nach oben

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Erschienen in:

01.04.2014

The Association of Type 2 Diabetes Patient and Spouse Illness Representations with Their Well-being: A Dyadic Approach

verfasst von: Georgia Dimitraki, Evangelos C. Karademas

Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to examine the relation between certain illness representations and the physical and psychological well-being of persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus and their spouses.

Purpose

In this study, we examined the relation of type 2 diabetes patients and their spouses’ representations of illness consequences and timeline (chronicity and cyclicality/predictability) to the physical and psychological well-being of both. The interaction between patient and spouse illness representations was also studied.

Methods

A dyadic analysis approach was employed, while the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model was used to examine dyadic effects. One hundred and sixty-eight individuals nested in 84 couples participated.

Results

Regarding illness representations, both actor (i.e., the effects of a person’s own characteristics on own outcomes) and partner (i.e., the effects of the partner’s characteristics on a person’s outcomes) effects were identified but only for patients’ well-being. Certain significant interactions were also found: patients’ timeline-cyclical representations were weakly associated with their anxiety and depression symptoms when spouses perceived diabetes as less unpredictable. Also, spouses’ perceptions of consequences were more strongly related to their anxiety when patients perceived diabetes as less burdensome.

Conclusions

Overall, the findings indicate a type of synergy between patient and spouse illness representations. They also emphasize the interdependence between diabetes patients and their partners, and the need to examine adaptation to illness within a dyadic-regulation framework as well.

Aikens JE, Wagner LI. Diabetes mellitus and other endocrine disorders. In: Camic P, Knight S, editors. Clinical handbook of health psychology. Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber; 2004. p. 117–38.

Woodcock A, Bradley C. Diabetes mellitus. In: Ayers S, Baum A, McManus C, Newman S, Wallston K, Weinman J, West R, editors. Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 670–3.

Vijan S. Type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:ITC31–15.PubMed

Fritschi C, Quinn L. Fatigue in patients with diabetes: a review. J Psychosom Res. 2010;69:33–41.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Renn BN, Feliciano L, Segal DL. The bidirectional relationship of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31:1239–46.PubMedCrossRef

Roy T, Lloyd CE. Epidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012;142S1:S8–S21.CrossRef

Fisher L, Skaff MM, Mullan TJ, Arean P, Glasgow R, Masharani U. A longitudinal study of affective and anxiety disorders, depressive affect and diabetes distress in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Med. 2008;25:1096–101.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Li C, Barker L, Ford ES, Zhang X, Strine TW, Mokdad AH. Diabetes and anxiety in US adults: findings from the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Diabetic Med. 2008;25:878–81.PubMedCrossRef

Lloyd CE, Roy T, Nouwen A, Chauhan AM. Epidemiology of depression in diabetes: international and cross-cultural issues. J Affect Disord. 2012;142S1:S22–9.CrossRef

10.

Katon WJ. The comorbidity of diabetes mellitus and depression. Am J Med. 2008;121:S8–S15.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

11.

August KJ, Rook KS, Parris Stephens MA, Franks MM. Are spouses of chronically ill partners burdened by exerting health-related social control? J Health Psychol. 2011;16:1109–19.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

12.

Fisher L, Chesla CA, Skaff MM, Mullan JT, Kanter RA. Depression and anxiety among partners of European-American and Latino patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1564–70.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Franks MM, Lucas T, Stephens MAP, Rook KS, Gonzalez R. Diabetes distress and depressive symptoms: a dyadic investigation of older patients and their spouses. Fam Relat. 2010;59:599–610.CrossRef

14.

Hunt KJ, Heiss G, Sholinsky PD, Province MA. Familial history of metabolic disorders and the multiple metabolic syndrome: the NHLBI family heart study. Genet Epidemiol. 2000;19:395–409.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Khan A, Lasker SS, Chowdhury TA. Are spouses of patients with type 2 diabetes at increased risk of developing diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2003;26:710–2.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Searle A, Norman P, Thompson R, Vedhara K. Illness representations among patients with type 2 diabetes and their partners: relationships with self-management behaviors. J Psychosom Res. 2007;63:175–84.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In: Revenson TA, Kayser K, Bodenmann G, editors. Couples coping with stress: emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2005. p. 33–50.CrossRef

18.

Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010;29:169–80.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

19.

Berg CA, Upchurch R. A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:920–54.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Coyne JC, Smith DAF. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: a contextual perspective on wives’ distress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61:404–12.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Coyne JC, Smith DAF. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: contextual perspective on patient self-efficacy. J Fam Psychol. 1994;8:43–54.CrossRef

22.

Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The Common-Sense Representations Of Illness Danger. In: Rachman S, editor. Medical psychology, vol. 2. New York: Pergamon; 1980. p. 7–30.

23.

Leventhal H, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA. Illness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition treatment. Cogn Ther Res. 1992;16:223–30.CrossRef

24.

Heijmans M, de Ridder D, Bensing J. Dissimilarity in patients’ and spouses’ representations of chronic illness: explorations of relations to patient adaptation. Psychol Health. 1999;14:451–66.CrossRef

25.

