Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer 1/2018

23.05.2017 | Original Article

Change in sonographic brightness can predict pathological response of triple-negative breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

verfasst von: Naoko Matsuda, Kumiko Kida, Sachiko Ohde, Koyu Suzuki, Hideko Yamauchi, Seigo Nakamura, Hiroko Tsunoda

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Ultrasound (US) is conventionally performed to determine effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on breast cancer. In patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), higher pathological complete response (pCR) predicts the most favorable survival outcome. We aimed to predict pCR to NAC using echogenicity changes in US region of interest (ROI) in patients with TNBC.

Methods and materials

We retrospectively determined clinicopathological characteristics of 52 patients with primary TNBC who underwent NAC. Changes in echogenicity for pCR and non-pCR patients were calculated from ratios of tumor to fat (T/F) in their ROIs, before and after NAC, as [T/F After/T/F Before] and [T/F After − T/F Before].

Results

Of the 52 patients (median age: 52 years; range 26–77 years), 20 (38.5%) achieved pCR, which was significantly associated with change in ROI ratio (P < 0.01). The cut-off values for ROI ratio and ROI difference were 0.8 and 0.3. Sensitivity and specificity were 73.7 and 81.8% for ROI ratio, and 70.0 and 81.3% for ROI difference. Area under the curves (AUCs) for ROI ratio and ROI difference were 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–0.92] and 0.78 (95% CI 0.64–0.92), respectively.

