Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 5/2013

01.06.2013 | Brief Communication

Adaptation into Spanish of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and preliminary validation in a student sample

verfasst von: María Andrée López, Andrea Gabilondo, Miquel Codony, Carlos García-Forero, Gemma Vilagut, Pere Castellví, Montse Ferrer, Jordi Alonso

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

There is growing interest in the assessment of positive mental health as a global indicator of societal wealth. We aimed to adapt the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being scale (WEMWBS) into Spanish and to perform a preliminary evaluation of its metric properties.

Methods

Forward and back-translations and cognitive debriefing were carried out. University students (n = 148) were recruited to evaluate the final Spanish version, following the UK original study. Distribution of WEMWBS responses, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, and factor structure were assessed.

Results

Only 4 (out of 14) items of the initial Spanish version were not rated as conceptually and linguistically equivalent to the original and were modified. The final version was clear and comprehensible. Global score’s Cronbach’s alpha (0.90), item-total score correlations (0.44–0.76), and test–retest ICC (0.84) were all satisfactory. Moderate to high correlations (r = 0.45–0.70) were observed between the WEMWBS and validity scales. Preliminary confirmatory factor analyses did not support the hypothesis of a single factor.

Conclusions

A conceptually equivalent Spanish version of the WEMWBS was obtained with high internal consistency, good test–retest reliability, and similar construct validity as the original instrument. Further validity and factorial studies are necessary in larger and more heterogeneous samples.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.PubMedCrossRef Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Keyes, C. L. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: a complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62, 95–108.PubMedCrossRef Keyes, C. L. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: a complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62, 95–108.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gable, S., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and Why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9, 103–110.CrossRef Gable, S., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and Why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9, 103–110.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence NDaMHWHO. (2003). Investing in mental health. Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence NDaMHWHO. (2003). Investing in mental health.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.PubMedCrossRef Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Keyes, C. L., Dhingra, S. S., & Simoes, E. J. (2010). Change in level of positive mental health as a predictor of future risk of mental illness. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2366–2371.PubMedCrossRef Keyes, C. L., Dhingra, S. S., & Simoes, E. J. (2010). Change in level of positive mental health as a predictor of future risk of mental illness. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2366–2371.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tennant, R., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2006). Monitoring positive mental health in Scotland: Validating the Affectometer 2 scale and developing the Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-being Scale for the UK. Glasgow: NHS Health Scotland. Tennant, R., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2006). Monitoring positive mental health in Scotland: Validating the Affectometer 2 scale and developing the Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-being Scale for the UK. Glasgow: NHS Health Scotland.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 63.PubMedCrossRef Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 63.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart-Brown, S., & Jamohamed, K. (2008). Warwick-Edinburg mental well-being Scale: User guide. Glasgow: NHS Health Scotland. Stewart-Brown, S., & Jamohamed, K. (2008). Warwick-Edinburg mental well-being Scale: User guide. Glasgow: NHS Health Scotland.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55.CrossRef Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelley, T. L. (1942). The reliability coefficient. Psychometrika, 7, 75–85.CrossRef Kelley, T. L. (1942). The reliability coefficient. Psychometrika, 7, 75–85.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, misuse and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.PubMedCrossRef Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, misuse and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bentler, P. M. (2008). Alpha, dimension-free and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74, 137–143.CrossRef Bentler, P. M. (2008). Alpha, dimension-free and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74, 137–143.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Helms, J., Henze, K., Sass, T., & Mifsud, V. (2006). Treating Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients as data in counseling research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 630–660.CrossRef Helms, J., Henze, K., Sass, T., & Mifsud, V. (2006). Treating Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients as data in counseling research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 630–660.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19, 231–240.PubMed Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19, 231–240.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, A. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cohen, A. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (1998–2010) (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (1998–2010) (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 625–641.CrossRef Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 625–641.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson, D. L. (2001). Sample size and number of parameter estimates in maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis: A Monte Carlo investigation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 205–223.CrossRef Jackson, D. L. (2001). Sample size and number of parameter estimates in maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis: A Monte Carlo investigation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 205–223.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 15.PubMedCrossRef Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 15.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Adaptation into Spanish of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and preliminary validation in a student sample
verfasst von
María Andrée López
Andrea Gabilondo
Miquel Codony
Carlos García-Forero
Gemma Vilagut
Pere Castellví
Montse Ferrer
Jordi Alonso
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0238-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

Quality of Life Research 5/2013 Zur Ausgabe