Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Hematology 5/2011

01.05.2011 | Original Article

Nilotinib as frontline therapy for patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: results from the Japanese subgroup of ENESTnd

verfasst von: Hirohisa Nakamae, Hirohiko Shibayama, Mineo Kurokawa, Tetsuya Fukuda, Chiaki Nakaseko, Yoshinobu Kanda, Tadashi Nagai, Kazunori Ohnishi, Yasuhiro Maeda, Akira Matsuda, Taro Amagasaki, Masamitsu Yanada

Erschienen in: International Journal of Hematology | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Recent results from the phase 3 ENESTnd (Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials-Newly Diagnosed Patients) study have demonstrated superiority of nilotinib over imatinib for the treatment of newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP). Here, we report results from the Japanese subset of patients in ENESTnd, and assess whether results in this subpopulation are consistent with the overall study population. Seventy-nine Japanese patients with CML-CP were randomized to receive nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (BID) (n = 30), nilotinib 400 mg BID (n = 24) or imatinib 400 mg once daily (QD) (n = 25). Major molecular response rates at 12 months, the primary endpoint, were at least twice as high for nilotinib 300 mg BID (57%) and nilotinib 400 mg BID (50%) compared with imatinib 400 mg QD (24%). No patient on nilotinib progressed, while one patient progressed on imatinib. Both drugs were generally well tolerated and discontinuations due to adverse events were comparable among treatment arms. The results in the subpopulation of Japanese patients from ENESTnd closely mirror the results of the overall population, and support the use of nilotinib at 300 mg BID in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Deininger M, O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, et al. International randomized study of interferon vs STI571 (IRIS) 8-year follow up: sustained survival and low risk for progression or events in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with imatinib. Blood. 2009;114(22):462 (abstract 1126). Deininger M, O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, et al. International randomized study of interferon vs STI571 (IRIS) 8-year follow up: sustained survival and low risk for progression or events in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with imatinib. Blood. 2009;114(22):462 (abstract 1126).
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes TP, Hochhaus A, Branford S, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS). Blood. 2010;116(19):3758–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hughes TP, Hochhaus A, Branford S, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS). Blood. 2010;116(19):3758–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(24):2251–9.CrossRefPubMed Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(24):2251–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cortes JE, Jones D, O’Brien S, et al. Nilotinib as front-line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(3):392–7.CrossRefPubMed Cortes JE, Jones D, O’Brien S, et al. Nilotinib as front-line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(3):392–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Manley PW, Stiefl N, Cowan-Jacob SW, et al. Structural resemblances and comparisons of the relative pharmacological properties of imatinib and nilotinib. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18(19):6977–86.CrossRefPubMed Manley PW, Stiefl N, Cowan-Jacob SW, et al. Structural resemblances and comparisons of the relative pharmacological properties of imatinib and nilotinib. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18(19):6977–86.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson RA, le Coutre PD, Reiffers J, et al. Comparison of nilotinib and imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd beyond one year. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15S):487s (abstract 6501). Larson RA, le Coutre PD, Reiffers J, et al. Comparison of nilotinib and imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd beyond one year. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15S):487s (abstract 6501).
7.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Dwyer M, Swords R, Giles F, et al. Nilotinib 300 mg twice daily is effective and well tolerated as first line treatment of Ph-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: updated results of the ICORG 0802 phase 2 study. Haematologica. 2010;95(s2):340 (abstract 0812). O’Dwyer M, Swords R, Giles F, et al. Nilotinib 300 mg twice daily is effective and well tolerated as first line treatment of Ph-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: updated results of the ICORG 0802 phase 2 study. Haematologica. 2010;95(s2):340 (abstract 0812).
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosti G, Castagnetti F, Palandri F, et al. Efficacy and safety of nilotinib 800 mg daily in early chronic phase Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a phase II trial at 2 years. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15S):490s (abstract 6515). Rosti G, Castagnetti F, Palandri F, et al. Efficacy and safety of nilotinib 800 mg daily in early chronic phase Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a phase II trial at 2 years. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15S):490s (abstract 6515).
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kantarjian HM, Giles FJ, Bhalla KN, et al. Update on imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase (CML-CP) on nilotinib therapy at 24 months: clinical response, safety, and long-term outcomes. Blood. 2009;114(22):464 (abstract 1129). Kantarjian HM, Giles FJ, Bhalla KN, et al. Update on imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase (CML-CP) on nilotinib therapy at 24 months: clinical response, safety, and long-term outcomes. Blood. 2009;114(22):464 (abstract 1129).
10.
