Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2015

01.10.2015 | Original Article

Patient Non-adherence and Cancellations Are Higher for Screening Colonoscopy Compared with Surveillance Colonoscopy

verfasst von: Michael Greenspan, Navdeep Chehl, Krista Shawron, Lisa Barnes, Hong Li, Elizabeth Avery, Shannon Sims, John Losurdo, Sohrab Mobarhan, Joshua Melson

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 10/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A significant proportion of the eligible population is non-adherent to colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

Aims

To define the demographic and clinical variables associated with non-adherence and multiple cancellations to scheduled colonoscopy within 1 year in a CRC screening and adenomatous polyp surveillance population.

Methods

This was an observational cohort study of 617 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy at an outpatient academic tertiary care center for CRC screening or adenomatous polyp surveillance from January 2012 to September 2012.

Results

Overall, 551 patients (89.3 %) were adherent and 66 (10.7 %) were non-adherent to scheduled colonoscopy at 1 year. The relative risk for non-adherence was 5.42 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.74–10.75] in patients undergoing colonoscopy for screening compared to those for surveillance (16.7 vs. 3.5 % non-adherence, respectively, P < 0.001). An indication of screening in comparison with surveillance was associated with non-adherence [odds ratio (OR) 12.69, 95 % CI 4.18–38.51] and multiple cancellations (OR 2.33, 95 % CI 1.27–4.31) by multiple regression analysis.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing colonoscopy for CRC screening are significantly less likely to attend their scheduled procedure within a year and have more procedure cancellations than those undergoing surveillance colonoscopy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: CRC screening, incidence, and mortality—United States, 2002–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:884–889. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: CRC screening, incidence, and mortality—United States, 2002–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:884–889.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.CrossRefPubMed Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–1105.CrossRefPubMed Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–1105.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner BJ, Weiner M, Yang C, et al. Predicting adherence to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy on the basis of physician appointment-keeping behavior. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:528–532.CrossRefPubMed Turner BJ, Weiner M, Yang C, et al. Predicting adherence to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy on the basis of physician appointment-keeping behavior. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:528–532.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson DS, Egbuonnu N, Umunakwe C, et al. Scheduled out-patient endoscopy and lack of compliance in a minority serving tertiary institution. Am J Med Sci. 2012;344:194–198.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jackson DS, Egbuonnu N, Umunakwe C, et al. Scheduled out-patient endoscopy and lack of compliance in a minority serving tertiary institution. Am J Med Sci. 2012;344:194–198.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Badurdeen DS, Umar NA, Begum R, et al. Timing of procedure and compliance with outpatient endoscopy among an underserved population in an inner-city tertiary institution. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22:531–535.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Badurdeen DS, Umar NA, Begum R, et al. Timing of procedure and compliance with outpatient endoscopy among an underserved population in an inner-city tertiary institution. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22:531–535.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazarian ES, Carreira FS, Toribara NW, et al. Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:438–442.CrossRefPubMed Kazarian ES, Carreira FS, Toribara NW, et al. Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:438–442.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams LA, Pawlik J, Forbes GM. Nonattendance at outpatient endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2004;36:402–404.CrossRefPubMed Adams LA, Pawlik J, Forbes GM. Nonattendance at outpatient endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2004;36:402–404.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurudu SR, Fry LC, Fleischer DE, et al. Factors contributing to patient nonattendance at open-access endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:1942–1945.CrossRefPubMed Gurudu SR, Fry LC, Fleischer DE, et al. Factors contributing to patient nonattendance at open-access endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:1942–1945.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner BJ, Weiner M, Berry SD, et al. Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:58–63.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Turner BJ, Weiner M, Berry SD, et al. Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:58–63.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Naylor K, Ward J, Polite BN. Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1033–1046.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Naylor K, Ward J, Polite BN. Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1033–1046.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jandorf L, Stossel LM, Cooperman JL, et al. Cost analysis of a patient navigation system to increase screening colonoscopy adherence among urban minorities. Cancer. 2013;119:612–620.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jandorf L, Stossel LM, Cooperman JL, et al. Cost analysis of a patient navigation system to increase screening colonoscopy adherence among urban minorities. Cancer. 2013;119:612–620.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lukin DJ, Jandorf LH, Dhulkifl RJ, et al. Effect of comorbid conditions on adherence to colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Educ. 2012;27:269–276.CrossRef Lukin DJ, Jandorf LH, Dhulkifl RJ, et al. Effect of comorbid conditions on adherence to colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Educ. 2012;27:269–276.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss JM, Smith MA, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening variation among primary-care providers and clinics. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1159–1167.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Weiss JM, Smith MA, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening variation among primary-care providers and clinics. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1159–1167.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonnenberg A. How to overbook procedures in the endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:710–715.CrossRefPubMed Sonnenberg A. How to overbook procedures in the endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:710–715.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Patient Non-adherence and Cancellations Are Higher for Screening Colonoscopy Compared with Surveillance Colonoscopy
verfasst von
Michael Greenspan
Navdeep Chehl
Krista Shawron
Lisa Barnes
Hong Li
Elizabeth Avery
Shannon Sims
John Losurdo
Sohrab Mobarhan
Joshua Melson
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3664-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2015

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Bei seelischem Stress sind Checkpoint-Hemmer weniger wirksam

03.06.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Wie stark Menschen mit fortgeschrittenem NSCLC von einer Therapie mit Immun-Checkpoint-Hemmern profitieren, hängt offenbar auch davon ab, wie sehr die Diagnose ihre psychische Verfassung erschüttert

Antikörper mobilisiert Neutrophile gegen Krebs

03.06.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

Ein bispezifischer Antikörper formiert gezielt eine Armee neutrophiler Granulozyten gegen Krebszellen. An den Antikörper gekoppeltes TNF-alpha soll die Zellen zudem tief in solide Tumoren hineinführen.

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.