Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology 3/2015

01.03.2015 | Scientific Article

Validity, reliability and reproducibility of plain radiographic measurements after total hip arthroplasty

verfasst von: Sarwar S. Mahmood, Bariq Al-Amiry, Sebastian S. Mukka, Saida Baea, Arkan S. Sayed-Noor

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), radiographic preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation of acetabular component, femoral offset (FO) and leg length discrepancy (LLD) require good validity, interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. In this study, we evaluated the validity of the Sundsvall method of FO measurement and the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of measurement of FO, LLD, acetabular cup inclination and anteversion.

Material and methods

Ninety patients with primary unilateral osteoarthritis (OA) were included in this prospective study. On postoperative radiographs FO by the Sundsvall method (femoral axis-pelvic midline), FO by a standard method (femoral axis-hip rotational centre-teardrop point), LLD (inter-teardrop line-lesser trochanter), acetabular cup inclination (on AP view the angle between the cup rim and transischial line) and anteversion (on lateral view the angle between the face of acetabulum and a line perpendicular to the horizontal plane) were measured. The interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility were calculated for three independent observers. The concurrent validity and degree of prediction of the Sundsvall method are measured by comparing its results with the standard method.

Results

The interobserver reliability of all measurements was excellent (ICC >0.80), except for LLD, which was substantial (ICC = 0.79). The intraobserver reproducibility of all measurements was excellent (ICC > 0.80). The concurrent validity of the Sundsvall method compared to the standard method was good with a positive correlation.

