Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 4/2013

01.12.2013

Exploring the Validity of the Continuum of Resistance Model for Discriminating Early from Late and Non-uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Implications for the Design of Invitation and Reminder Letters

verfasst von: Tess Gregory, Stephen R. Cole, Carlene J. Wilson, Ingrid H. Flight, Ian T. Zajac, Deborah Turnbull, Graeme P. Young

Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The continuum of resistance model contends that respondents lie at one end of a continuum and non-respondents at the other with respect to factors demonstrated to impact on screening participation.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to explore the validity of this model for the prediction of participation in colorectal cancer screening.

Method

People aged 50 to 74 years were asked to complete a survey (n = 1,250). Eligible respondents (n = 376, 30 %) were invited to complete a faecal occult blood test (FOBT). The cutoff period for the determination of participation rates was 12 weeks, with a reminder sent at 6 weeks.

Results

FOBTs were returned by n = 196 people (132 within 6 weeks, 64 following a reminder). Participation was generally influenced by the same variables in both the first 6 weeks and the second 6 weeks, consistent with the continuum of resistance model. These variables were having known someone with bowel cancer and the social cognitive factor, perceptions of barriers to screening. There is a suggestion, however, that other factors may be differentially associated with early, late and non-participants.

Conclusion

Participation in screening appears somewhat consistent with the continuum of resistance model in that early and late participants respond to some of the same factors. This suggests that the same messages are relevant to early, late and non-screeners, but further consideration of what other factors may be influencing discrete stages of readiness to participate is necessary.
Fußnoten
1
This message forms part of a personalised decision support tool that the authors are involved in evaluating [28].
 