Zurück zum Zitat le Coutre P, Giles F, Hochhaus A, et al. Nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in accelerated phase (CML-AP) with imatinib (IM) resistance or intolerance: longer follow-up results of a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:369s. le Coutre P, Giles F, Hochhaus A, et al. Nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in accelerated phase (CML-AP) with imatinib (IM) resistance or intolerance: longer follow-up results of a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:369s.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tojo A, Usuki K, Urabe A, et al. A Phase I/II study of nilotinib in Japanese patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant Ph+ CML or relapsed/refractory Ph+ ALL. Int J Hematol. 2009;89(5):679–88.CrossRefPubMed Tojo A, Usuki K, Urabe A, et al. A Phase I/II study of nilotinib in Japanese patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant Ph+ CML or relapsed/refractory Ph+ ALL. Int J Hematol. 2009;89(5):679–88.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sokal JE, Baccarani M, Russo D, Tura S. Staging and prognosis in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Semin Hematol. 1988;25(1):49–61.PubMed Sokal JE, Baccarani M, Russo D, Tura S. Staging and prognosis in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Semin Hematol. 1988;25(1):49–61.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J, et al. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2006;108(6):1809–20.CrossRefPubMed Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J, et al. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2006;108(6):1809–20.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller MC, Cross NC, Erben P, et al. Harmonization of molecular monitoring of CML therapy in Europe. Leukemia. 2009;23(11):1957–63.CrossRefPubMed Muller MC, Cross NC, Erben P, et al. Harmonization of molecular monitoring of CML therapy in Europe. Leukemia. 2009;23(11):1957–63.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller MC, Cross NCP, Erben P, et al. Harmonization of molecular monitoring of CML therapy in Europe—perspective of widespread competence in BCR-ABL quantification. Blood. 2009;114(22):1026 (abstract 2616). Muller MC, Cross NCP, Erben P, et al. Harmonization of molecular monitoring of CML therapy in Europe—perspective of widespread competence in BCR-ABL quantification. Blood. 2009;114(22):1026 (abstract 2616).
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A, et al. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood. 2006;108(1):28–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A, et al. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood. 2006;108(1):28–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Branford S, Cross NC, Hochhaus A, et al. Rationale for the recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2006;20(11):1925–30.CrossRefPubMed Branford S, Cross NC, Hochhaus A, et al. Rationale for the recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2006;20(11):1925–30.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Branford S, Fletcher L, Cross NC, et al. Desirable performance characteristics for BCR-ABL measurement on an international reporting scale to allow consistent interpretation of individual patient response and comparison of response rates between clinical trials. Blood. 2008;112(8):3330–8.CrossRefPubMed Branford S, Fletcher L, Cross NC, et al. Desirable performance characteristics for BCR-ABL measurement on an international reporting scale to allow consistent interpretation of individual patient response and comparison of response rates between clinical trials. Blood. 2008;112(8):3330–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim DW, Granvil C, Demirhan E, et al. Comparison of steady-state imatinib (IM) trough levels, clinical response, and safety between Caucasian and Asian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with 400 mg and 800 mg daily doses of IM in the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Optimization and Selectivity (TOPS) Study. Blood. 2009;114(22):462–3. Kim DW, Granvil C, Demirhan E, et al. Comparison of steady-state imatinib (IM) trough levels, clinical response, and safety between Caucasian and Asian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with 400 mg and 800 mg daily doses of IM in the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Optimization and Selectivity (TOPS) Study. Blood. 2009;114(22):462–3.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes TP, le Coutre PD, Clark RE, et al. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response analysis of nilotinib in newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: results from ENESTnd. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15S):500s (abstract 6556). Hughes TP, le Coutre PD, Clark RE, et al. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response analysis of nilotinib in newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: results from ENESTnd. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15S):500s (abstract 6556).
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagai T, Takeuchi J, Dobashi N, et al. Imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a prospective study in Japan. Int J Hematol. 2010;92(1):111–7.CrossRefPubMed Nagai T, Takeuchi J, Dobashi N, et al. Imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a prospective study in Japan. Int J Hematol. 2010;92(1):111–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosti G, Palandri F, Castagnetti F, et al. Nilotinib for the frontline treatment of Ph(+) chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2009;114(24):4933–8.CrossRefPubMed Rosti G, Palandri F, Castagnetti F, et al. Nilotinib for the frontline treatment of Ph(+) chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2009;114(24):4933–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kantarjian HM, Giles F, Gattermann N, et al. Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase following imatinib resistance and intolerance. Blood. 2007;110(10):3540–6.CrossRefPubMed Kantarjian HM, Giles F, Gattermann N, et al. Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase following imatinib resistance and intolerance. Blood. 2007;110(10):3540–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicolini F, Alimena G, Al-Ali HK, et al. Final safety analysis of 1,793 CML patients from ENACT (expanding nilotinib access in clinical trials) study in adult patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Haematologica. 2009;94(s2):255–6 (abstract 630). Nicolini F, Alimena G, Al-Ali HK, et al. Final safety analysis of 1,793 CML patients from ENACT (expanding nilotinib access in clinical trials) study in adult patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Haematologica. 2009;94(s2):255–6 (abstract 630).
Metadaten
Titel
Nilotinib as frontline therapy for patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: results from the Japanese subgroup of ENESTnd
verfasst von
Hirohisa Nakamae
Hirohiko Shibayama
Mineo Kurokawa
Tetsuya Fukuda
Chiaki Nakaseko
Yoshinobu Kanda
Tadashi Nagai
Kazunori Ohnishi
Yasuhiro Maeda
Akira Matsuda
Taro Amagasaki
Masamitsu Yanada
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2011
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
International Journal of Hematology / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0925-5710
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-3774
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-011-0841-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

International Journal of Hematology 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.