Conclusion

The Sundsvall method is as reliable as the standard method. The evaluated radiographic measurement methods have the required validity and reliability to be used in clinical practice.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Boffeli SL, Pelt CE, Peters CL, Kubiak EN. A fluoroscopic grid in supine total hip arthroplasty: improving cup position, limb length, and hip offset. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:111–6.PubMedCrossRef Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Boffeli SL, Pelt CE, Peters CL, Kubiak EN. A fluoroscopic grid in supine total hip arthroplasty: improving cup position, limb length, and hip offset. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:111–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Konyves A, Bannister GC. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2005;87:155–7.CrossRef Konyves A, Bannister GC. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2005;87:155–7.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lecerf G, Fessy MH, Philippot R, Massin P, Giraud F, Flecher X, et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:210–9.PubMedCrossRef Lecerf G, Fessy MH, Philippot R, Massin P, Giraud F, Flecher X, et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:210–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka R, Shigematsu M, Motooka T, Mawatari M, Hotokebuchi T. Factors influencing the improvement of gait ability after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:982–5.PubMedCrossRef Tanaka R, Shigematsu M, Motooka T, Mawatari M, Hotokebuchi T. Factors influencing the improvement of gait ability after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:982–5.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasquier G, Ducharne G, Ali ES, et al. Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: is C T scan the most accurate option? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:367–75.PubMedCrossRef Pasquier G, Ducharne G, Ali ES, et al. Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: is C T scan the most accurate option? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:367–75.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wines AP, McNicol D. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:696–701.PubMedCrossRef Wines AP, McNicol D. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:696–701.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kjellberg M, Englund E, Sayed-Noor AS. A new radiographic method of measuring femoral offset. The Sundsvall method. Hip Int. 2009;19:377–81.PubMed Kjellberg M, Englund E, Sayed-Noor AS. A new radiographic method of measuring femoral offset. The Sundsvall method. Hip Int. 2009;19:377–81.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;15;21(21):1331–5.CrossRef Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;15;21(21):1331–5.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank ED, Long BW, Smith BJ. Merrill’s atlas of radiographic positioning & procedures. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2007. Frank ED, Long BW, Smith BJ. Merrill’s atlas of radiographic positioning & procedures. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2007.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Woolson ST, Hartford JM, Sawyer A. Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:159–64.PubMedCrossRef Woolson ST, Hartford JM, Sawyer A. Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:159–64.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wylde V, Maclean A, Blom AW. Post-operative radiographic factors and patient-reported outcome after total hip replacement. Hip Int. 2012;22:153–9.PubMedCrossRef Wylde V, Maclean A, Blom AW. Post-operative radiographic factors and patient-reported outcome after total hip replacement. Hip Int. 2012;22:153–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64-A:1295–306. Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64-A:1295–306.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2895–900.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2895–900.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wylde V, Whitehouse SL, Taylor AH, Pattison GT, Bannister GC, Blom AW. Prevalence and functional impact of patient perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2009;33:905–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wylde V, Whitehouse SL, Taylor AH, Pattison GT, Bannister GC, Blom AW. Prevalence and functional impact of patient perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2009;33:905–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng VY, Kean JR, Glassman AH. Current concepts review: limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1426–36.PubMedCrossRef Ng VY, Kean JR, Glassman AH. Current concepts review: limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1426–36.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cassidy KA, Noticewala MS, Macaulay W, Lee JH, Geller JA. Effect of femoral offset on pain and function after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(10):1863–9.PubMedCrossRef Cassidy KA, Noticewala MS, Macaulay W, Lee JH, Geller JA. Effect of femoral offset on pain and function after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(10):1863–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kjellberg M, Al-Amiry B, Englund E, Sjödén GO, Sayed-Noor AS. Measurement of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. The reliability of a plain radiographic method compared to CT-scanogram. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41:187–91.CrossRef Kjellberg M, Al-Amiry B, Englund E, Sjödén GO, Sayed-Noor AS. Measurement of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. The reliability of a plain radiographic method compared to CT-scanogram. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41:187–91.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams AB, Grainger AJ, O’Connor PJ, Redmond AC, Stewart TD, Stone MH. Assessing reproducibility for radiographic measurement of leg length inequality after total hip replacement. Hip Int. 2012;22:539–44.PubMedCrossRef McWilliams AB, Grainger AJ, O’Connor PJ, Redmond AC, Stewart TD, Stone MH. Assessing reproducibility for radiographic measurement of leg length inequality after total hip replacement. Hip Int. 2012;22:539–44.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel SR, Toms AP, Rehman JM, Wimhurst J. A reliability study of measurement tools available on standard picture archiving and communication system workstations for the evaluation of hip radiographs following arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1712–9.PubMed Patel SR, Toms AP, Rehman JM, Wimhurst J. A reliability study of measurement tools available on standard picture archiving and communication system workstations for the evaluation of hip radiographs following arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1712–9.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Meermans G, Malik A, Witt J, Haddad F. Preoperative radiographic assessment of limb-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(6):1677–82.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Meermans G, Malik A, Witt J, Haddad F. Preoperative radiographic assessment of limb-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(6):1677–82.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinberg B, Harris WH. The offset problem in total hip arthroplasty. Contemp Orthop. 1992;24:555–62. Steinberg B, Harris WH. The offset problem in total hip arthroplasty. Contemp Orthop. 1992;24:555–62.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2005;87:163–6.CrossRef Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2005;87:163–6.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Moskal JT, Capps SG. Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1432.PubMedCrossRef Moskal JT, Capps SG. Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1432.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup—accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58:294–300.PubMedCrossRef Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup—accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58:294–300.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu M, Zhou YX, Du H, Zhang J, Liu J. Reliability and validity of measuring acetabular component orientation by plain anteroposterior radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2987–94.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lu M, Zhou YX, Du H, Zhang J, Liu J. Reliability and validity of measuring acetabular component orientation by plain anteroposterior radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2987–94.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SW, Park JH, Han SB, Choi GW, Song DI, An ES. Are portable imaging intraoperative radiographs helpful for assessing adequate acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty? J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24:315–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Park SW, Park JH, Han SB, Choi GW, Song DI, An ES. Are portable imaging intraoperative radiographs helpful for assessing adequate acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty? J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24:315–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R, Kim YJ, Beaule PE, Morgan P, et al. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:666–75.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R, Kim YJ, Beaule PE, Morgan P, et al. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:666–75.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunley RM, Keeney JA, Zhu J, Clohisy JC, Barrack RL. The reliability and variation of acetabular component anteversion measurements from cross-table lateral radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:84–7.PubMedCrossRef Nunley RM, Keeney JA, Zhu J, Clohisy JC, Barrack RL. The reliability and variation of acetabular component anteversion measurements from cross-table lateral radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:84–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Nho JH, Lee YK, Kim HJ, Ha YC, Suh YS, Koo KH. Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2012;94:32–6.CrossRef Nho JH, Lee YK, Kim HJ, Ha YC, Suh YS, Koo KH. Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2012;94:32–6.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat McArthur B, Cross M, Geatrakas C, Mayman D, Ghelman B. Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:2810–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef McArthur B, Cross M, Geatrakas C, Mayman D, Ghelman B. Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:2810–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM, et al. The morphology of the proximal femur. A three dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1992;74:28. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM, et al. The morphology of the proximal femur. A three dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1992;74:28.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Varghese B, Muthukumar N, Balasubramaniam M, et al. Reliability of measurements with digital radiographs—a myth. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;5:622. Varghese B, Muthukumar N, Balasubramaniam M, et al. Reliability of measurements with digital radiographs—a myth. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;5:622.
Metadaten
Titel
Validity, reliability and reproducibility of plain radiographic measurements after total hip arthroplasty
verfasst von
Sarwar S. Mahmood
Bariq Al-Amiry
Sebastian S. Mukka
Saida Baea
Arkan S. Sayed-Noor
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-2055-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Skeletal Radiology 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.