Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Pediatric Radiology
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 8/2018

23.05.2018 | Editorial

Shaken baby syndrome is real

verfasst von: Peter J. Strouse

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Unequivocally, shaken baby syndrome is real. Unfortunately, controversy exists in the courtroom, in the media and online due to a few irresponsible individuals who continue to distort the medical literature and perpetuate implausible theories. There is little controversy in the medical community [1]. There is no “new science” that disproves the existence of shaken baby syndrome or abusive head trauma. There is new science that further defines what we see with shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma, why we see it and how to better differentiate abusive injury from other processes. …
Literatur
1.
Narang SK, Estrada C, Greenberg S et al (2016) Acceptance of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma as medical diagnoses. J Pediatr 177:273–278CrossRefPubMed
2.
Vinchon M (2017) Shaken baby syndrome: what certainty do we have? Childs Nerv Syst 33:1721–1733
3.
Maguire S, Pickerd N, Farewell D et al (2009) Which clinical features distinguish inflicted from non-inflicted brain injury? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child 94:860–867CrossRefPubMed
4.
Kemp AM, Jaspan T, Griffiths J et al (2011) Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish abusive from non-abusive head trauma? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child 96:1103–1112CrossRefPubMed
5.
Reece RM, Sege R (2000) Childhood head injuries: accidental or inflicted? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 154:11–15PubMed
6.
Dias MS (2011) The case for shaking. In: Jenny C (ed) Child abuse and neglect: diagnosis, treatment and evidence. Saunders/Elsevier, St. Louis, pp 364–372CrossRef
7.
8.
Lynøe N, Elinder G, Hallberg et al (2017) Insufficient evidence for ‘shaken baby syndrome’ — a systematic review. Acta Paediatr 106:1021–1027CrossRefPubMed
9.
Narang SK, Greeley CS (2017) Lynøe et al. — #theRestoftheStory. Acta Paediatr 106:1047–1049CrossRefPubMed
10.
Barnes PD, Galaznik J, Gardner H, Shuman M (2010) Infant acute life-threatening event — dysphagic choking versus nonaccidental injury. Semin Pediatr Neurol 17:7–11CrossRefPubMed
11.
Edwards GA (2015) Mimics of child abuse: can choking explain abusive head trauma? J Forensic Leg Med 35:33–37CrossRefPubMed
12.
Greeley CS (2010) Letter to the editor. Semin Pediatr Neural 17:275–278CrossRef
13.
Paterson CR, Monk EA (2013) Temporary brittle bone disease: association with intracranial bleeding. J Pediatr Endocr Met 26:417–426
14.
Mendelson KL (2005) Critical review of ‘temporary brittle bone disease’. Pediatr Radiol 35:1036–1040CrossRefPubMed
15.
Lynøe N, Rosén M, Elinder G et al (2018) Pouring out the dirty bathwater without throwing away either the baby or its parents. Commentary to Saunders et al. Pediatr Radiol 48:284–286CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Saunders D, Raissaki M, Servaes S et al (2017) Throwing the baby out with the bath water — response to the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) report on traumatic shaking. Pediatr Radiol 47:1386–1389CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
19.
Ludvigsson J (2017) Extensive shaken baby syndrome review provides a clear signal that more research is needed. Acta Paediatr 106:1028–1030CrossRefPubMed
20.
Lucas S, Bärtas A, Bonaamy AE et al (2017) The way forward in addressing abusive head trauma in infants — current perspectives from Sweden. Acta Paediatr 106:1033–1035CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
Hellgren K, Hellström A, Hard A-L et al (2017) The new Swedish report on shaken baby syndrome is misleading. Acta Paediatr 106:1040CrossRefPubMed
23.
Bilo RAC, Banaschak S, Herrmann B et al (2017) Using the table in the Swedish review on shaken baby syndrome will not help courts deliver justice. Acta Paediatr 106:1043–1045CrossRefPubMed
24.
Fleming P, Byard (2018) Subdural haemorrhage in infants: abuse or natural causes? The importance of thorough child death review. Acta Paediatr 107:382–383CrossRefPubMed
