nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.03.2016 | 2015 SSAT Quick Shot Presentation

Effect of BMI on Short-Term Outcomes with Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: a Case-Matched Study

verfasst von: Deborah S. Keller, Nisreen Madhoun, Juan Ramon Flores-Gonzalez, Sergio Ibarra, Reena Tahilramani, Eric M. Haas

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Many benefits of minimally invasive surgery are lost in the obese, but robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) may offer advantages in this population. Our goal was to compare outcomes for RALS in obese and non-obese patients.

Methods

A prospective database was reviewed for colorectal resections using RALS. Patients were stratified into obese (BMI > 30 kg/m²) and non-obese cohorts (BMI < 30 kg/m²), then case-matched for comparability. The main outcome measures were operative time, conversion rate, length of stay and complication, readmission, and reoperation rates between groups.

Results

Forty-five patients were evaluated in each cohort. The BMI was significantly different (p < 0.01). All other demographics were well matched. There were no significant differences in operative time (p = 0.86), blood loss (p = 0.38), intraoperative complications (p = 0.54), or conversion rates (p = 0.91) across cohorts. Length of stay was comparable between groups (p = 0.45). Postoperatively, the complication (p = 0.87), readmission (p = 1.00), and reoperation rates (p = 0.95) were similar. There were no mortalities. For malignant cases (37.8 %), the lymph node yield (p = 0.48) and positive margins (p = 1.00) were similar and acceptable in both cohorts.

Conclusions

In our matched RALS series, perioperative and postoperative outcomes were similar between obese and non-obese patients undergoing colorectal surgery. RALS is a feasible option in the surgical setting of the obese patient. Further controlled studies are warranted to explore the full benefits.

Nelson H, Sargent DJ, COST Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–2059.CrossRef

Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H et al. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142:298–303.CrossRefPubMed

Buunen M, Bonjer HJ, Hop WC et al. COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull. 2009;56:89–91.PubMed

Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:75–82.CrossRefPubMed

Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718–1726.CrossRefPubMed

Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3061–3068.CrossRefPubMed

Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1638–1645.CrossRefPubMed

Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2008;34:498–504.CrossRefPubMed

Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224–2229.CrossRefPubMed

10.

van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:210–218.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–484.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg. 2008;247:819–824.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Krane MK, Allaix ME, Zoccali M et al. Does morbid obesity change outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease? Review of 626 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:986–996.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Morrill AC, Chinn CD. The obesity epidemic in the United States. J Public Health Policy. 2004;25:353–366.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Wang Y, Beydoun MA. The obesity epidemic in the United States--gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:6–28.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Iorio T, Blumberg D. Laparoscopic colectomy is feasible in the mega-obese patient using a standardized technique. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:1005–1008.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Vaccaro CA, Rossi GL, Quintana GO, Soriano ER, Vaccarezza H, Rubinstein F. Laparoscopic colorectal resections: a simple predictor model and a stratification risk for conversion to open surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:869–874.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Wick EC, Hirose K, Shore AD et al. Surgical site infections and cost in obese patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;146:1068–1072.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Gendall KA, Raniga S, Kennedy R, Frizelle FA. The impact of obesity on outcome after major colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:2223–2237.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Geiger TM, Muldoon R. Complications following colon rectal surgery in the obese patient. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011;24:274–282.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

21.

Ballantyne GH, Merola P, Weber A, Wasielewski A. Robotic solutions to the pitfalls of laparoscopic colectomy. Osp Ital Chir. 2001;7:405–412.

22.

Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD et al. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg. 2013;37:2782–2790.CrossRefPubMed

23.

D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2162–2168.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW. Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1633–1639.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM et al. Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1601–1608.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1480–1487.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Ponsky L. Robot-assisted surgery and health care costs. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2175; author reply 2176.PubMed

28.

