nach oben

Erschienen in:

17.07.2018 | Systematic Review

Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Chiara Robba, Gregorio Santori, Marek Czosnyka, Francesco Corradi, Nicola Bragazzi, Llewellyn Padayachy, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Giuseppe Citerio

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Purpose

Although invasive intracranial devices (IIDs) are the gold standard for intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement, ultrasonography of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) has been suggested as a potential non-invasive ICP estimator. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonographic ONSD measurement for assessment of intracranial hypertension (IH) in adult patients.

Methods

We searched on electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed^®, Scopus^®, Web of Science^®, ScienceDirect^®, Cochrane Library^®) until 31 May 2018 for comparative studies that evaluated the efficacy of sonographic ONSD vs. ICP measurement with IID. Data were extracted independently by two authors. We used the QUADAS-2 tool for assessing the risk of bias (RB) of each study. A diagnostic meta-analysis following the bivariate approach and random-effects model was performed.

Results

Seven prospective studies (320 patients) were evaluated for IH detection (assumed with ICP > 20 mmHg or > 25 cmH₂O). The accuracy of included studies ranged from 0.811 (95% CI 0.678‒0.847) to 0.954 (95% CI 0.853‒0.983). Three studies were at high RB. No significant heterogeneity was found for the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR), with I² < 50% for each parameter. The pooled DOR, PLR and NLR were 67.5 (95% CI 29‒135), 5.35 (95% CI 3.76‒7.53) and 0.088 (95% CI 0.046‒0.152), respectively. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUHSROC) was 0.938. In the subset of five studies (275 patients) with IH defined for ICP > 20 mmHg, the pooled DOR, PLR and NLR were 68.10 (95% CI 26.8‒144), 5.18 (95% CI 3.59‒7.37) and 0.087 (95% CI 0.041‒0.158), respectively, while the AUHSROC was 0.932.

Conclusions

Although the wide 95% CI in our pooled DOR suggests caution, ultrasonographic ONSD may be a potentially useful approach for assessing IH when IIDs are not indicated or available (CRD42018089137, PROSPERO).

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

The protocol of this study was prospectively developed with the different steps started on 1 December 2017 (as pointed out in the PROSPERO “Anticipated or actual start date” section) and was submitted with some delay to the PROSPERO staff, which, after revision, did not find any flaw or methodological incoherence. Available at: https://bit.ly/2ISbIbp.

Marmarou A, Anderson RL, Ward JD et al (1991) Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma. J Neurosurg 75(Suppl 1):S59–S66

Holloway KL, Barnes T, Choi S et al (1996) Ventriculostomy infections: the effect of monitoring duration and catheter exchange in 584 patients. J Neurosurg 85:419–424. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.85.3.0419 CrossRefPubMed

Hoefnagel D, Dammers R, Ter Laak-Poort MP, Avezaat CJJ (2008) Risk factors for infections related to external ventricular drainage. Acta Neurochir 150:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-007-1458-9 CrossRefPubMed

Robba C, Bacigaluppi S, Cardim D, Donnelly J, Bertuccio A, Czosnyka M (2016) Non-invasive assessment of intracranial pressure. Acta Neurol Scand 134:4–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12527 CrossRefPubMed

Moretti R, Pizzi B (2011) Ultrasonography of the optic nerve in neurocritically ill patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55:644–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02432.x CrossRefPubMed

Sekhon MS, Griesdale DE, Robba C et al (2014) Optic nerve sheath diameter on computed tomography is correlated with simultaneously measured intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med 40:1267–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3392-7 CrossRefPubMed

Geeraerts T, Newcombe VFJ, Coles JP et al (2008) Use of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve sheath to detect raised intracranial pressure. Crit Care 12:R114. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Geeraerts T, Merceron S, Benhamou D, Vigué B, Duranteau J (2008) Non-invasive assessment of intracranial pressure using ocular sonography in neurocritical care patients. Intensive Care Med 34:2062–2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1149-x CrossRefPubMed