Benyamini Y, Medalion B, Garfinkel D. Patient and spouse perceptions of the patient’s heart disease and their associations with received and provided social support and undermining. Psychol Health. 2007;22:765–85.CrossRef

26.

Figueiras MJ, Weinman J. Do similar patient and spouse perceptions of myocardial infarction predict recovery? Psychol Health. 2003;18:201–16.CrossRef

27.

Sterba KR, DeVellis RF, Lewis MA, DeVellis B, Jordan JM, Baucom DH. Effect of couple illness perception congruence on psychological adjustment in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Health Psychol. 2008;27:221–9.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Horne R, Cameron LD. The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health. 2002;17:1–16.CrossRef

29.

Hemphill RC, Parris Stephens MA, Rook KS, Franks MM, Salem JK. Older adults’ beliefs about the timeline of type 2 diabetes and adherence to dietary regimens. Psychol Health. 2012. doi:10.1080/08870446.2012.685740.

30.

Hampson SE, Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ. Personal models of diabetes and their relations to self-care activities. Health Psychol. 1990;9:632–46.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Paddison CAM, Alpass FM, Stephens CV. Psychological factors account for variation in metabolic control and perceived quality of life among people with type 2 diabetes in New Zealand. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15:180–6.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Searle A, Norman P, Thompson R, Vedhara K. A prospective examination of illness beliefs and coping in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br J Health Psychol. 2007;12:621–38.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Hagger MS, Orbell S. A meta-analytic review of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations. Psychol Health. 2003;18:141–84.CrossRef

34.

Martin R, Leventhal H. Symptom perception and health care-seeking behavior. In: Boll TJ, Raczynski JM, Leviton LC, editors. Handbook of clinical health psychology, vol. 2. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2004. p. 299–328.

35.

Paschalides C, Wearden AJ, Dunkerley R, Bundy C, Davies R, Dickens CM. The associations of anxiety, depression and personal illness representations with glycaemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57:557–64.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Watkins KW, Connell CM, Fitzgerald JT, Klem L, Hickey T, Ingersoll-Dayton B. Effect of adults’ self-regulation of diabetes on quality-of-life outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1511–5.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Hampson SE, Glasgow RE, Foster LS. Personal models of diabetes among older adults: relationship to self-management and other variables. Diabetes Educ. 1995;21:300–7.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Brownlee S, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA, Patrick-Miller L, et al. Illness representations: theoretical foundations. In: Weinman J, Petrie K, editors. Perceptions of health and illness. London: Harwood Publishers; 1997. p. 19–45.

39.

Mann DM, Ponieman D, Leventhal H, Halm EA. Predictors of adherence to diabetes medications: the role of disease and medication beliefs. J Behav Med. 2009;32:278–84.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Weinberger M, Kirkman S, Samsa GP, Cowper PA, Shortliffe EA, Simel DL, et al. The relation between glycemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Med Care. 1994;32:1173–81.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Stewart AL, Ware JE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcome Study approach. Durham: Duke University Press; 1992.

42.

Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (validity and reliability). Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Parpa E, Katsouda E, Galanos A, Vlahos L. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Greek cancer patients: psychometric analyses and applicability. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12:821–5.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford; 2006.

46.

Joreskog KG, Sorbom D. LISREL 8 user’s guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International; 1993.

47.

Cook WL, Kenny DA. The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: a model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. Int J Behav Dev. 2005;29:101–9.CrossRef

48.

Whitford DL, McGee H, O’Sullivan B. Will people with type 2 diabetes speak to family members about health risk? Diabetes Care. 2009;32:251–3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

49.

Williams PG, Wasserman MS, Lotto AJ. Individual differences in self-assessed health: an information-processing investigation of health and illness cognition. Health Psychol. 2003;22:3–11.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Martire LM, Lustig AP, Schulz R, Miller GE, Helgeson VS. Is it beneficial to involve a family member? A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for chronic illness. Health Psychol. 2004;23:599–611.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: The Association of Type 2 Diabetes Patient and Spouse Illness Representations with Their Well-being: A Dyadic Approach
verfasst von: Georgia Dimitraki
Evangelos C. Karademas
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-7558
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-013-9296-z

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

The Association of Type 2 Diabetes Patient and Spouse Illness Representations with Their Well-being: A Dyadic Approach

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Decreased Physical Effort, Fatigue, and Mental Distress in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Importance of Personality-Related Differences

Social Capital and Self-rated Health Amongst Older People in Western Finland and Northern Sweden: A Multi-level Analysis

Health Anxiety, Cognitive Coping, and Emotion Regulation: A Latent Variable Approach

Caregiver Coping, Mental Health and Child Problem Behaviours in Cystic Fibrosis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Stochastic Variability in Stress, Sleep Duration, and Sleep Quality Across the Distribution of Body Mass Index: Insights from Quantile Regression

Validation of the TTM Processes of Change Measure for Physical Activity in an Adult French Sample