Conclusion

Quantification of echogenic changes by converting absolute values of tumor and fat regions can predict pCR and individual differences between tumors after NAC in patients with TNBC.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Killelea BK, Yang VQ, Mougalian S, Horowitz NR, Pusztai L, Chagpar AB, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer increases the rate of breast conservation: results from the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:1063–9.CrossRefPubMed Killelea BK, Yang VQ, Mougalian S, Horowitz NR, Pusztai L, Chagpar AB, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer increases the rate of breast conservation: results from the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:1063–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufmann M, von Minckwitz G, Mamounas E, Cameron D, Carey L, Cristofanilli M, et al. Recommendations from an international consensus conference on the current status and future of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1508–16.CrossRefPubMed Kaufmann M, von Minckwitz G, Mamounas E, Cameron D, Carey L, Cristofanilli M, et al. Recommendations from an international consensus conference on the current status and future of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1508–16.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE, Geyer CE Jr, Mamounas EP, Fisher B, et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2019–27.CrossRefPubMed Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE, Geyer CE Jr, Mamounas EP, Fisher B, et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2019–27.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:164–72.CrossRefPubMed Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:164–72.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dialani V, Chadashvili T, Slanetz PJ. Role of imaging in neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1416–24.CrossRefPubMed Dialani V, Chadashvili T, Slanetz PJ. Role of imaging in neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1416–24.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Toussaint C, Spielman M, Rietjens M, Petit JY, et al. Locally advanced breast cancer: contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging of response to preoperative chemotherapy. Radiology. 1994;191:633–8.CrossRefPubMed Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Toussaint C, Spielman M, Rietjens M, Petit JY, et al. Locally advanced breast cancer: contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging of response to preoperative chemotherapy. Radiology. 1994;191:633–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Segara D, Krop IE, Garber JE, Winer E, Harris L, Bellon JR, et al. Does MRI predict pathologic tumor response in women with breast cancer undergoing preoperative chemotherapy? J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:474–80.CrossRefPubMed Segara D, Krop IE, Garber JE, Winer E, Harris L, Bellon JR, et al. Does MRI predict pathologic tumor response in women with breast cancer undergoing preoperative chemotherapy? J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:474–80.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Stucky CC, McLaughlin SA, Dueck AC, Gray RJ, Giurescu ME, Carpenter SG, et al. Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2009;198:547–52.CrossRefPubMed Stucky CC, McLaughlin SA, Dueck AC, Gray RJ, Giurescu ME, Carpenter SG, et al. Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2009;198:547–52.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Li YL, Zhang XP, Li J, Cao K, Cui Y, Li XT, et al. MRI in diagnosis of pathological complete response in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:242–9.CrossRefPubMed Li YL, Zhang XP, Li J, Cao K, Cui Y, Li XT, et al. MRI in diagnosis of pathological complete response in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:242–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Parekh T, Dodwell D, Sharma N, Shaaban AM. Radiological and Pathological Predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a brief literature review. Pathobiology. 2015;82:124–32.CrossRefPubMed Parekh T, Dodwell D, Sharma N, Shaaban AM. Radiological and Pathological Predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a brief literature review. Pathobiology. 2015;82:124–32.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology/college of American pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3997–4013.CrossRefPubMed Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology/college of American pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3997–4013.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clark GM. Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:155–68.PubMed Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clark GM. Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:155–68.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Alam SK, Feleppa EJ, Rondeau M, Kalisz A, Garra BS. Ultrasonic multi-feature analysis procedure for computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast lesions. Ultrason Imaging. 2011;33:17–38.CrossRefPubMed Alam SK, Feleppa EJ, Rondeau M, Kalisz A, Garra BS. Ultrasonic multi-feature analysis procedure for computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast lesions. Ultrason Imaging. 2011;33:17–38.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadeghi-Naini A, Papanicolau N, Falou O, Zubovits J, Dent R, Verma S, et al. Quantitative ultrasound evaluation of tumor cell death response in locally advanced breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:2163–74.CrossRefPubMed Sadeghi-Naini A, Papanicolau N, Falou O, Zubovits J, Dent R, Verma S, et al. Quantitative ultrasound evaluation of tumor cell death response in locally advanced breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:2163–74.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Banihashemi B, Vlad R, Debeljevic B, Giles A, Kolios MC, Czarnota GJ. Ultrasound imaging of apoptosis in tumor response: novel preclinical monitoring of photodynamic therapy effects. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8590–6.CrossRefPubMed Banihashemi B, Vlad R, Debeljevic B, Giles A, Kolios MC, Czarnota GJ. Ultrasound imaging of apoptosis in tumor response: novel preclinical monitoring of photodynamic therapy effects. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8590–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, Miller ID, Payne S, Gilbert FJ, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1456–66.CrossRefPubMed Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, Miller ID, Payne S, Gilbert FJ, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1456–66.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat von Minckwitz G, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Denkert C, Eidtmann H, Eiermann W, et al. Response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3623–30.CrossRef von Minckwitz G, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Denkert C, Eidtmann H, Eiermann W, et al. Response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3623–30.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Marinovich ML, Houssami N, Macaskill P, von Minckwitz G, Blohmer JU, Irwig L. Accuracy of ultrasound for predicting pathologic response during neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:2730–7.CrossRefPubMed Marinovich ML, Houssami N, Macaskill P, von Minckwitz G, Blohmer JU, Irwig L. Accuracy of ultrasound for predicting pathologic response during neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:2730–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Segel MC, Paulus DD, Hortobagyi GN. Advanced primary breast cancer: assessment at mammography of response to induction chemotherapy. Radiology. 1988;169:49–54.CrossRefPubMed Segel MC, Paulus DD, Hortobagyi GN. Advanced primary breast cancer: assessment at mammography of response to induction chemotherapy. Radiology. 1988;169:49–54.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Helvie MA, Joynt LK, Cody RL, Pierce LJ, Adler DD, Merajver SD. Locally advanced breast carcinoma: accuracy of mammography versus clinical examination in the prediction of residual disease after chemotherapy. Radiology. 1996;198:327–32.CrossRefPubMed Helvie MA, Joynt LK, Cody RL, Pierce LJ, Adler DD, Merajver SD. Locally advanced breast carcinoma: accuracy of mammography versus clinical examination in the prediction of residual disease after chemotherapy. Radiology. 1996;198:327–32.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Keune JD, Jeffe DB, Schootman M, Hoffman A, Gillanders WE, Aft RL. Accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2010;199:477–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Keune JD, Jeffe DB, Schootman M, Hoffman A, Gillanders WE, Aft RL. Accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2010;199:477–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Change in sonographic brightness can predict pathological response of triple-negative breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
verfasst von
Naoko Matsuda
Kumiko Kida
Sachiko Ohde
Koyu Suzuki
Hideko Yamauchi
Seigo Nakamura
Hiroko Tsunoda
Publikationsdatum
23.05.2017
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Elektronische ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-017-0782-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Breast Cancer 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.