Amini A, Kariman H, Arhami Dolatabadi A et al (2013) Use of the sonographic diameter of optic nerve sheath to estimate intracranial pressure. Am J Emerg Med 31:236–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2012.06.025 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Strumwasser A, Kwan RO, Yeung L et al (2011) Sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter as an estimate of intracranial pressure in adult trauma. J Surg Res 170:265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.03.009 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Dubourg J, Javouhey E, Geeraerts T, Messerer M, Kassai B (2011) Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 37:1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2224-2 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Robba C, Cardim D, Tajsic T et al (2017) Ultrasound non-invasive measurement of intracranial pressure in neurointensive care: a prospective observational study. PLoS Med 14:e1002356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002356 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD et al (2018) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Int Med 155:529–536. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AWS, Scholten RJPM, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH (2005) Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 58:982–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Liu Z, Yao Z, Li C, Liu X, Chen H, Gao C (2013) A step-by-step guide to the systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic test accuracy evaluations. Br J Cancer 108:2299–2303. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.185 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM (2008) We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews. Stat Med 27:687–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2992 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Doebler P, Holling H, Böhning D (2012) A mixed model approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies with binary test outcome. Psychol Methods 17:418–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028091 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56:455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x CrossRefPubMed

21.

DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Doebler P (2017) mada: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. R package version 0.5.8. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mada/index.html. Accessed 19 June 2018

23.

Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03 CrossRef

24.

Debray T, de Jong V (2017) metamisc: diagnostic and prognostic meta-analysis. R package version 0.1.7. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metamisc/index.html. Accessed 19 June 2018

25.

Mehrpour M, Oliaee Torshizi F, Esmaeeli S, Taghipour S, Abdollahi S (2015) Optic nerve sonography in the diagnostic evaluation of pseudopapilledema and raised intracranial pressure: a cross-sectional study. Neurol Res Int 2015:146059. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/146059 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Rajajee V, Vanaman M, Fletcher JJ, Jacobs TL (2011) Optic nerve ultrasound for the detection of raised intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care 15:506–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9606-8 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Moretti R, Pizzi B (2009) Optic nerve ultrasound for detection of intracranial hypertension in intracranial hemorrhage patients confirmation of previous findings in a different patient population. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 21:16–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0b013e318185996a CrossRefPubMed

28.

Geeraerts T, Launey Y, Martin L et al (2007) Ultrasonography of the optic nerve sheath may be useful for detecting raised intracranial pressure after severe brain injury. Intensive Care Med 33:1704–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0797-6 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Jeon JP, Lee SU, Kim SE et al (2017) Correlation of optic nerve sheath diameter with directly measured intracranial pressure in Korean adults using bedside ultrasonography. PLoS One 12:e0183170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183170 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Kimberly HH, Shah S, Marill K, Noble V (2008) Correlation of optic nerve sheath diameter with direct measurement of intracranial pressure. Acad Emerg Med 15:201–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.00031.x CrossRefPubMed

31.

del Saz-Saucedo P, Redondo-González O, Mateu-Mateu Á, Huertas-Arroyo R, García-Ruiz R, Botia-Paniagua E (2016) Sonographic assessment of the optic nerve sheath diameter in the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Sci 361:122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.12.032 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Anderson RC, Kan P, Klimo P, Brockmeyer DL, Walker ML, Kestle JR (2004) Complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with head trauma. J Neurosurg 101(Suppl 1):53–58. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2004.101.2.0053 PubMedCrossRef

33.

Dubourg J, Messerer M, Karakitsos D et al (2013) Individual patient data systematic review and meta-analysis of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasonography for detecting raised intracranial pressure: protocol of the ONSD research group. Syst Rev 2:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-62 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Nabeta HW, Bahr NC, Rhein J et al (2014) Accuracy of noninvasive intraocular pressure or optic nerve sheath diameter measurements for predicting elevated intracranial pressure in cryptococcal meningitis. Open Forum Infect Dis 1:ofu093. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofu093 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Wang LJ, Chen LM, Chen Y, Bao LY, Zheng NN, Wang YZ, Xing YQ (2018) Ultrasonography assessments of optic nerve sheath diameter as a noninvasive and dynamic method of detecting changes in intracranial pressure. JAMA Ophthalmol 136:250–256. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6560 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Sterne JAC, Gavaghan D, Egger M (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00242-0 CrossRefPubMed

37.

