMed

49.

Yunker CK, Golembieski W, Lemke N, Schultz CR, Cazacu S, Brodie C, Rempel SA (2008) SPARC-induced increase in glioma matrix and decrease in vascularity are associated with reduced VEGF expression and secretion. Int J Cancer 122(12):2735–2743CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Yiu GK, Chan WY, Ng SW, Chan PS, Cheung KK, Berkowitz RS, Mok SC (2001) SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. Am J Pathol 159(2):609–622CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100(1):57–70CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Prognostic value of NDRG1 and SPARC protein expression in breast cancer patients
verfasst von: Maria Aparecida Nagai
Renê Gerhard
José Humberto T. G. Fregnani
Suely Nonogaki
Regina Barbosa Rierger
Mário Mourão Netto
Fernando A. Soares
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2011
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0867-2

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Prognostic value of NDRG1 and SPARC protein expression in breast cancer patients

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Mehr Brustkrebs, aber weniger andere gynäkologische Tumoren mit Levonorgestrel-IUS

Bei seelischem Stress sind Checkpoint-Hemmer weniger wirksam

Antikörper mobilisiert Neutrophile gegen Krebs

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

Update Onkologie

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Genetic variants in COX-2, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and breast cancer risk: the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) Study

Comprehensive genetic characterization of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families from Slovakia

A small number of subjects do not always indicate that they are minor variants data for inclusion in a pooled analysis

Reversed urban–rural differences in breast cancer mortality (China, 2002–2008)

Effect of aspirin and other NSAIDs on postmenopausal breast cancer incidence by hormone receptor status: results from a prospective cohort study

Bilateral breast cancer: analysis of incidence, outcome, survival and disease characteristics

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Mehr Brustkrebs, aber weniger andere gynäkologische Tumoren mit Levonorgestrel-IUS

Bei seelischem Stress sind Checkpoint-Hemmer weniger wirksam

Antikörper mobilisiert Neutrophile gegen Krebs

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

Update Onkologie