25.
Offiah AC, Servaes S, Adamsbaum CS et al (2017) Initial response of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology and Society for Pediatric Radiology to the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services’ document on the triad of shaken baby syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 47:369–371CrossRefPubMed
26.
Lynøe N, Elinder G, Hallberg B et al (2017) Authors’ overarching reply to all the response receive to the systematic literature review on shaken baby syndrome. Acta Paediatr 106:1031CrossRefPubMed
27.
Lynøe N, Elinder G, Hallberg B et al (2017) What are acceptable conclusions? Response to Dr. Ludvigsson. Acta Paediatr 2017:1032CrossRef
28.
Lynøe N, Elinder G, Hallberg B et al (2017) Conflicts of interest issues. Response to Lucas et al. Acta Paediatr 106:1036CrossRefPubMed
29.
Lynøe N, Elinder G, Hallberg B et al (2017) The scientific evidence regarding retinal hemorrhages. Response to Hellgren et al. and Levin. Acta Paediatr 106:1041–1042CrossRefPubMed
30.
Lynøe N, Elinder G, Hallberg B et al (2017) A misunderstanding. Response to Dr. Bilo et al. Acta Paediatr 106:1046CrossRefPubMed
31.
Lynøe N, Elinder G, Hallberg B et al (2017) The shaken baby syndrome report was not the result of a conspiracy. Response to Dr. Narang et al. Acta Paediatr 106:1050–1051CrossRefPubMed
32.
Lynøe N, Elinder G, Hallberg B et al (2017) Is accepting circular reasoning in shaken baby studies bad science or misconduct? Acta Paediatr 106:1445–1446CrossRefPubMed
33.
Rosén M, Lynøe N, Elinder G et al (2017) Shaken baby syndrome and the risk of losing scientific scrutiny. Acta Paediatr 106:1905–1908CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
Lynøe N, Eriksson A (2018) »Triaden« räcker inte för att diagnostisera skakvåld - Mycket svagt vetenskapligt underlag – felaktiga bedömningar med under- och överdiagnostik kan få ödesdigra konsekvenser ["Triad" is not enough to diagnose traumatic shaking — very weak scientific evidence — incorrect assessments of under- and overdiagnosis can have fatal consequences]. Lakartidningen 22:115
36.
Levin AV, Christian CW, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, Section on Ophthalmology (2010) Clinical report — the eye examination in the evaluation of child abuse. Pediatrics 126:376–380CrossRefPubMed
37.
38.
Watts P, Child Maltreatment Guideline Working Party of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists UK (2013) Abusive head trauma and the eye in infancy. Eye 27:1227–1229CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Maguire SA, Watts PO, Shaw AD et al (2013) Retinal haemorrhages and related findings in abusive and non-abusive head trauma: a systematic review. Eye 27:28–36CrossRefPubMed
40.
Binenbaum G, Forbes BJ (2014) The eye in child abuse: key points on retinal hemorrhages and abusive head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 44:S571–S577CrossRefPubMed
41.
Starling SP, Patel S, Burke BL et al (2004) Analysis of perpetrator admissions to inflicted traumatic brain injury in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158:454–458CrossRefPubMed
42.
Adamsbaum C, Grabar S, Mejean N et al (2008) Abusive head trauma: judicial admissions highlight violent and repetitive shaking. Pediatrics 126:546–555CrossRef
43.
Biron D, Shelton D (2005) Perpetrator accounts in infant abusive head trauma brought about by a shaking event. Child Abuse Negl 29:1347–1358CrossRefPubMed
44.
Vinchon M, de Foort-Dhellemmes S, Desurmont M, Delestret I (2010) Confessed abuse versus witnessed accidents in infants: comparison of clinical, radiological, and ophthalmological data in corroborated cases. Childs Nerv Syst 26:637–645CrossRefPubMed
45.
Jenny CA, Bertocci G, Fukuda T et al (2017) Biomechanical response of the infant head to shaking: an experimental investigation. J Neurotrauma 34:1579–1588CrossRefPubMed
46.
Duhaime AC, Gennarelli TA, Thibault LE et al (1987) The shaken baby syndrome — a clinical, pathological, and biomechanical study. J Neurosurg 66:409–415CrossRefPubMed
47.
Prange MT, Coats B, Duhaime AC, Margulies SS (2003) Anthropomorphic simulations of falls, shakes, and inflicted impacts in infants. J Neurosurg 99:143–150CrossRefPubMed
