Erschienen in:
01.10.2005 | Article
The inflammatory properties of electronegative low-density lipoprotein from type 1 diabetic patients are related to increased platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase activity
verfasst von:
J. L. Sánchez-Quesada, S. Benítez, A. Pérez, A. M. Wagner, M. Rigla, G. Carreras, L. Vila, M. Camacho, R. Arcelus, J. Ordóñez-Llanos
Erschienen in:
Diabetologia
|
Ausgabe 10/2005
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Aims/hypothesis
Chemical and biological characteristics of LDL(−) from type 1 diabetic subjects were analysed. The diabetic patients were studied during poor and optimised glycaemic control.
Materials and methods
Total LDL was subfractionated into electropositive LDL(+) and electronegative LDL(−) by anion exchange chromatography and the lipid and protein composition of the two determined.
Results
LDL(−) differed from LDL(+) in that it had higher triglyceride, non-esterified fatty acids, apoE, apoC-III and platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH), as well as lower apoB relative content. No evidence of increased oxidation was observed in LDL(−). LDL(−) increased two-fold the release of interleukin 8 (IL-8) and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) in endothelial cells, suggesting an inflammatory role. Optimisation of glycaemic control after insulin therapy decreased the proportion of LDL(−), but did not modify the composition of LDL subfractions, except for a decrease in PAF-AH activity in LDL(−). The possibility that LDL(−) could be generated by non-enzymatic glycosylation was studied. Fructosamine and glycated LDL content in LDL subfractions from type 1 diabetic patients was greater than in LDL subfractions isolated from normoglycaemic subjects, and decreased after glycaemic optimisation in both subfractions. However, no difference was observed between LDL(+) and LDL(−) before and after insulin therapy.
Conclusions/interpretation
These results provide evidence that LDL(−) is not produced by glycosylation. Nevertheless, LDL(−) from diabetic patients displays inflammatory potential reflected by the induction of chemokine release in endothelial cells. This proatherogenic effect could be related to the high PAF-AH activity in LDL(−).