Mirnezami AH, Mirnezami R, Venkatasubramaniam AK, Chandrakumaran K, Cecil TD, Moran BJ. Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:1084–1093.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Lin S, Jiang HG, Chen ZH, Zhou SY, Liu XS, Yu JR. Meta-analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:5214–5220.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

30.

Ortiz-Oshiro E, Sanchez-Egido I, Moreno-Sierra J, Perez CF, Diaz JS, Fernandez-Represa JA. Robotic assistance may reduce conversion to open in rectal carcinoma laparoscopic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2012

31.

Shin JY. Comparison of Short-term Surgical Outcomes between a Robotic Colectomy and a Laparoscopic Colectomy during Early Experience. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28:19–26.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

32.

Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R et al. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:e134-56.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2012

34.

Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2485–2493.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P et al. Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Disease, Focusing on Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012

36.

Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, Bressel M, Lynch AC. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012

37.

Alasari S, Min BS. Robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. ISRN Surg. 2012;2012:293894.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

38.

Baek SK, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A. Robotic surgery: colon and rectum. Cancer J. 2013;19:140–146.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V. Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg. 2013;79:553–560.PubMed

40.

Keller DS, Senagore AJ, Lawrence JK, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP. Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection. Surg Endosc. 2013

41.

Trinh BB, Jackson NR, Hauch AT, Hu T, Kandil E. Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS. 2014;18

42.

Xu H, Li J, Sun Y et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:274.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

43.

Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:816–830.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Young M, Pigazzi A. Total mesorectal excision: open, laparoscopic or robotic. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2014;203:47–55.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Scarpinata R, Aly EH. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:253–262.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Hardiman K, Chang ET, Diggs BS, Lu KC. Laparoscopic colectomy reduces morbidity and mortality in obese patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2907–2910.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Cai Y, Zhou Y, Li Z, Xiang J, Chen Z. Surgical outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer in obese patients: A comparative study with open colectomy. Oncol Lett. 2013;6:1057–1062.PubMedCentralPubMed

48.

Delaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ et al. Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:975–981.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Zhou Y, Wu L, Li X, Wu X, Li B. Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:783–789.CrossRefPubMed

50.

He Z, Zhang Z. Factors influencing the feasibility of laparoscopy colectomy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127:772–776.

51.

Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for benign disease. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:61–65.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Geisler D, Garrett T. Single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single surgeon experience of 102 consecutive cases. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15:397–401.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Miller S, Causey MW, Damle A, Maykel J, Steele S. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: training the next generation. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1784–1790.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Geisler DP. Laparoscopic single-port colectomy for sigmoid cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2010;14:253–255.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Geisler DP, Condon ET, Remzi FH. Single incision laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileopouch anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:941–943.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Rieger NA, Lam FF. Single-incision laparoscopically assisted colectomy using standard laparoscopic instrumentation. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:888–890.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Ross H, Steele S, Whiteford M et al. Early multi-institution experience with single-incision laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:187–192.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Keller DS, Ibarra S, Flores-Gonzalez JR et al. Outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy surgery in obese patients: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2015 [ePub ahead of Print Jan 20, 2015].

59.

Aly EH. Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:1–8.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Stephan JM, Goodheart MJ, McDonald M et al. Robotic surgery in supermorbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:49.e1-49.e8.CrossRef

61.

Komninos C, Tuliao P, Koo KC, Chang CH, Han WK, Rha KH. Obesity is not associated with increased operative complications in single-site robotic partial nephrectomy. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56:382–387.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

62.

Hemli JM, Darla LS, Panetta CR, Jennings J, Subramanian VA, Patel NC. Does body mass index affect outcomes in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass procedures? Innovations (Phila). 2012;7:350–353.CrossRef

Titel: Effect of BMI on Short-Term Outcomes with Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: a Case-Matched Study
verfasst von: Deborah S. Keller
Nisreen Madhoun
Juan Ramon Flores-Gonzalez
Sergio Ibarra
Reena Tahilramani
Eric M. Haas
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-3016-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Effect of BMI on Short-Term Outcomes with Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: a Case-Matched Study