48.
Cory CZ, Jones BM (2003) Can shaking alone cause fatal brain injury? A biomechanical assessment of the Duhaime shaken baby model. Med Sci Law 43:316–333CrossRef
49.
Wolfson DR, McNally DS, Cliffort MJ, Vloeberghs M (2005) Rigid-body modeling of shaken baby syndrome. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 219:63–70CrossRefPubMed
50.
Tuerkheimer D (2014) Flawed convictions: “shaken baby syndrome” and the inertia of injustice. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef
51.
Barber I, Kleinman PK (2014) Imaging of skeletal injuries associated with abusive head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 44:S613–S620CrossRefPubMed
52.
Piteau SJ, Ward MG, Barrowman NJ, Plint AC (2012) Clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with abusive and nonabusive head trauma: a systematic review. Pediatrics 130:315–323CrossRefPubMed
53.
Maguire SA, Kemp AM, Lumb RC, Farewell DM (2011) Estimating the probability of abusive head trauma: a pooled analysis. 128:e550–e564
54.
Ayoub DM, Hyman C, Cohen M, Miller M (2014) A critical review of the classic metaphyseal lesion: traumatic or metabolic? AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:185–196CrossRefPubMed
55.
Keller KA, Barnes PD (2008) Rickets vs. abuse: a national and international epidemic. Pediatr Radiol 38:1210–1216CrossRefPubMed
56.
Paterson CR (2015) Fractures in rickets due to vitamin D deficiency. Curr Orthopaed Practice 26:261–264CrossRef
57.
Slovis TL, Chapman S (2008) Evaluating the data concerning vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency and child abuse. Pediatr Radiol 38:1221–1224CrossRefPubMed
58.
Feldman K (2009) Commentary on “congenital rickets” article. Pediatr Radiol 39:1127–1129CrossRefPubMed
59.
Strouse PJ (2013) ‘Keller and Barnes’ after 5 years — still inadmissible as evidence. Pediatr Radiol 43:1423–1424CrossRef
60.
Servaes S, Brown SD, Choudhary AK et al (2016) The etiology and significance of fractures in infants and young children: a critical multidisciplinary review. Pediatr Radiol 46:591–600CrossRefPubMed
61.
Perez-Rossello JM, McDonald AG, Rosenberg AE et al (2015) Absence of rickets in infants with fatal abusive head trauma and classic metaphyseal lesions. Radiology 275:810–821CrossRefPubMed
62.
Christian CW, Block R, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect (2009) Abusive head trauma in infants and children. Pediatrics 123:1409–1411CrossRefPubMed
63.
Moran DA, Findley KA, Barnes PD, Squier W (2012) Shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, and actual innocence: getting it right. Hous J Health L & Pol’y 12:209–312
64.
Gabaeff SC (2011) Challenging the pathophysiologic connection between subdural hematoma, retinal hemorrhage and shaken baby syndrome. West J Emerg Med 12:144–158PubMedPubMedCentral
65.
Tuerkheimer D (2010) Anatomy of a misdiagnosis. The New York Times, September 21:A31
66.
67.
Christian CW, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect (2015) The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics 135:566–574CrossRef
68.
Flaherty EG, Perez-Rossello JM, Levine MA et al (2014) Evaluating children with fracture for child physical abuse. Pediatrics 133:e477–e489CrossRefPubMed
69.
Metadaten
Titel
Shaken baby syndrome is real
verfasst von
Peter J. Strouse
Publikationsdatum
23.05.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4158-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

Pediatric Radiology 8/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Carotid artery intima-media thickness measurement in children with normal and increased body mass index: a comparison of three techniques

Original Article

Phalangeal microgeodic syndrome in childhood

Letter to the Editor

Posterior fossa lipoma without T1 hyperintensity in foetal magnetic resonance imaging performed in the third trimester

Case Report

Dysplastic megalencephaly phenotype presenting with prenatal high-output cardiac failure

Original Article

Two signs indicative of successful access in nuclear medicine cerebrospinal fluid diversionary shunt studies

Original Article

Diffusion tensor imaging in acute pyelonephritis in children

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise