Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2012

01.06.2012 | Epidemiology

Increased diagnosis and detection rates of carcinoma in situ of the breast

verfasst von: J. A. Glover, F. J. Bannon, C. M. Hughes, M. M. Cantwell, H. Comber, A. Gavin, S. Deady, L. J. Murray

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 2/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify trends in the diagnosis of carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the breast in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and to examine the impact of mammography. Data on cases of newly diagnosed CIS of the breast and mode of detection (screen detected or not) were obtained, where available, from regional cancer registries between 1990 and 2007. Age-standardised diagnosis rates for the UK and the ROI, and regional screen detected diagnosis rates were compared by calculating the annual percentage change (APC) over time. The APC of the diagnosis rate amongst women aged 50–64 years (original screening age group) showed a significant 5.9% increase in the UK (1990–2007) and 11.5% increase in the ROI (1994–2007). The rate of diagnosis (50–64 years) stabilized in the UK between 2005 and 2007 and was substantially higher than in other western populations with national screening programmes. The APC of the diagnosis rate amongst those aged 65–69 years showed a significant 12.4% increase in the UK (1990–2007) and 10.3% increase in the ROI (1994–2007). amongst women aged 50–74 years in the UK, approximately 4,300 cases of CIS (≈90% ductal carcinoma in situ) were diagnosed in 2007. Our analyses have shown that screen detected CIS contributed primarily to the increase in diagnosis of CIS of the breast. The high diagnosis rate of screen detected CIS of the breast underlines the need for further research into lesion and patient characteristics that are related to progression of CIS to invasive disease to better target treatment.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi WS, Parker BA, Pierce JP et al (1996) Regional differences in the incidence and treatment of carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 5:317–320 Choi WS, Parker BA, Pierce JP et al (1996) Regional differences in the incidence and treatment of carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 5:317–320
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Levi F, Te VC, Randimbison L et al (1997) Trends of in situ carcinoma of the breast in Vaud, Switzerland. Eur J Cancer 33:903–906PubMedCrossRef Levi F, Te VC, Randimbison L et al (1997) Trends of in situ carcinoma of the breast in Vaud, Switzerland. Eur J Cancer 33:903–906PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barchielli A, Federico M, De Lisi V et al (2005) In situ breast cancer: incidence trend and organised screening programmes in Italy. Eur J Cancer 41:1045–1050PubMedCrossRef Barchielli A, Federico M, De Lisi V et al (2005) In situ breast cancer: incidence trend and organised screening programmes in Italy. Eur J Cancer 41:1045–1050PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K (2010) Epidemiology of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 41:139–141CrossRef Kerlikowske K (2010) Epidemiology of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 41:139–141CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Betsill WL Jr, Rosen PP, Lieberman PH et al (1978) Intraductal carcinoma. Long-term follow-up after treatment by biopsy alone. JAMA 239:1863–1867PubMedCrossRef Betsill WL Jr, Rosen PP, Lieberman PH et al (1978) Intraductal carcinoma. Long-term follow-up after treatment by biopsy alone. JAMA 239:1863–1867PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Page DL, Dupoint WD, Rogers LW, Landenberger M (1982) Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only. Cancer 49:751–758PubMedCrossRef Page DL, Dupoint WD, Rogers LW, Landenberger M (1982) Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only. Cancer 49:751–758PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Erbas B, Provenzano E, Armes J et al (2006) The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 97:135–144PubMedCrossRef Erbas B, Provenzano E, Armes J et al (2006) The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 97:135–144PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett RL, Blanks RG, Patnick J et al (2007) Results from the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme 2000–2005. J Med Screen 14:200–204PubMedCrossRef Bennett RL, Blanks RG, Patnick J et al (2007) Results from the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme 2000–2005. J Med Screen 14:200–204PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat van Steenbergen LN, Voogd AC, Roukema JA et al (2009) Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:181–183PubMedCrossRef van Steenbergen LN, Voogd AC, Roukema JA et al (2009) Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:181–183PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorum R, Hofvind S, Skaane P et al (2010) Trends in incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ: the effect of a population-based screening programme. The Breast 19:499–505PubMedCrossRef Sorum R, Hofvind S, Skaane P et al (2010) Trends in incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ: the effect of a population-based screening programme. The Breast 19:499–505PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kricker A, Goumas C, Armstrong B (2004) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, a population-based study of epidemiology and pathology. Br J Cancer 90:1382–1385PubMedCrossRef Kricker A, Goumas C, Armstrong B (2004) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, a population-based study of epidemiology and pathology. Br J Cancer 90:1382–1385PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Barchielli A, Paci E, Giorgi D (1999) Recent trends of in situ carcinoma of the breast and mammographic screening in the Florence area, Italy. Cancer Causes Control 10:313–317PubMedCrossRef Barchielli A, Paci E, Giorgi D (1999) Recent trends of in situ carcinoma of the breast and mammographic screening in the Florence area, Italy. Cancer Causes Control 10:313–317PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Increased diagnosis and detection rates of carcinoma in situ of the breast
verfasst von
J. A. Glover
F. J. Bannon
C. M. Hughes
M. M. Cantwell
H. Comber
A. Gavin
S. Deady
L. J. Murray
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-1975-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2012 Zur Ausgabe

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Perioperative Checkpointhemmer-Therapie verbessert NSCLC-Prognose

28.05.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Eine perioperative Therapie mit Nivolumab reduziert das Risiko für Rezidive und Todesfälle bei operablem NSCLC im Vergleich zu einer alleinigen neoadjuvanten Chemotherapie um über 40%. Darauf deuten die Resultate der Phase-3-Studie CheckMate 77T.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.