PROSPERO. York, England: Centre for reviews and dissemination, University of York. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/. Accessed 19 June 2018

38.

Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y et al (2016) Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol 84:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.008 CrossRef

39.

Tricco AC, Cogo E, Page MJ et al (2016) A third of systematic reviews changed or did not specify the primary outcome: a PROSPERO register study. J Clin Epidemiol 79:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.025 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Ballantyne SA, O’Neill G, Hamilton R, Hollman AS (2002) Observer variation in the sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in normal adults. Eur J Ultrasound 15:145–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00036-8 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Tayal VS, Neulander M, Norton HJ, Foster T, Saunders T, Blaivas M (2007) Emergency department sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter to detect findings of increased intracranial pressure in adult head injury patients. Ann Emerg Med 49:508–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.040 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Bäuerle J, Niesen WD, Egger K, Buttler KJ, Reinhard M (2016) Enlarged optic nerve sheath in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage despite normal intracranial pressure. J Neuroimaging 26:194–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12287 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J et al (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 24(Suppl 1):S37–S44. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2007.9990 PubMedCrossRef

44.

Robba C, Citerio G (2017) Focus on brain injury. Intensive Care Med 43:1418–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4869-y CrossRefPubMed

45.

Asehnoune K, Balogh Z, Citerio G et al (2017) The research agenda for trauma critical care. Intensive Care Med 43:1340–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4895-9 CrossRefPubMed

46.

Cnossen MC, Huijben JA, Van Der Jagt M et al (2017) Variation in monitoring and treatment policies for intracranial hypertension in traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study. Crit Care 21:233. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1816-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Robba C, Cardim D, Donnelly J et al (2016) Effects of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on intracranial pressure assessed using different non-invasive methods. Br J Anaesth 117:783–791. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew356 CrossRefPubMed

48.

Robba C, Bragazzi NL, Bertuccio A et al (2017) Effects of prone position and positive end-expiratory pressure on noninvasive estimators of ICP: a pilot study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 29:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000295 CrossRefPubMed

49.

Blaivas M, Theodoro D, Sierzenski PR (2003) Elevated intracranial pressure detected by bedside emergency ultrasonography of the optic nerve sheath. Acad Emerg Med 10:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01352.x CrossRefPubMed

50.

Gatsonis C, Paliwal P (2006) Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:271–281. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0226 CrossRefPubMed

51.

Koziarz A, Sne N, Kegel F et al (2017) Optic nerve sheath diameter sonography for the diagnosis of increased intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 7:e016194. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016194 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Bürkner PC, Doebler P (2014) Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study. Stat Med 33:3061–3077. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6177 CrossRefPubMed

53.

Santori G (2016) Research papers: journals should drive data reproducibility. Nature 535:355. https://doi.org/10.1038/535355b CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von: Chiara Robba
Gregorio Santori
Marek Czosnyka
Francesco Corradi
Nicola Bragazzi
Llewellyn Padayachy
Fabio Silvio Taccone
Giuseppe Citerio
Publikationsdatum: 17.07.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5305-7

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Springer Medizin

Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Summary

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Update AINS

Springer Medizin

Summary

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

Intensive care medicine in 2050: nanotechnology. Emerging technologies and approaches and their impact on critical care

Haloperidol and delirium in the ICU: the finger pointing to the moon

Intensive care support and clinical outcomes of patients with Ebola virus disease (EVD) in West Africa

More than the tip of the iceberg: association between disabilities and inability to attend a clinic-based post-ICU follow-up and how it may impact on health inequalities

Lung point in the absence of pneumothorax

Intracranial pressure thresholds in severe traumatic brain injury: Con

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Update AINS