2
Refer to footnote 1
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat McQueen A, Vernon S, Rothman A, Norman G, Myers R, Tilley B. Examining the role of perceived susceptibility on colorectal cancer screening intention and behavior. Ann Behav Med. 2010;40:205–17.PubMedCrossRef McQueen A, Vernon S, Rothman A, Norman G, Myers R, Tilley B. Examining the role of perceived susceptibility on colorectal cancer screening intention and behavior. Ann Behav Med. 2010;40:205–17.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Myers RE, Vernon SW, Tilley BC, Lu M, Watts BG. Intention to screen for colorectal cancer among white male employees. Prev Med. 1998;27:279–87.PubMedCrossRef Myers RE, Vernon SW, Tilley BC, Lu M, Watts BG. Intention to screen for colorectal cancer among white male employees. Prev Med. 1998;27:279–87.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lustria M, Cortese J, Noar S, Glueckauf R. Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the web: review and analysis of key components. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:156–73.PubMedCrossRef Lustria M, Cortese J, Noar S, Glueckauf R. Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the web: review and analysis of key components. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:156–73.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schűz B, Sniehotta F, Mallach N, Wiedemann A, Schwarzer R. Predicting transitions from preintentional, intentional and actional stages of change. Health Educ Res. 2009;24:64–75.PubMedCrossRef Schűz B, Sniehotta F, Mallach N, Wiedemann A, Schwarzer R. Predicting transitions from preintentional, intentional and actional stages of change. Health Educ Res. 2009;24:64–75.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cole S, Young GP, Esterman A, Cadd B, Morcom J. A randomised trial of the impact of new faecal haemoglobin test technologies on population participation in screening for colorectal cancer. J Med Screen. 2003;10:117–22.PubMedCrossRef Cole S, Young GP, Esterman A, Cadd B, Morcom J. A randomised trial of the impact of new faecal haemoglobin test technologies on population participation in screening for colorectal cancer. J Med Screen. 2003;10:117–22.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jepson R, Clegg A, Forbes C, Lewis R, Sowden A, Kleijnen J. The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(14):i–vii, 1–133. Jepson R, Clegg A, Forbes C, Lewis R, Sowden A, Kleijnen J. The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(14):i–vii, 1–133.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MHE, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–8.PubMedCrossRef Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MHE, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardie JA, Bakke PS, Morkve O. Non-response bias in a postal questionnaire survey on respiratory health in the old and very old. Scand J Public Health. 2003;31:411–7.PubMedCrossRef Hardie JA, Bakke PS, Morkve O. Non-response bias in a postal questionnaire survey on respiratory health in the old and very old. Scand J Public Health. 2003;31:411–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Verlato G, Melotti R, Olivieri M, Corsico A, Bugiani M, Accordini S, et al. Asthmatics and ex-smokers respond early, heavy smokers respond late to mailed surveys in Italy. Respir Med. 2010;104:172–9.PubMedCrossRef Verlato G, Melotti R, Olivieri M, Corsico A, Bugiani M, Accordini S, et al. Asthmatics and ex-smokers respond early, heavy smokers respond late to mailed surveys in Italy. Respir Med. 2010;104:172–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Haring R, Alte D, Völzke H, Sauer S, Wallaschofski H, John U, et al. Extended recruitment efforts minimize attrition but not necessarily bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:252–60.PubMedCrossRef Haring R, Alte D, Völzke H, Sauer S, Wallaschofski H, John U, et al. Extended recruitment efforts minimize attrition but not necessarily bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:252–60.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Filion F. Exploring and correcting for nonresponse bias using follow-ups of nonrespondents. Pac Sociol Rev. 1976;19:401–8.CrossRef Filion F. Exploring and correcting for nonresponse bias using follow-ups of nonrespondents. Pac Sociol Rev. 1976;19:401–8.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitzgerald R, Fuller L. I hear you knocking but you can’t come in: the effects of reluctant respondents and refusers on sample survey estimates. Sociol Methods Res. 1982;11:3–32.CrossRef Fitzgerald R, Fuller L. I hear you knocking but you can’t come in: the effects of reluctant respondents and refusers on sample survey estimates. Sociol Methods Res. 1982;11:3–32.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin IF, Schaeffer NC. Using survey participants to estimate the impact of nonparticipation. Public Opin Q. 1995;59:236–58.CrossRef Lin IF, Schaeffer NC. Using survey participants to estimate the impact of nonparticipation. Public Opin Q. 1995;59:236–58.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lahaut V, Jansen H, van de Mheen D, Garretsen H, Verdurmen J, van Dijk A. Estimating non-response bias in a survey on alcohol consumption: comparison of response waves. Alcohol Alcohol. 2003;38:128–34.PubMedCrossRef Lahaut V, Jansen H, van de Mheen D, Garretsen H, Verdurmen J, van Dijk A. Estimating non-response bias in a survey on alcohol consumption: comparison of response waves. Alcohol Alcohol. 2003;38:128–34.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Prochaska J, DiClemente C, Norcross J. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behavior. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102–14.PubMedCrossRef Prochaska J, DiClemente C, Norcross J. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behavior. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102–14.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vernon S. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Nat Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;89:1406–22.CrossRef Vernon S. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Nat Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;89:1406–22.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillman D. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley; 2007. Dillman D. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley; 2007.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian demographic statistics. Canberra: ABS; 2008. Report No: Cat no 3101.0. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian demographic statistics. Canberra: ABS; 2008. Report No: Cat no 3101.0.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Janda M, Stanton W, Hughes K, Del Mar C, Clavarino A, Aitken J, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and intentions related to colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood tests in a rural Australian population. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2003;15:50–6.PubMedCrossRef Janda M, Stanton W, Hughes K, Del Mar C, Clavarino A, Aitken J, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and intentions related to colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood tests in a rural Australian population. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2003;15:50–6.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Weller D, Owen N, Hiller J, Willson K, Wilson D. Colorectal cancer and its prevention; prevalence of beliefs, attitudes, intentions and behaviours. Aust J Public Health. 1995;19:19–23.PubMedCrossRef Weller D, Owen N, Hiller J, Willson K, Wilson D. Colorectal cancer and its prevention; prevalence of beliefs, attitudes, intentions and behaviours. Aust J Public Health. 1995;19:19–23.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vernon SW, Myers RE, Tilley BC. Development and validation of an instrument to measure factors related to colorectal cancer screening adherence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:825–32.PubMed Vernon SW, Myers RE, Tilley BC. Development and validation of an instrument to measure factors related to colorectal cancer screening adherence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:825–32.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Honda K, Kagawa-Singer M. Cognitive mediators linking social support networks to colorectal cancer screening adherence. J Behav Med. 2006;29:449–60.PubMedCrossRef Honda K, Kagawa-Singer M. Cognitive mediators linking social support networks to colorectal cancer screening adherence. J Behav Med. 2006;29:449–60.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51:390–5.PubMedCrossRef Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51:390–5.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Bureau of Statistics. Information paper: an introduction to socio-economic indexes for areas. Canberra: ABS; 2006. Report No: Cat. no 2039.0. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Information paper: an introduction to socio-economic indexes for areas. Canberra: ABS; 2006. Report No: Cat. no 2039.0.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gregory T, Wilson C, Duncan A, Turnbull D, Cole SR, Young G. Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer. BMC Publ Health. 2011;11:38.CrossRef Gregory T, Wilson C, Duncan A, Turnbull D, Cole SR, Young G. Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer. BMC Publ Health. 2011;11:38.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Duncan A, Wilson C, Cole S, Mikock-Walus A, Turnbull D, Young G. Demographic associations with stage of readiness to screen for colorectal cancer. Health Promot J Aust. 2009;20:7–12. Duncan A, Wilson C, Cole S, Mikock-Walus A, Turnbull D, Young G. Demographic associations with stage of readiness to screen for colorectal cancer. Health Promot J Aust. 2009;20:7–12.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Worthley DL, Cole SR, Esterman A, Mehaffey S, Roosa NM, Smith A, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer by faecal occult blood test: why people choose to refuse. Intern Med J. 2006;36:607–10.PubMedCrossRef Worthley DL, Cole SR, Esterman A, Mehaffey S, Roosa NM, Smith A, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer by faecal occult blood test: why people choose to refuse. Intern Med J. 2006;36:607–10.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson C, Flight I, Zajac I, Turnbull D, Young G, Cole S, et al. Protocol for population testing of an Internet-based personalised decision support system for colorectal cancer screening. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:50.PubMedCrossRef Wilson C, Flight I, Zajac I, Turnbull D, Young G, Cole S, et al. Protocol for population testing of an Internet-based personalised decision support system for colorectal cancer screening. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:50.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Trauth JM, Ling BS, Weissfeld JL, Schoen RE, Hayran M. Using the transtheoretical model to stage screening behavior for colorectal cancer. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30:322–36.PubMedCrossRef Trauth JM, Ling BS, Weissfeld JL, Schoen RE, Hayran M. Using the transtheoretical model to stage screening behavior for colorectal cancer. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30:322–36.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Spencer L, Pagell F, Adams T. Applying the transtheoretical model to cancer screening behavior. Am J Health Behav. 2005;29:36–56.PubMedCrossRef Spencer L, Pagell F, Adams T. Applying the transtheoretical model to cancer screening behavior. Am J Health Behav. 2005;29:36–56.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Exploring the Validity of the Continuum of Resistance Model for Discriminating Early from Late and Non-uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Implications for the Design of Invitation and Reminder Letters
verfasst von
Tess Gregory
Stephen R. Cole
Carlene J. Wilson
Ingrid H. Flight
Ian T. Zajac
Deborah Turnbull
Graeme P. Young
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-7558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-012-9254-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe